Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Sustainability Trends in Korea - Past & Outlook

910

Published on

Andy Gebhardt, Director - Solability Ltd. - South Korea …

Andy Gebhardt, Director - Solability Ltd. - South Korea

Published in: Economy & Finance, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
910
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
25
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. ESG trends & performance in Korea TBLI Asia 2009 May 2009
  • 2. Overview of presentation <ul><li>Short overview of the Korean ESG market &amp; trends </li></ul><ul><li>ESG performance </li></ul><ul><li>Linkages and correlations between CSM (corporate sustainability management), ESG research and financial performance </li></ul>
  • 3. SolAbility Founded 2005 Ltd since 2007 Currently 7 full-time staff <ul><li>ESG research services </li></ul><ul><li>Company reports </li></ul><ul><li>Sector reports </li></ul><ul><li>Training &amp; capacity building </li></ul>ESG research <ul><li>Analysis &amp; benchmark of sustainability levels </li></ul><ul><li>Development of corporate sustainability strategy </li></ul><ul><li>Specialized services: </li></ul><ul><li>Risk management </li></ul><ul><li>GHG services </li></ul><ul><li>Project-related sustainability analysis &amp; evaluation </li></ul><ul><li>Stakeholder engagement </li></ul>Corporate sustainability services
  • 4. Corporate sustainability: ESG-related reporting Number of stand-alone Environmental and/or Sustainability Reports published in Korea
  • 5. Drivers &amp; status of corporate sustainability in Korea <ul><li>Comparable late introduction of CSM compared to global level </li></ul><ul><ul><li>… but fast catching up </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Government driven </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Government drive under previous administration: government controlled companies &amp; agencies required to publish sustainability report </li></ul></ul><ul><li>International trends </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Copying of international trends </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Inclusion of Samsung SDI (2004) and POSCO (2005) &amp; SK Telecom (2008) in the DJSI increased awareness for sustainability management issues </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Compliance drive </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Compliance with regulation &amp; public perception </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Most recently: “Green growth” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Economic stimulus package officially label “80% green”; however: “green” depends on the definition </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus on selected technologies (energy efficiency, new renewable technologies, materials) </li></ul></ul>
  • 6. Drivers &amp; status of corporate sustainability in Korea <ul><li>Sustainability seen as must… </li></ul><ul><ul><li>… in terms of reporting </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Little strategic integration of sustainability into core product/service development until recently </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Traditional approach: Improving governance systems, increasing environmental awareness and management systems </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>low anticipation of business value of CSM management on top-management level </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>But little strategic integration as of yet </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ne development: seizing sustainable business opportunities without relevant management systems </li></ul></ul>
  • 7. ESG-related retail funds in Korea Source: KOSIF, SolAbility ESG/”SRI” retail funds and ESG related theme funds
  • 8. ESG related AuM in Korea - cumulated Source: KOSIF, SolAbility estimation <ul><li>National Pension Fund announces public bidding for U$ 300 ml ESG fund </li></ul><ul><li>AMs launch SRI retail funds </li></ul><ul><li>Launch of several thematic funds </li></ul><ul><li>Decline of KOSPI following sub-prime crises </li></ul><ul><li>Chinese gold rush </li></ul><ul><li>Disappointing performance of thematic fund </li></ul><ul><li>National Pension Fund increases ESG mandates </li></ul><ul><li>Renewed interest in clean-tech investment </li></ul>
  • 9. Latest ESG developments <ul><li>Public bidding by the NPS to managed assets against EGS criteria, 2006/2007 </li></ul><ul><li>Strong, but short rally of ESG-related retail funds, Summer 2007, however: enthusiasm dried quickly </li></ul><ul><li>Recent developments </li></ul><ul><li>National Pension Service expected to sign to the UN PRI </li></ul><ul><li>Public Sustainability Index on the KRX, Q4 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Korea-specific DJSI Index, Q4 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Korea-specific Accountability Rating, January 2009 </li></ul><ul><li>Sustainability ranking published by major newspaper </li></ul>
  • 10. Backtracked performance Backtracked performance 2002 -2009: 118% outperformance
  • 11. Performance since inception Performance since April 2007: 10% outperformance Actual fund performance (actively managed): 16% outperformance
  • 12. Are sustainable companies more profitable or … … are profitable companies more sustainable?
  • 13. Methodology: ESG linkages to financial bottom-line <ul><li>Methodology characteristics: </li></ul><ul><li>Two –step screening </li></ul><ul><li>Best-in-class </li></ul><ul><li>Positive screening </li></ul><ul><li>Pioneer-screening </li></ul><ul><li>MarketCap adjustment </li></ul><ul><li>Performance verification </li></ul>
  • 14. In-depth analysis: 150 equities ESG Investment universe <ul><li>Starting universe </li></ul><ul><li>Total equities : 350 </li></ul><ul><li>KOSPI: 260 </li></ul><ul><li>KOSDAQ: 85 </li></ul><ul><li>KOSPI200 : 175 </li></ul>SolAbility SRI 평가 대상기업 현황 Starting universe: 350 equities ESG “pre-assessment” ESG-in-depth Assessment Investment portfolio Financial analysis
  • 15. Korean specific issues for ESG research <ul><li>Only limited number of Large Cap companies </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Need to differentiate lower reporting levels of smaller companies </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Late absorber of corporate sustainability trends </li></ul><ul><ul><li>however: catching up fast </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Governance structure </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Historical &amp; cultural differences </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cross-ownership structure of large conglomerates </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Legislation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>E.g. Korea not required to cap emissions under Kyoto – but probably will be required under post-Kyoto agreement </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Aging society </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Birthrate decreased dramatically over last 30 years </li></ul></ul>
  • 16. “ Chaebol” Structure: Samsung Samsung Group cross-ownership structure : =&gt; Founding family exerts full control with minority ownership (3%)
  • 17. Indicator correlation – Corporate Governance
  • 18. Low energy efficiency <ul><li>High dependence on imported energy carriers </li></ul><ul><li>Low energy efficiency compared to OECD levels </li></ul>
  • 19. Indicator correlation – resource efficiency
  • 20. Indicator correlation – HR development All assessed companies: limited information
  • 21. Indicator correlation – HR development Full information
  • 22. Conclusions from criteria relations <ul><li>Visible correlation between sustainability performance and share price development </li></ul><ul><li>However: low r-value-correlation, wide spread =&gt; high scores in ONE criteria does not necessarily mean good performance in all cases </li></ul><ul><li>Financial performance is more closely related to sustainability score if a company scores high throughout all ESG factors/criteria </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of information (insufficient reporting): affects research outcome </li></ul>
  • 23. Sustainable companies are… =&gt; Sustainability = business Intelligence <ul><li>Not only “responsible” </li></ul><ul><li>Do more than comply </li></ul><ul><li>Have more than awareness </li></ul><ul><li>Have a wider and longer horizon </li></ul>
  • 24. The future: climate change risks, resource constraints, etc… =&gt; Correlation between sustainability performance and financial performance is expected to increase in the future Environmental degradation Human Capital Management Vision &amp; Capability Corporate Sustainability Cost and revenues Profitability Climate Change Aging population Bottom of Pyramid markets Changing perceptions Resource scarcity
  • 25. <ul><li>Thank You. </li></ul>606 FloStar 756-1 Janghang-dong, Ilsan-gu, Goyang-Si 410-380 Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea www.solability.com [email_address] Tel ++82 31 811 3578

×