Private Investments in New Environmental Technologies: Having Your Cake and Eating it Too

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Private Investments in New Environmental Technologies: Having Your Cake and Eating it Too - Presentation Transcript

    1. Private Investments in New Environmental Technologies Presentation to the Triple Bottom Line Investing Conference Bangkok, Thailand May 24, 2007 Jay Shepherd, Shibley Righton LLP
    2. Presentation Roadmap
      • Investing Issues
        • Philosophies
        • Startup Investing
        • Environmental Technologies
      • Case Studies
        • Frozen Sun Inc.
        • Iogen Inc.
        • Group IV Semiconductor Inc.
    3. Investing Issues
    4. The Philosophical Debate
      • Profit vs. SRI Goals
        • SRI as charitable donations
        • SRI for indirect benefits
        • SRI as sound long term fundamentals
        • Is there a free ride for TBLI?
      • Investing in “SRI” Startups
        • Some investors – profit maximization
        • Other investors – non-profit motives
        • Trick is integrating the two
    5. Investing in Technology Startups
      • Technology
      • Does it Work?
      • Is it Unique?
        • Can it be Replicated?
        • Barriers to Entry?
        • Ownership and Protection
      • Can it be Scaled Up?
      • People
      • Management Team
        • Entrepreneur
        • CEO, CFO
      • Scientific Team
        • Inventor
        • Development group
      • Recruitment
    6. Risk Minimization Technology
      • Standard Due Diligence
        • Patents
        • Literature Review
        • Demo
      • Startup Specials
        • Peer Review
        • Critical Path Analysis
          • “ Showstoppers” List
        • Scenario Analysis
          • Alternate Revenue Streams
    7. Risk Minimization People
      • Existing Personnel
        • “ Founderitis”
          • Earnbacks and other Vesting Tests
          • Investor controls
        • Management vs. Technical Strengths
        • Stock Options/Performance Compensation
      • Recruitment
        • Detailed Needs Analysis
        • Investor Assisted Additions
        • Attractiveness of technology and team
    8. Environmental Technologies What’s Different?
      • Investor Motivations
      • Government Funding
      • Entrepreneur’s Attitude
      • Recruitment
    9. Environmental Technologies Investor Motivations
      • Good Deeds
        • Altruistic
        • Cocktail party advantage
      • Public Relations
      • Hedging
        • Technology/product
        • Regulatory
    10. Environmental Technologies Government Funding
      • Expanded List of Sources
        • eg. Climate Change, Air Quality
      • Funding Life Cycle
        • Relationship to Technology Window
        • Corporate Culture (Patience)
      • Strings Attached
        • Intellectual Property Rights
        • Location/Hiring, etc.
    11. Environmental Technologies Entrepreneur’s Attitude
      • Business Management
        • Management as “bloodsport”
        • Dedication to profit motive
      • The Righteous Executive
        • Can she/he make the hard decisions?
        • How clear are the corporate goals?
        • A special kind of “founderitis”
    12. Environmental Technologies Recruitment
      • Who Can You Attract?
        • “ First round draft choices”
        • Mid to late career success stories
      • What about the Money?
        • Personal goals of “young stars”
        • Importance of stock options for true believers
    13. Case Studies
    14. Frozen Sun Inc.
      • Result
      • Ran out of money
        • Investors lost 100%
        • Entrepreneur moved on to new ventures
      • Technology never finished
        • Patents never filed
        • Never commercialized
      • Technology
      • Solar cooling rooms
        • Food storage for rural villages
        • No moving parts
      • Potential customers
        • Development agencies
        • NGOs and foundations
        • Private corporations
    15. Frozen Sun Inc. What Did They Do Wrong?
      • Wrong Board of Directors
        • Good CVs, lack of business experience
        • Politicians, true believers, etc.
      • Scientist CEO
        • Inexperienced in business
        • No “hardass” to create urgency in R&D program
      • Underfunded
        • Needed more focus on financial plan
        • A strong CFO or CEO would have seen need for more funding earlier
    16. Iogen Inc.
      • Result
      • Pilot Plant
        • Fully operational
      • Commercial facilities
        • In planning stages
        • $80 million DOE grant
      • Prospects
        • Will be multi-billion company in 5 years
      • Technology
      • Cellulose ethanol
        • Enzymes
        • Proprietary process
      • Large Market
        • Superior to corn ethanol
        • Even if competition, market large enough
    17. Iogen Inc. What Did They Do Right?
      • Technology Decisions
        • Seek a near-term revenue stream from core technology early, but
        • Focus development team on long-term goal
        • Entrepreneur scientist steps back
      • Personnel Decisions
        • Build a top development team and let them run it
        • Recruit top executives early
        • Use advantage of environmentally positive business model
    18. Iogen Inc. What Did They Do Right?
      • Financial Decisions
        • Strategic relationships with oil companies seeking
          • Public relations advantages
          • Hedging an environmentally negative portfolio
        • Aggressive use of government funding
          • Location in Canada’s national capital
          • Early hire of experienced government relations exec.
          • Patience and understanding of government agenda
          • High risk approach paid off - $80 million US DOE
        • Independent Revenue Stream
          • Spinoff applications of core technology
          • Allowed corporation to skip VC funding
    19. Group IV Semiconductor Inc.
      • Result
      • Well financed
        • Angels and VCs
        • High quality investors
      • Prototypes performing better than LEDs
        • Multiple technology platforms
        • Main products by 2008/9
        • Niche products earlier
      • Technology
      • Solid state lighting
        • Uses inexpensive materials, e.g silicon
        • Incandescent costs, but 10-15% energy use
      • Massive markets
        • General illumination
        • LCD backlighting
        • Many niche apps
    20. Group IV Semiconductor Inc. What Did They Do Right?
      • Inventor/Businessman Partnership
        • Inventor sought experienced businessman as CEO
        • CEO runs company, inventor has specialized role
      • Recruitment
        • Sold on business, not environmental benefits
        • Emphasis on product development experience
      • Board of Directors
        • Business acumen the selection criterion
        • Three successful technology CEOs included
        • World class Chairman of the Board
    21. Group IV Semiconductor Inc. What Did They Do Right?
      • Solid conventional financing plan
        • Early angel funding and solid seed round investors
        • Top calibre A Round financing – attracts others
        • Relentless program, plus reliance on great board
        • Paid strong attention to Cleantech, etc.
      • Alternative financing program
        • Government sources
          • Tie-in to universities – problems, but worth it
          • Heavy use of milestone-driven financing
        • Conventional energy sector
          • Mainly public relations driven
    22. Private Investments in New Environmental Technologies Presentation to the Triple Bottom Line Investing Conference Bangkok, Thailand May 24, 2007 Jay Shepherd, Shibley Righton LLP

    + TBLITBLI, 6 months ago

    custom

    213 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Jay Shepherd, Senior Partner - Shibley Righton LLP more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 213
      • 213 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events