Creating Value(s) In The Manager Selection Process. - Presentation Transcript
TBLI ASIA, Yokohama, 28 May 2009 Creating Value(s) During Manager Selection Floris Lambrechtsen Director, Double Dividend B.V.
Profile Double Dividend B.V.
Double Dividend is an independent advisory company on Responsible Investment, based in Amsterdam The Netherlands since 2007. Its passion is to provide institutional investors and asset managers with support on RI policies, research, portfolio management, active ownership and reporting.
Double Dividend works for large European institutional investors like pension funds and asset managers such as ABN AMRO Pensioenfonds, F & C Investments, Pensioenfonds Vervoer, PGGM Investments, AXA Investments and Pioneer Investments. The assets under management of these clients vary from 6 to 200 billion euros.
Typical projects include:
Development and implementation of a Responsible Investment policy for pension funds;
Matching demand and offering between pension funds and asset managers;
Review/Development Sustainable Investment funds for asset managers;
Thematic Investment Manager selection on e.g. Microfinance.
Double Dividend uses the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) of the United Nations as a reference framework, and is a signatory to the PRI (see www.unpri.org). Its director Floris Lambrechtsen was a member of the Expert Panel that assisted in developing the PRI.
Responsible Investing provides several opportunities
PRI signatories grow to US$14 trn globally
Improvement in the willingness of corporations to increase disclosure and provide detail on ESG operating risks (asria.org)
Failure of the Western financial sector to manage risks
Opportunity to:
Restore trust
Align interests with beneficiaries
Develop investment products that anticipate to ESG needs
Create desired skills and culture to manage risks
The Evolution of Responsible Investment (RI) Strategy Process redesign Process support Filter before 1900 1970 1990 2010
RI in Manager Selection; adding value
Financial performance
Listed Equity ‘ESG best practice’ outperforms 6 bp ‘ESG worst practice’
Fixed Income undecided on causal effect
Green RE outperforms RE with 16% of selling prices/sq.ft. (source: ECCE)
>70 studies available
Social Value
Sustainability quality in investments
Assets (and trust!) allocated to activities with social benefit
Integrity of investment managers
Note: Social values differ per region
Reasons for screening Investment Managers on non-financial qualities
Conviction that traditional financial indicators alone do not deliver returns in the long run
Non-financial (ESG) factors are priced in, this price factor will continue to gain weight
Discussing new (and relatively unknown) issues with managers demonstrates how they think and act
Raising awareness on importance of long term stability in the economy and financial markets
Yasumono kai no zeni ushinau (Penny wise, pound foolish)
RI Assessment Framework Note: interpretations on ESG are not prescriptive
First survey: low average scores 2 Projects in 2008, scope: > 30 selected Listed Equity Funds (actively managed) Only 2% of selected listed equity managers score above 60%
Findings and Next Steps
Expected progress of investment managers Risk Management Integration in core activities Value creation Level of integration time
In conclusion
Selected Asset managers score low on ESG integration, action is needed to:
Add financial and social value
Restore trust and alignment with beneficiaries
Improve risk management
Next steps to benefit from opportunities:
Start dialogue with managers on RI
Demand transparency from managers
Adjust assessment framework and incentives
Chiri mo tsumoreba yama to naru (Great oaks grow from little acorns)
0 comments
Post a comment