Open Sharing, Global Benefits April 17, 2008 Terri Bays How to Start and Run an OCW Project Director, Notre Dame OCW At Your Institution Program Manager, OCW Consortium
170+ OCWC Institutions Over 6,000 OCW Courses Online ~2,000,000 visitors/month
Making the OCW Case at Your Institution
Structuring Your OCW Team
Technologies for OCW
OCW Curriculum and Content
Intellectual Property
OCW Assessment
Questions
Making the OCW Case at Your Institution
University Culture
Scope of the Project
Benefits to Faculty, Students, Learners, University
Existing Processes
Pain Points
University Culture
Mission alignment
MIT: Best serve nation and world
JHSPH: Improve global public health
Utah State: Land grant institution
Notre Dame: Catholic social mission
Michigan State: World-grant mission
Scope of Project
Institution-wide
Departmental
Showcase
Other models
Benefits to Faculty, Students, Learners, University
Lifelong learning
Prospective students, current students, alumni
A catalyst for academic improvement
Collaboration; organization; use of technology
A tool for resource development and international engagement
Fundraising; faculty, department reputation; global collaboration
Existing Processes
Educational materials “lifecycle”
IP management
Faculty support teams
Research and communication
Pain Points
Stakeholder buy-in
Faculty time
Materials ownership
Scarce resources
Making the OCW Case at Your Institution
Structuring Your OCW Team
Technologies for OCW
OCW Curriculum and Content
Intellectual Property
OCW Assessment
Questions
Structuring your OCW Team —Considerations
Size and Structure of Institution
Institutional Culture
Flow of OCW Support
Existing E-learning Resources
Financial Resources
Financial Sustainability
Project Goals
Work Flow
Structuring your OCW Team —Sustainability
Cost-Benefit Models
Reduce costs
Increase benefits
Third-Party Funding Models
Foundations, Government
Sponsorships
Donations
Endowment
Value-Added Models
Fees for goods and services
Membership
Examples —Considerations at Notre Dame
Project Support from Provost’s Office, Faculty
Tension between Graduate and Undergraduate Needs
Minimal Distance Education in Institution
In-Project Planning rather than Top-Down Direction
Start with Grant, Need to Develop Grass-Roots Support
Goal Not to Publish Everything, but to Showcase Strengths
Flexible Work Flow
Examples —OCW Structure at Notre Dame
Project Director Hosted by Center for Teaching and Learning
Strategic Recruitment of Faculty
Training and Supervision of Course Production Assistants
Resolution of Intellectual Property issues
Technical Oversight of Project
Outreach, Assessment and Development Efforts
Coordination with other parts of the Campus Community
Communication with Consortium and Broader OER Community.
A Variety of Campus Professionals
Intellectual Property Consultation with General Counsel’s Office
Assessment via Office of Institutional Research
University Librarians, Museum Curators, etc.
Examples —OCW Structure at Notre Dame
Course Production Assistant (at Notre Dame this is usually a Graduate Student in the relevant discipline)
No html skills necessary
Focus on familiarity with the discipline, so as to best adapt/develop the strengths of the course to suit the online environment
Basic intellectual property management
Undergraduate Student Workers
Routine clerical work (e.g., metadata entry)
Photography, Videography
Some coding and/or design work (e.g. flash module)
Intellectual Property Training by Reference Librarian
Work Flow sometimes too flexible, requires close monitoring
Examples —Considerations at Michigan State
Faculty driven
Provost and Administrative support
Enhance value of online programs
No/low-cost, decentralized solution required
Strategic approach using the MSU Global product suite model:
Examples —OCW Structure at Michigan State
Facilitators
MSU Global
Libraries Computing and Technology
Office of Intellectual Property
Internal Advisory Group
Faculty
Program Leaders
Faculty Development Office
University Relations
Stakeholders
Examples —OCW Structure at Michigan State
Make existing LMS materials open and findable
LCT Virtual University Design and Technology support faculty to enable their ANGEL courses to be open
MSU Global staff make non-credit program content available
What is the Size and Structure of Your Institution?
What Factors in Your Institutional Culture Might Contribute to OCW Production?
In What Direction(s) does Your OCW Support Flow?
What Are Your Existing E-learning Resources?
What are Your Financial Resources Now? In the Future?
What Kind of Work Flow is Feasible in Your Circumstances?
Making the OCW Case at Your Institution
Structuring Your OCW Team
Technologies for OCW
OCW Curriculum and Content
Intellectual Property
OCW Assessment
Questions
Mixed economy
Open source Learning Management System (LMS)
Proprietary Learning Management System (LMS)
Content Management Systems (CMS)
Overview of OCW technologies
Interoperability and standards
Audio/visual – an open approach?
Web 2.0 - social networking, bookmarking, folksonomies, blogs, wikis
Delivery – RSS, metadata, print
Accessibility
Overview of OCW technologies - formats
Making the OCW Case at Your Institution
Structuring Your OCW Team
Technologies for OCW
OCW Curriculum and Content
Intellectual Property
OCW Assessment
Questions
Course Curriculum and Content
Factors to consider
Intellectual Property: is there enough publishable content to make a ‘good course’?
Does it showcase our institution’s ‘speciality’?
Does the course meet General Education needs?
Quality of content
Remove or replace 3 rd party copyrighted materials?
What kinds of things would need to be localized?
How enable re-use, re-mix and re-publish?
Curriculum and Content —Notre Dame
Quality of Content
Topical Coherence with Other Offerings
Compatibility of Course Methodology
Intellectual Property
Appeal to Users, Especially Prospective Students and Alumni
Potential for Improving On-Campus Teaching
Potential for Expanding Range of Tools and Methods
Curriculum and Content —Michigan State
Strategic Product Suite Decision
MSU Quality
MSU Brand
Intended Use
Intended Community
Structured Learning Units
Portion of entire course
Intellectual property
New vs archived materials
Interest to partners—e.g. BBC
Introductory level to postgraduate
OCW curriculum and content - OpenLearn
Making the OCW Case at Your Institution
Structuring Your OCW Team
Technologies for OCW
OCW Curriculum and Content
Intellectual Property
OCW Assessment
Questions
FREE ≠ OPEN ≠ LIBRE
Intellectual Property —Wiley’s 4R’s
Reuse
use the work verbatim, just exactly as you found it
Rework
alter or transform the work so that it better meets your needs
Remix
combine the (verbatim or altered) work with other works to better meet your needs
Redistribute
share the verbatim work, the reworked work, or the remixed work with others
Intellectual Property —Choices
Attribution
Commercial
Share Alike
How Usable?
Re-use
Re-work (derivative works)
Re-mix (mixing licenses)
Re-distribute (mixing licenses)
Intellectual Property —The Basics
IP Law varies from country to country, but it generally provides legal protection—over a stated period of time—for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression. Both published and unpublished works usually are protected.
IP Law generally reserves to the creator of a work the right to authorize who may:
Create derivative works from the original work
Distribute originals or copies of the work, or
Publicly display or perform the work.
Once the stated period of time is over, the work enters the “public domain.”
Intellectual Property —The Basics
IP Law and OCW—Creative Commons License
Attribution
(Non-Commercial)
Share-Alike
Intellectual Property Rights must be determined before they can be shared
Relative Values of Licensing Consistency and Content Richness
Very Limited Fair Use Coverage—Murkiness of the Law
Intellectual Property —Getting to Know Your General Counsel
Develop a License Request You Both Can Live With
Determine Your Institution’s Attitude Toward IP Ownership of Faculty Course Materials
Determine How Much IP Adventure Your Institution Can Bear
Establish a Good Faith Relationship
Understand that Fair Use Determinations Generally are Handled on a Case-By-Case Basis:
Seek and Document Advice Before Embarking on a Fair Use Argument. The documentation establishes your “good-faith effort” not to infringe.
(at least in the US) A License Request does not undermine a fair use argument
Intellectual Property —Navigation
Documentary Tools:
Standard Object License Request
Database and/or spreadsheet for tracking all objects and their status
Other Licenses:
Participant License for Instructors, Students
Work-For-Hire License for OCW Employees
Clear chain of responsibility for IP Management
Making the OCW Case at Your Institution
Structuring Your OCW Team
Technologies for OCW
OCW Curriculum and Content
Intellectual Property
OCW Assessment
Questions
Assessment —Evaluation and Communication
Why evaluate?
Business decision
Funders and stakeholders
Evaluation vs. research
Communicating is essential
Assessment —Evaluation and Communication—Considerations
Whose buy-in is essential?
How are you funded?
What resources are available for evaluation and communication?
Assessment —Evaluation
Develop a plan
Keep it simple: Access, Use, Impact
Hook into other evaluation on campus
Make the effort for qualitative data
Keep the resources on it
Assessment —Communication
Identify key stakeholders
Develop key communication documents
Develop communications schedule
Stories are important
Thank You! Visit The OpenCourseWare Consortium portal at http://www.ocwconsortium.org Contact the Consortium at: [email_address]
0 comments
Post a comment