Getting started with research

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Getting started with research - Presentation Transcript

    1. Getting Started with Research Karen Belfer, VCC Tannis Morgan, BCIT
    2. Introductions
      • Our experiences
      • Your interests
      • What brought you to this session today?
    3. Why bother?
      • Motivations
        • “ research” vs investigation as part of own faculty development
        • Research in your discipline or educational research?
    4. Overview
      • SOTL, applied research, and research
      • The research process
      • Research ethics
      • Tools
      • Funding
      • Questions?
    5. Situating Research
      • SoTL Applied Empirical
    6. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SOTL) Research: Where it starts
      • Who am I as an instructor?
      • Are my exam questions too hard?
      • Does a course weblog help students feel connected?
      • Is group work helping first year math students?
      • Are employers satisfied with graduates of our program?
    7. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SOTL) Research
      • Teaching Expanded
        • Planned reflection and analysis
        • Shortest “distance” from current practice
      • Systematic investigation or exploration via a research process
      • Manageable scope--scalable
      • Teaching context as a laboratory
      • Focus on student learning
    8. Research Process (Carnegie criteria)
      • Adequate Preparation
        • Literature review - 25% of time
      • Clear Goals
        • Research questions - derived from own experience, curiosity, lit review  
      • Appropriate Methods
      • flow from research questions - “how” vs “what” determines methods to some degree
      • Significant Results
      • Analysis and discussion of what has been investigated, finding flaws in own research, need to investigate further if larger than thought, reflective critique of conducting the research, so what?
      • Reflective Critique
      • So what? what does this mean moving forward in your teaching? related to significant results, how does this affect the bigger picture
      • Effective Presentation
      • Sharing,  communication, reporting
    9. Preparation
      • Adequate Preparation - lit review - 25% of time
        • Engage librarians as a resource
        • Google scholar, interinstitutional loans, AskAway
        • Key words
        • SOTL groups, use the network
        • Research Ethics Board/Review
        • Organizational system: Refworks, cite-u-like
    10. Literature Review
    11. Clear Goals
      • What makes a good research question?
        • Simple
        • It addresses a need or a problem that you encounter as a practitioner
        • It is researchable, meaning you are able to collect evidence that would answer the question .
        • It is doable given your time and material constraints.
        • It inspires you and has the potential to hold your interest over several months.
        • It is not too general; that would result in a multitude of sub-questions.
        • It is not too narrow; that would rule out the emergence of other possibilities.
        • It cannot be answered Yes or No
      • How do you develop a research question?
        • need, own experience, curiosity, lit review
    12. Your questions
      • Share an observation, and what you would like to know
      • What would this look like as a research question?
    13. Appropriate Methods
      • How are you going to investigate your question?
      • Flow from research questions - “how” vs “what” determines methods to some degree
      • Does your discipline influence your methods?
        • Instruments
        • Process/research design
      • Organizing and documenting it all
    14. Research Design & Methods
      • Qualitative--How? Why?
        • Eg. Case studies, ethnographies, grounded theory
      • Quantitative--What?
      • Eg. (Quasi-)Experimental, correlational, surveys
      • Mixed--combination
      • Evaluation studies--typically program, institutional, or innovation focussed with a clear purpose of assessing the quality and effectiveness
    15. Qualitative Methods
      • Used to “understand” more deeply. Typically results do not seek to generalize widely.
      • May involve one or more of the following:
        • focus groups/interviews
        • text or discourse analysis
        • observations
    16. Quantitative Methods
      • Typically seeks to generalize to a large population. It is “hypothetically” more objective and less interpretive.
      • Examples include one or more of the following:
        • Surveys
        • Experimental Design
        • Content analysis
    17.  
    18. Our SOTL/Ed Research Examples
      • Cardiology applied research - quantitative
      • surveys, validation of instruments
      • Net Gen learner - mixed methods
      • interviews/focus groups; survey
      • Teaching Presence and Voice Feedback - qualitative
      • discussion thread; interviews
      • Question Analysis with Clickers - quantitative
      • clickers, Item Response theory , Classical Theory of Tests
    19. Matrix: Appropriate Methods
    20. Tools
      • Data Gathering
        • Digital: Text, audio, video, surveys
        • Backups!
      • Security and privacy (ethics)
      • Data Analysis
      • SPSS/NVIVO/MaxQDA/Microsoft Word Notes
      • Data visualization tools
    21. Brainstorm
      • Select one of your research questions and discuss with your partner/group how you would gather evidence/data
        • What are the challenges you would be faced with? What kinds of roadblocks would you anticipate?
    22. Results
      • Analysis and discussion of what has been investigated
      • Finding flaws in own research
        • need to investigate further if larger than thought
        • reflective critique of conducting the research
        • so what?
    23. Reflective Critique
      • So what?
      • What does this mean moving forward in your teaching?
      • How does this affect the bigger picture?
    24. Effective Presentation
      • Sharing
      • Communication
      • Reporting
    25. Research Ethics
      • Human dignity
      • Free informed consent
      • Vulnerable persons
      • Justice and inclusiveness
      • Minimizing (balancing) harm
      • Privacy and confidentiality
          • Audio recording vs video recording
          • Security of data
    26. Funding
      • Funding Calendar (Science focussed)
      • http:// www.bcit.ca/appliedresearch/funding/fundingcalendar.shtml
      • Funding Opportunities (Social Science focussed)
        • http://ltcollaboratory.org/funding
    27. Support
      • Peer support
      • Mentor support
      • Collaboration - with students, with other institutions
      • Role of Teaching and Learning Centres?
      • http://ltcollaboratory.org/
    28. Summary
      • Think about your orientation (and your disciplinary orientation) to doing research
      • Think about your comfort level with qualitative and quantitative methods
      • Think about your question
      • Think about the forms of evidence/data you might want to access or collect
    29. Parting Words
      • We believe the time has come to move beyond the tired old "teaching versus research" debate and give the familiar and honorable term "scholarship" a broader, more capacious meaning, one that brings legitimacy to the full scope of academic work. Surely, scholarship means engaging in original research. But the work of the scholar also means stepping back from one's investigation, looking for connections, building bridges between theory and practice, and communicating one's knowledge effectively to students.
      • E. L. Boyer
    30. Thanks
      • View/download the presentation and access the resources at
      • http://researchworkshop.wordpress.com
    31. Models
      • Boyer 1990
      • Examples in relation to model
    32. Boyer 1990 model Motivate Faculty Teaching Discipline Interdiscipline Outside Awareness Raise awareness Reflection Discuss and reflect about teaching practice Investigation Identify SoTL research, define research strategies. Application Analyze research finding, interpret and make changes to the classroom. Communication Communicate findings
    33. https://my.wsu.edu/portal/page?_pageid=177,280640&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL Washington State U.
    34. Resources
      • Good explanation of Evaluation research http://www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/resined/evaluation/index.htm
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + tanbobtanbob Nominate

    custom

    271 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 271
      • 263 on SlideShare
      • 8 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds
    • 8 views on http://researchworkshop.wordpress.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 8 views on http://researchworkshop.wordpress.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags