• Save
Should Kyivvodokanal be reprivatized?
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Should Kyivvodokanal be reprivatized?

on

  • 858 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
858
Views on SlideShare
299
Embed Views
559

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

3 Embeds 559

http://www.kse.org.ua 446
http://kse.org.ua 109
http://cms.kse.org.ua 4

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Should Kyivvodokanal be reprivatized? Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Should “Kyivvodokanal” bereprivatized?
  • 2. “Kyivvodokanal” now• 4 126 km of water supply network• 73% of worn-out equipment• Losses in 2011 = UAH 124 483
  • 3. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS2011:• Return on assets = -13.5%• Return on equity = -12.4%• Acid-test ratio = 2.5%• Working capital = -1 719 787 UAH
  • 4. PAIN POINTSPoor financialconditionIncreaseefficiencyWorn outsystemsAttractprivateinvestment
  • 5. PRIVATE = EFFICIENT ?2151115133Case Studies Econometric testingPositive influenceof private sectorNo differencePositive influenceof public sectorSource: Peard (2007, 2008)
  • 6. 0,532,653,09Price(USD)Prague NewYork KyivINCREASE EFFICIENCY6 5655 6001 045Employees4 12610 5004 322Network(km)
  • 7. INCREASE EFFICIENCY. PRAGUEMain facts:• PPP enterprise• Profit: UAH 151.5 mln.• Gold certificate for its integrated management system23,821,420,8 21,021,621,1 21,32006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012%Water loss 2006-2012, %
  • 8. INCREASE EFFICIENCY.SOLUTIONNegativeprofitOptimizepriceReduce laborintensityImprovemanagementthrough PPP
  • 9. SOURCES OF FINANCING. EBRD• Is interested in water supply. Projects in: Kyrgyzstan, Bosnia and Herzegovina Russia, Armenia• Drawbacks:• Maximum amount of loan - EUR 88 mln.;• Strict profitability requirements;
  • 10. SOURCES OF FINANCING. BONDSEurobonds• “Ukrzaliznytsia”: USD 500 mln - 9,5%• “Financing of Infrastructural Projects”: USD 690 mln - 7,5%• Kyiv: USD 250 mln – 8%• Drawbacks:• Credit rating requirements;• State guarantees may be needed
  • 11. CONCLUSIONEliminate RaiseReduce Create• Inefficientorganization• Labor intensity• Efficiency• Capital investment
  • 12. THANK YOU!