2012 TMR READERSHIP SURVEY RESULTS
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

2012 TMR READERSHIP SURVEY RESULTS

on

  • 1,431 views

500 of our readers were surveyed about the role of clinical experience in an evidence-based practice.

500 of our readers were surveyed about the role of clinical experience in an evidence-based practice.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,431
Views on SlideShare
482
Embed Views
949

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

14 Embeds 949

http://www.themedicalroundtable.com 509
http://themedicalroundtable.com 279
http://prepkitchen.ca 97
http://www.themedicalroundtable.biz 20
http://themedicalroundtable.org 17
http://www.linkedin.com 9
http://www.themedicalroundtable.info 4
http://foxp2media.com 4
http://69.27.110.73 2
http://localhost 2
http://www.themedicalroundtable.us 2
http://www.foxp2media.com 2
http://174.129.3.86 1
http://themedicalroundtable.biz 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

2012 TMR READERSHIP SURVEY RESULTS 2012 TMR READERSHIP SURVEY RESULTS Presentation Transcript

  • Readership Survey July 2012
  • Survey Designwww.TheMedicalRoundtable.com TMR Top 500 Readers  We invited our Top 500 Readers to participate • Selected after review of online activity and response to email campaigns  $100 Amazon Gift Card sweepstakes offered  10 Day Response Period • July 17 – 27, 2012 – One reminder July 25  500 Invitations Delivered & 210 Opened  68 Responders • 13.6% Response Rate of those who received the invitation • 32% Response Rate of those who opened the invitation
  • We are read onlinewww.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  Almost 60% of our readers are online  33% use iPads  Over 25% read our print editions
  • Start at ToC and go “Deep”www.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  Typically, readers skim the TOC and then go deep  22% read at least a portion of a Roundtable  Almost 15% read multiple Roundtables
  • Readers spend time with TMRwww.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  44% of our readers stay with us between 10-29 mins  40% curl up with TMR for over a half hour  100% of responders read TMR
  • Readers like our “skinny info”www.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  92% are interested in the Summary Abstract format  92% like the Clinical Implications Takeaways  88.5% like the Roundtables
  • Online Featureswww.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  69% don’t want social media options (FB, Twitter)  65% don’t want to be pushed to (RSS, Alerts)  50% don’t want quizzes (online edugaming)  73% want keyword searching
  • Expert Opinion Highly Valuedwww.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  81% of readers consider expert opinion along with empirical evidence  No responder disagreed
  • Readers Value Roundtableswww.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  Our readers overwhelmingly agree that TMR provides value to their practice and knowledge base
  • Readers “strongly agree”www.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  Responders who “agree” or “strongly agree” that:  they read TMR because they will learn something – over 88%  they value expert opinion to their practices – over 80%  TMR is an “important source of information” – over 60% and…….. TMR is “easy to read” 92%
  • Who took the survey?www.TheMedicalRoundtable.com  71% are Medical Doctors, Scientists or Pharmacists  23% are Publication Planning Professionals
  • Survey Conclusionswww.TheMedicalRoundtable.com Survey Confirms:  Readers believe TMR content is an important source of information valuable to their practice  TMR is “easy to read” – removing hurdles to learning  Readers overwhelmingly believe experiential evidence should be considered alongside empirical data  Readers access TMR online and with iPads  The Table of Contents is “highly read” and the Roundtables are “mostly read”  Most readers spend more than 10 minutes reading with over 40% over 30 minutes  Readers are interested in our unique “skinny info” such as summary abstracts, trials/compound listings and clinical takeaways  Readers not interested in social media or edugaming  Readers overwhelmingly believe expert opinion is valuable to their practice
  • Contact: T. Anthony HowellPublisher | FoxP2 Media LLC thowell@foxp2media.com