TOK 2
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

TOK 2

on

  • 4,548 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,548
Views on SlideShare
4,538
Embed Views
10

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
73
Comments
0

1 Embed 10

http://www.slideshare.net 10

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

TOK 2 TOK 2 Presentation Transcript

  • Critical Thinking & TOK require you to consider this:
    Nothing can be taken for granted
    All information should be questioned.
    We must separate factoids from facts
  • Ultimately
    TOK suggests to us that there is no truth. There is nothing that can be taken for granted and all information should be subjected to scrutiny. Everything from the moon landing, to carbon dating, to periods in history, to believing your own eyes and even to accepting that 2+2 =4.
  • So ‘truths’ and ‘facts’ are discarded in TOK.
    Instead we only have:
    “KNOWLEDGE CLAIMS
  • Knowledge Claim:
    As you are watching, ask yourself:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1CpNoI4WGc
    • What is being claimed?
    1.Who produces the information, why and for
    what audience?
    2.What is the producer’s biasand agenda?
    3.Does the knowledge claim have a source you
    can check?
    4.Think about what information has been left out.
    5.Has the information been editedor manipulated
    6.Is the claim logical?
    • Should I believe it?
    • How valid is the claim? What is the evidence?
  • The Problem of Knowledge Claims
    Evolution: Phoebe and Ross
    As you are watching, ask yourself:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXr2kF0zEgI
    • What is the knowledge claim by Phoebe?
    • By Ross?
    • Is Ross right to claim ‘evolution is irrefutable’?
    • Is Phoebe right to continue to doubt despite
    the evidence Ross presents?
    Who do you think has the strongest argument?
    Why?
    Evangelical Christians make the knowledge
    claim ‘God created the world in 6 days’ are they
    wrong? Why?
  • So, what should we believe?
    TOK is more concerned with how you believe something and that whatever you believe, you should try to support your beliefs with evidence and be able to consider and respond to criticisms of your views.
  • Bibliography
    http://knowledgetheory.blogspot.com
  • Certainty
    It is often thought that certainty is what distinguishes knowledge from mere belief
    When you know something you are certain it is true and have no doubts about it
    When you merely believe something, you may think it is true, but you are not certain
    Carry out the activity on the handout – Good Reasons
  • Consider 4 examples
    I know Neil Armstrong walked on the moon in 1969
    I know that strawberries are red.
    I know that if a is bigger than b and b is bigger than c, then a is bigger than c.
    I know that murder is wrong.
    Can we be 100% certain that these statements are true? Or is there an element of doubt
  • 4 Ways of knowing
    Language
    Perception
    Reason
    Emotion
  • Can we really be certain of anything?
    A Quick look at each of the ways of knowing – language, perception, reason and emotion – suggests that they cannot simply be taken at face value.
  • 1. Language
    Language enables us to acquire knowledge from other people and we claim to know a great many things because we have been told them or we have read them somewhere. However, the authority of other people is not always a reliable source of knowledge, and even the so-called experts ‘get it wrong’ sometimes.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el-TKmGSmb4&feature=related
    Discuss the short clip – Is this attempt to explain pain and suffering in our world a reliable source of knowledge? Why? How does it stand up to critical enquiry?
  • 2. Perception
    Much of our knowledge is based on personal experience, but our senses sometimes deceive us. For example if you are colour blind you may not see strawberries as red.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vz_YTNLn6w&feature=fvst
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVhJ8pXKaKQ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDLLf_WCyZ4&feature=related
  • 3. Reason
    Some philosophers have claimed that reason gives us greater certainty than perception. In practice, however, people do not seem to be very good at abstract reasoning and they are liable to make all sorts of errors. To illustrate, assuming that some dentists are drunkards and no cyclists are drunkards, does it follow that some cyclists are dentists? The answer is that it does not – but we may well struggle to see that this is true.
  • 4. Emotion
    Some of the things that we claim to know strike us as intuitively obvious or are based on our gut feelings. The trouble is that what is intuitively obvious to me may not be intuitively obvious to you and gut feelings are far from being a sure guide to the truth.
    Consider the following example – What is the right thing to do?
  • Radical doubt
    So far we have raised some preliminary doubts about knowledge that is derived from language, perception, reason and emotion. But following the French philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) There is perhaps one statement that you think is absolutely certain – namely that ‘I exist’. Surely that is something that cannot be sensibly doubted.
    Watch video – Mark Steel lectures – Descartes part 2. Discuss Descarte’s famous slogan ‘I think, therefore I am’.
  • The Matrix
    Watch the clip from the film The Matrix
    Could the Matrix exist?
    Would we be able to tell if we were living in the Matrix?
    How can we tell whether the world we see around us is real or just an illusion?
    Is the Matrix bad? Would you mind living in the Matrix?
    Do you think it is seriously possible that our lives could be just an illusion?
    Do you think some areas of knowledge are more certain than others?
  • Illusion
    Some philosophers have speculated that the whole of life might be a dream or an illusion. Perhaps we will awake in a few minutes and realise that we have been having the strangest dream in which we were a creature called a human being, living on a planet called earth. Although such a radical supposition does not prove that you do not exist, it does suggest that your life might be completely different from what you thought.
  • Brain in a vat scenario
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ursdoT66JlU
    Watch this clip and discuss the ideas.
  • Relativism
    Sometimes people react to this lack of certainty by embracing a position known as relativism. According to relativism there is no such thing as an absolute truth that exists in an objective way independent of what anyone happens to believe is true. Instead, truth is relative and may be different for different individuals or for different cultures. So rather than say that something is true or false in an unqualified way, the most we can do is say that it is ‘true for me’ or ‘false for you’. Since there are no grounds for saying that one opinion is better than the other, we must therefore conclude that all points of view are of equal value.
  • Is it right for women to dress like this according to their religious teachings?
  • Or this according to their own wishes
  • Problems with Relativism
    Despite its attractions, relativism leads to as many difficulties as equating knowledge with certainty. Consider the possibility of whether or not the world is round. According to a relativist we would have to say that it is true for me and false for a member of the flat earth society. But surely there is an objective fact of the matter independent of what I or anyone else might happen to think? After all the earth cant be both round and flat. In view of this, I think what people really mean when they say something is ‘true for them’ is that they believe it to be true. However, just because you believe something to be true it doesn’t mean that it actually is true. A young child might believe the tooth fairy or santaclaus to be true.
  • What should we believe?
    We have seen that neither common sense, nor certainty, nor relativism can give us a quick solution to the problem of knowledge. So what should we believe? There is no simple answer to that question, and TOK in any case is more concerned with how you believe something than with what you believe.Whatever you believe, you should try to support your beliefs with evidence and be able to consider and respond to criticisms of your views.
  • The role of judgement
    Since we live in a world in which there are few black and white certainties, you will probably have to rely on more on judgementthan proof in deciding what to believe. One important aspect of good judgement is the ability to balance skepticism with open-mindedness.
  • The role of judgement
    Watch the following clip – Alien invasion - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EVMQ8HrSIo
    Using your judgement
    and trying to be both open-
    minded and skeptical – Do
    you think aliens have visited
    planet earth?
  • Read the newspaper articles
    Central Questions
    Do you believe this article? Why or why not?
    Does it matter if what you believe is true?
    Preliminary Questions
    Do you consider the source to be reliable?
    Are there any features of visual presentation which incline you to accept or reject before you even read the article (size of headline, photographs or advertisements)
    Are there any features of the language used which influence your judgement (sensational phrasing, quotes from experts, use of statistics)
    Does the article seem plausible – does it make sense in terms of what you already know?
    Does the article present any evidence that can be checked or tested?
    Does it matter if you are wrong in your judgement? What are the consequences of false beliefs? Does any body get hurt?
  • Danger of gullibility
  • Tabloid Headlines
  • Danger of scepticism
  • In conclusion
    We need to find a balance between being open to new ideas that challenge our current way of thinking, and keeping in mind that human beings are credulous animals who are sometimes willing to believe strange things on the basis of slender evidence.
  • Reasonable knowledge
    In trying to determine whether or not a knowledge claim is reasonable 2 criteria serve as useful guides.
    1. Correspondence and 2. Coherence
  • 1. Correspondence
    For a belief to be reasonable there should be some positive evidence that corresponds to it.
    Imagine someone claiming that there are little green men living on Mars.
    If you were to challenge their belief, they could claim ‘well you can’t prove there aren’t’
    There has been no positive evidence in support of their claim
    The fact that you can’t prove that something isn’t true does nothing to show that it is true
    This is known as the argument ad ignorantiam
  • Coherence
    A belief is reasonable if it coheres or fits in with our current understanding of things
    Coherence demands the harmonious fitting together of all the knowledge claims without contradictions. You test the truth of the new claim on the basis of other claims that you believe already
    In short – although we should be open to new ideas, the more unlikely something is relative to the current state of knowledge, the stronger the evidence in its favour should be before we take it seriously
    Consider the claims of David Blaine in the following clip – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDjwdl3GReA
  • Questions
    1.Explain with reasons, which of the following statements you think is less likely to be true
    a) The Loch Ness Monster exists
    b) Some mystics are able to levitate
    2. In a book entitled The Appalling Fraud, it was claimed that a passenger jet did not hit the Pentagon on Sept 11th 2001 – Instead it was caused by a truck load of explosives – Using the criteria of coherence how likely is this?
  • Three truths and lie activity p104 TOK
  • Changing your mind: reflections on your own beliefs p107 TOK
  • Who cares?
    Does it matter what we believe?
    People can believe whatever they like?
    One reason why your beliefs and opinions matter is that they are important part of who you are as a person
    You should try to subject your beliefs and opinions to critical scrutiny in order to avoid becoming a ‘second-hand self
    Also
    Beliefs directly affect our actions and this can sometimes be a matter of life and death
    For example 15th – 17th Century 500,000 people burnt to death as witches
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJFA6uEfUlM
    More than 900 people commit mass suicide after cult leader Jim Jones tells his followers to die for him
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY3cx3U0gYE&feature=related
  • Heavens gate cult
    In 1997 the leader of an American religious cult called ‘Heavens gate’ persuaded his followers that if they ‘shed’ their bodies they would be beamed on board a spaceship behind the Hale-Bopp comet and taken to a new world.
    39 people committed suicide as a result
    Apply the role of judegement based on correspondence of evidence and coherence when watching the Heavens Gate Cult leader talking to people about what he believes
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3zU-h7rr3g&feature=related
    Should we respect the beliefs of a racist or sexist person? Give reasons
    The French philosopher Voltaire (1694-1778) stated ‘people who believe absurdities will commit atrocities’ – what did he mean? Give reasons and examples
  • Read the extract from a novel called ‘White Noise’
    It is a dialogue between a 14 year old son Heinrich being driven to school by his father.
    Heinrich begins the conversation…..