• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
The case for_materialism
 

The case for_materialism

on

  • 1,341 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,341
Views on SlideShare
1,095
Embed Views
246

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

1 Embed 246

http://isle.island.edu.hk 246

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    The case for_materialism The case for_materialism Presentation Transcript

    • The Case for Materialism
      Isla Wilson, Flora Schmelzer and Rory Power
    • Introduction
      Materialism is the belief that:
       - Do not have mind & body
      - Made of body
      The theory explains that physical matter is the only reality and that everything including thoughts, feelings and will can only be explained in terms of physical phenomena and matter.
      Positive arguments:
      • Man is an animal
      • The AI argument
      • Brain chemistry argument
      Negative arguments:
      • Problem of interaction 
      • Problem of other minds 
    • Positive arguments:)
    • The "Man is an animal" argument
      - Man evolved from animals, therefore man is an animal.
      - We are highly evolved biological forms
      - If animals are just physical organisms, then so are humans
      - Descartes argued that humans have souls, but non-human animals do not
    • The "Brain chemistry" argument
      “We perceive that the mind strengthens and decays with the body” - Lucretius
      - This argument contents that our increasing knowledge of the brain and its functions leads us to treat mental conditions as physiological states of the brain rather than psychological
    • The "Artificial Intelligence" argument
      Materialists conclude: - The advanced supercomputer is behaviourally just like a human
      - The supercomputer doesn’t have a mind- Therefore humans don’t have minds either
      Dualists argue: - The advanced supercomputer is behaviourally just like a human- We humans clearly embody minds, so - The supercomputer must embody a mind as well.
    • Negative arguments:(
    • Problem of Interaction
      “There was the Door to which I found no Key: there was the veil through which I might not see.” - Omar Khayyam
      - How things so different as immaterial minds and material bodies could possibly interact: how mental things can cause physical effects, and physical things cause mental effects.
    • Problem of other minds
      “How DO we know that the people we meet are not computers programmed to simulate people?” - R. Buckminster Fuller
      - If minds are distinct from bodies, and all we ever have access to in the case of other people are their bodies and bodily behavior, then how do we know that there are any other minds distinct from our own?