Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Academic governance 2
Academic governance 2
Academic governance 2
Academic governance 2
Academic governance 2
Academic governance 2
Academic governance 2
Academic governance 2
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Academic governance 2

448

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
448
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • It focuses attention on the issues at the heart of the academic enterprise, that generally the governing body such as the BOT does not (and should not) become involved with. There is a clear distinction between this and the responsibility for determining educational character and mission, which lives with the BOT.
  • Board of Trustees is typically seen as having ownership of financial or administrative issues. They’re typically seen as big picture thinkers who focus on keeping the institution true to it’s mission.BOT is seen as disconnected from curriculum evolution and not fit to make decisions because of the lack of expertise.Senate is seen as experts in both academics and curriculum. Typical duties may include changes in academic policy, establishment of councils for faculties, schools, or institutes, determination and regulation for graduation, and internal issues in connection with awards for academic and faculty achievement,
  • Hard to manage partly due to the fact that there’s no real definition or breakdown of duties.Influences of effectiveness include – relationships between the various leadership groups, cycles of planning and policy making process (new policies, vs revision), life cycle of governance (old vs new committees), political climate, and composition of the governing committee
  • One of the major issues in academic governance is the tension that exists between the faculty and members of the BOT. Power struggle for more authority and control in the institution. Faculty feel like they are the experts, and the BOT may feel like they need to have a hand in academic affairs in order to effectively steer the institution.One of the readings, the author, who was a member of the faculty senate, talked about the issue of land sale at her institution. When she brought up the matter, she was told that that is put of the purview of the faculty senate and should be left to the BOT. After reflection, she questioned whether or not the matter truly had nothing to do academic matters. Future academic expansion?
  • Transcript

    • 1. Academic Governance
      Sing Wong
      HIED 552
    • 2. Definition
      Research on Academic Governance
      No single or generally accepted definition
      Closest: responsibility for the key academic issues such as determining the curriculum, course approval, and ensuring standards
      No breakdown of specific duties or groups involved
      Differ across types of institution and its history
      Generally agreed upon that authority over everything to do with academics is decided by the relationships between the BOT and Senate
    • 3. Composition
      In the United States, there are two major “voices”
      The Board of Trustees (BOT) & Administration (President, Vice President, Deans)
      Faculty (Senate)
      Academic Governance
      “Owned” by both the BOT and the Senate
      Typically, BOT defers major decision making in academic realm to the senate
    • 4. Influences on Governance
      Meeting constituents needs and expectations
      Students, parents, community members, legislators, creditors, donors, alumni, staff, and faculty
      Meeting institutional goals
    • 5. Effective Governance
      Academic governance is a “hard to manage and describe” university system (Bradshaw & Fedette, 2008)
      Effective academic governance occurs when groups do not get sidetracked into operational details that may be better left to other groups or subgroups
      Multiple influences of effectives
    • 6. Complications in Governance
      Autonomy & Academic Freedom vs. Institutional Interest
      Typically, academic decision making is deferred to faculty
      Faculty are criticized for being slow
      Multiple committees impede processes
      Blurred lines of responsibility / Overlap
      What parts of the university would you assign to the BOT and what part would you assign to the Senate?
    • 7. Other Structures in Governance
      Concept of a Unicameral governing structure
      One governing board that encompasses all facets of decision making
      Claude (1972) argues that this method doesn’t pretend to solve problems by avoiding them
      Partnership Approach
      Separate responsibilities but close partnerships
      Joint committees & task forces
    • 8. References
      Bradshaw, P., & Fredette, C. (2008). Academic governance of universiites: Reflections of a senate chair on moving from theory to practice and back. Journal of Management Inquiry. 18(2).
      Leadership Foundation. Academic governance. Retrieved from http://www.lfhe.ac.uk/governance/aboutgovernance/. Retrieved on October 18, 2010.
      Morrill, R. (2003). The overlapping worlds of academic governance. Trusteeship, 1(11).
      Mortimer, K.P., & Sathre, C. (2007). The art and politics of academic governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & LIttlefield Publishers.
      Waitzer, E. J., & Enrione, A. (2005). Paradigm flaw in the boardroom: Governance versus management. International Journal of Disclosure and Governace, 2(4), 348-357.

    ×