QA evolution to the present day

1,490 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,490
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
152
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

QA evolution to the present day

  1. 1. QA Evolution to the present day Presener: Michael Yavin QA Engineer
  2. 2. Dark Team legend
  3. 3. Evolution
  4. 4. Analytic School
  5. 5. Analytic Schooltesting process
  6. 6. Analytic School (50th)• Testing is a branch of Mathematics• All developers are testers• Good for mathematic oriented products• Is a base of testing schools
  7. 7. Standard School
  8. 8. Standard School• Came from growing industry• Soft = Standart = Success• Testing must be managed (i.e. predictable, repeatable,planned)• Testing measures development progress
  9. 9. Quality School
  10. 10. Quality School• Quality (standart) can be only for customer• Testers may need to police developers to follow therules.• Testers have to protect users from bad software.• Gatekeeper - QA
  11. 11. Agile School
  12. 12. Agile School (begin of 90th)• Iterative develop small features and show• Software is an ongoing conversation• Agile manifesto• Product owner as quality identificator• Testing tells us when development story iscomplete• Tests must be automated
  13. 13. Context-Driven School
  14. 14. Context-Driven School• Context is a main thing• Product have quality, if it solve proper issue• Software created by people. People set the context.• Testing provides information to the project.• Testing is a skilled, mental activity.• Testing must be flexible
  15. 15. Who is Quality Engineers and what they do ХТО МИ МИ ТАКІ? ТЕСТУВАЛЬНИКИ!
  16. 16. Workflow in small companiesHere do this, there do that. Yeap. All Understood? clear Yeap
  17. 17. Workflow in big companies
  18. 18. Quality Engineer
  19. 19. Quality EngineerFeature knowledge
  20. 20. Quality EngineerFeature knowledgeCritical side view
  21. 21. Quality Engineers in SysIQ
  22. 22. Conclusion• Nobody wants pay for testers, but all want qualityproducts• Testing is a product thermometer• All depends of context• Main question is: how to choose right approach orcombine them
  23. 23. Questions?

×