Deloitte - Assistive Ict Workshop Presentation

  • 568 views
Uploaded on

Presentation provided at the workshop with the European Commission on Accessibility and Assistive Technology studies.

Presentation provided at the workshop with the European Commission on Accessibility and Assistive Technology studies.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
568
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • DK, close to 70% = gov agencies are buyers (survey 2009)
  • More supply push growth will move the market forward (manufacturers producing new products) but no barrier and rigidity will be removed. SDMs can choose between more options but are still the main decision makers.A demand pull scenario is user centricity. Once users are informed and endowed with freedom of choice, they will automatically become the interlocutors of companies, as they will be the final decision makers.
  • 9,86 million people -> 31 million
  • Single access points (Deloitte 2003)

Transcript

  • 1. Study on the Internal Market for Assistive ICT
    Workshop: eAccessibility and Assistive Technology
    21 June 2011
    Mar Negreiro
    Sebastiaan van der Peijl
  • 2. Aims and objectives
    Whyassistive ICT?
    Context: policy, disability in the EU,
    State of Play in the InternalMarketforAssistive ICT
    Service Delivery Models: barriers and opportunities
    Demandforassistive ICT: barriers and opportunities
    Supply-side of assistive ICT: barriers and opportunities
    Estimating the marketforassistive ICT
    Scenario Analysis
    Conclusions
    Recommendations
    Contents
  • 3. Aims and objectives
    Main research question:
    “What are the main barriers and opportunities today in the European Internal Market for Assistive ICT, and what could be gained from addressing barriers and embracing opportunities in the market for Assistive ICT?”
    Activities:
    • Extensive desk research, interviews at EU and Member State level (54 interviews):
    Policies and approaches to implementation of national support schemes (service delivery to people with a disability) in 9 Member States (ES, DE, DK, FR, IT, LV, NL, SE, UK)
    across three life environments: Education & Training, Work, Independent living;
    • Desk research and interviews at EU level (14 interviews):
    Cross-country analysis
    • 7 Case Studies:
    Investigating trends, gathering evidence, analysing barriers and opportunities
    • Scenario development:
    Propose recommendations for improvement, building on the advice of experts and relevant stakeholders.
  • 4. Current situation:
    More than 80 million people in the EU age 16-54 years with some form of disability (16,2% average disability rate);
    The rate of disability increases with age: an estimated total of 84-107 million people in the EU;
    • Citizens with the aspiration and the right to live their lives as an integrated part of the European society
    In today’s information society this right must be ensured: ICT is an integral part of everyday life: in education, work as well as the home environment;
    However, mainstream ICT is often designed taking into account the needs of all potential users;
    • Need for additional products or services or specific adjustments are needed to tailor to the specific needs of persons with a disability
    e.g.: a special keyboard, software that reads out text from the screen, or alternative controls for any type of ICT (e.g. computers, phones, ATM, etc.) in any environment (e.g. at home, in school or at the workplace);
    However, the poverty rate of people with a disability is 70% higher than average;
    • Need for support schemes in the Member States
    Why assistive ICT?
  • 5. What is assistive ICT?
    Education & Training
    Work
    ICT
    External
    assistive ICT
    Accessible ICT
    Embedded assistive ICT
    Independent Living
    Why assistive ICT?
    Assistive Technologies that enable accessibility and usability of mainstream Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) by addressing and overcoming deficiencies in the design of ICT that pose barriers for people with a disability, applied in the Work, Education & Training and Independent Living environments.
  • 6. Context: EU policy
    UN convention: signed and ratified by the EU, signed by all MS (ratified by 17), protocol signed by 22 MS (ratified by 14)
    European Disability Strategy (2010-2020): equal rights, dignity, treatment, independence, full participation
    • Accessibility: improving the availability and choice of assistive technologies, public procurement
    • 7. Participation: e.g. use of sign language, Braille, accessible websites and copyrighted works, etc.
    • 8. Employment, education, independent living, health: focus on sound working conditions, personal-assistance schemes, legal and organisational barriers, inclusive education, non-discriminatory health services and facilities, disability part of curricula of health professionals
    • 9. MS cooperation: information exchange and policy coordination (High Level Group on Disability)
    • 10. Awareness raising and data collection
    European Accessibility Act in 2012?
    • To substantially improve the proper functioning of the internal market for accessible products and services
  • Context: EU policy
    Digital Agenda
    • Enhancing digital literacy, skills and inclusion
    • 11. Inclusive digital services, web accessibility, ambient assisted living
    e-Inclusion: e-Accessibility
    • Ensure that people with disabilities and elderly people can access ICTs on an equal basis with others
    e-Accessibility and Assistive Technology (AT):
    • Design for All: universal design, adaptive design, interfacing/interoperability with AT
    • 12. Public procurement & Mandate 376
  • Context: disability in the EU
    Market demand: people with a disability in the EU
    Only cross-country dataset available today is the Ad-hoc Module on Disability from the 2002 Eurostat Labour Force Survey
    Issue: how to define disability?
  • 13. Context: disability in the EU
    Life environments:
    Education: provision of assistive ICT is important, however, often no common minimum denominators for provision of assistive ICT are in place;
    Employment: providing reasonable accommodation
    Independent living: an ageing society means a growing share of people with a disability that could be supported through assistive ICT
  • 14. Context: providingassistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Service Deliver Models (SDM): Member States’ support schemes implemented by (public) service providers
    Disability organisations
    (e.g. associations, charities, NGOs, etc)
  • 15. Context: providingassistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Three types of service delivery models:
    • Medical oriented model
    • 16. Social oriented model
    • 17. Consumer oriented model
    • 18. Service providers act as intermediaries
    • 19. People with a disability are generally not the final decision makers
    • 20. Service providers act as advisor and funding provider
    • 21. People with a disability, or a representative, are the final decision makers
    Source: Robotiker–Tecnalia, 2009
  • 22. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICT
    Estimating the market is difficult due to lack of data
    No recent and consistent data on people with a disability on the EU level (only 2002 LFS Eurostat)
    No quality data on take-up of ICT by people with a disability (some MS-data)
    No quality data on take-up of assistive ICT (some studies (MEAC, AEGIS))
    Little data on public expenditure on assistive ICT (some data in e.g. NL GIPdatabank)
    No consistent data on the assistive ICT supply (except national databases on Assistive Technology)
  • 23. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTMarket supply
    Market supply: lack of data
    No official statistics available on assistive ICT companies, production, sales, etc.
    This makes it hard to estimate the market
    The only available centralised source of information are the national databases on assistive technology kept by a number of Member States and provided through EASTIN
    Danish EBST survey (2009):
    70% of AT in Denmark procured by public service providers;
    The market consists of mostly small highly specialised companies;
    Most companies focus on the local market: over half do not export, only 2% export nearly all their products (91-100%).
    United States BIS AT survey (2003):
    Europe: the largest export market for US based AT companies;
    Particularly Denmark, Germany, Sweden and the UK.
  • 24. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Support schemes in the Member States
    • Across Member States, life environments and regions within Member States the support schemes in place and the approach to service delivery differ significantly, in terms of:
    Actors involved: e.g. municipalities, regional administrations, public employment services, public health services, education institutions, health insurance.
    Level of coverage / support: full coverage (including assistive ICT product, maintenance, upgrades), partial (end-user covers part of the costs), none (in some cases many of today’s assistive ICT devices are not covered).
    Type of support: provision of assistive ICT in ’natura’ (limited to lists of eligible products, or ‘positive lists’), personal budget, vouchers, reimbursement.
    Ownership: owned by organisation providing the device (leasing), owned by end-user.
    • These differences imply different types of service delivery and have an impact on the market.
  • State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Service Delivery Models
    • Service providers play an important role in the value chain: financing and procurement
    Source: Robotiker–Tecnalia, 2009
  • 25. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Government support differs widely across MS and life environments, even regions:
    different actors involved, differences in prescription or reimbursement processes, different types of procurement, different governance models (more or less decentralised),
  • 26. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Government support differs widely across MS and life environments, even regions:
    different levels of coverage (ranging from full reimbursement models to none, depending on the country/region), differences in eligible products...
  • 27. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Government support differs widely across MS and life environments, even regions:
    Different levels of influence of the end-user...
  • 28. The most prevailing type of SDM is the medical/social model
    Freedom of choice: often none (limited to lists), but more freedom of choice schemes are being implemented (e.g. DE, DK, NL, SE)
    SDMs have an important influence, they are the main buyers on the market
    State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTService Delivery Models
  • 29. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICTService Delivery Models
    Overlaps between the different systems across the life environments can result in unclear responsibilities
    Disabled people face a complex environment
    Assistive ICT companies similarly face a complex environment
  • 30. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICT Main findings
    Demand: End-userperspective
    Service Delivery Models
    High efforts to getaccess to funding and the right solutions
    Lack of information / independent advice
    Different actors in the life environments
    Limitedchoice
    Difficultieswith overlap in different life environments
    Different levels of coverage
    Supply: Company perspective
    De factorestrictionsonmarket entry
    Smallproduction volumes
    Different types of support
    Non-transparentpricing, canlead to high prices and pricedifferences
    Localised Markets
    Long supplychains
    In some cases: high margins
    Need to workthroughlocaldistributorsorlocalpresence
    High investmentformarket entry
    Limited cross border trading within the InternalMarket
  • 31. State of play in the Internal Market for assistive ICT A complex reality…
    The market structure for Assistive ICT can be characterisedby ‘supply push’: companiescompete to get in the SDM system, lowerattention to end-users
    Somekeydimensionsemerged and wereaddressed in the analysis and through case studies
    People with a disability
    Manufacturers / Distributors of Assistive ICT
    Service Delivery Models
    Supply push
  • 32. Service Delivery ModelsS.W.O.T.
    Strengths:
    In the work environment, support schemes are usually well defined, supported by the focus on reasonable accommodation;
    Weaknesses:
    Levels of support and types of support vary across MS and life environments
    Complex environment: many different actors, procedures, etc.
    Single points of access are hardly established, with exceptions in e.g. DE, FR
    In education support schemes are generally weakly defined
    Opportunities:
    Freedom of choice schemes are on the rise, either with a reimbursement or personal budget scheme (e.g. DE, DK, NL, SE)
    Function vs. Form debate: functional descriptions of products eligible for funding (e.g. NL, SE)
    Growing ageing population: market opportunity and potential to reduce costs
    Threats:
    Product lists limit choice and impact the market
    Provision of assistive ICT in education is important from an early age
  • 33. Case Study: Freedom of choice in SwedenFritt Val
    Fritt Val Pilot
    Aim: increased quality of life, empowering people with a disability, freedom of choice
    3 participating county councils: Kronoberg, Sodermanland, Stockholm
    Funding through vouchers: Voucher = purchase price (county council) + 30% + VAT
    Results:
    User empowerment:
    Better informed, better choices, greater satisfaction
    Try out opportunities are important
    Stimulating the market:
    Increased competition: larger number of suppliers, lowering of prices, increased service delivery / bundling
    Closer relations with the customer
    Opportunities for small manufacturers
    Scope for use of e-Commerce
    Opportunities for mainstreaming: function vs. form debate
    Service providers:
    New role, change of attitude (responsibility and legal consequences, some resistance)
    At no additional cost
    Potential for: more user focus, better information provision, more competition.
  • 34. Case Study: Personal budget in GermanyPersönliches Budget
    Self-payers for a ‘support mix’ (including assistive ICT)
    Self determination; statutory entitlement to personal budget since 2008
    Introduction of one-stop-shopping (8 types of funding providers) & freedom of choice
    Money
    Funding agencies
    (no one-stop-shopping)
    Manufacturers / Distributors
    Agreement on quantity, quality, etc.
    Provision of goods and services
    Entitlement to the goods and services provision
    Beneficiaries
    Purchase of goods and services
    Money
    Funding agencies (one-stop-shopping)
    Manufacturers / Distributors
    Beneficiaries
    Agreement on quantity, quality, etc.
    Target agreement
  • 35. Case Study: Personal budget in GermanyPersönliches Budget
    Results
    Implementation still resisted by some public agencies:
    Fear of loosing control over: the system, the quality, type of fundable devices
    Fear of higher administrative costs
    Non-standardised admin procedure and faulty individual target agreements
    Resulted in additional admin burden and lack of cooperation
    Impact on people with a disability
    General satisfaction reported (91%)
    However, heavy reporting obligations
    Used where the traditional system fails
    Expected to grow but lack of awareness
    Stimulating the market:
    Incumbents manufacturers/distributors: reluctance
    Insufficiently developed market offer
    Critical mass: new user group expected to emerge, more competition and innovation
    Transition issues, but expected to grow
  • 36. Service Delivery ModelsBarriers and opportunities
  • 37. Demandforassistive ICTS.W.O.T.
    Strengths:
    Eurostat provides data: LFS and use of ICT by elderly (also Senior Watch I and II)
    Initiatives for try-out sessions, online resources (e.g. national databases, product comparisons) are important to provide information
    Weaknesses:
    Data on people with a disability are difficult to compare across countries, due to different definitions of disability, no data on take-up of assistive ICT;
    Lack of user friendly information aimed at people with a disability (end-users);
    Information in national AT databases is aimed at service providers rather than end-users.
    Opportunities:
    Harmonised data collection could allow increasing awareness: potential market size, benchmarking across MS;
    Projects like AEGIS have shed light on use of assistive ICT;
    More information aimed at end-users helps empower them.
    Use of online platforms for information exchange is important (e.g. product ratings, comparisons, etc)
    Threats:
    Lack of data makes it difficult to estimate the actual market size, which can lead to underinvestment and unclarity on actually reaching the target group;
    Lack of awareness and information leaves people with a disability less empowered.
  • 38. Case Study: Information provision Local Blind Societies (UK)
    Need for ‘good information’ for informed decision making
    Resource rooms: try-out, equipment demonstrations, borrowing, outreach and home visiting, conferences, exhibitions, information days;
    Enhancing information provision to compare products and prices;
    Services close to the user: ‘second-tier’ assessments, hands-on training, peer-to-peer contact;
    Geographically close to users, no registration required;
    Established networks with: suppliers, agencies, technology networks, education& training inst. / employers, end-users;
    Training for professionals.
    Filling the gap: enabling blind people, market facilitation
    Lack of awareness of health services staff, information at point of diagnosis;
    Greater outreach, closer relations enabling inclusion;
    Facilitating market access.
  • 39. Case Study: Information provision RETADIS (Spain)
    Try out assistive ICT:
    26 centers throughout Spain with computers and assistive ICT + 50 private home-users;
    RETADIS social network: contact with peers, forums, newsletters;
    Training by occupation therapists and for education and work.
    Filling the gap: bringing together different stakeholders
    Bringing together stakeholders, manufacturers, end-users, occupational therapists for better information and hands-on experience;
    Using online tools to connect people and provide support: acquiring new skills, online social interaction;
    Providing advice and connecting to suppliers;
    Need for suppliers to reach out to people with a disability.
  • 40. Demandforassistive ICTBarriers and opportunities
  • 41. Supply of assistive ICTS.W.O.T.
    Strengths:
    National AT databases can provide a closer look into the supply of assistive ICT in terms of number of manufacturers / distributors;
    The trend towards freedom of choice can strengthen competition and focus on the actual needs of people with a disability;
    Assistive ICT companies and research centers do bring new solutions to the market
    Weaknesses:
    Very little information is available on the assistive ICT companies : e.g. market shares, cross-border trade;
    Little information is available on prices and price differences across MS prevail;
    Public procurement makes up the large share of procurement in the market, however pricing is not transparent;
    Complex supply chains and requirements for public procurement create significant barriers to trade across the Internal Market;
    Lack of presence of one-stop-shops for assistive ICT.
    Limited nr of assistive ICT companies involve end-users in the design of their products.
    Opportunities:
    Market surveys (e.g. BIS AT, EBST Danish survey) could be conducted at an EU level;
    Increasing amount of information on low costs AT (e.g. through Albacete in Spain, Raising the floor);
    Common standards and streamlined procurement could help create a more homogenous market;
    e-Commerce platforms can provide more transparency and information and increased competition;
    A more consumer oriented approach can ease market entry and bring good solutions to market.
    Threats:
    Lack of information hampers competition and innovation;
    Barriers to trade limit development of assistive ICT and trade across the EU;
    Price differences can undermine trust, limited transparency and public procurement for product lists hampers competition;
  • 42. Case Study: Pricing of assistive ICT
    Reasons for differences in prices across Member States:
    Long supply chains, distributors set their own margins;
    Localisation costs: e.g. different language versions;
    Bundling: after sales services included in sales price;
    Difficult to compare: rebranded products, different versions sold in different countries;
    Set levels of reimbursement influence pricing (FR: Poletti report, CNAS-Alcimed)
    Lack of transparency: prices are hard to obtain;
    • What the market will take
  • Case Study: Supply of assistive ICTAnalysis of national AT databases
    Screening of national AT databases for an improved market view
    General problem: General lack of information on supply side of assistive ICT market
    Idea: Screen national AT databases for companies providing assistive ICT devices
    Issue: Available information is partially inconsistent across databases
    General conclusion: The analysis adds insight, but the market remains opaque
  • 43. Case Study: supply of assistive ICTAnalysis of national AT databases
    Methodology
    Center of interest: assistive devices under ISO 9999:2007 subcategory 22 “assistive products for communication and information” in 8 national AT databases
    Problem: Not all devices in ISO 9999:2007 subcategory 22 can be considered as assistive ICT devices !!!
    Solution: Screening ‘company-by-company’ or ‘product-by-product’
  • 44. Case Study: supply of assistive ICTAnalysis of national AT databases
    810 different assistive ICT companies in 8 countries
    Supply side of national markets for assistive ICT is fragmented in most countries
    945 assistive ICT companies in total in 8 countries
    Accounting for multiple presence of identical companies in different countries, we count 810 different assistive ICT companies in 8 countries.
    * Note that the definitions for France have been adapted as follows to fit the table: manufacturers = manufacturers, importers = distributors, manufacturers-importers = manufacturers-distributors.
  • 45. Case Study: supply of assistive ICTAnalysis of national AT databases
    Little cross-border presence:
    Most companies are only present in 1 country;
    Most foreign companies are from the USA, UK and Germany;
  • 46. Case Study: supply of assistive ICTAnalysis of national AT databases
    Fragmentation: narrow markets, mostly SMEs
    On average the companies are present in only 1-2 product groups
    Qualitative insight: many micro enterprises and niche players with a very restricted product range (less than 5 products)
  • 47. Supply of assistive ICTBarriers and opportunities

  • 48. Estimating the marketforassistive ICT
    Estimating demand for Assistive ICT
    Lack of data on both the population and the take-up of assistive ICT
    Assessment of internet and mobile phone uptake:
    Estimation of the population of people with a disability
    Estimation of internet uptake
    Estimation of assistive ICT uptake
    Use of mainstream ICT
    Use of the internet
    Use of mobile phone
    Mobile phone use by people with a disability and 65+
    Internet use by people with a disability and 65+
    Supported by assistive ICT
    Supported by assistive ICT
  • 49. Estimating the marketforassistive ICT
    Methodology: estimating internet uptake:
    Basedon a set of availablevaluesforsomecountries;
    Estimatingexpectedvalues.
  • 50. Estimating the marketforassistive ICT
    Methodology: internet uptakeratesforpeoplewith a disability
    Applying the expected values to the Member States;
    Calculating the absolute figures: current market potential of roughly 29 million people.
  • 51. Estimating the marketforassistive ICT
    Methodology: assistive ICT uptakeratesforpeoplewith a disability
    Based on results of the AEGIS study: 1/3 uses assistive ICT when accessing internet;
    Roughly 10 million people estimated to make use of assistive ICT when surfing the internet
  • 52. Estimating the marketforassistive ICT
    Mobile phoneuptake:
    Mobile phoneuptakebypeoplewith a disability is close to that of the generalpopulation (aged 15-64);
    About 66.8 millionpeoplewith a disability are estimated to use mobile phones in the EU;
    According to AGEIS about 32% of mobile phoneuserswith a disabilityuseassistive ICT;
    About 21,4 millionpeopleusingassistive ICT for mobile phoneuse.
    Main results:
    Estimation of more than29 milliondisabledpeopleusing internet in the EU in 2009
    21 millionaged 15-64,
    8 millionagedabove 65
    Estimation of 9.86 million EU citizens already using assistive ICT to access the internet in the EU and about 21.4 million for mobile phones;
    Large existing disparities in uptake, especially for old people;
    Internet uptake is increasing fast.
  • 53. Scenario analysisConceptual framework
    Demand:
    informed and empowered consumers
    Supply
    push
    Demand
    pull
    Supply:
    competitive supply of assistive ICT
    Demand
    Supply
  • 54. Scenario analysisDemand: informed & empowered users
    Freedom of choice, drivers:
    User empowerment
    Role of (public) service provider
    Functional description of needs
    Mainstreaming
    e-Commerce
    Awareness and information, drivers:
    Digital literacy
    Close relationship with consumers
    Multi-stakeholder approach
    Independent information / advice
    Training
  • 55. Scenario analysisSupply: competitive supply of A-ICT
    Competition, drivers:
    Transparency
    Competition IN the market not FOR the market
    Barriers within the market
    e-Commerce
    Pricing, drivers:
    Transparency
    Supply chain
    Comparing
    Knowing what you pay for
  • 56. Scenario analysisDemand pull and supply push growth
    Demand: informed and empowered consumers
    Scenario 1
    Scenario 2
    Scenario 3
    Scenario 4
    Supply: competitive supply of assistive ICT
  • 57. Scenario analysisToward a consumer oriented market
    User empowerment, more transparent market, closer customer relations, more cross-border trade, changing the role of (public) service providers
  • 58. Scenario analysisImpact on the market: forecasting exercise
    Based on internet uptake:
  • 59. Scenario analysisImpact on the market: forecasting exercise
    Impact on internet uptake
  • 60. Scenario analysisImpact on the market: forecasting exercise
    Impact onassistive ICT usage
  • 61. Scenario analysisImpact on the market: forecasting exercise
    Estimates are based on assumptions and are projected in accordance with the S-curve of the Netherlands
    Actual internet take-up developments depend on many exogenous factors, such as general development of internet connections (infrastructure), digital literacy, etc.
    Yet, this analysis shows the expected direction, although country specifics should be taken into account
    This also shows that currently there is a large unexploited market potential
  • 62. ConclusionsThe impact of the role of government
    Public procurement:
    Can reduce cost (e.g. volume contracts)
    But leads to competition FOR the market not IN the market: i.e. market distortion
    Result: a heterogeneous EU Market (mainly local markets), limited economies of scale for producers, limits incentives for R&D and investment
    Information provision:
    Training of professionals in the SDM is essential
    End-user should be aware and well informed
    Funding:
    Uneven across MS, as well as prices paid by the SDM
  • 63. ConclusionsFunction vs Form
    Away from ‘positive lists’ of eligible products…
    Keeping positive lists up-to-date is cumbersome or simply not happening (e.g. IT)
    It can take a lot of time for new products to become ‘eligible’
    …towards a function based approach (with possibly a ‘negative list’)
    A function based approach opens up opportunities for new products, innovation
    A function based approach enables choice and user empowerment
  • 64. ConclusionsTowards a Consumer Oriented Model
    Empower people with a disability: decision makers
    Encourage interaction between companies and end-users: closer customer relationships, more information aimed at people with a disability (direct marketing, try-out sessions)
    Scope for reduced prices (e.g. SE)
    Mentality change: SDM becomes principally advisor and funding provider
    Single access points, across life environments
  • 65. ConclusionsIncreasing information provision & awareness
    Information provision: essential for professionals and end-users, the internet offers important opportunities (e-Commerce, product reviews, etc)
    Empowerment: more focus on desirable products (less stigma)
    Training: also essential for both end-users and professionals
    Maintenance, upgrades: clear rules are needed
  • 66. ConclusionsSupply
    Market fragmentation: mostly local markets, small companies
    Lack of transparency
    Distributors are essential today for local market access
    Long supply chains: high prices
    Focus on SDM reduces consumer orientation
    More consumer orientation opens possibilities for:
    easier market access
    more competition
    lower prices
    potentially better after sales services
    e-Commerce
    more information aimed at the end-user
    increased economies of scale and incentives to invest and conduct R&D
    mainstreaming: accessible mainstream solutions become attractive alternatives, incentives for Design for All
  • 67. ConclusionsData availability
    There is a general lack of statistics
    People with a disability: wide divergence due to different applied definitions across MS, lack of cross-country comparable data
    Use of ICT and assistive ICT: only ad-hoc national measurements
    Supply of assistive ICT: definition of assistive ICT: ISO 9999 Cat 2? EU NACE has no classification for A-ICT, resulting in lack of data
  • 68. Recommendations
    Shaping a more competitive and better functioning market for assistive ICT
    Improve the availability of data:
    common and consistent definition and measurement of people with a disability and their use of ICT and assistive devices
    need for granular data on MS expenditure
    need for an extensive survey at an EU level
    a common taxonomy of assistive ICT
    Fine-tune the role of government:
    consumer oriented, empower the end-user, freedom of choice
    provision of independent information and advice
    a common functional list for Europe
    establish single access points
  • 69. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
    Copyright © 2011 Deloitte Consulting All rights reserved.