Inspections of electrical installations in homes

3,112 views
2,992 views

Published on

Measurements are imperative.

See also our white paper on this topic at http://dld.bz/CtnR

Published in: Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,112
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
565
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
186
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Inspections of electrical installations in homes

  1. 1. Inspections of electrical installations in homes Measurements are imperative December 2010
  2. 2. Present situation Ageing housing stock Slow renovation rate Increasing use of electricity  Danger!
  3. 3. Present situation Periodic safety inspections = growing practice But: visual inspections alone are not enough Could give false feeling of safety Measurements are imperative When wires look like this, it’s already too late!
  4. 4. Is it worth the effort and cost? Electric defects = most common cause of fire Overheated wires = one of the most common electric defects Standardization bodies made wiring rules Rules make no sense if they are not verified
  5. 5. Only for new dwellings? Not only new, but also existing installations should be inspected Picture: DocteurCosmos, Creative Commons Picture: Brian Shaw, Creative Commons Which house is most likely to suffer from electrical safety issues?
  6. 6. Initial verification Verifying if the requirements of all applicable prescriptions are met  Full inspection of complete installations by qualified people  Testing to prove the effectiveness of the installations
  7. 7. Periodic verification Periodic verification is essential because: Electrical installations do wear (hardening of cable insulation, corrosion, loose contacts...) Number of electrical applications increases Safety awareness increases
  8. 8. Periodic verification Periodic verification should consist of: - Inspections: visual (naked eye, thermografic pictures), smell, touch, hearing - Testing (e.g. resistance of cable insulation)
  9. 9. Risk of bad contact Bad contact  electrical resistance rises  heat generation  fire risk Bad contact of 0.5 ohm  1 ohm after one week  10 ohm after one year
  10. 10. Verifying contacts Thermography is a non-contact method for visualizing temperature It is a good method to search and find bad contacts
  11. 11. Risk of bad wiring Two types of risks: Internal overheating due to inaptness to receive overloads or short circuits External exposure to fire: cable insulation containing excessive combustible material UK: 3,000 out of 9,000 fires each year are caused by inadequate wiring
  12. 12. Risk of Al wiring Aluminium wiring poses additional hazard Bad connections or failing circuits  Al wires have a higher probability for overheating Al wired homes have higher numbers of fire fatalities and injuries
  13. 13. When a periodic verification? 10 year interval also in IEC 60364 standard Unfortunately not mandatory in most countries Generally accepted: every 10 years
  14. 14. Ad hoc verifications: when? When issues did occur Tripping of circuit breakers Burn marks on sockets, switches... ... When modifications have been made Structural changes in the building Changes in electricity use Change of owner
  15. 15. What to verify? Periodic verification will take into account: Adequacy of earthing Suitability of switchgear Serviceability of equipment: signs of overheating? The wiring system and its condition Presence of RCD’s Presence of adequate circuit identification Presence of any wear, tear or damage Changes of use in premises
  16. 16. Test measurements Test measurements to be carried out: Continuity of protective conductors Equipotential bonding Earth electrode resistance Earth fault loop impedance Correct operation of RCD’s Correct operation of switches and isolators Condition of cables by measuring insulation resistance
  17. 17. Insulation quality tests Measuring the insulation resistance of cables = the most important test Low insulation resistance  leakage current Risk to shock individual if no RCD or if earth conductor is interrupted A leakage current of 500 mA can generate enough heat to cause a fire
  18. 18. Insulation quality tests Testing goes quick and cost is low With ‘insulation tester’ Initial verification when installation taken in use Reference measurement Revealing short circuits During periodic verification, insulation tester reveals insulation failures
  19. 19. Insulation quality tests Tests made between active conductor and conductor connected to earthing DC voltage is applied between them Small current will flow The higher this current, the more the insulation is deteriorated
  20. 20. Insulation quality tests Minimal values of insulation resistance, according to IEC 60364-6: But a reading ≤ 2 MΩ for individual circuit  Possibility of defective insulation Nominal circuit voltage V Test voltage d.c. V Insulation resistance M  SELV and PELV 250 > 0,5 Up to and including 500 V, including FELV 500 > 1,0 Above 500 V 1000 > 1,0
  21. 21. Main conclusions Periodic verification (every 10 years) of the electrical installation should be mandatory Only inspection is not enough, test measurements are equally important The insulation resistances should be tested In case this resistance is not high enough, the cable should be replaced
  22. 22. Other conclusions Obsolete cables should be removed to reduce the potential fuel load in case of fire Aluminium wiring should be removed at the first sign of degradation (or even before)
  23. 23. Bibliography IEC 60364-6, Low-voltage installations – Part 6: Verification ‘ Towards improved electrical installations in European homes’ - European Copper Institute ‘ Overview of electrical safety in 11 countries’ - European Copper Institute US Fire Administration publications ESFI (Electrical Safety Foundation International) publications ‘ Reducing the fire hazard in aluminium-wired homes’ - J. Aronstein, Ph.D.

×