Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Discussion webinars Labelling and efficiency performance standards
Content <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Setting the scene </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A taxonomy </li></ul></ul>...
Setting the scene Ambitious targets <ul><ul><li>Emissions reduction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Energy efficiency </li></ul...
 
The good and the bad
A taxonomy Types of labels <ul><ul><li>Information </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Comparative </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Endor...
The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of mo...
The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of mo...
The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of mo...
The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of mo...
Moving targets
Using labels to set standards – method 1 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient Current Suppl...
Using labels to set standards – method 1 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient 0 Method 1: S...
Using labels to set standards – method 1 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient 0 Method 1: S...
Using labels to set standards – method 2 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient Current Suppl...
Using labels to set standards – method 2 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient Current Suppl...
Using labels to set standards – method 2 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient Supply 2008 0...
Using labels to set standards – method 3 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient Supply 1989 0...
Using labels to set standards – method 3 % of  Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less  Efficient More Efficient Supply 1990 0...
The way forward Dynamic labelling <ul><ul><li>Need to phase out and prevent introduction of inefficient equipment into the...
Dynamic labelling <ul><ul><li>CECED proposed a new open-ended labelling scheme which can be dynamically updated to accommo...
Labelling cars In application of EU Directive 99/94/EC, Several Countries (Denmark, NL, BE...) have selected the above for...
Labelling buildings B In Austria, UK, Denmark, France… private homes are being labeled F D
Labelling schools www.display-campaign.org
Other application areas Systems <ul><ul><li>Quality of supply: Dips, harmonics, flicker, reliability </li></ul></ul><ul><u...
One example Top Runner Scheme <ul><li>Distinctive features: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Set high standard </li></ul></ul><ul><ul...
Conclusions Broad application of labelling <ul><li>Apply to systems, products, services, components & professions </li></u...
Discussion <ul><li>Is the “enlargement” of the labelling scheme beneficial? </li></ul><ul><li>What is the best way to acco...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Energy Efficiency Labels & Standards

2,322

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,322
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
63
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Energy Efficiency Labels & Standards"

  1. 1. Discussion webinars Labelling and efficiency performance standards
  2. 2. Content <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Setting the scene </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A taxonomy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The textbook case </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Labels & standards </li></ul><ul><li>The future of labelling </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dynamic labelling </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Beyond energy labelling </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Toprunner </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Conclusion </li></ul>
  3. 3. Setting the scene Ambitious targets <ul><ul><li>Emissions reduction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Energy efficiency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Labelling Directive (92/75/EEC) currently under revision </li></ul></ul>Successful but… <ul><ul><li>Every product has a safety label, but not an energy label </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>No phasing out policies for inefficient appliances </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Too many labels </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More labelling does not mean higher quality or a more efficient scheme </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>No harmonized scheme for certification of testing centres </li></ul></ul>
  4. 5. The good and the bad
  5. 6. A taxonomy Types of labels <ul><ul><li>Information </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Comparative </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Endorsement </li></ul></ul>Types of standards <ul><ul><li>Prescriptive </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Minimum performance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Class average </li></ul></ul>
  6. 7. The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of models/market EU Market 1992 B E C A D F G More Efficient Less Efficient
  7. 8. The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of models/market EU Market 1996 EU Market 1992 B E C A D F G More Efficient Less Efficient
  8. 9. The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of models/market EU Market 1999 EU Market 1996 EU Market 1992 B E C A D F G More Efficient Less Efficient
  9. 10. The textbook case – cold appliances 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% A B C D E F G Energy label class Share of models/market EU Market 1999 EU Market 1996 EU Market 1992 EU Market 2003 B E C A D F G More Efficient Less Efficient
  10. 11. Moving targets
  11. 12. Using labels to set standards – method 1 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient Current Supply 0
  12. 13. Using labels to set standards – method 1 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient 0 Method 1: Statistics Analysis
  13. 14. Using labels to set standards – method 1 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient 0 Method 1: Statistics Analysis Cold appliance 1999
  14. 15. Using labels to set standards – method 2 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient Current Supply 0
  15. 16. Using labels to set standards – method 2 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient Current Supply 2000 0 Top Runner
  16. 17. Using labels to set standards – method 2 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient Supply 2008 0 Top Runner Method 2: Top Runner
  17. 18. Using labels to set standards – method 3 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient Supply 1989 0 MEPS 1990
  18. 19. Using labels to set standards – method 3 % of Market Energy Efficiency Scale Less Efficient More Efficient Supply 1990 0 Method 3: Minimum Life-Cycle Cost MEPS 1990
  19. 20. The way forward Dynamic labelling <ul><ul><li>Need to phase out and prevent introduction of inefficient equipment into the market </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Minimum performance requirements </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Extend labelling to more products categories in a harmonized and simple way (EuP preparatory studies could be a good starting point) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Open ended but how to know where to stop? (A++++++) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>How to setup standards for new equipment? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Differentiated taxation? </li></ul></ul>
  20. 21. Dynamic labelling <ul><ul><li>CECED proposed a new open-ended labelling scheme which can be dynamically updated to accommodate the continued improvement of appliances. </li></ul></ul>
  21. 22. Labelling cars In application of EU Directive 99/94/EC, Several Countries (Denmark, NL, BE...) have selected the above format for Car Labelling G C
  22. 23. Labelling buildings B In Austria, UK, Denmark, France… private homes are being labeled F D
  23. 24. Labelling schools www.display-campaign.org
  24. 25. Other application areas Systems <ul><ul><li>Quality of supply: Dips, harmonics, flicker, reliability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>District heating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Renewable Energy System: Photovoltaics, solar panels, biomass system </li></ul></ul>Products <ul><ul><li>Building Materials: Windows, insulation, boilers, pumps </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Food products: Fresh food, meat, food processing </li></ul></ul>Services <ul><ul><li>Green power, electricity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Leisure: Air-travel </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Audits </li></ul></ul>Services <ul><ul><li>Installers, inspectors </li></ul></ul>
  25. 26. One example Top Runner Scheme <ul><li>Distinctive features: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Set high standard </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Meet ‘on average’ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mix of voluntary and mandatory requirements </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Collaborative standard setting </li></ul></ul>
  26. 27. Conclusions Broad application of labelling <ul><li>Apply to systems, products, services, components & professions </li></ul>Quality infrastructure of labelling <ul><li>Legal framework, testing laboratories, enforcement mechanisms </li></ul>Future proof labelling <ul><li>Sliding scale or dynamic labelling to take technological evolution into account </li></ul>
  27. 28. Discussion <ul><li>Is the “enlargement” of the labelling scheme beneficial? </li></ul><ul><li>What is the best way to accommodate continuous improvement? </li></ul><ul><li>How to design schemes for phasing-out of appliances? </li></ul><ul><li>How to certify testing centres and harmonize testing procedures? </li></ul><ul><li>How to design financial incentives to stimulate efficient products in the market? </li></ul><ul><li>Does differentiated taxation have a role here? </li></ul>
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×