Value of sustainability reporting


Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Value of sustainability reporting

  1. 1. Value of Sustainability ReportingA study by the Center for Corporate Citizenship and Ernst & Young LLPExecutive Summary
  2. 2. 1 Value of Sustainability ReportingWhere once sustainability disclosure was the province of afew unusually green or community-oriented companies,today it is a best practice employed by companies world-wide. A focus on sustainability helps organizations managetheir social and environmental impacts and improveoperating efficiency and natural resource stewardship,and it remains a vital component of shareholder,employee, and stakeholder relations.One of the biggest moments in the mainstreaming of sustainabilityreporting came in 2009, when Bloomberg made access to sustainabilitydata available to terminal subscribers as part of its regular subscription.There are more than 100 sustainability data points available for each firmcovered, and in the latter half of 2010, analysts and investors viewed morethan 50,000,000 indicators, representing a 29% uptick from the prior sixmonths.1It is clear that sustainability reporting is here to stay. A full 95% of theGlobal 250 issue sustainability reports.2Firms continuously seek newways to improve performance, protect reputational assets, and win share-holder and stakeholder trust. The evidence is all around us.Sustainability reporting has emerged as a common practiceof 21st-century businessWays that sustainability reporting provided major valueImproved reputationIncreased employee loyaltyReduced inaccurate information about theorganization’s corporate social performanceHelped the organization refineits corporate vision or strategyIncreased consumer loyaltyLed to waste reduction within the organizationImproved relationships with regulatory bodiesMonitoring long-term risk and improvinglong-term risk managementLed to other forms of cost savingswithin the organizationHelped the organization to take measures toincrease long-term profitabilityImproved access to capitalPreferred insurance rates0% 20% 40% 60%10% 30% 50%Source: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and Ernst & Young 2013 survey
  3. 3. 2 Value of Sustainability Reporting1. Financial performanceNew research suggests that the value of disclosure extends to the firm’sbalance sheet. This is consistent with the survey responses for this report,where by a majority reported realizing business value as a result of theircompanies’ reporting efforts.A 2009 analysis of the results of more than 200 independent empiricalstudies examining the relationship of corporate social and environmentalperformance to corporate financial performance suggested that companiesmight benefit from increased communication of their good deeds.3Thestudies in the sample specifically covering transparency and reporting indi-cated positive market reactions to sustainability reporting.4Recent research found that environmental disclosure quality and firm valuehave a positive relationship. Even after implementing a control for environ-mental performance, the most transparent companies in the study tendedto have higher cash flows.52. Access to capitalA recent paper suggests that investors increasingly prefer to invest intransparent enterprises due to higher stakeholder-manager trust, moreaccurate analyst forecasting, and lower information asymmetry.6Recent research found that reporting firms ranked highly for sustainabilityhave Kaplan-Zingales Index scores that are 0.6 lower than the scores forlow-sustainability companies.7A lower score signifies fewer capitalconstraints.Seven major business benefits of sustainability reports3. Innovation, waste reduction, and efficiencyReporting can offer firms insight into potential changes in process andbusiness. Innovative firms can employ social and environmental initia-tives as opportunities for learning.8In a 2012 global survey of sustainabilityreporters, 88% indicated that reporting helped make their organizations’decision-making processes more efficient.94. Risk managementThe links between material business impacts and environmental and socialrisks suggest that sustainable business management and its key metrics willbecome more significant in the evaluation of overall business risk.10Reporting firms may be better able to predict and manage risks emanatingfrom sustainability-related dimensions of business. Engaging in sustain-ability reporting may allow firms to:• Anticipate and prepare for issues in communities of operation• Increase agility in process improvement• Anticipate and prepare for future materials scarcity
  4. 4. 3 Value of Sustainability Reporting5. Reputation and consumer trustReporting may prove to be a powerful tool for corporations that needto build or restore trust. A recent Ernst & Young study found that socialacceptance risk was one of the Top Ten Risks for Global Business andthat corporations may benefit from communicating transparently to thepublic.11The 2013 Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and Ernst &Young survey revealed that more than 50% of respondents issuingsustainability reports reported that those reports helped improve firmreputation (see figure on page 1).6. Employee loyalty and recruitmentProactively communicating your firm’s corporate responsibility commit-ments has a positive impact on productivity, including the number ofvoluntary, uncompensated hours worked. A reputation for responsibilityand disclosure can help recruiting efforts.12More than 30% of reporters in the 2013 Boston College Center forCorporate Citizenship and Ernst & Young survey saw increased employeeloyalty as a result of issuing a report (see figure on page 1).7. Social benefitsA study of corporate social responsibility in highly competitive markets con-cluded that companies engaging in sustainability initiatives cansimultaneously increase firm success, reduce negative social influence andbenefit society at large.13
  5. 5. 4 Value of Sustainability ReportingMore than two-thirds of respondents indicate that theirorganizations employ the GRI framework in thepreparation of their reports.The Global Reporting Initiative was founded at the end of the 1990sand the first version of the GRI standards appeared in 2000.The GRI framework is a collection of reporting guidance documents —all of which were developed through global, multi-stakeholderconsultative processes — designed to assist companies in preparingsustainability reports and ESG disclosures. This framework is the mostwidely adopted globally, and provides a unified standard for reports tobe assessed and compared.The key benefit of using the GRI framework, in addition to standardiza-tion of reports, is guidance on material issues. The GRI emphasizes thata company consider those environmental and social aspects that aremost significant to its key stakeholders and have the most significantimpacts on its business —or result from it.14The Global Reporting Initiative: The leading global standardReporting framework organizations use toorganize their reports51%18%4%21%6%GRI GuidelinesGRI-referencedNon-GRINo frameworkIm not sureSource: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenshipand Ernst & Young 2013 survey
  6. 6. 5 Value of Sustainability ReportingBetween 2007 and 2011, the GRI Sustainability DisclosureDatabase, which tracks sustainability reports submitted bycompanies, grew, on average, more than 30% each year.Only a few dozen companies filed reports with the GRI in its first fewyears, but with the environmental sustainability movement at its core, itquickly gathered momentum. By the mid-2000s, hundreds of companieswere voluntarily adopting the GRI framework and producing sustainabilityreports. In January 2011, the GRI began collecting GRI-referenced and non-GRI-referenced reports.15Today, thousands of companies, from all over the globe, are publishingsustainability reports. In the Boston College Center for CorporateCitizenship and Ernst & Young survey, a majority of respondents indicatedthat their organizations issue a sustainability report.Sustainability reports: Yesterday and today01000150020002500Growth of sustainability reporting, 2000–201120002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201150030003500Source: Data from GRI Sustainability Database; collection of GRI-Referencedand Non-GRI reports began in January 2011NumberofsustainabilityreportsissuedGRINon-GRIGRI-referenced
  7. 7. 6 Value of Sustainability ReportingCompanies are motivated to report for differentreasons. Large companies are more likely to reportthan small companies, and they appear to be influ-enced more than small companies by expectationsof transparency with stakeholders and competitivedifferentiation.It’s just part of business: Reasons to reportSource: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenshipand Ernst & Young 2013 survey0% 100%20% 40%Transparencywith stakeholdersRisk managementStakeholder pressureCompetitive advantageBrand/ReputationOtherIm not sureCompany culture60%Motivations for reporting by company size80%Annual revenues of$5 billion and overAnnual revenues under$5 billionSource: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenshipand Ernst & Young 2013 survey0% 100%20% 40%Transparency withstakeholdersRisk managementStakeholder pressureOtherCompetitive advantageBrand/ReputationCompany cultureIm not sure60%Motivations for reporting by company type80%Publicly tradedfor-profit companyPrivate for-profitcompanyPublic companies are influenced by stakeholders toa greater extent than privately held companies,suggesting increased influence of stakeholderperspectives.Private companies are more likely than their publiccounterparts to see reporting as an opportunity tomanage risk.
  8. 8. 7 Value of Sustainability ReportingAcross industries, transparency with stakeholders was a keymotivation for organizations to issue reports.Reasons to report by industry0%10%20%30%40%50%What motivates organizations to reportFinanceandinsuranceHealthcareandsocialassistanceInformationManufacturingProfessional,scientific,andtechnicalservices60%70%80%90%100%UtilitiesandminingTransparency with stakeholdersCompetitive advantageRisk managementStakeholder pressureCompany cultureBrand/ReputationSource: Boston College Center forCorporate Citizenship andErnst & Young 2013 surveyAdditional internal and external drivers for reporting• Rating agencies factoring sustainability information into broaderanalysis16• Executives, shareholders and investors seeking assurance thatsustainability risks have been managed• Communities seeking information regarding how the company ismanaging the environmental and social impacts of its operations• Regulations related to environmental and social matters• Current and potential employees seeking information about companysustainability practice17
  9. 9. 8 Value of Sustainability ReportingIn many countries some type of sustainability reporting is mandated, either by exchanges or by the government,and every year brings new laws and guidelines to countries throughout the worldReporting: The law of the land?As of 2012, the governments or stock exchanges of 33 countries haverequired or encouraged some level of sustainability reporting:18Argentina Germany MexicoAustralia Greece NetherlandsAustria Hungary NorwayBrazil India Saudi ArabiaCanada Indonesia SingaporeChina Ireland South AfricaDenmark Italy SpainEcuador Japan SwedenEgypt Korea TurkeyFinland Luxembourg United KingdomFrance Malaysia United StatesOn April 16, 2013, the European Commission issued a press release thatannounced proposals for a directive of the European Parliament and theCouncil of the European Union which would require large companies todisclose information on the major economic, environmental, and socialimpacts of their business as part of their annual reporting cycle.Many indicators suggest that mandatory corporate reporting will be thefuture in both developed and emerging economies.
  10. 10. 9 Value of Sustainability ReportingMore than 40% of respondents withinthe information, health care, andprofessional services industriesindicated that reporting providesmajor value for employee loyalty.Source: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and Ernst & Young 2013 survey0% 10% 20% 40%Health care andsocial assistanceProfessional, scientific,and technical servicesInformationFinance and insuranceUtilities and miningManufacturing60%Increased consumer loyalty50%30% 0% 10% 20% 40%InformationHealth care andsocial assistanceProfessional, scientific,and technical servicesFinance and insuranceManufacturingUtilities and mining60%Increased employee loyalty50%30%0% 10% 20% 40%Professional, scientific,and technical servicesInformationFinance and insuranceManufacturingHealth care andsocial assistanceUtilities and mining60%Reduce waste50%30% 0% 10% 20% 40%Health care andsocial assistanceInformationUtilities and miningFinance and insuranceProfessional, scientific,and technical servicesManufacturing60%Monitoring long-term risk andimprove risk management50%30%Reporting contributes to important business outcomes:Industry breakdown
  11. 11. 10 Value of Sustainability ReportingOrganizations that are reporting are most challengedby data-related issues. Differences emerged among themajor reasons why private and publicly traded for-profitcompanies are not issuing reports.Why not report?Source: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and Ernst & Young 2013 survey0% 10% 20% 40%Availability of dataAccuracy orcompleteness of dataInternal buy-in todisclose dataLimited resources70%Challenges of sustainability reportingand assurance process50%30%0% 10% 20% 40%No one is asking forthis informationWe intend to do so, but havenot gotten the resources toprepare a public reportWe track this informationinternally, but elect notto publish itWe consider theinformation proprietary60%Reasons why companies do not report50%30%60%Publicly tradedfor-profit companyPrivate for-profitcompany
  12. 12. 11 Value of Sustainability ReportingSome advocates of sustainability believe that integratedreporting is the way forward. As more companies issuesustainability reports, analysts expect that public andinvestor demand for external assurance of sustainabilityreports will grow.One part of the move towards standardization is the push for annualreports that include and connect information on both financial andnon-financial aspects of business. In 2010, the GRI cofounded theInternational Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) to help promote thedisclosure of sustainability performance data.19Because analysts, investors, and other stakeholders are paying atten-tion to sustainability reporting, many firms have come to understandthat the credibility offered by assurance is important. Among thosereport-issuing companies in the Boston College and Ernst & Young sur-vey, 35% have some level of assurance conducted on their sustainabilityreports. Of those reporting assurance, 55% have their full reportsassured and 45% have some indicators assured.A recent study found that readers are more likely to believe negativedisclosures than positive disclosures in reports. In order for dis-closures of positive performance to have the same weight andcredibility as negative disclosures, the positive disclosures had tobe assured — even if the negative disclosures were not assured.20The future of sustainability reportingAssured reports by provider type, 201265%19%10%6%AccountantSmall consultancy/boutique firmOtherEngineering firmScope of assurance, 201251%32%2%15%EntireSustainabilityReportSpecific Section(s)Not SpecifiedGHG OnlySource: Data from GRI Sustainability Database
  13. 13. 12 Value of Sustainability ReportingReporting frameworksOrganization initiative or toolGlobal Reporting Initiative (GRI) SustainabilityReporting GuidelinesType/description• Reporting framework: G3.1 is the GRI’s setof sustainability reporting guidelines, andG4 is planned to be released in May 2013.Performance indicators are organized intothe following three dimensions: economic,environmental and social.• www.globalreporting.orgMembers/regions representedMore than 4,000 organizations from across theglobe have created a GRI or GRI-referenced report.Industries All public and private organizationsCore subjects• Organizational governance• Human rights• Labor practices• The environment• Fair operating practices• Consumer issues• Community involvement and developmentWebsite• The Global Reporting•• GRI Sustainability Disclosure Databasedatabase.globalreporting.orgA table illustrating the alignment of reporting dimensionsacross frameworks can be found here. This documentcovers nine different initiatives, descriptions of thereporting framework, tool, and/or standards they cover,the industries and regions they represent, and which coresustainability issues they address.Sample description:
  14. 14. 13 Value of Sustainability ReportingThis study was produced as a joint effort between theCarroll School of Management Center for CorporateCitizenship at Boston College and Ernst Young LLP.The Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship and Ernst YoungLLP conducted a survey on sustainability reporting, which was adminis-tered between February 26 and March 8, 2013. The comprehensive surveycovered various aspects of an organization’s ESG reporting. Topics in-cluded the cost and benefits of reporting, as well as making connections tofinancial performance. Respondents’ companies did not have to report inorder to participate in the survey.Survey information was sent by email to members of the Center for Cor-porate Citizenship and to other professionals. The survey was also sentto members of a Survey Sampling International (SSI) panel. Members ofthe SSI panel were corporate professionals and were required to be em-ployed at management or executive levels in their companies to completethe survey. All respondents needed to be at least somewhat familiar withtheir organizations’ sustainability disclosures (also known as corporatecitizenship; environmental, social and governance; ESG; or corporate socialresponsibility disclosures).There were 579 total respondents and 391 work for an organization thatissues a sustainability report.About this study Company operations area –domestic (US only) vs. global61%39%GlobalDomesticCompany type49%40%6%3%Publicly tradedfor-profitcompanyPrivatefor-profit companyOtherPrivate non-profitcorporation 2%Governmental corporationor congressionally authorized organizationSource: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenshipand Ernst Young 2013 survey
  15. 15. 14 Value of Sustainability ReportingClassification of companies by industryIndustry Percent ofrespondentsManufacturing 17Finance and insurance 15Professional, scientific, and technical services 12Utilities and mining 9Information 8Other 7Health care and social assistance 6Retail trade 5Construction 4Transportation and warehousing 4Other services (including public administration) 3Accommodation and food services 2Administrative and support; and waste and facili-ties management2Arts, entertainment, and recreation 2Educational services 2Real estate 2Note: Industries based on North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
  16. 16. 15 Value of Sustainability ReportingEndnotes1P. Tullis, “Bloomberg’s Push For Corporate Sustainability,” 30 March 2011 (online).Available: 5 February 2013).2GRI, “Report or Explain: a smart policy approach for non-financial information disclosure,”7 March 2013 (online). Available: (accessed 13 March 2013)3J.D. Margolis, H. A. Elfenbein and J. P. Walsh, “Does It Pay To Be Good…And Does ItMatter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Perfor-mance,” Social Science Research Network, 2009.4Ibid.5M. Plumlee, D. Brown, R. M. Hayes and R. S. Marshall, “Voluntary Environmental Disclo-sure Quality and Firm Value: Further Evidence,” Social Science Research Network, 2010.6D.S. Dhaliwal, O. Z. Li, A. Tsang and Y. G. Yang, “Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure andthe Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting,”The Accounting Review, Vol. 86, No.1, 2011, pp. 59-100.7B. Cheng, I. Ioannou and G. Serafeim, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Access toFinance,” Social Science Research Network, 2011.8C. E. Hull and S. Rothenberg, “Firm Performance: The Interactions of Corporate SocialPerformance with Innovation and Industry Differentiation,” Strategic Management Journal,Volume 29, Issue 7, 2008, pp. 781–789.9Black Sun Plc, “Understanding Transformation: Building the Business Case For IntegratedReporting,” Black Sun Plc, 2012.10Ernst Young, “Climate change and sustainability: How sustainability has expanded theCFO’s role,” Ernst Young, 2011.11Ernst Young, “The top 10 risks for business: a sector-wide view of the risks facingbusinesses across the globe,“ Ernst Young Business Risk Report, 2010.12P. Crifo and V. Forget, “The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Survey,”École Polytechnique, 2012.13J.D. Fernández-Kranz and J. Santaló, “When Necessity Becomes a Virtue: The Effect of Prod-uct Market Competition on Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Economics Manage-ment Strategy, Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2010, pp. 453–487.14GRI, “Materiality in the Context of the GRI Reporting Framework” (online). Available: ContextOf TheGRIReportingFramework.aspx (accessed 20 March 2013).15GRI, “Sustainability Disclosure Database Data Legend,” September 2012 (online). Available: (accessed 17 April 2013).16Standard Poor’s, “Corporate Responsibility Sustainability,” December 2012 (online).Available: (accessed 26 March 2013).17GRI, “Starting Points: GRI Sustainability Reporting: How valuable is the journey?” GRI,Amsterdam, 2011.18The Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations; Initiative for Responsible Investment,“Current Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Efforts by National Governments andStock Exchanges,” 2012.19GRI, “Integrated Reporting” (online). Available: (accessed 19 February 2013).20P. J. Coram, G.S. Monroe and D. R. Woodliff, “The Value of Assurance on Voluntary Nonfi-nancial Disclosure: An Experimental Evaluation,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, Vol.28, No. 1, 2009, pp. 137-151.
  17. 17. The Carroll School of Management Center for CorporateCitizenship at Boston College is a membership-basedknowledge center. Founded in 1985, the Center has ahistory of leadership in corporate citizenship researchand education.The Center engages more than 400 member compa-nies and more than 10,000 individuals annually to shareknowledge and expertise about the practice of corporatecitizenship through the Center’s professional develop-ment programs, online community, regional programs,and annual conference.The Center is a GRI-Certified Training Partner.For more information, visit the Center’s website the authors55 lee road • chestnut hill, ma 02467-3942 • t: 617–552–4545 • f: 617–552–8499 • e-mail: • www.BCCorporateCitizenship.orgErnst Young is a global leader in assurance, tax, trans-action and advisory services. Worldwide, our 167,000people are united by our shared values and anunwavering commitment to quality. We make a differenceby helping our people, our clients and our widercommunities achieve their potential.Ernst Young refers to the global organization ofmember firms of Ernst Young Global Limited, each ofwhich is a separate legal entity. Ernst Young GlobalLimited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does notprovide services to clients. For more information aboutour organization, please visit Young LLP is a client-serving member firm ofErnst Young Global Limited operating in the US.
  18. 18. To view the entire report please visit the Center forCorporate Citizenship website view the complete reporting frameworks visitthe Center for Corporate Citizenship website information on the Center’s professionaldevelopment training programs including SustainabilityReporting: A GRI certified program go contact Karen Hoff at:,for more information regarding this report.© Copyright 2013 Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship. All rights reserved.