Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Course for reviewers
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Course for reviewers

488
views

Published on

Published in: Education, Spiritual

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
488
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. 'How to be a critical but constructive friend: reviewing and refereeing for journal articles and conference papers’ Susie Andretta [email_address]
  • 2.
    • This course aims to explore the role of the reviewer in ascertaining the quality of a paper and to demonstrate the critical appraisal practices that a reviewer should employ to fulfil such a role.
    •  
    • By the end of the course you will be able to:
    •  
    • 1. Assess a paper according to the following critical appraisal criteria:
      • Appropriateness of title and abstract
      • Audience targeted
      • Quality of arguments (cohesion and style)
      • Use of evidence (from theory or practice), including citations and visual data
      • Referencing (consistency and accuracy)
    •  
    • 2. Produce a review for a paper and present it to the other participants.
  • 3.
    • Relevance
    • Originality and interest to audience
    • Title and Abstract
    • Methodology (if applicable)
    • Use of literature and Referencing
    • Clarity of expression and structure
    • Accept with no changes
    • Accept if specified minor revisions are made (no re-review necessary)
    • Substantial changes are needed before the article is resubmitted for review
    • Inappropriate
    JIL –review form
  • 4. Critical reading questions What is the author’s purpose? What key questions or problems does the author raise? What information, data, and evidence does the author present? What key concepts guide the author’s reasoning? What key conclusions is the author coming to? Are those conclusions justified? What are the author’s primary assumptions? What is the author’s viewpoint? What are the implications of the author’s reasoning?
  • 5. Plenary What can you do now that you could not do before the workshop? Can you identify at least one target/outcome as a result of this workshop?