• Save

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this document? Why not share!

Law commission- India surrogacy

on

  • 404 views

Surrogacy is becoming a viable option for more and more couples and individuals throughout the world,...

Surrogacy is becoming a viable option for more and more couples and individuals throughout the world,

Process of Surrogacy in India - IVF CLinic India - Egg Donors
Egg Donation - Egg Donor - Egg Donors - Surrogacy in India,Surrogacy - Our Clinic in India - Surrogacy in India
About Us Surrogacy - Surrogacy in India - IVF Clinic India - Egg Donors
News of Surrogacy - Egg Donors - Surrogacy India at Rotunda.

surrogacy australia,egg donation australia,adoption australia,ivf australia,surrogate australia,surrogacy Ireland,surrogacy France,surrogacy uk,egg donation uk,adoption uk,ivf uk,surrogacy usa,surrogacy laws usa,surrogacy agencies usa,
surrogate mothers usa,egg donation usa,adoption usa,ivf usa,surrogate usa,surrogacy spain,egg donation spain,adoption spain,
ivf spain,surrogacy canada,surrogacy laws canada,surrogate mothers canada,egg donation canada,adoption canada,ivf canada,surrogacy agencies canada,surrogate agencies in canada,Same-Sex Parenting: Creating a Strong Family Life as a Gay Couple,surrogacy United Kingdom,Surrogacy Denmark,Norway,Sweden,Finland, Scandinavian country,egg donation india,surrogacy india,surrogate india,sperm donor india,infertility india, ivf egg donation,india low cost egg donation,egg donation program india,ovum donation india,quality infertility treatments donation,surrogacy india,gestational surrogacy india,surrogacy agencies india,egg donation india,adoption india,ivf india,surrogate motherhood india,surrogacy india oprah,surrogacy india forum,surrogate india,gestational surrogacy india,surrogacy agencies india,egg donation india,
adoption india,ivf india,surrogate motherhood india,

Statistics

Views

Total Views
404
Views on SlideShare
404
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
2

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Law commission- India surrogacy Law commission- India surrogacy Document Transcript

  • rotundaivf.com Search Female Factor Male Factor Heterosexual Couple Same Sex Couple Cryoshipper Our global ambassadors Our global partners Home About us Services Programs Testimonials FAQs Contact Us Payment Options IVF humor Welcome to ‘www.rotundaivf.com’, the website hosted by Rotunda - The Center for Human Reproduction, a place where you can learn more about . Free Second Pregnancy tracking assisted reproduction. Opinion . and assistance service Rotunda- Centre for human reproduction is an ISO 9001:2000 certified Fertility clinic in Mumbai, India. Here, we provide state-of-the-art IVF treatment at affordable prices in a comfortable atmosphere. We strive to provide the best quality medical care, using the latest technology. Our equipment is state of the art and is sourced from all over the world. We know that facing infertility can be one of the most stressful situations you may encounter, emotionally, physically and sometimes financially. At Rotunda, we work hand-in-hand with you to make every phase of the process -- from diagnosis to treatment-- as predictable and comfortable as possible. Together we will map out a plan to determine the cause of your infertility and an appropriate course of action. Many couples need only counseling and many problems can easily be corrected with medication or surgical procedures. For couples facing more difficult challenges, our ART program ranks among the best in the nation. Our goal is to provide our patients with state-of-the-art medical care and an environment that fosters the best possible outcome. While the information provided here is not a substitute for the professional medical advice provided by your physician, it is a place to start as you search for a solution to overcome the challenge of infertility. We encourage you to learn as much as you can so that you can make educated decisions about your options and find the support you need to get through this difficult and frustrating time in your life. Let us know how we can be of assistance.
  • Information brought to you by: LAW COMMISSION’S REPORT ON SURROGACY in INDIA th On 5 of August, 2009 the Law Commission of India submitted the th228 report titled “Need for Legislation to regulate Assisted ReproductiveTechnology Clinics as well as Rights and Obligations of parties to aSurrogacy” to the Union Minister of Law and Justice, Ministry of Law andJustice, Government of India. The report expressed the view of the LawCommission on the Indian Counsel for Medical Research Guidelines 2005 onSurrogacy, the draft Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill andRules 2008 and the Seminar on “Surrogacy – Bane or Boon”. The report hadalso made recommendations to be kept in mind while legislating on surrogacy. Review of the Law Commission Report 1] The Law Commission of India Report on surrogacy has taken intoconsideration several areas of Surrogacy in India, the prevailing scenario ofsurrogacy and also recommended standards for the same. The report hasregarded that the laws related to surrogacy are highly complex and advised apragmatic approach while legislating on this issue. 2] The report considered Indian and foreign decisions on surrogacy(also constitution right to procreate) including the Baby M case and the BabyManji’s Case for reviewing the position on the constitutional validity ofsurrogacy in India. 3] Though the report has highlighted several issues on surrogacy, thereport has failed to move in deeper into the aspects of surrogacy. The report ishighly superficial and fell far below the expectations for providingrecommendations taking into consideration the Indian situation.
  • 4] The report has failed to notice many glowing issueswhich require immediate attention. The Report lacks clarity inthought and has found it best to limit itself to what is happening today,instead of suggesting a better tomorrow. The report has notconsidered the prevailing socio-economic situation in India, which haslead to present boom in Surrogacy. The report has not also been ableto identify the future of surrogacy in India, and has not maderecommendations for regulating the practice of surrogacy. 5] Paragraph 1.7 of the Report is extracted hereunder: “1.7 In commercial surrogacy agreements, the surrogate mother enters into an agreement with the commissioning couple or a single parent to bear the burden of pregnancy. In return of her agreeing to carry the term of the pregnancy, she is paid by the commissioning agent for that. The usual fee is around $25,000 to $30,000 in India which is around 1/3rd of that in developed countries like the USA. This has made India a favourable destination for foreign couples who look for a cost-effective treatment for infertility and a whole branch of medical tourism has flourished on the surrogate practice. ART industry is now a 25,000 crore rupee pot of gold. Anand, a small town in Gujarat, has acquired a distinct reputation as a place for outsourcing commercial surrogacy. It seems that wombs in India are on rent which translates into babies for foreigners and dollars for Indian surrogate mothers.” A specific mention has been made regarding “CommissioningAgent” in the above extract from the report. In the immediate sentencepreceeding this sentence, mention has been made about the“Commissioning Couple”. The meaning of “Commissioning Agent”is nowhere explained in the report and causes great confusion as towho is making the payment to the surrogate mother. The mention of‘commissioning agent’ assumes importance for the reason it signifiesthe existence of an agent communicating in-between the surrogate mother andthe intended parent. This practice is not appreciated
  • internationally and is not in line with the Indian Council for MedicalResearch Guidelines, 2005. 6] In the same paragraph, i.e., in 1.7 of the Report, it hasbeen stated that the usual fee for surrogacy in India is around $ 25000to $ 30000. This again lacks clarity for the reason that the sentencepreceding that was dealing with surrogate mothers. This fee referredto in the Report is the total cost which the Intended Parents would berequired to spend on surrogacy in India, and not just for the Surrogatemother. 7] Again, in paragraph 1.7 of the Law Commission Report,specific observation has been made that the Assistant ReproductiveTechnology Industry is worth about Rs.25 crores. This figure is notbased on any official report and lacks accuracy. 8] Paragraphs 1.9, 1.10 and 1.11 has been extractedhereunder: 1.9 As far as the legality of the concept of surrogacy is concerned it would be worthwhile to mention that Article 16.1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 says, inter alia, that “men and women of full age without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion have the right to marry and found a family”. The Judiciary in India too has recognized the reproductive right of humans as a basic right. For instance, in B. K. Parthasarthi v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld “the right of reproductive autonomy” of an individual as a facet of his “right to privacy” and agreed with the decision of the US Supreme Court in Jack T. Skinner v. State of Oklahoma, which characterised the right to reproduce as “one of the basic civil rights of man”. Even in Javed v. State of Haryana, though the Supreme Court upheld the two living children norm to debar a person from contesting a Panchayati Raj election it refrained from stating that the right to procreation is not a basic human right.
  • 1.10 Now, if reproductive right gets constitutional protection, surrogacy which allows an infertile couple to exercise that right also gets the same constitutional protection. However, jurisdictions in various countries have held different views regarding the legalization of surrogacy. In England, surrogacy arrangements are legal and the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 prohibits advertising and other aspects of commercial surrogacy. In the US also, commercial surrogacy seems prohibited in many states. In the famous Baby M case, the New Jersey Supreme Court, though allowed custody to commissioning parents in the “best interest of the child”, came to the conclusion that surrogacy contract is against public policy. It must be noted that in the US, surrogacy laws are different in different states. 1.11 If the 1988 Baby M case in the US forced many to put on legal thinking caps, then that year also saw Australia battling with societal eruptions over the Kirkman sisters’ case in Victoria. Linda Kirkman agreed to gestate the genetic child of her older sister Maggie. The baby girl, called Alice, was handed over to Maggie and her husband at birth. This sparked much community and legal debate and soon Australian states attempted to settle the legal complications in surrogacy. Now in Australia, commercial surrogacy is illegal, contracts in relation to surrogacy arrangement unenforceable and any payment for soliciting a surrogacy arrangement is illegal. In paragraph 1.10 to of the Report, the Law Commission ofIndia has rightly pointed out that the right to procreate is held to be aconstitutional right by the Supreme Court and High Courts in India.But the Law Commission has gone to the extent of assuming “ifreproductive right gets constitutional protection, surrogacy whichallows an infertile couple to exercise that right also gets the sameconstitutional protection.” The Law Commission has failed to realizethat the issue involved in the case of surrogacy is much larger than theambit of these decisions as these decisions have not considered therights of a third party i.e. “surrogate mother”. The right to procreation is theconstitutional right, but this right does not include the role of a third party, thesurrogate mother. Therefore, a simple analogy of the sort done by the LawCommission Report cannot be extended to a third party reproduction withoutconsidering its own pros and cons.
  • 9] The report has failed to note that the problems surrounding Surrogacyin India are not limited to the domestic issues, but goes to an internationallevel. The proposed legislation on surrogacy is required to be addressing theinternational requirements of surrogacy, and not only domestic. India hasmade a mark in the recent times for surrogacy in the international level, and isrequired to address this need of its new found importance. A legislation onsurrogacy which does not cater to the needs of the international arena ismerely incomplete. 10] The proposed legislation on surrogacy is required to take intoconsideration the surrogacy arrangement models followed world-over and hasto choose the right combination of the different models, so as to serve Indianscenario. Though the world’s second IVF baby was born in India in 1978,Indian Courts did not have many opportunities to deal the complex questionsof law about paternity and nationality. The Indian Law on surrogacy is yet ona pre-mature stage, and not many issues have transgressed into the form oflitigation except for one or two. This scene therefore gives the Indian lawmakers an opportunity to learn from the experience world-over through thedecision of the courts abroad. The problems that arise over surrogacy areadmittedly very complex, and therefore a world-class legislation competent tohandle every such issue is the need of the hour. 11] The proposed legislation on surrogacy is required to address theissues that the Intended Parents, both from India and abroad, who are takingup surrogacy in India. The draft should cater the needs of the intended parentson the lines of nationality, paternity of the child etc.
  • 12] The report has failed to make any mention on the rights of theIntended Parents in a surrogacy arrangement. The present situation demandsthat the drafters have in mind not only the domestic intended parents, but alsointended parents world over. Intended parents are bothered to a great extentabout their rights before they enter into a surrogacy arrangement. The intendedparents opt for surrogacy only as a last resort, with great longing for a child.This desire is what compels the intended parents choose alternative means ofreproduction such as surrogacy. 13] The availability of surrogate mothers at less costly compensation isthe stimulation for intended parents from abroad who choose surrogacy India.This being so, it is of utmost importance that specific measures are given forthe rights of the surrogate mother. Also, measures should be taken forprotection of those rights of the surrogate mother. 14] Legal Counseling of the surrogate mother plays a very importantrole in the process of surrogacy as it helps surrogate mothers understand theactual process in surrogacy. It is required that the legal counseling of thesurrogate mother is given by a lawyer or by a social activist, explaining to herthe process of surrogacy and also her rights and liabilities. Moreover, the legalcounseling is the best method to identify that the surrogate mothers are notforced into surrogacy by her family members. Therefore, it should berecommended that the surrogate mothers should attend the counseling with herrelatives. 15] The Law Commission of India has failed to address the need of aninternational surrogacy agreement. The international surrogacy agreement isrequired to serve the needs of the intended parents as well as the surrogatemother, so as to protect their interest.
  • The international surrogacy agreement should be enforceable in the IndianCourts, and should be acceptable by the embassy of the nation of the intendedparents. 16] The Law Commission report has failed to highlight the need for anational database of surrogacy being done in India. Such statistics is ofrequired to keep track of the statistics in the field of surrogacy. 17] The Law Commission had submitted the report without having donea field study of the present situation prevalent in India with regard to surrogatemothers and Assisted Reproductive Technique Hospitals. Therefore thefindings of the Law Commission cannot be clearly serving the needs of todaywith regard to surrogacy. 18] The Part IV of the Law Commission Report is extracted hereunder: IV. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION “4.1 Surrogacy involves conflict of various interests and has inscrutable impact on the primary unit of society viz. family. Non-intervention of law in this knotty issue will not be proper at a time when law is to act as ardent defender of human liberty and an instrument of distribution of positive entitlements. At the same time, prohibition on vague moral grounds without a proper assessment of social ends and purposes which surrogacy can serve would be irrational. Active legislative intervention is required to facilitate correct uses of the new technology i.e. ART and relinquish the cocooned approach to legalization of surrogacy adopted hitherto. The need of the hour is to adopt a pragmatic approach by legalizing altruistic surrogacy arrangements and prohibit commercial ones.” The above paragraph from the Law Commission Report has causedundue confusion from many international intended parents and journalists,especially because of the last line stating that commercial surrogacyarrangements required to be prohibited. This sentence has paved way for somany doubts including whether the commercial surrogacy arrangements aregoing to be banned in India.
  • The only observation which can formed from the above is that the LawCommission intends to recommend a system which is a line between the onefollowed in the United States and the United Kingdom. The Law Commissionrecommends that the birth certificate shall be in the name of Intended Parents,and it also recommends that the commercial surrogacy needs to be prohibited.This means that the only those reasonable expenses for the surrogate mother tobear the child shall be given by the intended parents. However, this issue islargely unclear and requires deliberation from the Law Commission of India. 19] The Law Commission has fell off from its expectations by makingno recommendations regulating the medical institutions who undertakesurrogacy. The absence of such recommendations was conspicuously felt. 20] The Law Commission turned blind eye to the amendments requiredto various other existing legislations. For example, the Indian Evidence Act,1872 gives a conclusive presumption that it shall be presumed that thehusband of woman who gives birth to the child is presumed to be the father ofthe child. This legislation requires amendment, so as to accept the laterscientific developments.CONCLUSION: th The Law Commission of India in it 228 Report has made a feeble impact in itsrecommendations compared to the need of the hour. India Legislation has got a long way to goin evolving the right sort of system suiting Indian conditions for surrogacy.surrogacy australia,egg donation australia,adoption australia,ivf australia,surrogate australia,surrogacy Ireland,surrogacy France,surrogacyuk,egg donation uk,adoption uk,ivf uk,surrogacy usa,surrogacy laws usa,surrogacy agencies usa,surrogate mothers usa,egg donation usa,adoption usa,ivf usa,surrogate usa,surrogacy spain,egg donation spain,adoption spain,ivf spain,surrogacy canada,surrogacy laws canada,surrogate mothers canada,egg donation canada,adoption canada,ivf canada,surrogacyagencies canada,surrogate agencies in canada,Same-Sex Parenting: Creating a Strong Family Life as a Gay Couple,surrogacy UnitedKingdom,Surrogacy Denmark,Norway,Sweden,Finland, Scandinavian country,egg donation india,surrogacy india,surrogate india,spermdonor india,infertility india, ivf egg donation,india low cost egg donation,egg donation program india,ovum donation india,qualityinfertility treatments donation,surrogacy india,gestational surrogacy india,surrogacy agencies india,egg donation india,adoption india,ivfindia,surrogate motherhood india,surrogacy india oprah,surrogacy india forum,surrogate india,gestational surrogacy india,surrogacyagencies india,egg donation india,adoption india,ivf india,surrogate motherhood india, Surrogacy in India, surrogacy india, surrogacylaws in India, Surrogacy cases in India, surrogacy agency, surrogacy cases, surrogacy laws, surrogacy india mumbai, surrogacy indiacost, surrogacy india, surrogacy india problems, surrogacy india australia, surrogacy india forum, surrogacy india guide, indian surrogacyprogram, indian surrogacy, india surrogacy clinic, indian surrogacy blog, india surrogacy cost, india surrogacy agency, jan balaz,surrogate mother, medical tourism surrogacy
  • Home Guide to Therapy Investigations Same Sex Couples Contact us Services Home Programs Facing infertility can be the most stressful situations you may encounter, emotionally, Our Team physically and financially. We believe hope is what builds dreams and dreams are the foundation for reality, so we would love to be part of your dreams. The Process Payments Welcome to “ wewantababy” website hosted by Rotunda – The center for Human Reproduction .At Rotunda we work hand in hand to make the process comfortable and Success rates productive. Our Global We cater to all aspects of infertility and provide all the services under one roof and the Ambassadors patient does not shuttle to different places . Cryoshipper Ovulation Induction Pregnancy tracking and assistance service Online payment to TPR-->