Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Euromarine jan 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Euromarine jan 2012

173
views

Published on

presentation at Euromarine 2012 in Bremen on information technology in education

presentation at Euromarine 2012 in Bremen on information technology in education

Published in: Education, Technology

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
173
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Using informationtechnology in education, positive benefits and potential pitfalls  Euromarine 2012-01-17
  • 2. Johan Lundin - johan.lundin@gu.seUniv.of Gothenburg, Dep. of Applied IT, Learning communication and IT University West LinCS
  • 3. Education and technology
  • 4. Educational expectations on IT• Teaching machines, computer aided instruction, AI tutoring, drills and often games (Skinner, 1968) • “From the player’s perspective, the coach will provide advice regarding strategy and tactics for better play. But, from the perspective of the coach, the request for help is an opportunity to tutor basic mathematical, scientific or other kinds of knowledge that the game exercises.“ (Goldstein & Carr, 1977, p. 1) • “This represents a static view and perhaps an outdated stimulus- response perspective on learning research, which is trying to establish a direct cause-effect relationship between technology (stimulus) and learning outcome (response), while ignoring the larger context within which learning occurs.” (Alavi & Leidner, 2001, p. 9).
  • 5. Educational expectations on IT, cont.• A tool for the learner • Tools for living (as tools enhancing what we can do), and tools for learning (as tools that are meant to fade out in use as the user can perform the activities by themselves). (Carmien and Fischer, 2005)• Simulations, visualizations and roleplays • A perfect simulation (with regard to learning) is not necessarily depending on how close to an actual real world event the experience is, but rather how well it allows for and supports interaction, reflection and learning among the learners. (Lundin, 2005).• Distance and learning, students distributed and away from teachers, fieldtrips, resources at a distance from co-located teachers and students• Support for collaborative activities, sharing, collaborating, peer-learning, etc.
  • 6. r se e w p ag b ro web eb st t”w F ir i rs es es g “F m i ti in ho un an k g ed m b bi y s e ct om et e s Ba site nn bc rn e e e go at e s- Co we t In dl ogl Pi r ce ok e ew ly co p a b o ub tter ify N ar is oo G o yS ce ut i ot E D M M Fa Yo Tw Sp1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 d arer s ng b o ay a t Po ck - pl e di SM ar s n g Bl a p3 g im g dI n 3G e on ops s G st C Pi m t gin mul gin ke h e t p opl ng P a ss ile ssa L in iP l ap kto e Pe etti tm ob me o re des g x M Te M an th
  • 7. iDeas, mobile, personal, in the field, connected, generic tools, knowledge expanding
  • 8. Using the WIKI together
  • 9. Creating structure Analytic work
  • 10. Creating norms!
  • 11. iDeas • Generic tools allowed for students to construct their own structure, and for unexpected uses of technology • Making activities and development visible • Tools that are useful in distributed and co-located activities • Connecting the field with campus • Allowing for individual and collective knowledge building1. Lundin, J., Lymer, G., Holmquist, L.E., Brown, B. & Rost, M. (2010). Integrating students’ mobile technology in higher education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. 4(1). 1-14.2. Brown, B., Lundin, J., Lymer, G., Rost, M., and Homquist, L.E. (2007). Seeing Ethnographically: Teaching ethnography as part of CSCW. In Proceedings of ECSCW 2007. pp. 411-430.3. Lymer, G., J. Lundin, B. Brown, M. Rost and L. E. Holmquist (2007): Web based platforms in co-located practice – The use of a wiki as support for learning and instruction. In Proceedings of CSCL 2007. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 476-485.4. Lymer, G. & Lundin, J. (2007). Formulating text: The practice of commenting in academic writing instruction. Paper presented at the EARLI Conference, August 28 - September 1, Budapest, Hungary.
  • 12. .†I†[p1,†p2,†p3,†...,†pm] !† wireless†infrastr 7 (†I†[b1,†b2,†b3,†...,†bn]!† multicast†for†het 8  s11 s12 ... s1j ... s1n  9 s  4.2.4 Interop 10  21 s 22 ... s2j ... s2n  Exchangi #†I†.†N†(I†  ... ... ... ... ... ...  6†Teaching programming 11 -ll†the†results†d 12   ing† the† learning  si1 ... ... sij ... sin  13  ... ... ... ... ... ...  trieved†frequent 14   @or†both†sides†o sm1 sm2 ... smj ... s mn  ††††††††† Fo 15   to† usersí† presen 16 o†make†the†system†work†well†on†most†mobile†phones!† face† hus!† it† is 17 we†need†to†make†it†work†on†the†mainstream†web†brows, from† database† t 18 ers† and† provide† services† according† to† device† context† in, and† interoperab using†X+",8. rP 19 formation† with† relevant† technologies† as† aforementioned† 20 in† 2*%† his† platform† adapted† application† can† be† illu, the† script† transf 21 strated† with† the† above† equations† P† denotes† platforms† and† then† transm 22 such† as† #ymbian!† i>#!† -ndroid!† Windows† +obile!† and† hen!† the† learne (lackberry!†etc†-nd†B†is†for†browsers†such†as†+#!†#a, ments† and† map ee 23 24 fari!† @irefox!† hrome!† and† >pera!† etc† (ased† on† the† con, source† constrain text† data!† different† services† in† equation† 6† are† provided† data†interaction† 25 n† this† way!† the† system† needs† to† suit† the† browser† j† and† ject† Hotation† ar 26 load† xample† c rR 27 platform†i†for†element†sijin†6†hus†the†device†features†of† platform†i†can†be†exploited†on†browser†j†.lease†see†sam, X+"†file!†and†th 28 ple†code†for†browser†aware†navigation†below†in†"ist†%† 29 30 31 ev 32 33 34 ie 35 36 37 w 38 39 40 List 1 Example Code of Browser Detection of Mobile WRS 41 42 4.2.3 Open Multimedia Infrastructure for Flexible 43 Question Organizing 44 >ne†of†the†important†strengths†of†the†mobile†approach†is† 45 its†multimedia†capability!†which†provides†open†and†flexi,
  • 13. Building your dream home
  • 14. The ongoing task design process Suggested by Suggested by students teacher Predefined Using the 3D program to Furnishing the house, making curriculum- design the house, building calculations of the size of based content a house in cardboard furniture Spin-off Making the house Making the house functionally content - off aesthetically pleasing pleasing (choosing media (choosing wallpaper, task calculations of wall paper- equipment, calculations of costs) size) 1. Tallvid, M., Lundin, J., Lindström, B. (forthcoming 2012). Using TPACK for Analysing Teachers’ Task Design – Understanding Change in a 1:1-Laptop Setting. Submitted to SITE2012.
  • 15. Some common pitfalls• Teachers rarely appreciate the difficulties of technical implementation• Developers rarely appreciate the difficulties of implementation in pedagogical practice• Creating repositories of information which are difficult, or demands large resources to contextualize into educational practice.• Technology blackbox (hide) what is to be learned/the content or Tech. emphasize unwanted aspects of the topic• Students end up learning how to use tech. instead of learning the intended content• Scaling is generally neglected, small projects over short time want to adress large problems over long time.• Inherently difficult to predict any future use of technology of based solely on the properties of a particular technology. Several studies are: “… showing how nearly identical technologies occasioned quite different social meanings and consequences in comparable organizational settings.” (Robey & Sahay, 1996, p. 108).
  • 16. Some possible benefits• Connecting classroom with field, and non-school practices, when to meet and when to work distributed?• Allowing for experiencing previously unavailable “things”• Allowing students to engage in new forms of production and development• Connecting students and teachers over distance (seems surprisingly difficult).• Crowdsourcing students.• From efficiency to quality to efficiency?
  • 17. ongoing and upcoming tech trends• mobile tech, in particular personal ones• ubiquitous computing - computing built into other tools - web of things (with sensors?)• robots• sensors, in particular personal ones