Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
IRIS RECOGNISATION
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

IRIS RECOGNISATION

857

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
857
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
103
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • {}
  • Transcript

    • 1. By: Deepak Attarde Mayank Gupta Vishwanath Srinivasan Guided by: Dr. Aditya Abhyankar
    • 2. BIOMETRIC SECURITY     Modern and reliable method Hard to breach Wide range Why Iris Recognition Highly protected and stable, template size is small and image encoding and matching is relatively fast.
    • 3. INTRODUCTION TO IRIS RECOGNITION Sharbat Gula – aged 12 at Afghani refugee camp. 18 years later at a remote location in Afghanistan. John Daugman, University of Cambridge – Pioneer in Iris Recognition.
    • 4. OVERVIEW OF OUR SYSTEM
    • 5. SEGMENTATION    Detecting the pupil edges Detecting the iris edges Extracting the iris region Canny Edge Detection Algorithm
    • 6. NORMALISATION Variations in eye: Optical size (iris), position (pupil), Orientation (iris). Fixed Dimension, Cartesian co-ordinates to Polar coordinates. Daugman’s Rubber Sheet Model: (R, theta) to unwrap iris and easily generate a template code.
    • 7. FEATURE EXTRACTION AND MATCHING      Generate a template code along with a mask code. Compare 2 iris templates using Hamming distances. Shifting of Hamming distances: To counter rotational inconsistencies. <0.32: Iris Match >0.32: Not a Match
    • 8. RESULTS AND CASE STUDIES   FAR, FRR EER: 18.3 % which gives an accuracy close to 82% ROC: Receiver Operator Characteristics
    • 9. Advantages       Uniqueness of iris patterns hence improved accuracy. Highly protected, internal organ of the eye Stability : Persistence of iris patterns. Non-invasive : Relatively easy to be acquired. Speed : Smaller template size so large databases can be easily stored and checked. Cannot be easily forged or modified.
    • 10. Concerns / Possible improvements     High cost of implementation Person has to be “physically” present. Capture images independent of surroundings and environment / Techniques for dark eyes. Non-ideal iris images Pupil Dilation Eye Rotation Inconsistent Iris size
    • 11. THANK YOU!!!

    ×