Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

HFA Monitoring and Review -Key Questions Guidance

2,568

Published on

This is an audio guidance on the key questions and means of verification included in the 2009- 2011 Hyogo Framework for Action Monitoring and Review process

This is an audio guidance on the key questions and means of verification included in the 2009- 2011 Hyogo Framework for Action Monitoring and Review process

Published in: Technology, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,568
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  1. HFA Monitoring and Review 2009-2011 Guidance on key questions and means of verifications
  2. Key Questions and Means of Verifications <ul><li>To provide some additional focus to each one of the core indicators. </li></ul><ul><li>Not meant to replace the core indicators </li></ul><ul><li>Focused on the unanswered questions, gaps and challenges identified in the previous HFA review exercise and GAR 2009 </li></ul>
  3. Priority for action 1 <ul><li>Ensure that disaster reduction is a national and local priority with a strong institutional basis for implementation </li></ul>
  4. CI 1: National policy and legal framework for disaster risk reduction exists with decentralised responsibilities and capacities at all levels. <ul><li>Is DRR included in development plans and strategies?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>National development plan </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sector strategies and plans </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Climate change policy and strategy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Poverty reduction strategy papers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CCA/ UNDAF </li></ul></ul>
  5. CI 2: Dedicated and adequate resources are available to implement disaster risk reduction plans and activities at all administrative levels. <ul><li>Is there a specific allocation of budget for DRR in the national budget?  Yes  No % allocated from national budget </li></ul><ul><ul><li> USD allocated from overseas development assistance fund </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li> USD allocated to hazard proofing sectoral development investments (e.g Transport, agriculture, infrastructure </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li> USD allocated to stand alone DRR investments (e.g. DRR institutions, risk assessments, early warning systems, …) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>USD allocated to disaster proofing post disaster reconstruction </li></ul></ul>
  6. CI 3: Community participation and decentralization are ensured through the delegation of authority and resources to local levels. <ul><li>Do local governments have legal responsibility and budget allocations for DRR?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Legislation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Budget allocations for DRR to local government </li></ul></ul>
  7. CI 4: A national multi sectoral platform for disaster risk reduction is functioning. <ul><li>Are civil society organisations , national planning institutions, key economic and development sector organisations represented in the national platform?  Yes  No civil society members (in numbers) </li></ul><ul><li>sectoral organisations (in numbers) </li></ul><ul><li>women’s organisations participating in national platform (in numbers) </li></ul>
  8. Priority for action 2 <ul><li>Identify, assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance early warning </li></ul>
  9. CI 1: National and local risk assessments based on hazard data and vulnerability information are available and include risk <ul><li>Is there a national multi-hazard risk assessment available to inform planning and development decisions?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Multi-hazard risk assessment </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li> % of schools and hospitals assessed  </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>schools not safe from disasters (in numbers) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Gender disaggregated vulnerability and capacity assessments </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Agreed national standards for multi hazard risk assessments </li></ul></ul></ul>
  10. CI 2: Systems are in place to monitor, archive and disseminate data on key hazards and vulnerabilities. <ul><li>Are disaster losses systematically reported, monitored and analysed? </li></ul><ul><li> Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Disaster loss database </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reports generated and used in planning </li></ul></ul>
  11. CI 3: Early warning systems are in place for all major hazards, with outreach to communities. <ul><li>Do risk prone communities receive timely and understandable warnings of impending hazard events?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Early warnings acted on effectively </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Local level preparedness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Communication systems and protocols </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Active involvement of media in early warning dissemination </li></ul></ul>
  12. CI 4: National and local risk assessments take account of regional/trans-boundary risks, with a view to regional cooperation on risk reduction. <ul><li>Does your country participate in regional or sub-regional DRR programmes or projects?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Programmes and projects addressing trans-boundary issues </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Regional and sub-regional strategies and frameworks </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Regional or sub-regional monitoring and reporting mechanisms </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Action plans addressing trans-boundary issues </li></ul></ul></ul>
  13. Priority for action 3 <ul><li>Use knowledge, innovation and education to build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels </li></ul>
  14. CI 1: Relevant information on disasters is available and accessible at all levels, to all stakeholders (through networks, development of information sharing systems, etc). <ul><li>Is there a national disaster information system publicly available?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Web page of national disaster information system </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Established mechanisms for accessing DRR information </li></ul></ul>
  15. CI 2: School curricula, education material and relevant trainings include disaster risk reduction and recovery concepts and practices. <ul><li>Is DRR included in the national educational curriculum?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>primary school curriculum </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>secondary school curriculum </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>university curriculum </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Professional DRR education programmes </li></ul></ul>
  16. CI 3: Research methods and tools for multi-risk assessments and cost benefit analysis are developed and strengthened. <ul><li>Is DRR included in the national scientific applied-research agenda/budget?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Research outputs, products or studies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Research programmes and projects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Studies on the economic costs and benefits of DRR </li></ul></ul>
  17. CI 4: Countrywide public awareness strategy exists to stimulate a culture of disaster resilience, with outreach to urban and rural communities. <ul><li>Do public education campaigns on DRR reach risk-prone communities?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Public education campaigns. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Training of local government </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Availability of information on DRR practices at the community level </li></ul></ul>
  18. Priority for action 4 <ul><li>Reduce the underlying risk factors </li></ul>
  19. CI 1: Disaster risk reduction is an integral objective of environment related policies and plans, including for land use, natural resource management and adaptation to climate change. <ul><li>Is there a mechanism in place to protect and restore regulatory ecosystem services? (associated with wet lands, mangroves, forests etc)  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Protected areas legislation </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Payment for ecosystem services (PES) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Integrated planning (for example coastal zone management) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Environmental impacts assessments (EIAs) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Climate change adaptation projects and programmes </li></ul></ul></ul>
  20. CI 2: Social development policies and plans are being implemented to reduce the vulnerability of populations most at risk. <ul><li>Do social safety nets exist to increase the resilience of risk prone households and communities?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Crop and property insurance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Employment guarantee schemes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Conditional cash transfers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DRR aligned poverty reduction, welfare policy and programmes  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Microfinance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Micro insurance </li></ul></ul>
  21. CI 3: Economic and productive sectorial policies and plans have been implemented to reduce the vulnerability of economic activities. <ul><li>Are the costs and benefits of DRR incorporated into the planning of public investment?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>National and sectoral public investment systems incorporating DRR. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Investments in retrofitting infrastructures including schools and hospitals </li></ul></ul>
  22. CI 4: Planning and management of human settlements incorporate disaster risk reduction elements, including enforcement of building codes. <ul><li>Is there investment to reduce the risk of vulnerable urban settlements?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Investment in drainage infrastructure in flood prone areas </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Slope stabilisation in landslide prone areas </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Training of masons on safe construction technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provision of safe land for low income households and communities </li></ul></ul>
  23. CI 5: Disaster risk reduction measures are integrated into post disaster recovery and rehabilitation processes. <ul><li>Do post-disaster recovery programmes explicitly incorporate and budget for DRR?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>% of recovery and reconstruction funds assigned to DRR </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Measures taken to address gender based issues in recovery </li></ul></ul>
  24. CI 6: Procedures are in place to assess the disaster risk impacts of major development projects, especially infrastructure. <ul><li>Are the impacts of major development projects on disaster risk assessed?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Assessments of impact of projects such as dams, irrigation schemes, highways, mining, tourist developments etc on disaster risk </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Impacts of disaster risk taken account in Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) </li></ul></ul>
  25. Priority for action 5 <ul><li>Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels </li></ul>
  26. CI 1: Strong policy, technical and institutional capacities and mechanisms for disaster risk management, with a disaster risk reduction perspective are in place. <ul><li>Are there national programmes or policies to make schools and health facilities safe in emergencies?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Policies and programmes for school and hospital safety </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Training and mock drills in school and hospitals for emergency preparedness </li></ul></ul>
  27. CI 2: Disaster preparedness plans and contingency plans are in place at all administrative levels, and regular training drills and rehearsals are held to test and develop disaster response programmes. <ul><li>Are the contingency plans, procedures and resources in place to deal with a major disaster?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Contingency plans with gender sensitivities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Operations and communications centre </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Search and rescue teams </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stockpiles of relief supplies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Shelters </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Secure medical facilities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dedicated provision for women in relief, shelter and emergency medical facilities </li></ul></ul>
  28. CI 3: Financial reserves and contingency mechanisms are in place to support effective response and recovery when required. <ul><li>Are financial arrangements in place to deal with major disaster?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>National contingency funds </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Catastrophic insurance facilities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Catastrophe bonds </li></ul></ul>
  29. CI 4: Procedures are in place to exchange relevant information during hazard events and disasters, and to undertake post-event reviews. <ul><li>Has an agreed method and procedure been adopted to assess damage, loss and needs when disasters occur?  Yes  No </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Damage and loss assessment methodologies and capacities available </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Post disaster need assessment methodologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Post disaster needs assessment methodologies include guidance on gender aspects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Identified and trained human resources </li></ul></ul>

×