Sos And Nano Rk A Comparative Study

  • 702 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Technology , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
702
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1.  
  • 2.  
  • 3.
    • OS for mote-class WSN.
    • Developed by the Networked and Embedded Systems Lab (NESL) at UCLA.
    • Dynamic reconfigurability- main motivation behind SOS.
    • Completely written in C Programming language.
  • 4. Static SOS kernel Sensor Manager Messaging I/O System Timer SOS Services Tree Routing Module Data Collector Application Photo-sensor Module Dynamically Loaded modules Dynamic Memory Message Scheduler Dynamic Linker Kernel Components
  • 5.
    • Dynamic operating system.
    • Compact kernel interface.
    • Safety features through run-time checks
    • Performance
  • 6.  
  • 7.
    • Fully preemptive reservation-based RTOS.
    • Developed by Carnegie Mellon University .
    • Multi-hop networking support.
    • Supports fixed-priority preemptive multitasking.
    • Currently runs on the FireFly and MicaZ motes.
  • 8.  
  • 9. FEATURES OF NANO-RK
    • Multitasking
    • Timeliness and Schedulability
    • Enforcement of Resource Usage Limits
    • Classical OS Multitasking
    • Small footprint
      • <18 KB ROM
      • <2 KB RAM
  • 10.  
  • 11.  
  • 12.  
  • 13.  
  • 14.
      • Preemptive scheduling
      • Task synchronization
      • deadlock prevention
  • 15.