Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer.To install it, go here
Blended Learning
In the future, blended learning
will become the de facto mode of training delivery. The reason is simple; face-to-face
training is great for some content types, while online training is great for different
types. Together, they provide a complete training solution
349 views | comments | 2 favorites | 70 downloads | 0 embeds (Stats)
More Info
This slideshow is Public
Total Views: 349 on Slideshare: 349 from embeds: 0
Slideshow Transcript
- Slide 1: Blended Learning
A Recipe for Rapid & Robust Training
Paul Schneider, Ph D – GeoLearning
Schneider Ph.D.
Sarah Kaiser – Cabela’s
- Slide 2: Blended Learning the Future?
\"I think that, in the future, blended learning
will become the de facto mode of training
delivery. The reason is simple; face-to-face
training is great for some content types
while online t i i is great for different
hil li training i t f diff t
types. Together, they provide a complete
training solution.”
solution
– Respondent, 2007 Brandon Hall Research
blended learning study
- Slide 3: What is Blended Learning
• Combing Instructional Modalities/Delivery
• Combing Instructional Methods
g
• Combing Online and Face-to-Face
Instruction
• Fi t two fit virtually all learning
First t i t ll ll l i
• Last fits more traditional view
- Slide 4: Poll Question Multiple Choice
Have you developed and used blended
learning programs?
gp g
Yes
No
Not sure
- Slide 5: POLL Question (Multiple Select)
• What types of learning have you used in your
blended learning program
Self paced e-learning courses
e learning
Traditional Instructor Led Learning
Webcast
On the job training
Free form in assignments (e.g., essay)
Structured assignments
Other
- Slide 6: Poll Question – Multiple Select
What do you feel were some of the benefits or
reasons for developing a blended learning program
Faster
Cheaper
More effective
More efficient
Development skills matched available methods
O
Other
- Slide 7: Learning Type, Method, & Location
• Synchronous – collaborative – in person
– ILT, Labs, onsite visits, coaching
• Synchronous – collaborative – via distance
– Online meetings, virtual classrooms, virtual labs, web
seminars, coaching, instant messaging, conference calls
• Asynchronous – self paced – via distance
h lf d i di
– Documents, WBT, Assessments, Job Aids (EPSS),
recorded live events, podcasts
p
• Asynchronous –collaborative – via distance
– Discussion rooms, wikis, blogs, email distribution lists
- Slide 8: Effective Blended Learning Programs
• Formal
– Clear path and overarching schedule for the
learner
– Organized collaborating and sharing of
experiences
– Organize the learning and provide guidance
- Slide 9: Effective Blended Learning Programs
• Coach or Instructor?
– Mentoring
–GGroup coaching
hi
– Asynchronous
•Pi
Private di
discussion rooms
i
– Synchronous
• W b t events
Webcast t
Guidance through the learning program
- Slide 10: Effective Blended Learning Programs
• Self paced work
Self-paced
– Video clips
– Web events
– Pod casts
– Documents
– Forms
– E-learning courses
ea g cou ses
Meet individual schedules and speed
p
- Slide 11: Effective Blended Learning Programs
• Shared experiences
– Discussions
• Structured
• Cl strategies to promote
Clear i
positive interaction
• Doing
– On the job activities
– Apply the learning
• Informal
– Continuous learning
– Next step is knowledge share & communities of
practice
- Slide 12: Overcoming Limits
• Fi d ti and location
Fixed time d l ti NO
• Fixed type and costs NO
• Fixed methodology NO
• Motivation can be a key issue/limit
– Blended Learning helps through
• social collaboration
• social responsibility/pressure
• high touch = high impact
- Slide 13: Rapid & Robust?
• Effectiveness
– Methodology x Level of Competency = Time x Money
– Combination of methodologies to reach different compentencies
• Robust
– Complete and all encompassing e.g., full bodied simulation
– Simulate or use real life?
• Rapid
id
– On the job
– Mentoring
Appropriate matches will increase efficiency and effectiveness
- Slide 14: Levels of Competency
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 15: Levels of Competency
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
The ability to define terms, explain concepts, and list the
steps of procedures and processes.
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 16: Levels of Competency
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
The ability to apply defined processes and procedures in
standard situations.
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 17: Levels of Competency
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Understanding of underlying principles enabling adaptation
in novel situations and development of new processes and
procedures.
procedures
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 18: Five key learning practices
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Instruction Application
Di
Discover Question
Q ti R fl t
Reflect Practice
P ti Perform
P f
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 19: Five key learning practices
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Instruction Application
Di
Discover Question
Q ti R fl t
Reflect Practice
P ti Perform
P f
Understand the need for learning; be motivated to learn.
Become familiar with key concepts, vocabulary, and
procedures.
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 20: Five key learning practices
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Instruction Application
Di
Discover Question
Q ti R fl t
Reflect Practice
P ti Perform
P f
Understand how concepts and procedures apply in their
unique situation
situation.
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 21: Five key learning practices
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Instruction Application
Di
Discover Question
Q ti R fl t
Reflect Practice
P ti Perform
P f
Actively process concepts to assimilate them into their
current cognitive structure
structure.
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 22: Five key learning practices
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Instruction Application
Di
Discover Question
Q ti R fl t
Reflect Practice
P ti Perform
P f
Try out new skills in controlled situations where mistakes
can be freely made and learned fromfrom.
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 23: Five key learning practices
Awareness Skillfulness Proficiency
Instruction Application
Di
Discover Question
Q ti R fl t
Reflect Practice
P ti Perform
P f
Apply new knowledge and skills on the job, receive
feedback,
feedback and learn from experience
experience.
Slide courtesy of Q2Learning:
Copyright 2006
- Slide 24: What to Look for in Blended
Learning Tools
• Robust Toolkit
Solid community features
– Any electronic content (peop e place)
(people & p ace)
– Traditional e-learning
Rich collaboration functionality
– Synchronous communication (discussions, blogs, wikis, email)
– Facilitated discussion
Robust content functions
– Learning program (RL, Search, RSS)
• S
Seamless P
l Presentation
t ti Administration
(Role-based, reports, admin toolkit)
– Match the corporation
– Easy to use
Graphic courtesy of
Q2Learning: Copyright 2006
- Slide 25: What to Look for in BL Tools:
Continued
• Track Activity
– Multiple methods
• Track Coaches
– Dashboards
– Contact utilities
– Coach monitoring
• Program Management
g g
• Informal Learning
• Enterprise Platform
p
Graphic courtesy of
Q2Learning: Copyright 2006
- Slide 26: Bridging the Gap: Formal to
Informal Learning
• Learning is a continuous process
• Basis for
– Knowledge sharing
– Communities of Practice
• The Link
– Blended Learning = Collaborative
– Blogs, Wikis, Tagging, Share resources,
extending the process
- Slide 27: Cabela’s U i
C b l ’ University
it
Sarah Kaiser
Sr. Human Resources Manager
- Slide 28: Poll Question
Does your organization partner with any
traditional colleges or universities for the
g
delivery of a program or programs?
Yes
Considering i
C id i it
No
- Slide 29: The World's Foremost Outfitter of
hunting, fishing and outdoor gear.
• Hi t
History
– Multi-channel retailer: Direct, Retail & Financial Services
– 2 Billion in total revenue in 2006
– 13,000 employees
– 32 locations (20 retail stores)
( )
• 6 additional retail locations by 2008
– Public company June, 2004
– Corporate Office located in rural Nebraska
- Slide 30: Cabela’s University
• 2004 - Started partnership with Western Nebraska
Community College (WNCC)
• Developed Cabela’s Customized Associates Degree
– Custom Cabela’s Content
– Cabela’s subject matter experts
– Cabela’s processes and procedures
– Blended l i
Bl d d learning approach that uses all five key learning
h th t ll fi k l i
techniques : Discover, Question, Reflect, Practice and
Perform
- Slide 31: Why GeoEngage
C t l tf
Current WNCC platform did not meet our needs
t t d
• GeoEngage
– SCORM compliance
li
– ASP model
– Interactive
– Customized Look and Feel
– Internet Based for students/instructors/ administrators –
When you travel it is always accessible
– Support to our employees
- Slide 32: Rapid Deployment Timeline
Development
D l t
Nov. Dec. Feb. Aug. Jan.
2006 2006 2007 2007 2008
Selected Systems 3 courses 9 courses 12 courses
GeoEngage Training Online Online Online
Deployment
In less that 1 year, Cabela’s will have launched a new training platform and offered 12
different online courses toward the Cabela’s University Associates Degree.
- Slide 33: Who does what?
• User Roles:
– System Administrator (WNCC)
– Support Administrator & Content
Administrator (Cabela’s)
– Curriculum Designer (WNCC & Cabela’s)
Cabela s)
– Instructors (WNCC)
- Slide 34: Program Description
• 3 professional skill awards (4 courses in each skill award)
– Human Resources
– S
Supervision
ii
– Leadership
• 8 week online format
• Cl ill t f i t t
Classes will cost $222 for in-state residents and $258 for out of state
id t d f t f t t
residents.
• Courses covered by Tuition Reimbursement Policy
Start dates: Supervision Leadership Human Resource Skill
Skill Award Skill Award Award
August 20, 2007 Teambuilding Leadership Employee Relations
January 7, 2008
y , Personal/Professional Skills Diversity & Change
y g Human Resources
Management Management
March 10, 2008 Legal Issues Budget & Finance Recruiting & Hiring
May 12, 2008 Supervisory Management Project Management Safety
- Slide 35: Webcasts and Webinars
•Who Attends:
•Students
•Instructors
•Subject Matter Experts
(SME) from Cabela’s
•WNCC Tech Support
•Purpose:
P
•Allow students to ask
SME’s questions
q
regarding course
material.
Content – Blended Approach
- Slide 36: Cabela’s Specific Items
Cabela s
The bottom line
impact - students
were better informed
about Cabela s and
Cabela's
greater pride being
part of the Cabela's
f
family.
y
-Dennis Nitschke
Budget and Finance
Instructor
- Slide 37: Discussion Boards
* Instructor to Student Interaction * Student to Student Interaction
- Slide 38: Oth Bl d d
Other Blended
Learning tools used:
•Webinars
•Audio Clips
•Interactive quizzes
•Scavenger Hunts
Each course has a short introductory video from the instructor.
•Web Searches
Result:
•Connection
•Engagement
•Classroom environment - online
- Slide 39: Future Programs
• Cabela’s New Leader Program - 40 hour program
– Supervisors newly hired to Cabela’s or employees promoted to a supervisory role
– Completion within the first 6 months of employment will be required
– Curriculum will come directly from our Cabela’s University Courses
• Merchandising – 80 hour program
g p g
– overview of the various systems used by the merchandising area
– Employees will learn:
• pricing steps,
• costing methodology,
• multi-channel merchandising,
• line reviews,
• plan-o-gramming,
• merchandising a store,
• vendor negotiations,
• inventory control,
• ICA responsibilities, and forecasting.
– Custom curriculum is being developed. The five learning styles will be applied.
- Slide 40: The only sustainable advantage is
the ability to learn faster than your
competition.
- Slide 41: References
References
• “The Real Story: Blended Learning,” Cleary, Janet (2007). http://www.brandon-
The Learning, http://www.brandon
hall.com/publications/blendedlearning/blendedlearning.shtml
• Dr. Bruck, Q2Learning: http://q2learning.com/
• Bersin & Associates, 2003; Orey, 2002a, 2002b; Singh & Reed, 2001; Thomson, 2002
• Driscoll 2002; House 2002; Rossett 2002
Driscoll, House, Rossett,
• Reay, 2001; Rooney, 2003; Sands, 2002; Ward & LaBranche, 2003; Young, 2002
• Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.).. Handbook of blended learning: Global
Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing