The Noun Phrase Presented By Rawia Aljehani
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

The Noun Phrase Presented By Rawia Aljehani

on

  • 6,855 views

Syntax,LANE 334, Beginning Syntax/Linda Thomas, Dr. Shadia Banjar,2010.

Syntax,LANE 334, Beginning Syntax/Linda Thomas, Dr. Shadia Banjar,2010.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
6,855
Views on SlideShare
6,850
Embed Views
5

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
222
Comments
0

1 Embed 5

http://www.slideshare.net 5

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    The Noun Phrase Presented By Rawia Aljehani The Noun Phrase Presented By Rawia Aljehani Presentation Transcript

    • The Noun Phrase
      RawiaAljehani
    • In the example sentences we have used so far the noun phrases have mainly been simple, consisting of either
      DET+N or just N.
      [The dog]chased the girl. [Girls] hate boys.
      The most meaningful part of a noun phrase is the noun.
      It is obligatory constituent and is the HEAD of the noun phrase.
      RawiaAljehani
    • A noun phrase could consist of a PRONOUN
      Types of pronouns:
      1-Personal
      2- Indefinite
      3-Demonstrative
      4-INTERROGATIVE
      5-POSSESSIVE
      6-REFLEXIVE
      RawiaAljehani
    • 1-Personal :Personal pronouns refer to specific entities
      She loves football.
      it refer to a specific she, and one who we presume the
      hearer or the reader can identify.
      Unlike the nouns in noun phrase, some of the personal
      pronouns have different forms according to their sentence
      position.
      the nouns in the following examples are the same in either position:
      Girls hate boys. Boys hate girls.
      Compare the above to the following personal pronouns:
      I hit her She hit me
      The form of the pronoun changed according to whether it is in subject position or not.
      RawiaAljehani
    • These are examples of personal pronouns. The personal pronouns are :
      1st person singular I/ me
      1st personal plural we/ us
      2nd person singular you
      2nd personal plural you
      3rd person singular she / her
      he / him
      it
      3rd personal plural they / them
      RawiaAljehani
    • You may remember that one of the tests for
      categorizing a noun phrase is the ability to
      replace it with a pronoun.
      A dog chased that girl
      Can become :
      It chased her
      And
      Girls hate boys
      Can become:
      They hate them
      RawiaAljehani
    • INDEFINITE:
      referring to unspecific entities: some ,
      something , anything , anyone, someone.
      Some like it hot
      Anything foes
      Demonstrative :
      this ,that , these , those
      This is really pretty
      That is very ugly
      RawiaAljehani
    • INTERROGATIVE:
      who, which, what , whose
      Who is coming to dinner?
      POSSESSIVE:
      mine , yours , hers , ours , yours (plural), theirs
      The red book is min
      REFLEXIVE:
      myself, yourself , herself , himself , itself , ourselves, yourselves, themselves.
      Ken loves himself
      RawiaAljehani
    • As is customary we have been marking the presence of a pronoun in tree diagrams. The shorthand version is PRO. for example:
      RawiaAljehani
      • Noun phrases can consist of :
      One constituent which is the head ,or more than one constituent (e.g. DET + N ).
      • Where other constituents do exist, they form part of the noun phrase and are said to modify the head noun.
      • Constituents which modify the head noun can appear before it or after it.
      1-Pre-modifiers: those which appear before the head noun.
      2-Post-modifiers: those which appear after the head noun.
      RawiaAljehani
    • Pre-modification Post-modification
      1-Prepositional phrase(PP).
      2-Relative clause
      1- Determiners (DET).
      2- Adjective phrases(AP).
      3- Genitives.
      4- Nouns(N).
      RawiaAljehani
    • Determiners
      Determiners are :
      1- Indefinite articles: a/an
      2- Definite article: The
      3- Demonstratives: this, that, these, those.
      4-Quantifiers: some, any, each, every, no, etc.
      5- possessives: my, your, her, his, its, our, your(plural), their.
      6- WH-determiners: whose, what, which.
      RawiaAljehani
    • Some of the determiners appear to be the same or similar to some
      of the pronouns listed before (e.g. the demonstratives).
      Sort out the differences between them in the following
      examples:
      1-some like it hot
      2-Some people like it hot.
      3-Which is the train to Ipswich?
      4-Which train goes to Ipswich?
      You should have noticed that PRONOUNS appear on their own to
      form the noun phrase; DETERMINERS appear with a head noun.
      RawiaAljehani
    • Genitives
      The possessive determiner can also be realized as a phrase . For example:
      This boy’s clothes are incredibly dirty.
      Kate'sbaby is crying .
      Where there is an NP (this boy, Kate)+’s . These possessive phrases (POSS) or genitives take the sentence position normally occupied by the determiner as in:
      The
      Kate's
      Baby is crying.
      we will analyze it as a determiner as follows
      RawiaAljehani
    • S
      NP
      VP
      DET N
      Vgp
      {inteans}
      POSS
      AUX
      V
      TENSE
      PROG
      NP
      N
      Kate ‘s baby ( pres ) is crying
      s
      p
      RawiaAljehani
    • Adjective Phrases (AP):
      Adjective Phrases (AP) are also used to pre-modify nouns .
      We looked briefly at the constitution of adjective phrase earlier .Using the example The dog chased a girl , The dog could also be the fat dog .The adjective fat slots in between the determiner the, and the noun dog,so that the noun phrase is expanded .
      That is :
      The dog chased a girl.
      The fat dog chased a girl.
      RawiaAljehani
    • An adjective phrase , like any other phrase ,can consist of one or more than one element (e.g. fat, very fat ).Within the NP, the AP has the function of pre-modifying the head. However, when analyzing function we will continue to label only the higher level sentence function of the entire NP , in this case either the dog or the fat dog
      In the sentences
      The dog chased a girl.
      The fat dog chased a girl.
      at these noun phrases are the subject and the entire noun phrase with or without a pre- modifying adjective phrase is analyzed as such.
      RawiaAljehani
    • To see how this works, substitute a pronoun for the noun phrase .Using the pronoun it for the subject .
      The dog
      Chased a girl
      The fat dog
      It
      P
      dO
      S
      Now in the question arises of how this new –look noun phrase is analyzed in terms of its constituent parts and how it appears on a tree diagram .One possibility is
      RawiaAljehani
    • S
      VP
      NP
      N
      Vgp
      [trans]
      DET
      AP
      NP
      V
      AUX
      A
      N
      DET
      TENSE
      The
      fat
      dog
      (past)
      chased
      a
      girl
      a girl
      dO
      (31b)
      The fat dog
      S
      (past) chased
      P
      RawiaAljehani
    • One of the reasons we had for forming individual constituents into phrases was that they seemed to belong closely together (as with DET and N, for example) .
      One way we have of testing this is to substitute a pronoun ,as we have just done ,to see what is replaced.
      In the above example , this showed us that the tree constituents determiner , adjective phrase and noun ,all belong together to form one phrase
      the noun phrase .
      RawiaAljehani
    • It is also the case that fat and dog seem to belong together more closely than the and fat or the and dog .
      Perhaps then the two constituents AP and N from a separate phrasal constituents at a lower level within the NP.
      We can test this suggestion by using a WH-determiner to question the statement at as follows:
      Which fat dog chased a girl .
      That one (=that fat dog.(
      In the answer, the determiner that replace the determiner which, but the term one replace not just dog, but fat dog. So that three elements which+ fat + dog have been replaced by tow, that + one.
      RawiaAljehani
    • The need for the determiner remain constant but because the tow elements fat and dog can be replaced by one element (i.g. one), this means that they function together at this level as a single unit or constituent.
      If tow element function as one constituent, they should have their own exclusive node within the tree.
      In the above diagram, the elements fat and dog do not have such a node. They are both dominated by the NP node but this is not exclusive since it also includes DET.
      RawiaAljehani
    • We must therefore create a system which shown not only that the three elements the+ fat+ dog from one constituent (that is, dominated by the NP node), but that the elements also fat + dog form a complete constituent within that larger one.
      What we can do then is to break the subject noun phrase down as follows:
      RawiaAljehani
    • Adjective phrases (AP)
      s
      NP VP
      DET ?? VgpNP
      (trans)
      AP N AUX V DET N
      A TENSE
      The fat dog (past) chased a girl
      RawiaAljehani
    • This shows us that the entire noun phrase thefat dog is one constituent (replaceable by it) and another constituent, fat+ dog ( replaceable by one).
      The problem then arises as to what this constituent fat+ dog should be called. It is not a full NP since it does not contain a determiner, neither a noun (N).
      The constituent has to be given another label. One solution is to use a label from a theory of syntax called X-bar theory and called this constituent N-bar (written N’). the label N’ which will signify that this is an intermediate constituent, smaller than an NP but larger than an N.
      RawiaAljehani
    • Adjective phrases (AP)
      RawiaAljehani
      s
      NP VP
      DET N’ VgpNP
      (trans)
      AP N AUX V DET N
      A TENSE
      The fat dog (past) chased a girl
    • Noun phrases can contain more than one adjective as the earlier example the fat brown dog indicates. That is:
      (35) The fat brown dog chased a girl.
      In the same that the dog in example (29a), and the fat dog in example (29b) from one noun phrase, so too dose the fat brown dog, even through it has more constituent parts. Try again the substituention test by replacing the subject noun phrase in (35) with the pronoun it.
      We now have to work out how to show this noun phrase on the tree diagram and will start by looking at the question:
      (36) Do you like this fat brown dog or that thin one?
      Do you understand one in this question to mean dog or brown dog? If you understand it to mean the letter then one is replacing brown+ dog, in which case these tow elements form one unit. again, this unit is smaller than an NP, but larger than an N, so is labelled N’.
      RawiaAljehani
    • Adjective phrases (AP)
      This is represented on the tree diagram
      s
      NP VP
      DET N’ VgpN
      AP N’ V DET N
      A AP N
      A
      The fat brown dog chased a girl
      RawiaAljehani
    • Rules to remember: adjective phrases (AP)
      AP (AdvP) +A
      Function: 1. sC
      2. oC
      e.g. 1.the dog is (quite disgustingly) fat
      2. john made is Kate angry
      OR
      Function: pre-modifier within NP
      e.g. The fat brown dog chased a girl
      RawiaAljehani
    • Nouns
      Nouns also serve to pre-modify. For example :
      I bought a new computer game.
      The noun pre-modify is closely connected to the head noun that the two can almost be considered one word.
      This close link is illustrated by the fact that when nouns do pre-modify other nouns they always come next to the head noun nothing else can come between them.
      RawiaAljehani
    • The analysis should reflect the fact that the noun pre-modifier and the head noun are so closely linked. We can do this by including them both under the name N node:
      S
      VP
      NP
      Vgp
      [trans]
      NP
      POR
      DET
      N
      V
      AP
      N
      A
      N
      N
      I bought a new computer game
      RawiaAljehani
    • Post-modification
      As stated before, constituents which modify the
      head noun can also appear after the noun. Such
      constituents are Post-modifiers. Here we will look
      at two ways to post-modify a noun:
      1-PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE:
      e.g. The dog chased the cat with three legs
      2-RELATIVE CLAUSE:
      e.g. The cat which is lying on the mat hates dog
      RawiaAljehani
    • Prepositional Phrase (PP)
      We have looked at prepositional phrase (PP) with regard to other functions; as adverbials and as indirect objects.
      Now we come to a further function; that of post-modifying the head noun in a noun phrase.
      The dog chased the cat with three legs
      S PdO
      RawiaAljehani
    • The dog chased the cat with three legs
      S P dO
      Just as an adjective before the noun, the prepositional
      phrase after the noun is acting to modify the noun by
      defining or describing it.
      The prepositional phrase belongs closely to the cat and forms part of the noun phrase.
      Its function within the noun phrase is to post-modify the
      head noun; at a higher level, the function of the entire
      noun phrase (including the prepositional phrase) is direct
      object of the sentence.
      We can check that the prepositional phrase forms part of the
      noun phrase by again substituting
      pronoun it for the direct object of the sentence .
      RawiaAljehani
    • The dog chased it.
      As you can see, it has replaced the entire expression the cat with three leg, not just the cat.
      Compare this to a sentence where a prepositional phrase is functioning as an adverbial:
      The dog chased the cat up the tree
      S P dO A
      If we use the pronoun it to replace the direct object in this sentence we get:
      The dog chased it up the tree.
      Hereithas only replaced the expression the cat. In
      this example, the cat and up the treeare separate
      constituent.
      Rawia Aljehani
    • If we use the pronoun it to replace the direct object in this sentence we get:
      (45) The dog chased it up the tree.
      Hereithas only replaced the expression
      the cat. In this example, the catand up the tree are separate constituent.
      Another way to check this is to move the direct-object NPs in each example to the subject position (as in the passive):
      Rawia Aljehani
    • Another way to check this is to move the direct
      object NPs in each example to the subject position
      (as in the passive):
      The cat with three legs was chased (by the dog).
      It is the determiner and noun(the cat) +the
      prepositional phrasewhich moves to subject
      Position thereby function as one unit.
      The cat was chased up the tree (by the dog).
      It is only the noun phrase the cat which moves,
      Leaving The separate PP constituent behind.
      Rawia Aljehani
    • NP
      DET
      PP
      N
      NP
      P
      AP
      N
      A
      the
      cat
      with
      three
      legs
      Rawia Aljehani
    • This though runs into the same type of problem that we had with adjective Phrases in that if we ask the question :
      Do you prefer this cat with three legs or that one
      The need for a determiner remains constant but the term one is understood as replacing cat with three legs, not just cat . That phrase cat with three legs must then function at this level as a constituent separate from DET and the tree diagram should show this ,as below :
      Rawia Aljehani
    • S
      NP
      VP
      Vgptrans]
      NP
      DET N
      DET
      N
      V
      N
      PP
      P
      NP
      AP
      N
      A
      The dog chased the cat wit three legs
      Rawia Aljehani
    • The dog chased the cat with three legs .
      S P dO
      The intermediate constituent cat with three legs is
      again labelled N’ to indicate that it is smaller than
      NP but lager than N.
      Rawia Aljehani
    • S
      NP
      VP
      DET
      N
      Vgp
      [trans]
      NP
      PP
      DET N
      NP
      AUX
      V
      P
      TENSE
      DET N
      The dog (past) chased the cat up the tree
      s P dOA
      Rawia Aljehani
    • E.g.
      1- sally looked up /Sally looked up the chimney .
      2- Sue gave a jumper to Oxfam .
      3- George is in the garden .
      4- Carol put the care in the garage .
      5- The children at the pictures .
      6-The dog chased the cat with three legs .
      PP P (+ NP )
      Function :
      1.A
      2. iO
      3. sC
      4. oC
      5. pO
      6.post-modifier withen NP.
      RawiaAljehani