Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Wet Vs. Foam Granulation- Powder Tech
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Wet Vs. Foam Granulation- Powder Tech

2,874
views

Published on

Evaluation of the physical & mechanical properties of high drug load formulations (Metformin, APAP, and Aspirin) - Wet Granulation vs. Foam technique

Evaluation of the physical & mechanical properties of high drug load formulations (Metformin, APAP, and Aspirin) - Wet Granulation vs. Foam technique


1 Comment
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • INTERESTING
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,874
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
99
Comments
1
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Powder Technology j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / p ow t e cEvaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of high drug load formulations:Wet granulation vs. novel foam granulationStuart L. Cantor a,1, Sanjeev Kothari b,1, Otilia M.Y. Koo c,⁎a ICON Development Solutions, 6031 University Blvd., Ellicott City, MD 21043, USAb AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850, USAc Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USAa r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c tArticle history: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influences of intrinsic drug mechanical properties and differentReceived 9 July 2008 granulation binder delivery processes on the physical and mechanical properties of high drug loadReceived in revised form 2 February 2009 granulations after wet granulation. Formulations (80% w/w) of acetaminophen (APAP), metformin andAccepted 6 May 2009 aspirin, which are brittle, viscoelastic, and ductile, respectively; were granulated by high-shear wetAvailable online 12 May 2009 granulation. Two modes of binder delivery for wet granulation, either conventional or binder foam, were investigated. Particle size, surface area and pore size of the granulations were characterized. Compacts wereKeywords:Hiestand tableting indices prepared at a solid fraction of 0.9 under tri-axial decompression and Hiestand indices (worst-case bondingConventional wet granulation index (BIw) and brittle fracture index (BFI)) of the compacts were determined. APAP formulations exhibitedFoam granulation the smallest geometric mean particle sizes (dg) and showed only slight differences in dg values between theViscoelastic two granulation processes. Binder delivery mode affected mechanical properties of the granulated modelDuctile drugs differently. Foam granulation appeared to enhance the granule plasticity for APAP while aspirinBrittle showed a mixed deformation mechanism based on both its high BIw and high BFI values. The higher BIw value for aspirin after foam granulation may be attributed to improved binder distribution among particles during granulation. On the other hand, conventional wet granulation improved the plasticity of metformin as measured by the higher BIw and lower BFI values. Therefore, conventional wet granulation process conferred advantages in manufacturability and product quality for metformin; as compared to foam granulation which did not enhance plasticity for metformin. Based on this study, a wet granulation process can be selected based on knowledge of the intrinsic drug mechanical properties. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.1. Introduction different binder delivery processes have on the properties of the final granules. The understanding of both physical and mechanical properties of The two granulation processes compared in this study are thepharmaceutical granulations is critical for successful tablet formula- conventional wet granulation and a new foam granulation process.tion. Costly problems such as low tablet crushing strengths, poor High drug loads, i.e. 80% w/w, were used in this study to minimizefriability, poor coating uniformity, and capping/lamination can formulation effects and enable an accurate comparison of thepotentially be avoided through an improved understanding of the differences between the mechanical properties of the three modelphysico-mechanical properties of granulations. Such useful informa- drugs in affecting granulation properties. The foam-mediated wettion to quantify a granulations degree of brittleness or plasticity can granulation process where the binder is delivered as foam has beenbe gained by using dimensionless parameters known as the Hiestand gaining increasing attention in the pharmaceutical industry due to itstableting indices. In this study, the physical and mechanical properties advantages over conventional wet granulation. Foam granulationof high drug load granulations prepared via both conventional wet yields a more homogeneous dispersion of binder throughout theand foam processes were evaluated. It was desired to determine both powder bed during granulation and can potentially reduce dryingthe influences that the intrinsic drug mechanical properties and time due to the lower soak-to-spread ratio of binder foam compared to a conventional spray of binder solution [1]. Moreover, delivery of the binder foam through rigid plastic tubing eliminates the need to ⁎ Corresponding author. Biopharmaceutics Research and Development, Bristol-Myers optimize nozzle placement and geometry. Excipients suitable for foamSquibb Company, 1 Squibb Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA. Tel.: +1 732 227 5341; generation include commonly used binders such as hydroxypropylfax: +1 732 227 3986. E-mail address: otilia.koo@bms.com (O.M.Y. Koo). cellulose (HPC), hypromellose (HPMC) and other cellulose ethers [1]. 1 All of the work described here was conducted by the authors at Bristol-Myers Surfactants (e.g., sodium laurel sulfate, Poloxamer® 188) may also beSquibb Company, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. used as aids to generate foam. The typical binder solution viscosity0032-5910/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.05.003
  • 2. 16 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24range for foam generation is between 5 and 100 cP [2]. HPC solution plastic deformation occurs [4]. Plastic deformation is predominant inhas the viscosity and surface tension properties to generate high the decompression stage for viscoelastic materials that exhibit flowquality foam of low density and was selected for this study. after release of the compression stress. Recently, scale-up trials of sodium naproxen immediate- and Brittle fracture index (BFI) is the ratio of the tensile strength of thecontrolled-release formulations using foam granulation technology tablets without a hole and with a hole at their center. This ratio mayshowed that this process prevented localized over wetting during indicate the ability or inability of compact to relieve stress at a crackgranulation. Furthermore, drug dissolution rate profiles were similar tip within the compact by plastic deformation [12]. The BFI is based onacross the different batch sizes, from laboratory to pilot and the Griffith crack propagation theory, which states that a crack will bemanufacturing scale [3]. initiated and propagated when the incremental change of elastic In addition to the granulation moisture level, physical properties of energy during crack growth provides the incremental gain of surfacegranulations such as surface area, particle size, particle size distribu- energy for the new surfaces [13]. It is assumed that the origin of thetion, and pore diameter can influence subsequent tablet strength on crack is from a defect site where the elastic stress is concentrated. It iscompaction. It is known that porous particles are mechanically higher than the nominal stress, and hence the first region to reach theweaker and readily deform to create new bonding surfaces which stress level needed for crack growth. Since the crack tip may continuecan lead to increased inter-particulate bonding and thus, harder to be a stress concentrator; the crack often continues to propagate.tablets [4,5]. Similarly, granulations with higher surface areas are Therefore the material fails at much lower applied stress thanexpected to result in harder tablets through increased inter-particle expected from the theoretical bond strength and/or theoreticalbonding provided that true contact distances are reached between the shear strength. However, if a material relieves some of the stress indeforming particles. Therefore, an adequate tensile strength, indica- the region of concentrated stress by plastic deformation, then thetive of good bond formation, is one criterion to determine a successful stresses may not build to the level required for crack propagation. Thetablet formulation. However, physical measurements of granulations Griffith theory is modified to include the absorption of energy byare typically studied because mechanical properties are not pre- plastic deformation when calculating the BFI.dictable a priori [6]. Three representative model drugs with different deformation Some processes such as conventional wet granulation can have a mechanisms were chosen: 1) metformin was selected as the modelsignificant effect on the mechanical properties of certain materials; for viscoelastic drug in this study. Viscoelastic materials are uniquelyexample, the compactability of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) is affected by their sensitivity to both moisture [9,12] and time undersignificantly reduced after granulation [7]. It was found that a loss of load [12,14]; 2) acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), a drug known to deformcompactability following conventional wet granulation is associated plastically [15], and 3) acetaminophen (APAP), known to undergowith a decrease in the particle porosity of MCC [8]. This is due to the brittle fracture. APAP exhibits poor tableting characteristics becausestrain hardening effect of the wetting and drying process that leads to the particles of this drug are very hard, and therefore, inter-particulatestrong hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups of the cellulose bonding is very weak [16]. Furthermore, APAP has been shown to bechains and results in an increased elastic modulus. Mechanical susceptible to capping following compression [16–19].properties of pure excipients have been extensively studied since Interestingly, while the thermodynamically stable and commer-they can impact a successful tablet formulation. For instance, cially available monoclinic polymorph of APAP (form I) requiresviscoelastic materials such as starch [9] or polyethylene oxides for binders for tablet formation, the metastable, orthorhombic form doescontrolled-release applications [10] are known to be strain-rate not. The reason for the significant difference in mechanical propertiessensitive; thus, when scaling-up to faster tablet machines with lies in the fact that the crystal structure of form I consists of puckereddecreased dwell times, a reduction in tablet tensile strength can be hydrogen-bonded sheets which are relatively stiff and do not easilyobserved because the material did not receive sufficient time under slip over each other during compression. However, the crystalload for good bond formation. structure of form II has parallel hydrogen-bonded sheets which give Hiestand tableting indices have traditionally been employed to rise to slip planes that allow for plastic deformation and improvedstudy the mechanical properties of pure excipients or drugs. These compression properties [20].tableting indices, developed over 30 years ago, have been found to be Aspirin and APAP were chosen specifically because there issufficiently sensitive to detect lot-to-lot variations in raw materials representative data on the Hiestand indices already reported in the[11]. Hiestand indices provide a fundamental understanding of the literature for comparison purposes [11]. On the other hand, to ourbehavior of materials under compression and decompression. While knowledge, this is the first work that Hiestand tableting indices oftypically used to characterize pure materials, this research is an metformin are discussed. This work is also important because muchattempt to study the mechanical properties of pharmaceutical previous work has focused on the mechanical properties of puregranulations prepared using two different binder delivery processes excipients [3,21–23] or pure drugs [11,23] as well as model formula-for wet granulation and three drugs of different intrinsic mechanical tions without drug [24,25] but not on drug-based granulations.properties. The indices of relevance here include the worst-case The objectives of this study are to 1) establish a fundamentalbonding index (BIw) and the brittle fracture index (BFI). understanding of the physico-mechanical properties of high drug load BIw is a ratio of the compacts tensile strength to its dynamic granulations manufactured using conventional wet or foam granula-indentation hardness and indicates the ability of intra-particulate tion techniques and determine the influence of the binder deliverybonds formed during the compression phase to survive during the technique on the granulation mechanical properties; 2) providedecompression process. Relatively speaking, a higher BIw value guidance for selection of the most appropriate granulation processindicates a more plastic material, and such materials will likely have based on the mechanical properties of drug; and 3) determine if anylower dynamic hardness values. Plastic deformation occurs during relationship exists between the physical properties (i.e., particle size,tablet compression and decompression. As compression takes place, surface area) and mechanical properties of each granulation.particles initially rearrange and repack to assume a smaller bedvolume. When no further reduction in volume is possible through 2. Experimentalrearrangement, particles begin to deform. When their elastic limit isexceeded, permanent deformation occurs through brittle fracture Acetylsalicylic acid USP was purchased from Spectrum Chemicalsand/or plastic deformation, and the particle bed is sheared. When the (New Brunswick, NJ), metformin hydrochloride USP was obtainedshear strength is greater than the breaking strength, particle fracture from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Evansville, IN) and acetaminophen USPoccurs. When the shear strength is less than the breaking strength, and magnesium stearate NF were purchased from Mallincrodt Inc. (St.
  • 3. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 17Table 1 time of 12 h. The LOD of the granulations was determined using aFormulations for conventional wet or foam granulations. Mettler DSC HFT-2000M Moisture balance (Columbus, OH). SamplesMaterial Wet process % Foam process % of approximately 2.0 g were dried to constant weight at 105 °C forDrug 80.0 80.0 10 min.Microcrystalline cellulose 17.0 17.0Hydroxypropyl cellulose 3.0 Dry 2.0 2.2. Physical characterization of granulations As foam 1.0Water added during granulation 12–14 12–14 Particle size of the dried granulations was determined in duplicate by sieve analysis using a sonic sifter (Allen Bradley ATM Model L3P Sonic Sifter®, Milwaukee, WI). Sieving was run for 5 min at anLouis, MO). Microcrystalline cellulose NF (Avicel® PH-102, FMC, amplitude setting of five and a pulse setting of 5. The percentage byPhiladelphia, PA) and hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) NF (Klucel®, weight retained on each sieve was determined and the geometricAqualon, Wilmington, DE) were also used in this study. mean diameter, labeled as GMD or dg, and geometric standard deviation, σg, of the particle size distributions were calculated using2.1. Granulation batches using a high-shear mixer Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively [27]: P Table 1 lists the conventional wet and foam granulation formula- ðni T log di Þ log dg = P ð2Þtions used in this study. The rationale for devising simple model niformulations consisting of only three ingredients is because acomparison of results using the Hiestand Indices can become difficult where ni is the weight percent of particles in the ith interval, for all ni;if a more complex system of materials is used [26]. The drug load was and di is equal to the midpoint of the diameter of the size interval inkept constant at 80.0% w/w. Since a high drug load was used, it is the ith interval, for all di.assumed that physical and mechanical properties of the drugs 2P  2 31 = 2themselves exert a significant impact on the properties of the ni log dg − log di 7 6 Presultant granulations. Granulations containing each of the three log σ g = 4 5 ð3Þ nidrugs (metformin, aspirin, and APAP) were manufactured by eitherconventional wet or foam granulation processes. Mixing andgranulation was performed in a 6-L Diosna high-shear granulator The spread of the data was calculated as D90 − D10, where D90 and D10(Osnabruck, Germany) at a batch size of 1 kg. All powders were pre- are the diameters of the 90th and 10th percentiles of the cumulativeblended in the mixer for 2 min before granulation, with the mixer particle size distribution, respectively. The particle size span, Sx, whichimpeller set at 200 rpm and the chopper set at 500 rpm. gives a description of the width of the distribution and is independent During conventional wet granulation, mixer impeller and chopper of the median size, was calculated according to Eq. (4) [28]:were set at 300 rpm and 1300 rpm, respectively. Water was added at arate between 55 and 65 g/min using a peristaltic pump and the D90 − D10 Sx = ð4Þimpeller power was recorded at several fixed time intervals during D50granulation. The total amounts of water added were adjusted for eachdrug, but kept constant for both conventional wet and foam According to Fan et al. [28] if the span of the distribution is b2, it isgranulation processes for a drug. considered narrow; ≥2 but b3, moderate; and ≥3, considered a broad The foam granulation process utilized the same mixer impeller and distribution. All spans calculated from the granulation data were lesschopper settings as for the conventional wet granulation process. A than 2, indicating that the breadth of the distributions were relatively10% w/w HPC stock solution was prepared by dissolving HPC in water narrow.with gentle stirring overnight. The concentration of the HPC solution Optical microscopy was used to examine the particle morphologywas further adjusted before granulation so that 1% of HPC in the of the pure materials as well as the conventional wet granulationformulation was added as foam and 2% HPC as dry powder in the pre- and foam granulation samples (Nikon SMZ 1500 digital camera usingblend. Therefore, final quantity of HPC (3%) was the same as in Act-1 v.1 2.63 software (Micron Optics, Cedar Knolls, NJ) at 50×formulations used in conventional wet granulation. magnification. HPC foam was generated utilizing the same concepts previously All granulations were hand sieved using a mesh cut of #30/#80described by Keary and Shesky [1]. The compressed air and liquid flow (595–177 μm) to eliminate oversize and fines and only particlesrates were adjusted to achieve a ≥90% foam quality, according to Eq. retained on #80 were used for the following characterizations and to(1): prepare compacts. Using a narrow particle size range minimized particle size effects and improved comparability among the different Rate of air flow − Rate of liquid flow drug granulations.Foam quality = T100 ð1Þ Rate of air flow The true densities of dried, sieved granulations were determined by a helium pcynometer (AccuPyc 1330, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA). Air flow rate and liquid flow rate were 2.0 L/min and 0.1 L/min, The true densities used in the solid fraction calculations were therespectively. The rate of addition of the foamed binder was kept the average of five determinations.same as for water during the conventional wet granulation process, Surface area and average pore diameter were determined byapproximately 55–65 g/min. A high foam quality enables the foam to nitrogen adsorption (Gemini 2380, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA) forbehave more solid-like and retain its properties better as it flows powdered formulations before conventional wet granulation (i.e.through a rigid plastic pipe from the foam generator into the high- before water addition) and all dried granulations, which includesshear mixer. The foam was homogeneously dispersed into the powder conventional wet granulation and foam granulation batches (i.e. afterduring granulation. wet granulation). Accurately weighed samples (1.0–1.3 g) were The wet granules were dried in a hot-air convection oven at 60 °C degassed by nitrogen flow and dried at 60 °C overnight (VacPrepfor 6 h to a loss on drying (LOD) value of less than 2.0%. For 061, Micromeritics). The amount of nitrogen adsorbed was deter-comparison purposes using aspirin, an additional conventional wet mined at partial nitrogen vapor pressures (P / Po) ranging betweengranulation batch was also prepared and dried for a longer drying 0.05 and 0.98. Surface area was determined by the Gemini software
  • 4. 18 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24using the Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) isotherm calculation for of 0.4 times the compact width; and a vertical fracture through thethe nitrogen adsorption data in the P / Po range from 0.05 to 0.30. Pore center of the compacts indicated that the failure occurred in tension.size diameter was also calculated by the Gemini software using the The platens were padded with cardboard paper to decrease theBET analysis (4 × pore volume / surface area) for the adsorption data in stress concentration at their edges and this minimized the shearthe P / Po range from 0.05 to 0.30 [29]. failure of the compact [32]. The time constant between loading to fracture process was set at approximately 10 s, which is the amount2.3. Mechanical characterization of granulations of time between 1 / e, or 0.368, of the fracture force and the time of the fracture force (the mathematical constant, e, has a value of The relative degree of brittleness or plasticity of a high drug load 2.718).granulation can be calculated following the well established methods The tensile strengths of compacts without holes (σT) and ofof Hiestand [6,11,30,31]. Flawless square compacts were created using compacts with holes (σTo) were measured. A total of at least 6tri-axial decompression. This method is selected due to its ability to compacts were tested for each granulation and the average was usedrelease elastic stresses in three dimensions following decompression. to calculate the Hiestand tableting indices.Three discrete tests are then subsequently performed on the compact,(tensile strength, dynamic indentation hardness, and chordal radius) 2.3.3. Dynamic indentation hardnessand this combined information was used to calculate the Hiestand The dynamic indentation hardness (H) test employed a custom-tableting indices. Conventional wet granulation formulations, both built pendulum impact device using a steel sphere with a weight ofbefore and after water addition (e.g., dried), and foam granulation 0.0618 g as the indenter, which was suspended from a one-meterbatches were characterized for their mechanical properties. length of 15-pound fishing line. The face of the compact is covered with a small strip of carbon paper before being clamped onto the2.3.1. Preparation of square compacts by tri-axial decompression testing platform. The sphere is held in place by an electromagnet and Square compacts of approximately 3.0 g measuring 2.0 cm × then released, once the sphere impacts the compact, the carbon is2.0 cm × 0.6 cm were prepared using a custom-built tri-axial decom- transferred to the dent and enables easier viewing. The short dwellpression press. A split-die block was used along with a computer- time of the indenter acting on the compact minimized any strain-ratecontrolled hydraulic system (Loomis Engineering and Manufacturing dependent effects. The inbound and rebound velocities in m/s of theCompany, Caldwell, NJ). Compression forces ranged from 6000 to sphere were measured using an optical ballistic sensor and are30,000 lb and a 10 s dwell time at maximum compression force was converted into the initial height, hi, and rebound height, hr, by usingused. The compression forces employed for aspirin, metformin, and Eq. (7):APAP granulations were 6000, 20000, and 30000 lb, respectively. Theedges of the die surface were sparingly lubricated with magnesium ðvelocityÞ2 ðvelocityÞ2 h= = : ð7Þstearate suspended in acetone when needed. For evaluating the brittle 2×g 19:62fracture index, a stress concentrator was also introduced in the centerof the compacts using an upper punch equipped with a 1.1-mm The degree of rebound of the sphere occurs as a result of the elasticdiameter, round, spring-loaded retractable pin. modulus or hardness of the material [32]. The chordal radius of the This tri-axial press allows for release of elastic stresses in three indentation was determined using a Mahr Federal Perthometerdimensions during decompression by allowing the split die to expand Concept #3754341 (Gottingen, Germany) equipped with a dia-and hence to produce flawless compacts suitable for tensile strength mond-tip stylus to trace through the surface roughness of the indenttesting. While the compact dimensions were measured with a caliper on the compact. Two measurements were taken per compact byimmediately after ejection, compacts were allowed to undergo elastic rotating each sample by 90°. A total of 10 measurements wererecovery for a 24 h period prior to testing. The solid fraction is defined taken for the chordal radius of each granulation and the averagesas the proportion of solid material contained in the compact and was calculated. At least 5 compacts were tested for each granulation andcalculated according to Eqs. (5a) and (5b). The pressure of the tri-axial the dynamic indentation hardness (H) was calculated according topress was adjusted for each granulation to achieve a constant solid Eq. (8):where:fraction of 0.90 ± 0.01 or 10% porosity.   4mgrhr hi 3 compact weight H= − ð8ÞApparent density ρapp: = ð5aÞ πa4 hr 8 compact volume ρapp:Solid fraction = ð5bÞ where: ρT m mass of the indenter,where ρT represents the average true density of the granulation g gravitational constant,determined in Section 2.2. r radius of indenter, hi initial height of indenter,2.3.2. Determination of tensile strength hr rebound height of indenter, and An Instron® Model 5567 stress–strain analyzer equipped with a a chordal radius of the dent.30 kN load cell and using a Bluehill® software (version M-K2-ENRevision B, Norwood, MA) was used for tensile strength (σT) testing ofcompacts according to Eq. (6): 2.3.4. Hiestand tableting indices   Peak Force The worst-case bonding index (BIw) is calculated according to Eq. 2Tensile Strength N=m = ð6Þ (9): ðlenght TwidthÞ σT The ramp rate was set at 1.0 mm/min and the failure was BIw = ð9Þ Hdetermined both by when the true strain was ≤10% and when thecompressive load threshold fell below 5 N. Testing was performed where σT is tensile strength and H is the dynamic indentationunder transverse compression between two platens each with a width hardness.
  • 5. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 19 Fig. 1. Granulation power plots for the different drugs (A) wet granulation and (B) foam granulation. The brittle fracture index (BFI) is the ratio of the tensile strength of increases the surface area per gram of liquid several fold compared tothe compacts without a hole, (σT), and with a hole, (σTo), at their the sprayed system. Furthermore, foam has the capacity to spreadcenter and is given by Eq. (10): rather than to soak (i.e. a low soak-to-spread ratio), and particles that   are initially non-coated become surface-coated by the spreading foam. σT 1BFI = − ð10Þ 2σ To 2 The BFI scale ranges from zero, which represents highly ductile/plastic materials, to one, which indicates highly brittle materials thatshow a greater propensity to cap or laminate during decompression/ejection [33].3. Results and discussion3.1. Granulation particle size For a given drug, impeller power vs. time plots were higher forconventional wet granulation (Fig. 1A) than foam granulation(Fig. 1B). During conventional wet granulation, water droplet sizecan influence the extent of development of large granules or oversizeand binder distribution at short mixing times [34]. However, Ax et al.[34] also noted that the distinction between spraying binder liquidwith different droplet sizes becomes less pronounced on thegranulations as process time increases. This is likely due to the factthat competing breakage and re-agglomeration phenomena will beoccurring simultaneously during high-shear mixing. Furthermore,conventional wet granulation typically involves areas of localized overwetting of particles which then become agglomerated. Therefore, inorder to optimize particle size distribution and improve flow proper-ties, conventional wet granulations usually require a milling operationafter drying. Interestingly, the foam process showed a less steep slopefrom the power profile and lower power consumption compared toconventional wet granulation particularly for metformin and aspirin.This suggests less viscous granulation and more controlled initialgranule growth for these two drugs due to improved binderdistribution and less localized over wetting during foam granulationas compared to conventional wet granulation. Water added via theconventional drip method have larger droplet sizes compared to abinder solution added as aerated foam. On the other hand, APAPpower consumption profiles for both the conventional wet granula-tion and foam granulations were more similar; therefore, the effect oflocalized over wetting was not as pronounced for conventional wetgranulation of APAP. Keary and Sheskey proposed the hypothesis of foam granulationand how the foamed binder circumvents localized over wetting duringconventional wet granulation [1]. A foam is by definition, air dispersedin a liquid continuous phase. In foams prepared using the same liquid, Fig. 2. Optical microscopy pictures of APAP particle morphology. Pure material (P), wetthis phase inverted relationship of liquid-to-air is significant and granulation (W), and foam granulation (F).
  • 6. 20 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24This is in contrast to the conventional wet granulation process wherethe dry binder is dispersed in the powder bed and larger waterdroplets are dripped or sprayed on top of the particles. In this case, thespray droplets are typically of the same size range as the powders tobe granulated. In general, there appeared to be some level of primary particleagglomeration in all three drug samples for both granulationprocesses. However, it is unclear whether there are differences inthe spatial distribution and thickness of the binder solution aroundthe granules in the conventional wet as compared to foam granulationprocesses. It appears from the optical microscopy pictures that thegranulation processes had the most effect on the APAP particlemorphology and physical properties (Fig. 2). While pure APAP (P) is acohesive, poorly flowable powder comprised of acicular needles, thisdrug became appreciably less cohesive following either conventionalwet (W) or foam granulation (F) processes. Furthermore, there alsoappeared to be some particle agglomeration occurring in addition tothe distribution of uneven binder for both APAP granulation samples.While there was some primary particle agglomeration occurring onlywith the smaller size fractions of aspirin in conventional wet (W) andfoam granulation (F) samples (Fig. 3), granules from the twogranulation processes appeared similar. Pure metformin (P) (Fig. 4)showed a heterogeneous mixture of particle size and shape. Both Fig. 4. Optical microscopy pictures of metformin particle morphology. Pure material (P), wet granulation (W), and foam granulation (F). metformin granulations showed similar particle agglomeration, however, there appeared to be an appreciable reduction in the amount of fines for metformin granulations relative to APAP and aspirin granulations. Geometric mean diameter (dg) and geometric standard deviation (σg) were similar for both conventional wet and foam granulation processes for a given model drug (Table 2). Among the three drugs, APAP granulations processed by both conventional wet and foam granulation exhibited the smallest granule size as compared to metformin and aspirin (Table 2). Granule particle size distributions of the model drugs are illustrated in Fig. 5A–C. Generally, the higher percentage of larger granules for aspirin and metformin compared to APAP can be attributed to the relatively larger particle sizes of these pure materials (P) (Figs. 3 and 4). Compared with the other two drugs, the APAP granulations had the greatest percentage of fines, ca. 10% b74 µm (Fig. 5A) and a wider span (Table 2). It is interesting to note that the foam granulation process yielded a higher proportion of larger particles (≥500 µm), for the APAP and metformin samples. This, together with the generally lower impeller power current vs. time plots observed for the foam granulation process (Fig. 1), suggestFig. 3. Optical microscopy pictures of aspirin particle morphology. Pure material (P), that other factors other than drug mechanical properties, such as drugwet granulation (W), and foam granulation (F). surface hydrophlicity/hydrophobicity and wettability can influence
  • 7. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 21Table 2 mechanical properties of these conventional wet granulations. This isPhysical characterization of granulations for three model drugs. discussed further in Section 3.3. Geometric mean Spread Span LOD Surface Average diametera and of data of datac,d % area pore 3.3. Mechanical properties of granulations geometric standard (μm)c,d (m2/g) diameter deviationb (μm) (nm) Mechanical properties of compacts from all granulations wereDried granulations characterized by their dynamic indentation hardness, tensileConventional Wet Metformin 421.0 (1.7) 505.6 1.20 0.9 0.17 6.7 strengths, BIw, and BFI values (Table 3). The dynamic indentation (2.5) (0.02) hardness (H) indicates the resistance of a material to permanent Aspirin 541.6 (1.5) 483.9 0.86 1.7 0.19 4.5 plastic deformation under a compressive load and will vary depending (0.5) (0.05) on the ductility or brittle nature of the material. The tensile strength APAP 147.7 (1.9) 215.4 1.61 0.8 0.29 7.8 (0.7) (0.00) represents the strength of a compact after permanent plasticFoam deformation has occurred and gives an indication of the extent of Metformin 507.9 (1.6) 503.9 0.99 1.3 0.13 7.4 intra-particulate bonding due to true contact areas formed between (1.6) (0.01) the surfaces. In evaluating the different processes for metformin, foam Aspirin 452.1 (2.2) 539.4 1.44 2.0 0.16 4.1 granulation showed a higher H, while the tensile strength was the (4.1) (0.15) APAP 157.8 (2.0) 232.3 1.47 1.1 0.28 10.1 (0.8) (0.01)Powder before wet granulationMetformin – – – – 0.213 10.20Aspirin – – – – 0.180d 8.7dAPAP – – – – 0.304 8.99 a Geometric mean diameter, (dg). b Values in parenthesis represent the geometric standard deviation, (σg). c Values in parenthesis represent the arithmetic standard deviation. d Values are the average of 2 measurements.the granulation properties and granule growth during the 2 granula-tion processes. It will be worthy to probe these factors and determineif these are different during the 2 granulation process in future studies.3.2. Surface area and pore diameter The surface area of a granulation is an important physical propertythat can affect granule flowability as well as final tablet hardness. Thesurface area results for metformin and aspirin sieved granulationswere similar, while sieved APAP granulations had a smaller meanparticle size and a larger surface area than metformin and aspirin. Inorder to investigate the effects of wet granulation and the method ofgranulating liquid addition on the powder formulations, surface areaand pore diameters were also measured for the dry powderformulations before granulation (Table 2). Generally, there wereminimal changes in the surface area and pore diameter results for allsamples, and when comparing between the two granulationprocesses. While all granulations were dried to b2.0% LOD for 6 h, to furtherinvestigate the effect of over-drying aspirin formulation prepared byconventional wet granulation, a batch was dried for an additional 6 hto study the effect of additional drying time on the mechanicalproperties of the granulation. The surface area and pore diametervalues for the aspirin granulation dried for 12 h (LOD 1.9%) were0.05 m2/g and 3.2 nm, respectively. However, for the aspiringranulation dried for 6 h (LOD 1.7%), the surface area and porediameter values were 0.19 m2/g and 4.5 nm, respectively. While thepore diameter remained essentially unchanged, this additional dryingtime for the aspirin conventional wet granulation sample caused asignificant reduction in the surface area. This can be attributed to thedrying process that removes the added water first from the surfaceand then from the pores within the particles. As the internal waterwas removed from the structure, the granules begin to densify due tothe collapsing of their pore structure. Even though there is a negligibleLOD difference between aspirin granulations dried for either 6 or 12 h, Fig. 5. Particle size distributions for (A) APAP, (B) aspirin, and (C) metformin,such granule densification will likely have a major impact on the conventional wet granulation vs. foam granulation.
  • 8. 22 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24Table 3 than for either conventionally wet granulated sample, indicatingMechanical characterization of granulations for three model drugs. enhanced plasticity. The chordal radius determined from the aspirin Dynamic hardness Tensile strength BIw BFI before granulation compact was slightly less than the value from the (H) N/m2 109 N/m2 × 106 10− 3 foam granulated compact. Thus, while the foam granulation processDried granulations appears to enhance the plasticity of aspirin, the conventional wetConventional Wet granulation process decreases its plasticity. However, the rebound Metformin 0.4 (0.01)a 0.7 (0.0) 1.7 0.001 velocity data offers some contrasts. The highest rebound velocities Aspirin wet (6 h drying) 0.1 (0.0) 0.7 (0.0) 7.0 0.002 Aspirin wet (12 h drying) 0.2 (0.0) 0.7 (0.0) 3.5 0.1 were obtained for the aspirin before wet granulation sample and the APAP 0.5 (0.01) 0.7 (0.16) 1.6 0.02 lowest values observed were for the aspirin granulations dried forFoam either 6 or 12 h. This data indicates that the conventionally wet Metformin 0.7 (0.01) 0.7 (0.0) 1.0 0.1 granulated samples are more ductile than either the aspirin before Aspirin 0.1 (0.0) 0.7 (0.0) 8.9 0.5 APAP 0.3 (0.0) 1.0 (0.03) 3.8 0.005 wet granulation or the foam granulated sample. The contrasts between the chordal radius and rebound velocity results supportPowder before wet granulation the likelihood that aspirin undergoes a mixed deformationMetformin – 0.03 (0.31) – 0.81 mechanism.Aspirin 0.08 (0.00) 0.4 (0.15) 4.7 0.08 In their study comparing microcrystalline cellulose granulatedAPAP 1.2 (0.01) 0.7 (0.0) 0.55 0.06 with 3% HPC, Badawy et al. [8] found that there was a significant a Values in parenthesis represent the arithmetic standard deviation. decrease in the surface area when comparing under-granulated with over-granulated samples; 0.91 m2/g vs. 0.53 m2/g, respectively. The authors reported that the difference in surface area can impact and reduce the compactability of the microcrystalline cellulose to varying degrees.same for both processes. However, the higher H values resulted in a Similarly, lactose, an excipient with some brittle character, showedlower bonding index, BIw for the foam granulation suggesting that this lowered compactability after being over-granulated with excess waterprocess may not be beneficial for metformin. Lower BIw indicates less and high-shear forces. The reason for this effect was found to be theplastic deformation behavior and lower ability of intra-particulate inability of the larger, denser granules with reduced surface area tobonds formed during the compression phase to survive during the significantly fracture or deform when subjected to a compressive loaddecompression process. [35,36]. It is noteworthy to also mention that the extent of brittle Compacts were prepared from the metformin formulations before characteristics and thereby the mechanical properties can vary quiteconventional wet granulation (dry powder) as well as after conven- significantly depending on the preparation method of the grade oftional wet granulation (dried) in order to compare their tensile lactose selected [37,38]. In addition, such brittle excipients can cause astrength values (Table 3). The average peak strengths of the before decrease in tablet crushing strength due to the fact that theseand after conventional wet granulation samples were 10.5 N/m2 and materials are characteristically harder and tend to be poor at forming272 N/m2, respectively; which corresponds to tensile strength values strong inter-particulate bonds [39].of approximately 0.026 × 106 N/m2 and 0.7 × 106 N/m2, respectively. It There were significant differences in dynamic hardness betweenis interesting that after conventional wet granulation, the metformin the two granulation processes for APAP, the model drug known toformulation displayed roughly a 27-fold increase in the tensile undergo brittle fracture. The results showed that the powder beforestrength of the compacts. This significant increase in tensile strength conventional wet granulation had the highest H value of all thewith the addition of water from the conventional wet granulation samples tested, indicating the brittle character of APAP. However, theprocess indicates that metformin has viscoelastic properties. Based on dynamic hardness was reduced by N50% after conventional wetthe data thus far, the conventional wet granulation process offers the granulation and further still after foam granulation (Table 3).most benefit for metformin in terms of improvement in mechanical Furthermore, it was only for APAP that an improvement in tensileproperties. strength was observed when comparing after granulation samples A brittle material will resist permanent deformation and hence, from the conventional wet and foam granulation processes to beforeshow a smaller indentation from the sphere, with a resultant smaller granulation samples. Tensile strength value of 1.0 N/m2 for APAP foamchordal radius. Also, less of the impact energy will be absorbed by a granulation was the highest of all the granulations. These resultsbrittle material and that will result in a higher rebound velocity. This is indicate that for a brittle drug such as APAP, the foam process is morein contrast to a compact composed of a ductile material. Such a plastic appropriate to improve the mechanical properties of the drug. Thiscompact is relatively softer and will deform around the sphere, may be attributed to the higher surface area of solution in the form ofabsorbing its impact energy and leaving a much larger dent, therefore tiny bubbles of foam that enabled a more uniform distribution of thedisplaying a larger chordal radius. plastic binder to cover the drug granules, thus modifying their Different properties were observed for aspirin, a known ductile mechanical properties more effectively.material. For the conventional wet granulation process three sampleswere evaluated; before granulation (without any added water), after 3.4. Hiestand tableting indicesgranulation dried for 6 h, as well as the granules over-dried for 12 h.The conventional wet granulation sample that was over-dried for 12 h The BIw and BFI values can be used to further elucidate whichbehaved very differently. The extra drying time caused the granule granulation process is best suited to improve the intrinsic mechanicalsurface area to collapse. Therefore, as the water evaporated from properties of the drug. These two indices have an inverse relationship;within the pores of the particles, the particles became denser, harder therefore, a higher BIw and/or a lower BFI are indicative of plasticand more brittle. This is clearly seen in the doubling of the dynamic deformation behavior. BIw and BFI values of the formulations are listedhardness value (H). in Table 3. Furthermore, interesting relationships were observed when In comparing the conventional wet and foam granulations forexamining the chordal radius and rebound velocity data for the metformin, the conventional wet granulation (after) sample yieldeddifferent aspirin granulations. While the chordal radii and rebound the highest BIw as well as the lowest overall BFI value of 0.001. On thevelocities were similar in both the 6 and 12 h granulations, the chordal other hand, the powder blend before conventional wet granulationradius for the aspirin foam granulation was approximately 30% higher showed the highest overall BFI value of 0.81. The addition of water in
  • 9. S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24 23the conventional wet granulation process dramatically improved the was determined. While there do not appear to be major differences inBFI value of metformin by 800-fold and showed markedly improved surface area and pore size for the different granulation batches, thereplasticity as compared with the powder blend before granulation. were discernible differences in their mechanical properties. The foamThese results were also an improvement over the foam granulation process appeared to significantly enhance the plasticity of a granula-process. This supports the data discussed previously that conventional tion containing a brittle drug such as APAP. However, foam granula-wet granulation is the best process for this drug (Table 3). BIw tion with a ductile drug like aspirin produced a material with mixedmeasures the survival success of true contact areas formed at deformation behavior based on the high BIw and BFI values. This is inmaximum compressive stress; viscoelastic materials such as metfor- contrast to the conventional wet granulated aspirin that showed anmin will produce compacts with higher tensile strengths due to inverse relationship between high BIw and low BFI values.enhanced intra-particulate bonding in the presence of higher Foam granulation did not enhance the plasticity for viscoelasticmoisture levels. BFI indicates the ability of a material to relieve stress materials like metformin and the conventional wet granulationby plastic deformation in accordance with the Griffith crack propaga- process was observed to confer the greatest advantage for metformin.tion theory. If the BFI is less than 0.2 there will typically be no capping The increase in plasticity for foam granulated formulations may beor lamination. However, if the BFI is N0.2 in conjunction with poor BIw due to the improved surface coverage of HPC on the drug particles asvalues, there is a greater probability of capping or lamination [4,11]. compared to the conventional wet granulation process. In conclusion, Among the aspirin granulations, the lowest BIw value of 0.0035 the selection of the most appropriate granulation process (conven-was observed for the over-dried, low surface area (0.05 m2/g) tional wet or foam) to improve a drug products manufacturability canconventional wet granulation sample, indicating relative brittle be guided by knowledge of the intrinsic mechanical properties of thebehavior. This effect has been previously reported for conventionally drug.wet granulated microcrystalline cellulose where the authors foundthat dense, less porous granules would be less prone to fragmentation Acknowledgementsor plastic deformation during compression [8]. A comparison of BIwand BFI values before and after conventional wet granulation (6 h The authors would like to acknowledge BMS for providing thedrying) indicated that the aspirin formulation improved in plasticity opportunity and summer internship funding to S. Cantor to conductafter conventional wet granulation. Foam granulated aspirin exhibited this work and also to the BMS foam granulation team membersthe highest BIw value of 0.0089 of all the granulations. However, the especially F. Nikfar; C. Keary and P.J. Sheskey (Dow Chemical) for theirBFI value of 0.5 observed for foam granulated aspirin was high given technical input and assistance.that aspirin is known to be ductile. Therefore, the deformationbehavior of the aspirin foam granulation can be considered as Referencesanomalous or mixed, showing both plastic and brittle characteristics.Phenacetin, a drug known to exhibit a brittle deformation behavior, [1] C. Keary, P.J. Sheskey, Preliminary report on the discovery of a new pharmaceuticalwas reported to demonstrate very similar results to the aspirin foam granulation process using foamed aqueous binders, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30 (2004) 831–845.granulation with 0.0088 and 0.43 for BIw and BFI values, respectively [2] R. Rowe, P.J. Sheskey, P.J. Weller (Eds.), Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients,[11]. High BIw and BFI values also suggest a mixed deformation 4th ed., Pharmaceutical Press, Grayslake, IL, 2003.mechanism for phenacetin. However, Hiestand classified phenacetin [3] P. Sheskey, C. Keary, D. Clark, K. Balwinski, Scale-up trials of foam granulation technology — High shear, Pharm. Technol. 31 (2007) 94–108.as a “normal” material that compresses in a viscoelastic manner [31] [4] M. Aulton, A.M. Dyer, K.A. Khan, The strength and compaction of millispheres,whereas APAP, a brittle drug, would be classified as a “special case” Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 20 (1994) 3069–3104.material. Special case materials exhibit extremely poor tableting [5] Y. Habib, L.L. Augsburger, R.F. Shangraw, Production of inert cushioning beads: effect of excipients on the physicomechanical properties of freeze-dried beadscharacteristics because their particles are very hard and bonding containing microcrystalline cellulose produced by extrusion–spheronization, Int. J.between them is very weak. Additionally, special case particles do not Pharm. 233 (2002) 67–83.deform plastically under compressive load to form bonding surfaces. [6] E.N. Hiestand, Mechanical properties of compacts and particles that control tableting success, J. Pharm. Sci. 86 (1997) 985–990.Instead, particles easily rearrange by sliding past each other. This [7] C. Gustafsson, H. Lennholm, T. Iversen, C. Nystrom, Evaluation of surface and bulkoccurrence leads to greatly diminished inter-particulate bonding and characteristics of cellulose powders in relation to compaction behavior and tabletlow tensile strength of compacts [23,31]. properties, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 29 (2003) 1095–1107. [8] S. Badawy, D.B. Gray, M.A. Hussain, A study of the effect of wet granulation on In comparing BIw and BFI values of APAP before and after microcrystalline cellulose particle structure and performance, Pharm. Res. 23conventional wet granulation a three-fold increase in the BIw and a (2006) 634–640.three-fold decrease in the BFI value was observed after granulation. [9] K. van der voort Maarschalk, H. Vromans, W. Groenedijk, G.K. Bolhuis, C.F. Lerk,This suggested some beneficial effect of the conventional wet Effect of water on deformation and bonding of pregelatinized starch compacts, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 44 (1997) 253–260.granulation process in improving the plasticity of this brittle drug. [10] L. Yang, G. Venkatesh, R. Fassihi, Characterization of compressibility andHowever, the foam process further resulted a two-fold increase in the compactibility of polyethylene oxide polymers for modified release applicationBIw coupled with a decrease in BFI of granulated APAP over the by compaction simulator, J. Pharm. Sci. 85 (1996) 1085–1090. [11] E.N. Hiestand, Mechanical behavior of solids, in: J.G. Stowell (Ed.), Mechanics andconventional wet granulation process, indicating that this is the best Physical Properties for Powders and Compacts, SCSI, Inc., West Lafayette, IN, 2002,process to improve the mechanical properties of this drug. These pp. 21–48.results can be attributed to the fact that the foamed binder has an [12] J.E. Rees, K.D. Tsardaka, Some effects of moisture on the viscoelastic behavior of modified starch during powder compaction, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 40 (1994)enhanced surface area compared with water alone. Therefore, HPC, 193–197.being a surface-active binder with ductile characteristics, can more [13] A.A. Griffith, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc.homogeneously coat the APAP granules containing this brittle drug. Lond A221 (1920) 163–198. [14] W.T. Morehead, Viscoelastic behavior of pharmaceutical materials duringThus, by improving the intrinsic APAP granule plasticity the mechan- compaction, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 18 (1992) 659–675.ical properties of the compacts were also improved. [15] S. Pedersen, H.G. Kristensen, Change in crystal density of acetylsalicylic acid during compaction, S.T.P, Pharm. Sci. 4 (1994) 201–206. [16] E. Joiris, P.D. Martino, C. Berneron, A.M. Guyot-Hermann, J.-C. Guyot, Compression4. Conclusions behavior of orthorhombic paracetamol, Pharm. Res. 15 (1998) 1122–1130. [17] B. Obiora, E. Shotten, Effects of waxes, hydrolyzed gelatin and moisture on the The physico-mechanical properties of high drug load granulations compression characteristics of paracetamol and phenacetin, J. Pharm. Pharmacol.manufactured using conventional wet granulation or foam granula- 28 (1976) 629–632. [18] N. Patel, N.R. Poola, A. Babar, F.M. Plakogiannis, Fluidized-bed agglomeration oftion techniques were studied. Thus, influence of binder delivery acetaminophen: direct compression of tablets and physiologic availability, Drugtechniques on granulation mechanical properties of the 3 model drugs Dev. Ind. Pharm. 15 (1989) 1175–1198.
  • 10. 24 S.L. Cantor et al. / Powder Technology 195 (2009) 15–24[19] C. Imbert, P. Tchoreloff, B. Leclerc, G. Couarrazw, Indices of tableting performance [31] E.N. Hiestand, Rationale for and the measurement of tableting indices, in: G. and application of percolation theory to powder compaction, Eur. J. Pharm. Alderborn, C. Nystrom (Eds.), Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology, Biopharm. 44 (1997) 273–282. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996, pp. 219–244.[20] T. Beyer, G.M. Day, S.L. Price, The prediction, morphology, and mechanical [32] D. Wurster, S. Likitlersuang, Y. Chen, The influence of magnesium stearate on the properties of the polymorphs of paracetamol, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) Hiestand tableting indices and other related mechanical properties of maltodex- 5086–5094. trins, Pharm. Dev. Technol. 10 (2005) 461–466.[21] S. Malamataris, J.E. Rees, Viscoelastic properties of some pharmaceutical powders [33] N. Davar, R. Shah, D.G. Pope, L.L. Augsburger, A critical comparison of Hiestands compared using creep compliance, extended Heckel analysis and tablet strength tableting indices and traditional measures of compactibility to predict tableting measurements, Int. J. Pharm. 92 (1993) 123–135. behavior, Pharm. Res. 12 (1995) S168.[22] K.M. Picker, The 3D model: Explaining densification and deformation mechanisms [34] K. Ax, H. Feise, R. Sochon, M. Hounslow, A. Salman, Influence of liquid binder by using 3D parameter plots, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30 (2004) 413–425. dispersion on agglomeration in an intensive mixer, Powder Technol. 179 (2008)[23] M. Mullarney, B.C. Hancock, Improving the prediction of exceptionally poor 190–194. tableting performance: an investigation into Hiestands “Special Case.”, J. Pharm. [35] S. Badawy, M.M. Menning, M.A. Gorko, D.L. Gilbert, Effect of process parameters on Sci. 93 (2004) 2017–2021. compressibility of granulation manufactured in a high shear mixer, Int. J. Pharm.[24] V. Busignies, B. Leclerc, P. Porion, P. Evesque, P. Tchoreloff, Compaction behaviour 198 (2000) 51–56. and new predictive approach to the compressibility of binary mixtures of [36] M. Wikberg, G. Alderborn, Compression characteristics of granulated materials. IV. pharmaceutical excipients, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 64 (2006) 66–74. The effect of granule porosity on the fragmentation propensity and compactibility[25] F. Kiekens, R. Zelko, I. Antal, J.P. Remon, Evaluation of substrate–binder interaction of some granulations, Int. J. Pharm. 69 (1991) 239–253. in a model granule system, Int. J. Pharm. 169 (1998) 175–182. [37] P. Narayan, B.C. Hancock, The relationship between the particle properties,[26] R. Williams, J.W. McGinity, The use of tableting indices to study the compaction mechanical behavior, and surface roughness of some pharmaceutical excipient properties of powders, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 14 (1988) 1823–1844. compacts, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355 (2003) 24–36.[27] P. Reist, Aerosol Science and Technology, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993, [38] V. Busignies, P. Tchoreloff, B. Leclerc, M. Besnard, G. Couarraze, Compaction of pp. 13–30. crystallographic forms of pharmaceutical granular lactoses. I. Compressibility, Eur.[28] A. Fan, S. Pallerla, G. Carlson, D. Ladipo, J. Dukich, R. Capella, S. Leung, Effect of J. Pharm. Biopharm. 58 (2004) 569–576. particle size distribution and flow property of powder blend on tablet weight [39] E. Horisawa, K. Danjo, H. Sunada, Influence of granulating method on physical and variation, Amer. Pharm. Rev. 8 (2005) 73–78. mechanical properties, compression behavior, and compactibility of lactose and[29] P. Webb and C. Orr, 1997, Analytical Methods in Fine Particle Technology. microcrystalline cellulose granules, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 26 (2000) 583–593. Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA.: pp. 80, 157.[30] E.N. Hiestand, J.E. Wells, C.B. Peot, J.F. Ochs, Physical processes of tableting, J. Pharm. Sci. 66 (1977) 510–519.