November 10 Class
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

November 10 Class

on

  • 197 views

http://engl621.wordpress.com

http://engl621.wordpress.com

Statistics

Views

Total Views
197
Views on SlideShare
197
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Apple Keynote

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n

November 10 Class November 10 Class Presentation Transcript

  • Pre-Workshop Workshop• A walk through the schedule... • (bottom line=”not necessarily complete but deliverable” for peer review 11/23)
  • Pre-Workshop Workshop• Some assumptions about peer review: • It is useful for writing at all levels • As a reader, you should be capable of giving good advice even on topics where you are not an expert • As a writer, you should be capable of receiving and acting on advice from others • The only way you get better as a writer is to have an audience • To get good advice, you have to give good advice • It takes practice-- more practice time than we have, unfortunately
  • Pre-Workshop Workshop• Groups: • Jessica, Graham, Bill, Alisha • Sarah, Brenda, Heather, Sierra • Carrie, Beth, Jeff, Emily, Bernice
  • Pre-Workshop Workshop• Step 1: Make sure everyone has contact info, etc.• Step 2: Everyone take a moment to: • explain briefly what your project for this class is about • where you’re at on the project so far • what one or two (or three or four!) things you are hoping to get from peer review• Step 3: Gather questions/concerns for the larger group
  • Heather and Bill and Teacher/Action Research
  • Blythe, Grabill, Riley• Action research is... (273-4)• The questions that framed their research (280)• The data analysis process-- note that they can’t completely agree (280-2)• (Also, this is an example of rhetorical/ content analysis too)
  • Blythe, Grabill, Riley• Evidence based understanding of community (the consultant example and such on 284)• “Why genre matters” (and why this is tech comm kind of research) (287-9)• Stases matters (289-91)• And action matters (295)