Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Transparency in the charitable sector final
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Transparency in the charitable sector final

507

Published on

A presentation about transparency in the Canadian charitable sector delivered at the Charity Legal Information Program Conference Being Good at Doing Good in February 2012.

A presentation about transparency in the Canadian charitable sector delivered at the Charity Legal Information Program Conference Being Good at Doing Good in February 2012.

Published in: Business, Travel
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
507
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. TRANSPARENCY INTHE CANADIANCHARITABLESECTOR
  • 2. TRANS·PAR·ENT Adj.Allowing light to pass through so that objects behind can be distinctly seen.
  • 3. THE MEDIA’STAKE ONTRANSPARENCY
  • 4. WHAT I’M GOING TOCOVER• An overview of free third-party transparency tools for charitable organizations• An overview of Imagine Canada’s new CharityFocus tool and what unique transparency resources it offers• An overview of the challenges (and solutions!) of using financial data in transparency-related tools• The future of transparency• Feel free to ask questions at any point!
  • 5. ABOUT ME• President, Common Good Strategies• Previously, Senior Research Associate at Imagine Canada• Designed CharityFocus.ca• Designed T3010QuickPrep.ca• Many reports on the T3010• 1000s of hours working on T3010 and financial statements!Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
  • 6. DOES TRANSPARENCY HURTCHARITABLE DONATIONS?
  • 7. “Satisfied customers tell threefriends, angry customers tell 3000” Pete Blackshaw
  • 8. % OF TAX FILERS CLAIMING DONATIONS ON TAX RETURNS 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 29.4% 23.4% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 1991 1992 1994 1995 1996 1998 1999 2000 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008 2010Source: http://www.imaginecanada.ca/files/www/en/researchbulletins/rb1501en.pdf
  • 9. DONATION RATE TOCHARITIES, BY HOUSEHOLDS70% 62%60%50% 55%40% 38%30% 29%20%10%0% Rate of giving to religious charities Rate of giving to non-religious charities Source: Analysis from Survey of Household Spending
  • 10. LEVEL OF TRUST INCHARITIES, 2000 TO 200890%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0% 2000 2004 2006 2008 A lot of trust Some trust
  • 11. TOTAL DONATIONS TO CHARITIES FROM INDIVIDUAL TAX RETURNS (IN $1000S) $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $-Source: http://www.imaginecanada.ca/files/www/en/researchbulletins/rb1501en.pdf
  • 12. • Lack of transparency can definitely hurt an individual charity• One of the strongest predictors of donations to a particular charity is trust in that charity• Most people do not use financial information, even if its available • Of those that do, most use it as a “heuristic” • Is it there or not? • The challenge is that people also use heuristics to judge the charity• The media definitely will use this information• It’s always better to have bad news come from your own organization
  • 13. According to the Muttart Foundation’s Talking AboutCharities Survey:• 49% of donors want more information about the work charities do• 62% strongly agree that more attention should be paid to the work that charities do
  • 14. Source: Muttart Foundation’s Talking About Charities Report: 2008
  • 15. TRANSPARENCYINTERMEDIARIESIN CANADA
  • 16. CHARITY RATINGS
  • 17. MONEYSENSECHARITY 100
  • 18. CHARITY INTELLIGENCE
  • 19. TOP PICKS http://www.charityintelligence.ca/images/to ppicks/ci_top_picks_2011.pdf
  • 20. CHARITY MATCHING
  • 21. A NEW TRANSPARENCYTOOL FOR CHARITIES
  • 22. Provided by
  • 23. “CharityFocus is a powerful and user-friendly,fully bilingual resource for the Canadian public,which providescomprehensive financial information about allCanadian charities. The site draws fromorganizations T3010 filings to the CRA butalso provides charities with an opportunity toupload their own material to provide contextand meaning to the numbers.”- Stephen Faul, Vice President Strategic Communications andBusiness Development
  • 24. WHAT NEXT?• More structured details on volunteers?• More structured details on impact?• More APIs for social media as new sites become popular
  • 25. HOW TO USECHARITYFOCUS• Step 1. Make absolutely sure your current T3010 is accurate and fully complete • Make sure you have charitable programs, fundraising expenditures, etc. on the form • Check your math • Check for keying (that’s not a typo) areas that may have been introduced by CRA• Step 2. Ensure that key information is accurate going back for all years available (Revenue, Expenditures, Charitable Expenditures, Qualified Donees)• Step 3. Check all years available and ensure the information is accurate• Step 4. Make sure all future submissions are accurate.
  • 26. HOW TO GET MOREFROM CHARITYFOCUS• Upload your annual report• Upload your financial statements• Upload your social media channels• Upload your brochures• Upload impact statements and evaluations you’d like to share with the public!• Upload your own RSS news stream• TELL YOUR STORY.
  • 27. THE PROBLEMS WITHT3010 INFORMATION
  • 28. ERRORS ON THE T3010 (2007) Annual revenue With 1 error on With 3 or more the T3010 errors Less than $30,000 42% 16% $30,000 to $99,999 35% 9% $100,000 to $249,999 29% 6% $250,000 to $499,999 25% 5% $500,000 to $999,999 22% 4% $1,000,000 to $9,999,999 22% 4% $10,000,000 or more 23% 5%http://www.muttart.org/sites/default/files/report/PerspectivesOnFundraising-FINAL.pdf
  • 29. My favourite error: $5.7 billion dollars in tax-receipted donations from one organization
  • 30. $205 million dollars Source: http://fotos.eluniversal.com.mx/coleccion/muestra_fotogaleria.html?idgal=3405
  • 31. Approximately $5.7 billion dollars
  • 32. UNDERESTIMATING REVENUE BY$1.5 BILLION
  • 33. OTHER ERRORS• In 2007...• 84% of organizations report dollars received from tax-receipted gifts or fundraising revenues.• 58% completed the checklist on the T3010 which identifies which type of fundraising methods they use.• 27% of charities reported any amount greater than $0 for fundraising expenditures.
  • 34. OUR SOLUTION FORTHE PROBLEM
  • 35. T3010 QUICKPREP• www.quickprep.ca• This tool was created with the support of Canada Revenue Agency!
  • 36. LIMITATIONS OF THE TOOL• Only errors that can be found by a computer • Though over 150 business rules built into the system• It’s an online only application• It does require basic technological skills
  • 37. THE FUTURE OF THEQUICKPREP• We hope to continue to improve it based on feedback from users, charities, and the general public!• From reactive to proactive
  • 38. ANOTHER COOL SITE
  • 39. SEARCH FORDIRECTORS
  • 40. the future oftransparency
  • 41. MOBILE ACCESS
  • 42. MOBILE• 7% of our traffic is from a mobile device• Almost ½ of mobile traffic is now from an Ipad• Almost 1/3 of mobile traffic is from an Iphone• Average time on site: 46 seconds
  • 43. WEB SEARCHES34 Average time on site: 58 seconds
  • 44. MORE INFORMATIONON NONPROFITS• Almost no information on these organizations!
  • 45. OTHER KEY TRENDS• More expectations• More charities, larger charities • (Mo’ money, mo’ problems)• More ratings• More automatic processing of your data • Spiders, automatic processing of your website• Social media• Blogs
  • 46. ADDITIONS I’D LIKETO SEE TO THE T3010• More awareness of public usage of Charity data• Notes to the financial statements• More information on volunteers• More sections for charities to provide context and impact to their filings• More details on technology expenditures• Online filing• Tiered forms
  • 47. BECOMING MORE TRANSPARENT Transparent concrete
  • 48. QUICK CHANGES FORYOUR WEBSITE• Upload your annual reports on your website• Upload your audited financial statements • Decide whether you might want to link to your T3010• Upload impact statements, key metrics, and evaluations that can show how well you’ve done!• Make it easy to find!
  • 49. BIGGERCONSIDERATIONS INTRANSPARENCY• According to your annual reports and financial statements, did nothing bad happen last year?• Is this decision the sort of things my staff are going to complain about when they’re drunk after work?• Do reporting frameworks make sense for our organization?• Do we want to highlight our transparency by joining Standards of Accreditation organizations?• How can we explain to our stakeholders how our decisions are made? • How can people contribute to the decision making?• Should we upload all of our policies relating to conflict of interest, ethics, whistleblowing, ethics, etc.?
  • 50. THANK YOU!STEVE@GOODSTRATEGY.CA

×