Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
TEDxObserver
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

TEDxObserver

310
views

Published on

A talk I gave at the Contact Theatre in Manchester on 10 March 2012 on communications for social good and behavioural change.

A talk I gave at the Contact Theatre in Manchester on 10 March 2012 on communications for social good and behavioural change.


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
310
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • \n
  • As a teenager considering the future world of work, I found myself torn between what I thought at the time were two opposing and contradictory forces. \n\nI was radicalised as only a 16 or 17 year old can be. I blame Paul Weller. I was incandescent with rage at a dizzyingly wide array of injustices. Environmentalism, feminism, human rights, animal rights, socialism, anti-racism – I was probably unbearable to be around.\n\nAt the same time I had a dark and undeclared passion for the world of advertising, design and marketing. I loved the wordplay, the beautifully executed photo shoots and the off-the-wall TV commercials. Bad type, ugly design and clumsy copy lines secretly made me almost as enraged as politics or social issues. The raw creativity of ad land was something I found utterly beguiling and immediate, yet I had no idea how I could fuse this world together with the zealous campaigner in me.\n
  • I would come to discover that there was a practice of creative communications which did not have to fuel wasteful and empty consumerism, that didn’t have to promote the squandering of finite resources and that didn’t need to further strengthen stereotypical views of women or minorities.\n\nYou can sell good ideas just as effectively and with as much flair as you could sell fast moving consumer goods and I’ll get back to that personal journey in a moment.\n\nFirst of all I’d like to explode the idea that creative communications, by which I mean everything from advertising to direct marketing, media relations, social media campaigns and even the odd flash mob, is purely about selling stuff that we don’t really need.\n\n
  • To make us all smile, I’ll paint this picture as a flower.\n\nImagine that the conventional ‘Mad Men’ world of consumer marketing is just one petal on the flower of human communications, what do the other petals represent? What kind of communications do we messy but wonderful humans indulge in?\n\nThere’s an obvious petal of gossip, chatter with friends or colleagues and keeping up with family or loved ones, increasingly through social media channels like Facebook or Twitter.\n\nThere are more formal channels too like public information - what time does the library open? What day will my wheelie bin be emptied? How do I get a bus to the Arndale?\n\nAfter that there’s social marketing. Much of this is health related (get fit, stop smoking, drink less and somehow still be happy) but it can also cover social calls to action, such as fostering a child, or changes in environmental behaviour.\n\nCommunications also covers news and current affairs, from the pioneering journalism of a Pilger or a Paxman to the phone-hacked exposé. \n\nLocal communities communicate in their own distinctive way, too. Engagement at the community level is often overlooked as a critical part of communications. From the photocopied newsletter to a notice pinned to a church door.\n\nWhat other petals are on the flower of creative communications? There are political campaigns for both single issues and to get elected. There are social and environmental campaigns looking to exert change on politics, business or public opinion. Places communicate and brand or promote themselves, there is entertainment, fundraising, religious evangelism, even military propaganda - the ‘munitions of the mind’ - is a form of creative communications.\n\nI’ve engaged in communications across plenty of these areas. \n\nI’ve yet to be given the chance to roll out a major military propaganda campaign but I live in hope. \n
  • My career in communications started with journalism and then switched to campaigns around food and more specifically, vegetarianism. \n\nFor six houmous-fueled years I was a campaigner and then campaigns director at the Vegetarian Society, where I quickly realised that humour and not hectoring was slightly more effective in getting people to change their views or habits. Then I moved into working on sustainability and issues like climate change and ten years ago set up Creative Concern, one of the UK’s first creative agencies dedicated to sustainability and social issues.\n\n
  • The Creative Concern portfolio of brands, media campaigns, films and digital projects covers a number of different and discrete areas of communication. Our team works on place promotion, community engagement, public information campaigns and, for a good deal of the time, on changing behaviour, which is what I’d like to focus on today.\n
  • There are differing views on ‘behavioural change’ campaigns. \n\nYou may have heard of the idea of ‘nudge’ as a method of shifting behaviour. It’s currently in vogue in Downing Street and even with the departure of Steve Hilton Guru, continues to be seen as a way to get us to recycle, litter less, stop speeding and put the toilet seat down. I’m not a massive fan. \n\nOur approach to behaviour change has a number of ‘rules’ or ‘themes’ which we apply and which we’ve shown to actually work over the last ten years. I’m going to run through some of those rules and then show a couple of campaigns where they’ve done the trick.\n
  • First of all, it’s really important to recognise that choices are emotional as much as they’re rational. \n\nThis principle was established in probably one of the most famous ‘issues’ campaigns there’s ever been, the Crying Indian ad run by Keep America Beautiful in the early 70s. Iron Eyes Cody canoes up the Hudson River and then reaches landfall through a sea of litter. \n\nFrom the discarded drink cans and burger cartons the camera pans up to his face, down which a single tear runs. \n\n‘People start pollution; people can stop it’ runs the voiceover. \n
  • The second rule I like to apply is social proofing and the notion that ‘everyone’s doing it’. We’ve shown this to work in our campaigns but one of the best and most persuasive examples is the ‘hotel towel experiment’ that was carried out by researchers at Chicago Business School and captured in their book ‘Yes! 50 Secrets from the Science of Persuasion’.\n\nThe research team worked with a local hotel and changed a proportion of the ‘Please re-use your towel’ signs in hotel bathrooms to read ‘The majority of people in this hotel tend to re-use their towels at least once during their stay’. Towel re-use went up by 26% in the rooms with the amended labels in. What’s even more fascinating is that when they changed them again to read ‘People in this room...’ the rate of re-use went up even higher, to 33% above the normal rate.\n\nI don’t think this shows a ‘herd’ mentality at work, but more the idea that as a society we are contractarians, who will shift our behaviours if we think others are doing it too. As the Institute for Public Policy Research once put it, it’s about ‘I will if you will’.\n\n
  • Pride is another rule. Whether that’s pride of place or pride in your group, tribe or organisation, if you can attach pride to an appeal for change, you’ve got a better chance of success. \n\nA great example here is the ‘Don’t Mess With Texas’ campaign. Run by the Texas Department for Transport it boasted some great copy lines: “If Texas was your mother, would you still litter?” Great work. \n\nThe campaign reduced litter on Texan highways by 72% between 1986 and 1990.\n\n
  • Framing comes in next. The way you frame your pitch makes all the difference. In politics for example, framing the dismantling of massive parts of the public sector as ‘Big Society’ is a remarkably canny bit of framing. \n\nHow you position your message in relation to the frame of reference of your audience is absolutely critical and politics is a great place to watch this play out. \n\nAre we ‘building sustainable communities’ or tackling ‘Broken Britain’? Depends on your frame.\n\n
  • Number five is fun. Famously the Fun Theory in Sweden has turned stairs into piano keys and litter bins into bottomless pits. \n\nTheir latest wheeze is a Speed Camera Lottery where the fines from cars breaking the speed limit at one Stockholm intersection are entered into a lottery for those cars snapped going under the speed limit. \n\nThey cut average speeds by over 20%. \n\nFun is massively important, as is humour. \n\n
  • Rule six is to take risks. Headspace is a crowded marketplace. \n\nEvery day you are deluged by thousands of messages that are both commercial and non-commercial. \n\nOur heads are mashed with messages and we’re also a powerfully distracted species. \n\nBritain’s most popular Google search terms in 2011 were ‘Royal Wedding’, ‘iPhone5’ and ‘Fifa’. Also in the top ten were ‘Groupon’, ‘Adele’ and the terrifying ‘Rebecca Black’. \n\n\n
  • For every person searching for ‘sustainability’ there are 51 looking for cheap flights or, inevitably, 152 furtling around looking for porn.\n\nThe combination of data deluge plus dubious distraction means that any ethical or behavioural change campaign needs to take a few creative risks to break through and grab some attention. \n
  • My final rule is to know your audience and understand what you’re asking them to do. I’m by nature a massive optimist and so one thing that gives me great hope is the fact that we’re not all evil wankers. \n\nHere’s some proof. If you look at models of altruism versus outright greed, there are a number of ways to break society down into groups. \n\nFor example there’s a model based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs that looks at pioneers, prospectors and settlers who exhibit varying levels of ethical behaviour, but at its most basic level around 10% of us are altruistic from the outset, while 25% are in the Clarkson camp of unabashed selfishness and 65% sit in a big, slightly dozy ‘consensual’ zone in the middle. \n
  • In terms of behaviour change I like to think of these as ‘Would love to’, ‘Not on your nelly’ and ‘I will if you will’.\n\nThe critical thing in terms of audience understanding and pitch is that if you pitch something purely at the 10% you’re doomed to failure; if you get into a shouting match with the selfish bastards your similarly doomed; successful campaigns need to aim at the mass market, consensual majority and coax them into our altruistic camp.\n\nAnd the fascinating thing is that even the selfish quarter will come onside once a consensus is established, they’d be too ashamed to do otherwise.\n\nSo that’s the theory. How does it work? Here are few examples from our work.\n
  • First of all I’d like to cover humour. \n\nSince I first realised that scaring people with secret filming from inside abattoirs wasn’t the only way to convince them to go vegetarian, I’ve always thought a good gag goes down really well. \n\nIt has the added benefit of showing that you don’t take yourself too seriously and that adopting your proposed change in behaviour will not render you as humourless as Tomás de Torquemada on a bad hair day.\n
  • My back catalogue here basically consists of rude vegetables. \n\nIt’s not complicated; a small study came out showing that vegetarians had slightly more rigorous and rewarding sex lives until a slightly older age\n\nQuicker than you can say ‘tofu is the new viagra’ an ad campaign was born. \n\nIt got a lot of coverage.\n
  • Here’s a more recent ad campaign we ran with Friends of the Earth across Manchester which even now gets referenced as one of the best of its kind.\n\nCycling is up significantly across the city, not all down to this ad, but it’s safe to say that the humourous tone increased the ad’s reach massively.\n
  • And humour led us to team up with a californian animator to create a campaign called ‘Get Me Toasty’ for energy efficiency and home insulation. Notoriously unsexy, creating a giant, walking but not talking piece of toast has helped us recast home insulation as something you’d actually walk across the street to find out more about. \n\nSo far the campaign’s generated 15,000 enquiries for free or low cost insulation, cutting loads of winter fuel bills and cutting carbon emissions right across Greater Manchester.\n
  • More examples. Social proofing was at the forefront of our mind as we crafted a campaign for the borough of Wrexham called ‘People Power’. We led with images of ordinary folk from Wrexham who were willing to take a small step - a pledge - to reduce their carbon emissions as the Council committed to massively cut their emissions too. The entire focus was on a shared effort and shared benefit. \n\nAcross the Council alone they saw energy bills drop by 7% during the campaign period, saving over £25,000. \n
  • The Wrexham campaign built on an earlier, pledge-based campaign we did across Greater Manchester called ‘Manchester is my Planet’ which again combined social proofing with small steps and in this case, civic pride, to recruit carbon pledges. \n\nOver 20,000 people signed up over the lifetime of the campaign.\n\n
  • Here’s a really simple but effective example of reframing a proposition. The Northwest’s Fostering Forum asked us to run a campaign across television, radio and print to generate applications to become foster carers. \n\nWe ran some research groups and discovered that the problem wasn’t feeling compassionate about kids that needed homes, the problem was that most people didn’t feel that they could be a foster parent, that somehow they wouldn’t fit the profile. So we ran a fostering campaign with no children in, just lots of real life fosterers from as many walks of life as possible, telling you that ‘You Can Foster’. \n\nThe campaign overshot its target by 100% and over 3,000 applied to become foster carers.\n
  • My last example is less about behaviour change and more about the power of communications to build pride and belief in a community. We’ve been running a campaign for the last four years in a large area of Manchester called Wythenshawe. \n\nIt’s an area that has plenty of social challenges but that also has loads going for it.\n
  • For years it had been done down in the mass media as a class A example of ‘Broken Britain’. Our Real Lives Wythenshawe campaign, which includes a network of 100 community ambassadors, has reclaimed the news agenda and allowed the people of the area to build a more positive image of their area. \n\n
  • In our finest hour, we organised mass activity in response to an ill-thought documentary by Sarah Ferguson called the ‘Duchess on the Estate’, which depicted the very worst that they could find in Wythenshawe. \n\nOur campaign fought back and won national, widespread coverage as a result.\n\n
  • Let’s get back to the bigger picture. If you ignore for a moment the fact that every second 28,000 people are searching the internet for porn, human communications, is a wonderful, diverse and powerful part of who we are and what we could become in the future. It takes in education, our individual passions and ideals, our connections with family and friends, our work and our playtime. \n\nCommunications is a critical part of us, as individuals and as a society.\n\nA couple of years ago a senior business journalist had a pop at my agency for not working in the ‘real economy’. Our focus on social good and public service just didn’t make any sense to him. We weren’t selling stuff, so how could we possibly be legitimate.\n\nHis business magazine went bust shortly afterwards, a victim of his ‘real economy’. \n\nOur business is not about selling, it’s about something bigger.\n
  • It’s about great people and good ideas. It’s about enlightenment. It’s about making people smile and its about making lives better.\n\nThis is the real world of communications and its my contention that in an age where austerity is still biting and where there may actually be no return to the days of rampant and unbridled consumerism, this kind of communications, for social good, will in fact be the norm in the months and years ahead.\n\nThis is the future, and it’s the business that we’re in.\n\nThanks for listening.\n
  • \n
  • Transcript

    • 1. who can I
    • 2. Advertising is anaccident of
    • 3. not very subtle.
    • 4. Discover your Real lives. Wythenshawe.new favourite place...
    • 5. EmotionsI will if you willPrideFramingHave funTake risksKnow yourmark
    • 6. Emotions
    • 7. 26% 33%in this hotel in this room I will if you will
    • 8. Framing Big Society Image: Political Cream
    • 9. Have fun
    • 10. 10% 65% 25%altruist consensual selfish bastards
    • 11. would love to i will if you will not on your nelly
    • 12. do not smile
    • 13. we don’t sell shit to sleepwalkers
    • 14. SMILE PLEASE