Criminal Law in Canada<br />Fundamental Concepts<br />
Sources of Criminal Law<br />The Criminal Code of Canada<br />Main source of criminal law in Canada<br />Describes offense...
Types of Criminal Offences<br />Summary Conviction Offences<br />Minor criminal offences<br />Can be arrested and summoned...
Types of Criminal Offences<br />Indictable Offences<br />More serious crimes, severe penalties<br />Maximum penalty is lif...
Elements of a Crime<br />
To obtain a conviction, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that each and every element of the offence with whi...
ActusReus<br />The actusreus of the offence is the act or omission (failure to act) that has been identified by Parliament...
Most criminal offences require that the accused take some action.<br />Some provisions make it a criminal offence to fail ...
s. 222(1) “a person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being”<br />
s. 90(1) “every person commits an offence who carries a weapon … concealed, unless the person is authorized under the Fire...
Mens Rea<br />The mental element that accompanies the commission of the actusreus<br />The act must be done with a ‘guilty...
s. 319(2) it is an offence to “willfully promote hatred by communicating statements, other than in private conversation”<b...
Carelessly<br />Knowingly<br />Recklessly<br />Negligently<br />Fraudulently<br />
s. 265(1)(a) “A person commits an assault when … without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to ...
Subjective assessment of culpability<br />Insist that the prosecution prove that the accused actually knew that there was ...
Objective Standard<br />In the 19th century, people were presumed to intend the natural consequences of their acts.<br />A...
Subjective Standard<br />Coming into favour in Canada.<br />Requires that the Crown prove that the accused had the requisi...
The choice of subjective or objective is made by the offence, not the case.  Once an offence is determined to be subjectiv...
R. vs. Lamb<br />Larry Lamb was a young man who owned a revolver that had a five-chambered cylinder that rotated clockwise...
A female person who, being pregnant and about to be delivered, with intent that the child shall not live or with intent to...
Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats...
Absolute and Strict Liablity<br />Regulatory offences are offences that regulate otherwise desirable behaviour where harm ...
1978 R. v. Sault St. Marie, the Supreme Court changed this.<br />Strict Liability Offences introduced<br />Crown must prov...
Assume that it is an offence under environmental protection legislation to discharge pollutants into a waterway.  Assume a...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Fundamentals of Criminal Law in Canada

8,016

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
8,016
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
12
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Eg – be sting and allergic reaction results in crash and injuryHow about mental illness, alcohol and drugs?
  • Find the actusreus – causing the death of a human being
  • Actus Reus – carrying a weapon, that is concealed, without authorizationFour elements of the actusreus that get confusingCarrying - what is carrying? In the truck of a car being used by the accused?Weapon – is an ice pick a weapon? Nail file? Tire Iron?Concealment – what constitutes concealment?Authorization – what is authorization? Must it be carried?
  • Intent – the true purpose of the actRecklessness– the careless disregard for the possible results of an action. They may not intend to hurt someone, but they understand the risks of their actions and proceed anyway.Motive – reason for committing the offence – does not establish guilt
  • Two aspects to the actusreus – direct or indirect application of force, and lack of consentIf force is applied to a consenting person (hockey player) actusreus is misisngApplied to an animal, actusreus is missingWhat mensrea is required?Force must be intentional, but how about the mensrea for the consent?You can interpret this is there not being mensrea for the consent, but there is an interpretive presumption that mensrea is required for every element of acts reus.
  • Assume a charge of homicideActusreus is killing a human – presentMensrea depends on subjective/objective p. 249
  • Driving, manufacturing, selling goods and services
  • p. 251 and includes a full case
  • Fundamentals of Criminal Law in Canada

    1. 1. Criminal Law in Canada<br />Fundamental Concepts<br />
    2. 2. Sources of Criminal Law<br />The Criminal Code of Canada<br />Main source of criminal law in Canada<br />Describes offense and punishments.<br />Federal Law<br />The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act<br />Quasi-Criminal Law<br />Provincial & municipal laws which results in fines<br />Eg: Highway Traffic Act<br />
    3. 3. Types of Criminal Offences<br />Summary Conviction Offences<br />Minor criminal offences<br />Can be arrested and summoned to court without delay<br />Max $2000 fine and/or six months in jail, except for drug offenses<br />
    4. 4. Types of Criminal Offences<br />Indictable Offences<br />More serious crimes, severe penalties<br />Maximum penalty is life imprisonment<br />Trial judges decide penalties<br />Maximum penalty set in law, some have minimum penalty<br />Hybrid Offences<br />Crown attorney makes decision<br />
    5. 5. Elements of a Crime<br />
    6. 6. To obtain a conviction, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that each and every element of the offence with which the accused is charged was in fact committed by the accused.<br />
    7. 7. ActusReus<br />The actusreus of the offence is the act or omission (failure to act) that has been identified by Parliament has harmful.<br />It is simply to identify the actusreus – read the offence itself<br />All elements of the actusreus must be proven for a conviction.<br />
    8. 8. Most criminal offences require that the accused take some action.<br />Some provisions make it a criminal offence to fail to act in circumstances where a duty to act exists – eg: necessities of life<br />It is understood that the actusreus must be committed voluntarily – the conscious choice of an operating mind<br />
    9. 9. s. 222(1) “a person commits homicide when, directly or indirectly, by any means, he causes the death of a human being”<br />
    10. 10. s. 90(1) “every person commits an offence who carries a weapon … concealed, unless the person is authorized under the Firearms Act to carry it concealed”<br />
    11. 11. Mens Rea<br />The mental element that accompanies the commission of the actusreus<br />The act must be done with a ‘guilty mind’<br />Sometimes the law specifies mensrea<br />Some don’t and you must use case law<br />
    12. 12. s. 319(2) it is an offence to “willfully promote hatred by communicating statements, other than in private conversation”<br />
    13. 13. Carelessly<br />Knowingly<br />Recklessly<br />Negligently<br />Fraudulently<br />
    14. 14. s. 265(1)(a) “A person commits an assault when … without the consent of another person, he applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly.”<br />
    15. 15. Subjective assessment of culpability<br />Insist that the prosecution prove that the accused actually knew that there was no consent<br />Objective assessment of culpability<br />The Crown must only establish that a reasonable person would have realized that there was no consent<br />Less concerned with the actual knowledge of the accused<br />
    16. 16. Objective Standard<br />In the 19th century, people were presumed to intend the natural consequences of their acts.<br />A natural consequence was one that a reasonable person would foresee.<br />If a reasonable person would foresee an actusreus, the actusreus was intended and mensrea was present<br />No concern for the accused’s mind at the time<br />
    17. 17. Subjective Standard<br />Coming into favour in Canada.<br />Requires that the Crown prove that the accused had the requisite intention at the time the offence was committed.<br />Links fault to the accused’s own choices, therefore fairer.<br />Criminal law is reserved for those those consciously choose to behave criminally<br />
    18. 18. The choice of subjective or objective is made by the offence, not the case. Once an offence is determined to be subjective or objective, it stays that way for all cases.<br />
    19. 19. R. vs. Lamb<br />Larry Lamb was a young man who owned a revolver that had a five-chambered cylinder that rotated clockwise each time the trigger was pulled. As a joke and with no intention of doing harm, Lamb pointed the revolver at his best friend. There were two bullets in the chambers, but neither bullet was in the chamber opposite the barrel. Lamb did not intend to fire the gun, but when he pulled the trigger, the cylinder rotated and placed a bullet opposite the barrel so that it was struck. Lamb killed his best friend.<br />
    20. 20. A female person who, being pregnant and about to be delivered, with intent that the child shall not live or with intent to conceal the birth of the child, fails to make provision for reasonable assistance in respect of her delivery is, if the child is permanently injured as a result thereof or dies immediately before, during or in a short time after birth, as a result thereof, guilt of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years.<br />
    21. 21. Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces or attempts to induce any person, whether or not he is the person threatened, accused or menaced or to whom violence is shown, to do anything or cause anything to be done.<br />
    22. 22. Absolute and Strict Liablity<br />Regulatory offences are offences that regulate otherwise desirable behaviour where harm could be caused if carried out improperly.<br />Until 1978 all were absolute liability offences<br />The Crown had only to prove the actusreus, no mensrea was necessary.<br />
    23. 23. 1978 R. v. Sault St. Marie, the Supreme Court changed this.<br />Strict Liability Offences introduced<br />Crown must provieactusreaus<br />Accused may prove that it was ‘duly diligent’ (took all reasonable care to avoid committing the offence) to avoid a conviction.<br />This is a compromise between strict liability and full criminal liability based on mensrea<br />
    24. 24. Assume that it is an offence under environmental protection legislation to discharge pollutants into a waterway. Assume also that the crown can prove that Company X dischaged pollutants into a river.<br />

    ×