Slideshow Transcript

1. Slide 1: z-shaped thinkers
2. Slide 2: Really good interaction design
3. Slide 3: SUBJECTIVE / QUALITATIVE Focused on Experiences (People, Activities, Context) Meaningful Has personal significance Pleasurable Memorable experience worth sharing Convenient THIS IS THE “CHASM” THAT IS REALLY, REALLY HARD FOR ORGANIZATIONS TO CROSS Super easy to use, works like I think Usable Can be used without difficulty Reliable Is available and accurate Functional (Useful) Works as programmed Focused on Tasks (Products, Features) OBJECTIVE / QUANTIFIABLE
4. Slide 5: “Never Use a Warning When you Mean Undo”
5. Slide 6: “Never Use a Warning When you Mean Undo”
6. Slide 7: “Never Use a Warning When you Mean Undo”
7. Slide 8: “Never Use a Warning When you Mean Undo” X “infinite scrolling”
8. Slide 9: “Never Use a Warning When you Mean Undo” X “infinite scrolling”
9. Slide 10: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers
10. Slide 11: Why ?
11. Slide 12: ‘T’ was taken...
12. Slide 13: ‘T’ was taken... T empathy to see patterns and branch out into other areas deep vertical expertise
13. Slide 14: -Shaped Thinkers?
14. Slide 15: V -Shaped Thinkers?
15. Slide 16: iShaped Thinkers?
16. Slide 17: Z
17. Slide 18: “When everyone zigs, zag.”
18. Slide 20: X
19. Slide 21: Z
20. Slide 22: Z
21. Slide 23: Z
22. Slide 25: reliable, but diminishing returns
23. Slide 26: reliable, but diminishing returns opportunity to ‘change the game’
24. Slide 27: ?
25. Slide 28: Nicholas Negroponte
26. Slide 29: Nicholas Negroponte George Lucas
27. Slide 30: Dean Kamen
28. Slide 31: minster buck fuller
29. Slide 32: Geodesic Dome Housing
30. Slide 33: The Fuller Projection
31. Slide 34: The Dymaxion Car
32. Slide 35: The Dymaxion Bathroom / Fog Gun Shower
33. Slide 36: “When everyone zigs, zag.”
34. Slide 37: Cool... But What does this have to do with application design and development?
35. Slide 38: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers approach challenges (of all kinds!) in different ways
36. Slide 39: Z
37. Slide 40: Z what happens here?
38. Slide 41: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers... challenge assumptions
39. Slide 42: “Ladders of Abstraction” also known as... Why? Why? WHY? WHY? WHY?
40. Slide 43: Build a tricycle with wings!
41. Slide 44: Build a tricycle (Silly Request) with wings!
42. Slide 45: Build a tricycle (Silly Request) with wings! B What color do you want it?
43. Slide 46: Build a tricycle (Silly Request) with wings! B We can try out some Ajax-coated titanium! B What color do you want it?
44. Slide 47: Build a tricycle (Silly Request) with wings! B b Stop. We can try Why is this out some valuable? And Ajax-coated for whom? titanium! B What color do you want it?
45. Slide 48: Things not broken modal transparent confirmation messages boxes
46. Slide 49: Things not broken
47. Slide 51: Context makes the content explicit (remove the darn labels!)
48. Slide 52: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers... reframe the problem
49. Slide 53: A ROUGH DESIGN MATURITY CONTINUUM DESIGN AS Design redefines the challenges facing the organization. FRAMING Framing sets the agenda, outlines the boundaries and axes of interest, and moves design from executing strategy to shaping strategy. Disruptive innovation lives here. Design finds new opportunities by solving existing problems. PROBLEM ? Design process generates alternatives within a problem space. Design also narrows down SOLVING those options to a specific solution. Design makes things work better. FUNCTION This is the classic practice of design - but it's still commonly limited to incremental + improvements through iteration over existing AND FORM solutions. Design is the gateway to be hip and cool. , STYLE Design is stylish, but too often is percieved and practiced as a cosmetic afterthought. Design value isn't recognized. ? NO CONSCIOUS This attitude fosters design by default - however things come out is fine, because DESIGN there are more important issues to deal with. (Jess McMullin - Design Maturity Model - http://www.bplusd.org/2005/10/19/a-rough-design-maturity-model/ )
50. Slide 54: Design a vase. (example from Marc Rettig)
51. Slide 55: Design a better way for people to enjoy flowers in their home. (example from Marc Rettig)
52. Slide 56: (Insert Jeremy’s example from Quizno’s)
53. Slide 57: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers... explore many perspectives
54. Slide 59: http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2007/01/sobering_though.html
55. Slide 60: http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2007/01/sobering_though.html Coopetition
56. Slide 61: http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2007/01/sobering_though.html Coopetition 3rd Party Developers
57. Slide 62: http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2007/01/sobering_though.html Coopetition Government Regulations 3rd Party Developers
58. Slide 63: http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2007/01/sobering_though.html Global Market Coopetition Government Regulations 3rd Party Developers
59. Slide 64: ‘the important stuff’ changes over time... What about different ‘time-based’ layouts?
60. Slide 65: ‘the important stuff’ changes over time... Confirmation What about different ‘time-based’ layouts?
61. Slide 66: ‘the important stuff’ changes over time... Navigation What about different ‘time-based’ layouts?
62. Slide 67: ‘the important stuff’ changes over time... Check-In What about different ‘time-based’ layouts?
63. Slide 68: ‘the important stuff’ changes over time... What about different ‘time-based’ layouts?
64. Slide 69: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers... synthesize information
65. Slide 70: + = Fog Gun Shower
66. Slide 71: Project A Project B Project A Project B Project C
67. Slide 72: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers... challenge assumptions reframe the problem explore many perspectives synthesize information
68. Slide 73: ‘Z’-Shaped Thinkers... challenge assumptions reframe the problem explore many perspectives synthesize information in order to... envision unseen opportunities
69. Slide 75: Thanks! ME MY PERSONAL SITE THE BEST WAY TO REACH ME Stephen P. Anderson / www.poetpainter.com