Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>The pre-eminent strategy document </li></ul><ul><li>E...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Defense Planning Guidance </li></ul><ul><li>DPG FY 04...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Quadrennial Defense Review </li></ul><ul><li>Required...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Nuclear Posture Review </li></ul><ul><li>DoD report t...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Contingency Planning Guidance </li></ul><ul><li>Fulfi...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Transformation Planning Guidance </li></ul><ul><li>Pr...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Study what changes to US over- </li></ul><ul><li>seas...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Provides advice of CJCS to the  </li></ul><ul><li>Pre...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan </li></ul><ul><li>P...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Provides guidance for  military transformation </li><...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Defines the process that translates emerging joint co...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Amplifies a particular function or  </li></ul><ul><li...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Conducted to assess or review  </li></ul><ul><li>spec...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Provides the next level of resolution  </li></ul><ul>...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships Integrate joint and Service concepts in  an operational level...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Naval Operational Concept </li></ul><ul><li>Operation...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Vision of how Navy will organize, integrate, and tran...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Establishes the SECNAV’s vision  </li></ul><ul><li>fo...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>USN CONOPS </li></ul><ul><li>Based on DPG guidance  <...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Bridging document between strategy & programs.  Descr...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Identify and prioritize Capability Objectives needed ...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>I ntegrated  R esources  R equirements  M anagement  ...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Define document’s purpose </li></ul><ul><li>Brief des...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Naval Transformation Roadmap </li></ul><ul><li>Provid...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Operational Availability  Study </li></ul><ul><li>DPG...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Navy Operational Availability  Study </li></ul><ul><l...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Navy Forward Presence Study </li></ul><ul><li>Attempt...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>National Security Policy Directives </li></ul><ul><li...
Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Define document’s purpose </li></ul><ul><li>Brief des...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Strategy Documents1a

1,966

Published on

Informs Strategic documents map

Published in: Health & Medicine, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,966
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
27
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Strategy Documents1a"

  1. 1. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>The pre-eminent strategy document </li></ul><ul><li>Encompasses all aspects of National power </li></ul>Published Classification: UNCLASS National Security Council (Ms. Condoleezza Rice) OPNAV POC: N513 NSS DPG NMS NSS
  2. 2. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Defense Planning Guidance </li></ul><ul><li>DPG FY 04-09 provides direction for DoD components to develop their FY 04-09 program submissions and the President’s FY04 budget submission. </li></ul><ul><li>The DPG focuses on plans and programs that enhance joint warfighting capabilities, including the interoperability, training and experimentation needed to support those capabilities. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>DPG FY04-09 was signed out effective 3 May 02 </li></ul><ul><li>Numerous studies, briefs and program reviews directed by DPG are in progress </li></ul><ul><li>DPG FY 05-09 started 1st week of Nov 02: </li></ul><ul><li>Purpose is to refine, not re-write, DPG 04 </li></ul><ul><li>Goal for publication is 15 March 03 </li></ul><ul><li>OSD (Policy) and OSD (PA&E) share lead </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV Lead: N8 </li></ul>DPG (to PPBS) DPG NSS TPG FP Study OA Study QDR JPD
  3. 3. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Quadrennial Defense Review </li></ul><ul><li>Required by Congress every 4 years after Presidential inauguration. </li></ul><ul><li>Used by Administration to conduct comprehensive review of defense strategy </li></ul><ul><li>2 x QDRs to date: 1997 & 2001 </li></ul><ul><li>Next QDR in 2005 </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: UNCLASS </li></ul><ul><li>QDR 2001 report released Sept 2001 </li></ul><ul><li>Next QDR report due Sept 2005 </li></ul><ul><li>OSD is principal author </li></ul><ul><li>CJCS required by Congress to do separate assessment of risk </li></ul><ul><li>Services can provide input, but have limited ability to influence content </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC: QDR Cell </li></ul><ul><li>QDR 2001 cell established in N8 in Sept 2000, disestablished Oct 2001 </li></ul><ul><li>N51 (N512/513) support strategy/policy aspects of QDR </li></ul>QDR DPG QDR
  4. 4. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Nuclear Posture Review </li></ul><ul><li>DoD report to President and Congress which provides blueprint for strategic posture. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Current NPR signed by SecDef Dec 2001 </li></ul><ul><li>NPR Implementer (tasking from SecDef to Services based on NPR) is in draft. Signature expected Dec 2002. </li></ul><ul><li>Lead: OSD </li></ul><ul><li>Implementation is closely coordinated w/JS, Services, STRATCOM and DOE. </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC: N51 (N514) </li></ul>NPR NMS NPR
  5. 5. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Contingency Planning Guidance </li></ul><ul><li>Fulfills Title X, USC requirement for written policy guidance for CJCS and Combatant Commanders to prepare and review contingency plans. </li></ul><ul><li>Drafted by OSD, approved by President. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul>The 2002 CPG was approved by the President on 28 June 02 and signed out by SECDEF effective 1 July 02 <ul><li>OSD Document </li></ul><ul><li>JS Lead: J5/Strategic Plans and Policy Directorate </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC: N51 (N512) </li></ul>CPG CPG JSCP
  6. 6. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Transformation Planning Guidance </li></ul><ul><li>Provides rationale for </li></ul><ul><li>transformation </li></ul><ul><li>Provides tasks relating to </li></ul><ul><li>transformation to the Services, </li></ul><ul><li>JS, OSD, and JFCOM </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Draft in work </li></ul><ul><li>Current draft: 31 October 02 </li></ul><ul><li>Out for Service Chief chop (due 8 Nov) </li></ul><ul><li>D/FT has lead for OSD </li></ul><ul><li>N71 has Navy lead </li></ul>TPG DPG TPG JV JCC JOCs NTR
  7. 7. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Study what changes to US over- </li></ul><ul><li>seas presence must take place to </li></ul><ul><li>account for new realities & a new </li></ul><ul><li>defense strategy. </li></ul><ul><li>- DPG Directed </li></ul><ul><li>Briefed to OPSDEP tank (Early Oct 02) </li></ul><ul><li>Brief was stopped short due to time </li></ul><ul><li>JCS tank TBD </li></ul><ul><li>DASD/Strategy is lead agency </li></ul><ul><li>N513 is OPNAV liaison to </li></ul><ul><li>DASD/Strategy </li></ul>FP Study DPG FP Study Navy Fwd Pres Study
  8. 8. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Provides advice of CJCS to the </li></ul><ul><li>President and SECDEF on the </li></ul><ul><li>strategic direction of the Armed </li></ul><ul><li>Forces. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: Unclassified </li></ul><ul><li>Approved by OPSDEPS. </li></ul><ul><li>JCS decision Brief 6 Nov 02. </li></ul><ul><li>Publication Dec 02. </li></ul>Lead: J-5. OPNAV POC: N51 (N513) NMS NSS NMS JV JCC NOC JOCs
  9. 9. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan </li></ul><ul><li>Provides guidance to Combatant Commanders, Service Chiefs and Defense Agencies to accomplish tasks and missions based on near-term capabilities </li></ul><ul><li>Apportions resources to the Combatant Commanders </li></ul><ul><li>Implements deliberate planning guidance reflected in the CPG </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>JSCP 2002 was approved by CJCS and signed 01 Nov 02 </li></ul><ul><li>Work has begun on JSCP 02 chng 1 to refine force apportionment as Combatant Commanders develop their Swiftly Defeat The Efforts (SDTE) plans. </li></ul><ul><li>Joint Staff document: J5/Strategic Planning and Policy Directorate </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC: N51 (N512) </li></ul>JSCP (to COCOM plans) NMS CPG JSCP
  10. 10. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Provides guidance for military transformation </li></ul><ul><li>Joint Warfare </li></ul><ul><li>Joint Concepts </li></ul><ul><li>Joint Capabilities </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: Unclassified </li></ul><ul><li>As of 28 Oct 02 </li></ul><ul><li>Signed by CJCS </li></ul><ul><li>Forwarded to SECDEF </li></ul><ul><li>for endorsement </li></ul><ul><li>DJ7 has lead </li></ul><ul><li>N513 has Navy lead </li></ul>JV NMS JCC JV JIMP Func Concepts
  11. 11. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Defines the process that translates emerging joint concepts into warfighting capabilities through </li></ul><ul><li>experimentation and assessments. </li></ul><ul><li>JV describes the conduct of future joint warfare. The JIMP details the process, from concept to capability, that will support achieving the Chairman’s Vision. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: Unclassified </li></ul>Approved 15 Apr 01 <ul><li>DJ7 has lead </li></ul><ul><li>N513 had lead </li></ul><ul><li>N81 supported </li></ul><ul><li>COG shift to N70 </li></ul>JIMP JV JIMP
  12. 12. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Amplifies a particular function or </li></ul><ul><li>describes how to employ a system or </li></ul><ul><li>conduct a task. </li></ul><ul><li>A functional concept may be specific to a particular operating concept or it may </li></ul><ul><li>apply broadly to multiple concepts. </li></ul><ul><li>Provides the detail for experiments and </li></ul><ul><li>establishes a benchmark against which </li></ul><ul><li>to measure improvement. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: TBD </li></ul><ul><li>Functional Concept development TBD. </li></ul><ul><li>Will flow from existing JWCAs. </li></ul><ul><li>Lead will be JWCA offices under J-5. </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC: N51/N81 </li></ul>Functional Concept s JCC JOCs Service Concepts Functional Concepts
  13. 13. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Conducted to assess or review </li></ul><ul><li>specific aspects of the NMS between </li></ul><ul><li>NMS cycles ( 4 years ) </li></ul><ul><li>Supports NMS – feeds the same </li></ul><ul><li>documents during the NMS off-years </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>No JSR during NMS publication year </li></ul><ul><li>DJ5 has overall lead </li></ul><ul><li>N513 is Navy lead </li></ul>JSR NMS NOC JSR
  14. 14. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Provides the next level of resolution </li></ul><ul><li>below JV. Amplifies the JV key ideas </li></ul><ul><li>to provide a more detailed foundation </li></ul><ul><li>for follow on concept development, </li></ul><ul><li>experimentation and assessment. </li></ul><ul><li>JCC focus is on the employment of joint </li></ul><ul><li>forces in missions across the range of </li></ul><ul><li>military operations. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: Unclassified </li></ul><ul><li>Outline approved by JROC 17 Oct 02 </li></ul><ul><li>Outline due SECDEF 1 Nov. </li></ul><ul><li>Final Document due SECDEF 1 Feb 03. </li></ul>Lead: J-7 Support: J-8, JFCOM OPNAV POC: N51 (N513) JCC JV JOCs Service Concepts Functional Concepts JCC
  15. 15. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships Integrate joint and Service concepts in an operational level perspective for joint concept development and experimentation. Describes how a Joint Force Commander will plan, prepare, deploy, employ and sustain a joint force along a specified range of the range of military operations. Classification: TBD <ul><li>JOC development TBD. </li></ul><ul><li>Will follow JCC. </li></ul>Each individual JOC will be lead by a Combatant Commander or Service as directed. JOCs JV JOCs Service Concepts Functional Concepts JCC
  16. 16. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Naval Operational Concept </li></ul><ul><li>Operationalizes Naval Force Concepts: </li></ul><ul><li>Seapower-21 </li></ul><ul><li>Marine-21 </li></ul><ul><li>Entry point for Service concepts in JCC </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: UNCLASS </li></ul><ul><li>Draft In work </li></ul><ul><li>TOR/Outline approved </li></ul><ul><li>1 st Draft to released 22 Oct </li></ul><ul><li>Responses to NWDC 25 Oct </li></ul><ul><li>CFFC/CO MCCDC brief 7 Nov </li></ul><ul><li>CNO/CMC brief TBD </li></ul><ul><li>NWDC and MCCDC have lead in drafting </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC: N51 (N513) </li></ul>NOC NMS JCC Mar. Info OPS CONOPS NTR SP21 Global CONOPS NOC JSR JOCs Strategic Planning Framework
  17. 17. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Vision of how Navy will organize, integrate, and transform through Sea Strike, Sea Shield, Sea Basing, FORCEnet, Sea Warrior, Sea Trial and Sea Enterprise. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: Unclassified </li></ul><ul><li>Series of Proceedings articles </li></ul><ul><li>Overview and Sea Shield published </li></ul><ul><li>Other articles to follow </li></ul><ul><li>N00Z lead </li></ul><ul><li>N513 transitioning to lead for briefings/ownership </li></ul>SP21 NP21 SP21 NOC
  18. 18. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Establishes the SECNAV’s vision </li></ul><ul><li>for the Naval forces </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: UNCLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Approved Oct 02 </li></ul><ul><li>Deep Blue had Navy lead </li></ul><ul><li>N513 supported </li></ul><ul><li>SIG coord for USMC </li></ul>NP21 NP21 SP21 SECNAV Posture Stmt
  19. 19. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>USN CONOPS </li></ul><ul><li>Based on DPG guidance </li></ul><ul><li>Services will achieve capabilities </li></ul><ul><li>for deterring aggression & coercion. </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Published </li></ul><ul><li>N-8 Document </li></ul><ul><li>Currently no action for N3/N5 </li></ul><ul><li>Would be co-opted if SPF concept </li></ul><ul><li>is accepted </li></ul>GlobalCONOP S Global CONOPS NOC Strategic Planning Framework
  20. 20. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Bridging document between strategy & programs. Describes how Navy will operate in 1-4-2-1 context: </li></ul><ul><li>7-12 years out and 15-19 years out </li></ul><ul><li>Companion document to NSPG </li></ul><ul><li>Bridge from QDR, JV, SP-21 and NTR to PPBS process </li></ul><ul><li>Leads into Campaign Analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: TBD (likely CLASSIFIED ) </li></ul><ul><li>Concept being developed in N513 </li></ul><ul><li>In development </li></ul>Strategic PlanningFramewor k Mar. Info OPS CONOPS NSPG NTR Global CONOPS NOC Navy OA Study Strategic Planning Framework
  21. 21. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Identify and prioritize Capability Objectives needed to support the execution of the strategy. </li></ul><ul><li>Bridge from QDR, NMS, JV, SP-21, and NTR to PPBS process </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: UNCLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Draft Navy version in review by OPNAV and CFFC/NWDC. </li></ul><ul><li>Final draft expected by 1 Nov </li></ul><ul><li>Naval (w/ USMC) planned for APR 03 </li></ul><ul><li>N513 lead </li></ul><ul><li>Draft on annual basis (each APR) </li></ul><ul><li>With N512, monitor implementation (MCPs) </li></ul>NSPG IRRMP NSPG Strategic Planning Framework
  22. 22. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>I ntegrated R esources R equirements M anagement P rocess </li></ul><ul><li>DNS attempt at OPNAV organizational </li></ul><ul><li>and process (PPBS) improvement </li></ul><ul><li>Results will be incorporated into </li></ul><ul><li>NSPG & SPF framework </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: TBD (likely to be UNCLASSIFIED ) </li></ul>In work. Due Date unknown. <ul><li>DNS Lead </li></ul><ul><li>N3/N5A is N3N5 lead </li></ul><ul><li>N513 has had inputs </li></ul><ul><li>N512 has had inputs </li></ul>IRRMP . (to PPBS) IRRMP NSPG
  23. 23. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Define document’s purpose </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul><ul><li>List the document’s current status </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul><ul><li>List Lead/Action Organization respon. </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul>Maritime InfoCONOP S Mar. Info OPS CONOPS NOC Strategic Planning Framework
  24. 24. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Naval Transformation Roadmap </li></ul><ul><li>Provides Service path to </li></ul><ul><li>transformation </li></ul><ul><li>Assessed and tracked by OSD </li></ul><ul><li>D/FT </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: UNCLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Published </li></ul><ul><li>Next update due 1 March 2003 </li></ul><ul><li>N71 to reconvene NTR working </li></ul><ul><li>group in Nov 2002 </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC : N71 </li></ul><ul><li>N51 (N513) supports </li></ul><ul><li>Marine Corps POC : MCCDC </li></ul>NTR NTR NOC TPG JOCs
  25. 25. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Operational Availability Study </li></ul><ul><li>DPG 04 directed CJCS to study concept of Operational Availability to determine the joint military capabilities and force employment timelines required to accomplish emerging missions in the 2002 CPG. </li></ul><ul><li>OA final report recommendations will feed DPG-05 </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Interim Report (near term scenario) briefed to DepSecDef in Aug, SecDef in Sept </li></ul><ul><li>Final Report (including all sub-studies) due by 31 Mar 03. </li></ul><ul><li>JS Lead: J8/Warfighting Analysis Division </li></ul><ul><li>Note: JROC oversight of study </li></ul><ul><li>OPNAV POC: N51 (N512) </li></ul>OA Study DPG Navy OA Study OA Study (+ 5 substudies)
  26. 26. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Navy Operational Availability Study </li></ul><ul><li>Navy OA Study goal is to examine “Strategy-to-capability mismatches” and recommend courses of action to re-align resources. </li></ul><ul><li>The 5 OA sub-studies will conduct alternative analysis to provide recommendations addressing OA shortfalls/overages and to improve responsiveness of forces </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: CLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Sub-studies are progressing at different rates, general goal is for each sub-study to have developed their CONOPS by 1 st week of December 02 to support OA modeling. </li></ul><ul><li>Navy OA Leads: </li></ul><ul><li>Overall study lead: N51 (N512) </li></ul><ul><li>Strategic Reserve: N512 </li></ul><ul><li>Executing Swiftly Defeat: N816 </li></ul><ul><li>AC/RC Mix: N512 </li></ul><ul><li>Worldwide PrePo assets: N421 </li></ul><ul><li>Force generation/Rotation Ratios: N512 </li></ul>Navy OA Study Navy OA Study OA Study (+ 5 substudies)
  27. 27. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Navy Forward Presence Study </li></ul><ul><li>Attempts to answer </li></ul><ul><li>What activities does presence consist of? </li></ul><ul><li>What do we get from presence? </li></ul><ul><li>Where should presence be? </li></ul><ul><li>What should presence look like in the future? </li></ul><ul><li>Classification: UNCLASSIFIED </li></ul><ul><li>Draft in progress </li></ul><ul><li>Initial outline approved by N513 </li></ul><ul><li>Info gathering from NWC, CNA, GAO, CRS, CBO, available literature </li></ul>OPNAV POC: N51 (N513) Navy FP Study NMS NSS TSC Guidance QDR Report QDR Report Navy FP Study SP-21
  28. 28. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>National Security Policy Directives </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul><ul><li>List the document’s current status </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul><ul><li>List Lead/Action Organization respon. </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul>NSPD 17 4 NMS NSPDs
  29. 29. Purpose Organizational Responsibilities Status Relationships <ul><li>Define document’s purpose </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul><ul><li>List the document’s current status </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul><ul><li>List Lead/Action Organization respon. </li></ul><ul><li>Brief description </li></ul><ul><li>2-3 lines max </li></ul>DOCUMENT TITLE
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×