Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
StatiSense ® - Wale Micaiah ©UTME 2013:UTME 2013:UTME 2013:UTME 2013:Candidates’ PerformanceCandidates’ PerformanceCandida...
UTME2013:44.91%44.91%44.91%44.91%Scored 200and Above
The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board(JAMB) released the 2013 Unified TertiaryMatriculation Examination (UTME) resu...
A total of 1,735,729 candidates applied for UTME2013; with the introduction of other testingmodes – ComputerComputerComput...
UTME results are usually announced by the Registrar ofJAMB, Prof. Dibu Ojerinde, in a news conference.Besides other inform...
No. ofNo. ofNo. ofNo. of Candidates That Sat forCandidates That Sat forCandidates That Sat forCandidates That Sat for UTME...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored Below 170Candidates Scored Below 170Candidates Scored Below...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 170Candidates Scored 170Candidates Scored 170Candidates Sco...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored Below 200Candidates Scored Below 200Candidates Scored Below...
No.No.No.No. That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200 andandandand AboveAboveAboveAbove44.91% of candi...
No.No.No.No. That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200 andandandand AboveAboveAboveAbove (contd.)(contd...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 200Candidates Scored 200Candidates Scored 200Candidates Sco...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 250Candidates Scored 250Candidates Scored 250Candidates Sco...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 270Candidates Scored 270Candidates Scored 270Candidates Sco...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 300 & AboveCandidates Scored 300 & AboveCandidates Scored 3...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates With InvalidCandidates With InvalidCandidates With InvalidCandidat...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Results Withheld for MalpracticeResults Withheld for MalpracticeResults Withh...
No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Results BeingResults BeingResults BeingResults BeingInvestigated & AbsentInve...
In Summary:In Summary:In Summary:In Summary:YearYearYearYearRated UTME YearRated UTME YearRated UTME YearRated UTME YearBe...
Even though more candidate scored 200 andAbove in UTME 2013 (44.91% = 738,375), incomparison with the available admission ...
Nevertheless, it is still disturbing that for straightfive years we have not been able to achieve 50%pass rate.UTME2013:UT...
Freely share use and acknowledge the source – © Wale MicaiahDataDataDataData sourcesourcesourcesource::::- UTME result as ...
StatiSense ® - Wale Micaiah ©Freely share, freely use and freely recognize thesource – © Wale MicaiahDataDataDataData sour...
Utme-2013-performance-analysis
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Utme-2013-performance-analysis

570

Published on

Published in: Education, News & Politics
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
570
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
15
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Utme-2013-performance-analysis"

  1. 1. StatiSense ® - Wale Micaiah ©UTME 2013:UTME 2013:UTME 2013:UTME 2013:Candidates’ PerformanceCandidates’ PerformanceCandidates’ PerformanceCandidates’ PerformanceAnalysisAnalysisAnalysisAnalysis
  2. 2. UTME2013:44.91%44.91%44.91%44.91%Scored 200and Above
  3. 3. The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board(JAMB) released the 2013 Unified TertiaryMatriculation Examination (UTME) results less thanone week after it was conducted on the 27th ofApril, 2013.InInInIn additionadditionadditionaddition wewewewe willwillwillwill testtesttesttest ifififif::::“The general performance of candidates in thisyear’s examination shows remarkableremarkableremarkableremarkable improvementimprovementimprovementimprovementcompared with last year” (as(as(as(as reportedreportedreportedreported inininin somesomesomesome dailies)dailies)dailies)dailies)This study is carried out to analyze candidates’performance in UTME 2013 as well as to establish –if any – any appreciable improvement and to whatdegree from previous performance.
  4. 4. A total of 1,735,729 candidates applied for UTME2013; with the introduction of other testingmodes – ComputerComputerComputerComputer BasedBasedBasedBased TestingTestingTestingTesting (CBT)(CBT)(CBT)(CBT) and DualDualDualDual(Computer/Paper(Computer/Paper(Computer/Paper(Computer/Paper)))) BasedBasedBasedBased TestingTestingTestingTesting (DBT)(DBT)(DBT)(DBT) – below isthe breakdown of candidates choices:Exams have been conducted for DBT and PPTalready, totally 1,644,119 candidates. CBT examswill be conducted from May 18th to June 1st, 2013.TESTING MODETESTING MODETESTING MODETESTING MODE USEDUSEDUSEDUSEDComputer-Based Testing 91,610Dual (Computer/Paper) Based Testing 15,008Paper & Pencil Testing 1,629,111Grand Total:Grand Total:Grand Total:Grand Total: 1,735,7291,735,7291,735,7291,735,729
  5. 5. UTME results are usually announced by the Registrar ofJAMB, Prof. Dibu Ojerinde, in a news conference.Besides other information, the following are extractedand therefore used in this analysis:No. of candidates that sat for UTMENo. that scored 200 and aboveNo. of UTME candidates scored below 200No. of UTME candidates scored below 170No. of UTME candidates scored 170 – 199No. of UTME candidates scored 200 – 249No. of UTME candidates scored 250 – 269No. of UTME candidates scored 270 – 299No. of UTME candidates scored above 300No. of UTME candidates with invalid or incomplete resultsNo. of UTME results withheld for malpracticeNo. of UTME results being investigatedAbsent
  6. 6. No. ofNo. ofNo. ofNo. of Candidates That Sat forCandidates That Sat forCandidates That Sat forCandidates That Sat for UTMEUTMEUTMEUTMEYearYearYearYear Total CandidatesTotal CandidatesTotal CandidatesTotal Candidates % Increase% Increase% Increase% Increase2009 1,182,381 -2010 1,375,652 16.352011 1,493,604 8.572012 1,503,931 0.692013 1,735,729* 15.41UTME started in 2010 following the merger ofMonotechnics, Polytechnics and Colleges of Education(MPCE) and University Matriculation Examinations(UME). This could have contributed to the 16.35%increase in the number of applicants.Total applicant is 1,735,729 while 1,644,119 applicants have tested already having chosenPPT and DBT as testing modes. Hence, 1,644,110 will be used in subsequent calculations
  7. 7. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored Below 170Candidates Scored Below 170Candidates Scored Below 170Candidates Scored Below 170Performance in this category is far better for 2013compared to previous years. Only 14.02% scored lessthan 170, UTME 2012 being the worst – 22.36%.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate Below 170Below 170Below 170Below 170 %%%%2009 1,182,381 167,251 14.15%2010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 201,798 13.51%2012 1,503,931 336,330 22.36%2013 1,644,119 230,506 14.02%Evidently, these candidates do not qualify forEvidently, these candidates do not qualify forEvidently, these candidates do not qualify forEvidently, these candidates do not qualify for PostUMEPostUMEPostUMEPostUMEin Universities, may be some Polytechnic/College ofin Universities, may be some Polytechnic/College ofin Universities, may be some Polytechnic/College ofin Universities, may be some Polytechnic/College ofEducation would accept them.Education would accept them.Education would accept them.Education would accept them.
  8. 8. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 170Candidates Scored 170Candidates Scored 170Candidates Scored 170 –––– 199199199199Year 2013 shows a great improvement from 2012;34.75% scored between 170 and 199. However, UTME2011 still emerged the best in this category with 42.93%of candidates.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate 170170170170 –––– 199199199199 %%%%2009 1,182,381 293,451 24.822010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 641,143 42.932012 1,503,931 374,920 24.932013 1,644,119 571,298 34.75This category is qualified for both College ofThis category is qualified for both College ofThis category is qualified for both College ofThis category is qualified for both College ofEducation and PolytechnicEducation and PolytechnicEducation and PolytechnicEducation and Polytechnic PostUMEPostUMEPostUMEPostUME....
  9. 9. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored Below 200Candidates Scored Below 200Candidates Scored Below 200Candidates Scored Below 200If most Universities decide to peg PostUMEqualification criterion at 200 marks fromUTME; 41% of candidates will not bequalified for University admission.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate BelowBelowBelowBelow 200200200200 %%%%2009 1,182,381 460,702 38.962010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 842,851 56.432012 1,503,931 711,250 47.292013 1,644,119 674,787 41.04
  10. 10. No.No.No.No. That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200 andandandand AboveAboveAboveAbove44.91% of candidates obtained score greater than orequal to 200 (of 400). This is just a slight improvementfrom that of 2012 with 44.78%.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate ScoreScoreScoreScore ≥≥≥≥ 200200200200 % (% (% (% (≥≥≥≥200)200)200)200)2009 1,182,381 548,543 46.39%2010 1,375,652 501,463 36.45%2011 1,493,604 597,494 40.00%2012 1,503,931 673,394 44.78%2013 1,644,119 738,375 44.91%In essence, less than 50% Candidatesscored 200 and above in UTME 2013.
  11. 11. No.No.No.No. That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200That Scored 200 andandandand AboveAboveAboveAbove (contd.)(contd.)(contd.)(contd.)Even though more candidates scored “200 and above”in 2013; there are lesser admission opportunitycompared to that of 2012. 70.42% are eligible forPostUME if 200 is the benchmark for consideration asagianst 74.25% in 2012.YearYearYearYear Score ≥ 200Score ≥ 200Score ≥ 200Score ≥ 200CarryingCarryingCarryingCarryingCapacityCapacityCapacityCapacity% of Carrying% of Carrying% of Carrying% of CarryingCapacityCapacityCapacityCapacity2009 548,543 183,420 33.442010 501,463 - -2011 597,494 400,000 66.952012 673,394 500,000 74.252013 738,375 520,000 70.42
  12. 12. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 200Candidates Scored 200Candidates Scored 200Candidates Scored 200 –––– 2492492492492013 candidates emerged the best in this category;generally, there is an appreciable increase from 2011 to2013.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate 200200200200 –––– 249249249249 %%%%2009 1,182,381 - -2010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 495,426 33.17%2012 1,503,931 601,151 39.97%2013 1,644,119 704,622 42.86%About 43% of 1.7million candidatesscored between 200 and 249!.
  13. 13. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 250Candidates Scored 250Candidates Scored 250Candidates Scored 250 –––– 269269269269There is a sharp drop for 2013 candidates as only 2.01%achieved a score of 250 – 269.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate 250250250250 –––– 269269269269 %%%%2009 1,182,381 - -2010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 67,732 4.53%2012 1,503,931 71,339 4.74%2013 1,644,119 33,115 2.01%This implies approximately only 2% ofcandidates scored 60% of 400 marks!.
  14. 14. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 270Candidates Scored 270Candidates Scored 270Candidates Scored 270 –––– 299299299299Fewer number of candidates scored 270 – 279compared to UTME 2011 and 2012.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate 270270270270 –––– 299299299299 %%%%2009 1,182,381 - -2010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 31,444 2.11%2012 1,503,931 901 0.06%2013 1,644,119 628 0.04%There is a progressive and consistent dropin number of candidates in this category.
  15. 15. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates Scored 300 & AboveCandidates Scored 300 & AboveCandidates Scored 300 & AboveCandidates Scored 300 & AboveCandidates in this category increased byover 300% from that of UTME 2012;however, UTME 2011 is still of greatachievement compare to others.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate Score ≥ 300Score ≥ 300Score ≥ 300Score ≥ 300 %%%%2009 1,182,381 - -2010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 2,892 0.193632012 1,503,931 3 0.000202013 1,644,119 10 0.00061
  16. 16. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Candidates With InvalidCandidates With InvalidCandidates With InvalidCandidates With Invalidor Incomplete Resultsor Incomplete Resultsor Incomplete Resultsor Incomplete ResultsAccording to JAMB, those who are in this categoryare as a result of either multiple shading or nomultiple shading or nomultiple shading or nomultiple shading or noshading at allshading at allshading at allshading at all.YearYearYearYearTotalTotalTotalTotalCandidateCandidateCandidateCandidateInvalid orInvalid orInvalid orInvalid orIncomplete ResultsIncomplete ResultsIncomplete ResultsIncomplete Results%%%%2009 1,182,381 - -2010 1,375,652 - -2011 1,493,604 28,069 1.882012 1,503,931 5,161 0.342013 1,644,119 40,692 2.48Financially, this is 40,672 x 4,600 = NNNN187,091,200187,091,200187,091,200187,091,200*A UTME form cost NNNN4,600 [4,600 [4,600 [4,600 [without online registration]]]]
  17. 17. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Results Withheld for MalpracticeResults Withheld for MalpracticeResults Withheld for MalpracticeResults Withheld for MalpracticeUTME 2013 malpractice figure is the lowest in thelast five UTME. Technology though has aidedcandidates in this act, it also shows that JAMB hasdeveloped a more proven strategy to curbingmalpractices in UTME.YearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate WithheldWithheldWithheldWithheld %%%%2009 1,182,381 23,819 2.012010 1,375,652 20,780 1.512011 1,493,604 15,160 1.012012 1,503,931 27,266 1.812013 1,644,119 12,110 0.74
  18. 18. No. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTMENo. of UTME Results BeingResults BeingResults BeingResults BeingInvestigated & AbsentInvestigated & AbsentInvestigated & AbsentInvestigated & AbsentYearYearYearYear Total CandidateTotal CandidateTotal CandidateTotal Candidate InvestigatedInvestigatedInvestigatedInvestigated AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent2009 1,182,381 - -2010 1,375,652 - 98,8572011 1,493,604 7,504 -2012 1,503,931 - -2013 1,644,119 68,309 47,974Absent: 47,974 x 4,600 = NNNN220,680,400220,680,400220,680,400220,680,400
  19. 19. In Summary:In Summary:In Summary:In Summary:YearYearYearYearRated UTME YearRated UTME YearRated UTME YearRated UTME YearBestBestBestBest WorstWorstWorstWorstScored Below 170 2011 2012Scored 170 – 199 2009 2011Scored Below 200 2009 2011Scored 200 and Above 2013 2010Scored 200 – 249 2013 2011Scored 250 – 269 2012 2013Scored 270 – 299 2011 2013Scored above 300 2011 2012Invalid or Incomplete Results 2012 2013Withheld for Malpractice 2013 2009
  20. 20. Even though more candidate scored 200 andAbove in UTME 2013 (44.91% = 738,375), incomparison with the available admission spaces,year 2012 is better as more candidates hadhigher chances of admission.From this analysis, we cannot say that this year’sexamination shows “remarkable“remarkable“remarkable“remarkable improvementimprovementimprovementimprovementcomparedcomparedcomparedcompared withwithwithwith lastlastlastlast year”year”year”year”. Though morecandidates can compete for the 520,000 availableadmission spaces compared to last year 500,000,but the carrying capacity of 2012 (74.25%) gaveopportunity to more candidates compared to2013 (70.42%).
  21. 21. Nevertheless, it is still disturbing that for straightfive years we have not been able to achieve 50%pass rate.UTME2013:UTME2013:UTME2013:UTME2013: 44.91%44.91%44.91%44.91%UTME2012: 44.78%UTME2012: 44.78%UTME2012: 44.78%UTME2012: 44.78%UTME2011:UTME2011:UTME2011:UTME2011: 40.00%40.00%40.00%40.00%UTME2010: 36.45%UTME2010: 36.45%UTME2010: 36.45%UTME2010: 36.45%UTME2009:UTME2009:UTME2009:UTME2009: 46.39%46.39%46.39%46.39%Scored 200 & AboveScored 200 & AboveScored 200 & AboveScored 200 & Above
  22. 22. Freely share use and acknowledge the source – © Wale MicaiahDataDataDataData sourcesourcesourcesource::::- UTME result as announced in the dailiesAnalysis by: WaleWaleWaleWale MicaiahMicaiahMicaiahMicaiaheeee:::: walegate@yahoo.commmmm:::: 08078001800bbbb:::: walemicaiah.blog.comwwww.... www.statisense.info
  23. 23. StatiSense ® - Wale Micaiah ©Freely share, freely use and freely recognize thesource – © Wale MicaiahDataDataDataData sourcesourcesourcesource::::- JAMB result as announced in the dailiesAnalysis by: WaleWaleWaleWale MicaiahMicaiahMicaiahMicaiaheeee:::: walegate@yahoo.commmmm:::: 08078001800bbbb:::: walemicaiah.blog.comwwww.... www.statisense.info
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×