Open Hole Logging: Potential Gamma Ray Interpretation Concerns

  • 1,774 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,774
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
46
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Open Hole Logging: Potential Gamma-Ray Interpretation Concerns 1 1 2 Staffan Kristian Van Dyke , Jim Basick , and Vinay K. Sahay 1 Nexen Petroleum U.S.A. Inc., Dallas, TX, U.S.A. (email: staffan_vandyke@nexeninc.com) 1 Nexen Petroleum U.S.A. Inc., Dallas, TX, U.S.A. (email: jim_basick@nexeninc.com) 2 Maheshwari Mining Ltd, Ramesh Nagar, India (email: geo_vinay@yahoo.co.in) When used as a standalone tool for Vshale, there are some known issues about gamma-ray (GR) logging to consider. Petrophysicists frequently use the term ‘Vshale’ or ‘Vclay’ (where V stands for Volume) to help establish gamma-ray cut-off values (baseline) to determine a shale from a clean sandstone in clastic depositional environments. Typically, in most geologic settings, this works with reasonably well, but of course, the tool, and the use of a single measurement, isn’t always perfect. So, what exactly is a gamma-ray tool actually measuring? Radioactivity. Because most shales tend to contain one, or more, of the radioactive elements Potassium (K), Thorium (Th), or Uranium (U), they have higher radioactivity levels (Figure 1). The higher the radioactivity measured, the ‘hotter’ the interval. Since sandstones typically have few radioactive minerals, they are termed ‘clean.’ GR response is usually calibrated by a ‘clean’ or radioactive-free zone in the rock column being measured. This GR response is then contrasted to more radioactive rock in the column, notably the much finer-grained shales – this then creates the ‘baseline’ by which all rock classifications are then based. As aforementioned, this method can work very well as a lithology indicator, particularly in the GOM, however, there can be misinterpretations. Kaolinite is virtually a radioactively clean and common clay. So, if a gamma ray log was run through a purely kaolinitic clay, you would have a very ‘clean’ or zero-radioactive GR response, which could be misinterpreted as Vclay = 0%; hence, the clay would then be wrongly identified as a ‘clean’ sandstone...well, obviously, this is not the case. On a similar note, this same phenomenon (i.e., an erroneous reading) can occur to a perfectly good reservoir-quality sandstone, as well. Sandstones are typically characterized by sand-sized particles (very fine to very coarse), and are usually highly quartzose (i.e., non-radioactive). Theoretically though, they could be almost exclusively feldspathic (as seen in active margin settings [e.g., California]), or calcitic, or basaltic, or even hematitic. Since the provenance of
  • 2. many reservoir rocks found in California oil fields were sourced from granitic uplifts, the resultant reservoir rocks contain radioactive aggregates (primarily Potassium Feldspar [K-Spar]). Because of this, these rocks (with permeabilities in the order of Darcies) light up on the GR sonde as ‘hot’ lithologies, i.e., and would lead one to classify them as shales. Obviously, this is not the case, either. In order to avoid these potential misinterpretations, a thorough background geologic study of the field at hand should be carried out. Figure 1: Example of a spectral gamma-ray log; the black curve represents the total radioactivity measured, while the other curves represent the contribution of radioactivity from the elements: Thorium (blue curve [ppm]), green for Potassium (green curve [%]), and red for Uranium (red curve [ppm]). We can see that there are inherent errors associated with using the GR sonde as the sole lithology indicator in certain geologic settings, not only with Kaolinite in shales, but with K-Spar in sandstones, as two end-member examples. This is why it is always wise to use several tools at one’s disposal for proper lithologic classification. So, in addition to the familiar GR tool, consider using neutron-density, and possibly a Spectral Gamma Ray tool in conjunction with the Spontaneous Potential (SP) log for additional insight on the true lithologic character of the intervals being examined.