Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco - Presentation Transcript

    1. 4 Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 3 Van Dyke, Staffan* Vanco Energy Co. Papers Houston, Texas * Current address: Aera Energy LLC Bakersfield, California Start Abstract Author Analysis for placement of a well in deep water but is relatively insignificant and therefore not consid- ered to be a potential geohazard. typically begins with a thorough study of the seafloor. This is followed by a shallow geohazard report, which Gullies and canyons are the most prominent fea- Search tures in the study area. They include active modern is used to identify zones of instability in the shallow sediment pathways, which may be subject to slumps subsurface (faulting, over-pressured zones, etc.). and slides and therefore may negatively impact nearby Help An example from a 415.55 km2 (160.44 mi2) 3D seabed structures. Older groups of buried channels that seismic survey, offshore Morocco, is presented. Ampli- may be sand prone and/or associated with pore pressure tude extraction and stratal slice maps were generated anomalies were also mapped. Print within the focus area of the Ras Tafelney 3D seismic Sand-rich facies in the near seafloor sediment 8.5 x 11 data-set volume. Three horizons have been mapped in column are not in themselves hazards but should be the subsurface to track reflection events that showed characterized because of the potential for problems bright positive amplitudes. In the survey area, the main related to setting casing points. Sandy facies are also potential hazards appear to be active sediment path- host to shallow water-flow conditions, shallow gas res- ways (gullies) and shallow sands, both of which can be ervoirs, and hydrates. the site for shallow water-flow conditions. Minor fault- Improvements in estimating drilling risk and ing is present through different stratigraphic intervals costs that could be carried out include the analysis of Reservoir Characterization: Integrating Technology and Business Practices 1233
    2. Van Dyke 4 offset logs, velocity data, sediment properties, and pres- tions and other displays that may reduce drilling risk sure data. In concert with the existing seismic data, and costs. these data can be used to create pore pressure cross sec- 3 Introduction 7 Emerging technologies, such as 3D modeling and ity and content. Thus, the subsequent interpretations visualization, can be used in conjunction with funda- play a major role in determining potential timing and mental geoscience principles to locate potential zones migration of the hydrocarbons, as well as determining of interest for deep- water reservoir targets. Potential the locations for acceptable source and reservoir rocks. Papers drilling locations are determined after regional geologi- Despite the lack of hard data in these frontier areas, cal studies, sedimentological and stratigraphic studies, when sound geological principles are applied, the final possibly field work, basin modeling, and all interpreted Start interpretations can make a target very attractive for geophysical data. Typically in frontier areas, the work is highly interpretative due to the lack of data availabil- drilling. Author Methodology The 3D model that was developed for this study possible reservoir targets. This comparison is important Search compared the character of the images in a shallow geo- because shallow seismic records contain a larger com- hazards seismic dataset to that of deeper seismic ponent of high-frequency data than do the underlying reflections records, to form a more complete under- exploration seismic records, thus providing improved standing of the underlying strata and to identify interpretation of the deeper data. Help Study area The first deep-water well drilled offshore drilled in May, 2004, and was operated by Vanco Energy Company in its Ras Tafelney block (Fig. 1). Morocco, the Shark B-1 was located at latitude 31.00846º N and longitude 11.18078ºW, 5n a water Analysis for placement of the Shark B-1 well depth of 2,120 meters (based on 1,493 m/sec water commenced with a thorough study of the seafloor. This velocity), and had a TD of 4,162 meters. The well was was accomplished through a shallow geohazard 3D 1234
    3. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 seismic survey, which was used to identify zones of located offshore northwest Africa in waters adminis- instability in the shallow subsurface (faulting, over- tered by the country of Morocco. The live data area is pressured zones, etc.). A pore-pressure analysis was approximately 3,000 km2 or about 1,160 mi2. Ampli- 3 done at the same time to complement interpretations tude extraction and stratal slice maps were generated from the shallow hazard study. These studies were then within the focus area of the Ras Tafelney 3D seismic used in tandem to construct a robust 3D geological/geo- 7 physical model to help determine the character and dataset, delineated within the southern region of the full quality of the potential underlying reservoir strata. seismic volume, bounded to the east by inline 100, to The following figures and content contained in the west by inline 1000, to the south by crossline 1000, this paper are based on the shallow geohazard survey Papers to the north by crossline 2600, and covers an area of and the pore pressure study from the Shark B-1 well 415.55 km2 or 160.44 mi2 (Fig. 2). area. The area of interest surrounding Shark B-1 is Start Pore pressure analysis and shallow geohazard survey The pore pressure analysis was carried out on a Jointly, the pore pressure analysis and the 3D Author smaller data set, having an area of 25 km2, and centered seismic volume analysis summarized slope instability issues related to bathymetry, shallow sediment strength over the well location. The initial seismic velocity vol- ume contained 25 migration velocity functions over the and coherency, and shallow sediment stratigraphy, Search 25 km2 target area. These functions were corrected for including identification of sand prone intervals. In addi- water velocity variations, interpolated and smoothed to tion, the study provided evidence for shallow water create an interval depth velocity volume. Ultimately, Help flow conditions and issues related to sand control. The 40,401 velocity functions were analyzed for pore pres- shallow geohazard study focused primarily on visualiz- sure anomalies. Each function in the volume was ing seismic anomalies and mapping sedimentary analyzed independently for overburden gradient, nor- features related to one or more of the issues listed above mal compaction trend, and pore pressure gradient. The (Fig. 3). Specifically, the geohazards study presented velocity function at the proposed location was extracted maps and slices over the first several hundred meters of from the volume and was analyzed for fracture gradi- the sedimentary column as well as interpretation and ent, kick tolerance, and maximum sustainable column height. commentary. 1235
    4. Van Dyke 4 Geologic setting Figure 4 is a composite seismic line of 2D and 3D region of the continental margin. The angle of the slope data transecting part of the slope environment. The of the water bottom in this area averages about 2 3 composite line shows substantial vertical exaggeration. degrees. Updip, 95 km from the study area, is the shelf/ The 3D seismic dataset rests in the lower slope/rise slope break. 7 Environments of deposition and facies description Figure 5 shows an arbitrary northwest-southeast groups of buried channels that may be sand prone and/ seismic line. The top picture represents the uninter- or associated with pore pressure anomalies also have Papers preted line, while the lower picture shows the same been mapped. These buried channels are grouped seismic line with interpreted seismic-depositional within three major channel-belt systems. Small-scale facies overlain. Five main channel-belt facies are recog- fans and overbank features are associated with some of Start nized in the dataset; they are channel-fill facies, the gullies. These regions can be the site of rapid depo- proximal levee facies, distal levee facies, sheet fan sition of coarse clastics. Rapid deposition of the sand facies, and a debrite facies. The interpretation shows and burial of an impermeable shale is a condition asso- Author aggradationally stacked channel-fills encased within a ciated with enhanced risk of shallow water flow. relatively dim section interpreted to represent shale The numerous modern and buried channel-fill deposited by hemipelagic settling. Search deposits also are the site of strong negative amplitude The channel-fill facies is the most prominent in values that appear to be caused by sand-rich fans, chan- the study area (Fig. 6). Channels may be active modern nel axes, and overbank deposits. This paper documents seafloor sediment pathways and may contain channel- Help the facies distribution and depositional environment of fill subfacies, such as slumps and slides, and therefore may negatively impact nearby seabed structures. Older the entire study area. Seismic interpretation Figure 7 shows a close-up view of the water bot- location, another lies south-southeast, and the third lies tom amplitude extraction; the location of the proposed directly northeast of the well location. Sediment waves Shark B well is indicated. Three slumps are clearly vis- can be clearly seen on the seafloor. An amplitude ible on the surface; one lies northwest of the well extraction map is useful for revealing hazards at that 1236
    5. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 interface, but it is designed also to see beneath the sur- horizons are: H100 horizon (blue); H160 horizon face, at least for a few hundred meters. Clearly, a time (green); H180 horizon (pink); and H200 horizon (yel- slice at 1.0 seconds would not follow a stratal surface. low) (Fig. 6). Also, it should be noted that the faint sub- 3 Therefore, the four horizons mapped for the shallow vertical lines seen on most amplitude extraction maps geohazard survey have been used as datums to flatten and stratal slices are the acquisition footprint from the the cube volume at these horizons in order to compare 7 with deeper horizons (discussed below). These four 3D seismic survey. Depositional history of shallow subsurface strata via stratal slices and amplitude extractions Papers All of the amplitude extractions in this paper denoted by green arrows, while the proposed well loca- show sedimentological features that help to describe the tion is marked by the yellow dot. At this depth, depositional history of the area. Color bars have been unconsolidated and unstable conditions should be Start chosen that are meant to heighten the contrast between expected while drilling. anomalous amplitudes and the background reflectivity. Figure 9 is an amplitude extraction map gener- Strong negative reflection values indicate coarser mate- ated on the H100 horizon. The slump feature in the Author rial. The area around the channels is typically northwest now encroaches onto the wellsite location. quiescent, therefore positive reflection values are This region may once again cause problems for drilling shown in white (for monochrome extractions) and pur- as the sediments may still be unconsolidated and unsta- Search ple (for full colored extractions) and strong positive ble at such shallow subsurface depths. All three channel amplitudes are in blue (for monochrome extractions) systems are present; stronger amplitudes within these and red (for full colored extractions). regions infer they are filled with coarse clastics. Sys- Help tems 1 and 2 (Fig. 6) are abruptly cut in the northern After flattening, time slices reveal much about regions of the study area due to an interpreted slump the structure and properties of the shallow sediments. block trending from the northwest to the southeast, Figure 8 shows the result at 52 milliseconds below the moving in a southerly direction. flattened water bottom. Here, channels cut the seafloor, and sediment transport direction is shown by red Figure 10 is an amplitude extraction map arrows. The three slumps previously described are still between the seafloor and H100 horizon. It shows a pro- present, however, one has completely encroached the nounced slump feature in the northwest region of the well location. Their direction of mass transport is study area. System 3 shows bifurcation of its channel 1237
    6. Van Dyke 4 directly south of the well location. The region immedi- potential hazard for drilling because the sediments may ately surrounding the well location shows a debris-flow still be unconsolidated and unstable at these shallow character in the seismic response. Sediment waves also subsea depths. 3 appear to be present. This region is once again inter- Figure 13 is an amplitude extraction map preted to contain a relatively thick package of debrites between the H180 and H200 horizons. Channel Sys- that may cause instability while drilling. 7 tems 1 and 2 are not present within this time interval, Figure 11 shows a time slice from the flattened but Channel 3 is present. The dominant feature, how- cube volume generated from the H160 horizon. Figure ever, is the paleo-Agadir Canyon located in the 11 is located 52 milliseconds below the flattened hori- southern region of the study area. The region immedi- Papers zon and shows the prominent northwest-southeast ately surrounding the well location shows very weak trending slump feature terminating directly west of the reflection events, interpreted to represent a thick, Start wellsite. A large expression of a sheet fan is also inter- argillaceous sequence deposited during this time preted to be fed from the mouth of System 3 into the interval. southwestern part of the study area. Figure 14 is a stratal slice located 100 millisec- Author Figure 12 is an amplitude extraction map onds above the H200 horizon that was generated from between the H160 and H180 horizons. Channel Sys- the flattened cube volume from that horizon. The main tems 1 and 2 can no longer be seen because the conduit Search feature is the east-west trending paleo-Agadir Canyon, that fed these systems is not present at this time. Chan- which exhibits extremely strong negative reflections nel System 3 dominates the map by its strong positive within the canyon boundaries. Another large debris- Help reflection character; it has a broader geometry than flow deposit occurs in the northern channel margin. before, particularly in the southwest regions where faint Figure 15 shows a gated window of 40 millisec- fan-like geometry is visible. A northwest to southeast onds at about the H200 horizon (20 ms above and 20 trending debris flow deposit dominates the relatively ms below). The main feature manifested on the map is a quiescent area outside of System 3’s environment. The series of extremely strong negative reflections confined region immediately surrounding the well location within the paleo-Agadir Canyon, but the region around shows stronger reflectors than previous maps and is thus interpreted as a debris-flow. This interval may be a the wellsite remains quiescent. 1238
    7. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 Economics of shallow hazard survey Most shallow hazard surveys are accompanied by Typically, a branch on the diagram is representative of a pore-pressure analysis. Pore pressure imaging is a particular horizon (geologic time or event) and its 3 based on mapping seismic velocity to pore pressure associated hazard (e.g., an over-pressured zone). using a petrophysical model. Any uncertainty in the The best way to quantify a numerical value for velocity analysis will impact the pore pressure predic- the economic exposure to each potential geohazard is to 7 tion, as well as the calibration of the pore pressure multiply the likelihood of the risk’s existence versus the model. Thus, pore pressure prediction is heavily reliant total cost of alleviating the problem (e.g., 20% risk of on a well developed, and accurate, velocity model. Typ- encountering an over-pressured zone in the Oligocene/ Papers ically this is not exact, but it can be close to exact if a Miocene boundary at a 200m depth below the mud line high-quality seismic dataset is available and the proper at location X,Y). Historically, no oil blowout has time is spent developing the velocity model. Particu- occurred in deep water, but the industry has spent hun- larly in frontier regions, where little, if any, true data dreds of millions of dollars actively preventing shallow Start such as well logs are available, a pore pressure analysis water flows and underground blowouts. Thus far, how- will lead to a better understanding of the shallow sedi- ever, three broached mud line gas flows and one BOP ments and their associated geohazard risk potential. failure resulting in a gas blow-out have occurred in the Author deep water. The estimated costs of these four events In order to grasp the economic impact that totaled $40MM. During a gas or oil blowout, the loss of accompanies a potential hazard disclosed by the shal- the ~$1MM tool assembly and the additional 10 days to low hazard survey or pore pressure prediction analysis, Search sidetrack and recover the lost hole, can cost the operator a dendrogram can be drawn to gather a more complete a significant amount of money to get back to normal understanding of each hazard. This diagram can be drilling operations; e.g., a minor underground blowout accompanied by a spreadsheet that relates a quantitative Help can result in as much as an $8MM claim. It should be cost to each hazard represented in the diagram; an over- noted that many of these well control problems are simplified dendrogram can be seen in Figure 16. Each unique to deep-water operations. branch, or pathway, on the dendrogram represents a potential hazard and associated cost based on its risk Many other potential risks exist, such as encoun- percentage; therefore there can be numerous branches tering a shallow gas pocket that might be breached, thus on each diagram. Depending on the size and detail of releasing the gas upward, engulfing the drill ship or the shallow hazard survey and the pore pressure predic- semi-submersible, and in a worst case scenario, sinking tion analysis, nearly infinite branches can exist. the vessel. The costs involved with this type of disaster 1239
    8. Van Dyke 4 can be many hundred of millions of dollars, not includ- hazard reports in any region of the world where a deep- ing the potential for loss in human life. It should be water well is to be drilled. In the example for this paper, noted, that nowadays, total costs for some deepwater the shallow Moroccan sediments studied are considered 3 wells can be as high as $95MM, and daily rig costs can to be relatively tight and there is little risk for over- be >$500,000/day. pressured zones or other anomalies that are generally Evaluating the economic impact that these poten- 7 encountered in other deep-water regions of the world, tial disasters can cause is a helpful and debatably necessary exercise that should accompany all shallow such as those commonly found in the Gulf of Mexico. Conclusions Papers In summation, these studies suffered from a lack could perhaps be verified. However, all of the maps and of well control, shallow geo-boring data, and drilling stratal slices that were generated from these studies Start and wireline data from deeper boreholes. If such data help to show the basic geometry of the channel systems could have been obtained, then many of the assump- present, which can be inferred to deeper reservoir tar- tions as to sediment and fluid characteristics of the area gets for their improved characterization. Author Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Dr. Roger Slatt, providing the opportunity to present the material within Search Vanco Energy Company, and Aera Energy LLC for this paper. Help 1240
    9. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 1. Ras Tafelney block, offshore Morocco. k 1241
    10. Van Dyke 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 2. Ras Tafelney 3D seismic dataset with area of interest highlighted. Proposed well location is shown by yellow circle. k 1242
    11. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 3. Example of amplitude extractions performed within shallow subsurface between H100 and H160 (see text for explanation of symbols). k 1243
    12. Van Dyke 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 4. West-east composite seismic transect showing shelf-slope break. Vertical exaggeration is 3X. k 1244
    13. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 5. Uninterpreted and interpreted seismic line showing channel subenvironments. k 1245
    14. Van Dyke 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Figure 6. Seismic line showing the 3 major channel-belt systems. Crossline 1830. k Help 1246
    15. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 7. Maximum peak amplitude extraction of seafloor showing slumps and slides (outlined in yellow); green arrows point in the direction of down-slope movement, sediment waves, and channels; and red arrows point in the direction of presumed sediment transport. k 1247
    16. Van Dyke 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 8. Flattened time slice 52 ms below the seafloor showing the features illustrated in Figure 7. k 1248
    17. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 9. Maximum peak amplitude extraction for H100 Horizon showing slumps/slides and sediment transport direc- tions. k 1249
    18. Van Dyke 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 10. RMS amplitude extraction between the seafloor and H100 horizon. k 1250
    19. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 f 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 11. Flattened time slice 52 ms below the H160 horizon showing slumps, channels, and sheet fan. k 1251
    20. Van Dyke 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 12. RMS amplitude extraction between H160 and H180 horizons. k 1252
    21. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 13. RMS amplitude extraction between H180 and H200 horizons showing the paleo Agidar Canyon. k 1253
    22. Van Dyke 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 14. Flattened time slice 100ms above the H200 horizon showing paleo Agadar Canyon and slump scar. k 1254
    23. Geoscientific Workflow Process in Drilling a Deep-Water Well, Offshore Morocco 4 3 7 Papers Start Author Search Help Figure 15. H200 horizon amplitude extraction with 40ms gated window (20ms above and below) showing the paleo Agadir Canyon. k 1255
    24. Van Dyke 4 Geologic Potential Projected Boundary Rock Type Probability Geohazard 3 Cost Lower 7 $5 MM Pliocene 0% Possible Oil Papers SS Blowout Plio- $8 MM 10% Miocene Start Boundary Sh Author Possible $10 MM Upper Gas 25% Miocene Blowout Search LS Help Lower $15 MM 50% Miocene Figure 16. Simplified representation of a typical dendrogram. k 1256
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Staffan Van DykeStaffan Van Dyke Nominate

    custom

    367 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Analysis for placement of a well in deep water typi more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 367
      • 367 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 36
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories