SONA Q4 :October - December “ Health  + Performances = Success"
PARAMETERs: <ul><li>PERFORMANCEs : -  Exchange </li></ul><ul><li>- Exchange + Leadership  </li></ul><ul><li>- Leadership R...
Modality of Evaluation: <ul><li>Each Parameter has a score </li></ul><ul><li>I define the total score for performance and ...
LC’s SITUATION for Q4
RANKING Q3
What is the “ campione ottimale ” <ul><li>It is the indicator of the best situation that each area has to have in the Best...
ANCONA
BARI
BOLZANO
CATANIA:
GENOVA
MILANO CATTOLICA
NAPOLI FEDERICO II
NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
PALERMO
PAVIA
PISA
ROMA SAPIENZA
ROMA TRE
TORINO
TRENTO
TRIESTE
VENEZIA
Best LC for each subsystem <ul><li>Costumer Relation:  Ancona, Bari, Genova, Napoli Parthenope, Sapienza, Roma Tre, Venezi...
CLUSTERs Q4
Explenation: <ul><li>In order to allocate each LC in clusters I took in consideration the average of each LC based on perf...
Average of LCs: 1,05 1,9 0,2 Venezia 1,05 1,3 0,8 Trieste 1,25 1,7 0,8 Trento 1,85 2,1 1,6 Torino 1,65 1,9 1,4 Roma Tre 1,...
1th Cluster 10X 3 X+L 8 LR 40 M 18-24 H   AVERAGE 2,51 – 4 No one LC is  in this cluster for the Q4 WHO WANT TO COVER THIS...
2th Cluster 6 X 2 X+L 6 LR 30 M 12-17 H   AVERAGE 1,51 – 2,50 <ul><li>LC: </li></ul><ul><li>Ancona  </li></ul><ul><li>Bari...
3th Cluster 3 X 1 X+L 2  LR 10 M 6-11 H   AVERAGE 0 – 1,50 LCs Bolzano Catania Genova Milano Cattolica Napoli Federico II ...
CONGRATULATION TO:  <ul><li>Napoli Parthenope  </li></ul><ul><li>Ancona </li></ul><ul><li>Bari </li></ul><ul><li>Roma Tre ...
Italian Do it Better… <ul><li>For each question you can contact Silvia, MCVP LCD & Project </li></ul><ul><li>s [email_addr...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Presentation sona q4

508
-1

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
508
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Presentation sona q4

  1. 1. SONA Q4 :October - December “ Health + Performances = Success&quot;
  2. 2. PARAMETERs: <ul><li>PERFORMANCEs : - Exchange </li></ul><ul><li>- Exchange + Leadership </li></ul><ul><li>- Leadership Role </li></ul><ul><li>- Members </li></ul><ul><li>- n° of member for each X realized </li></ul><ul><li>HEALTH : - costumers relation </li></ul><ul><li>- Exchange </li></ul><ul><li>- Communication </li></ul><ul><li>- Talent Management </li></ul><ul><li>- Finance </li></ul><ul><li>- Organizational Structure </li></ul>
  3. 3. Modality of Evaluation: <ul><li>Each Parameter has a score </li></ul><ul><li>I define the total score for performance and health </li></ul><ul><li>I calculate an average between performance and health </li></ul><ul><li>The average is the indicator for the status of each LC </li></ul>
  4. 4. LC’s SITUATION for Q4
  5. 5. RANKING Q3
  6. 6. What is the “ campione ottimale ” <ul><li>It is the indicator of the best situation that each area has to have in the Best LC. </li></ul><ul><li>In this way you can understand in which situation are your areas comparing these </li></ul><ul><li>with the “ campione ottimale ” </li></ul>
  7. 7. ANCONA
  8. 8. BARI
  9. 9. BOLZANO
  10. 10. CATANIA:
  11. 11. GENOVA
  12. 12. MILANO CATTOLICA
  13. 13. NAPOLI FEDERICO II
  14. 14. NAPOLI PARTHENOPE
  15. 15. PALERMO
  16. 16. PAVIA
  17. 17. PISA
  18. 18. ROMA SAPIENZA
  19. 19. ROMA TRE
  20. 20. TORINO
  21. 21. TRENTO
  22. 22. TRIESTE
  23. 23. VENEZIA
  24. 24. Best LC for each subsystem <ul><li>Costumer Relation: Ancona, Bari, Genova, Napoli Parthenope, Sapienza, Roma Tre, Venezia </li></ul><ul><li>Exchange: Ancona, Catania,Palermo, Roma Tre </li></ul><ul><li>Communication: Palermo , Torino </li></ul><ul><li>Finance: Venezia, Pavia, Palermo </li></ul><ul><li>Talent Management: Ancona , Milano Cattolica, Palermo </li></ul>
  25. 25. CLUSTERs Q4
  26. 26. Explenation: <ul><li>In order to allocate each LC in clusters I took in consideration the average of each LC based on performance and health. </li></ul><ul><li>In the next slide you can discover the average of each LCs. </li></ul><ul><li>Average = (Perf. + Heal.) / 2 </li></ul>
  27. 27. Average of LCs: 1,05 1,9 0,2 Venezia 1,05 1,3 0,8 Trieste 1,25 1,7 0,8 Trento 1,85 2,1 1,6 Torino 1,65 1,9 1,4 Roma Tre 1,35 1,7 1 Roma Sapienza 0,75 1,1 0,4 Pisa 1,2 1,4 1 Pavia 1,75 2,1 1,4 Palermo 1,6 2 1,2 Napoli Parthenope 1,15 1,5 0,8 Napoli Federico 2 1,15 1,7 0,6 Milano Cattolica 1,3 2 0,6 Genova 1,5 1,6 1,4 Catania 1,1 1,4 0,8 Bolzano 1,55 2,1 1 Bari 1,85 1,7 2 Ancona TOT HEALTH PERF. LC name
  28. 28. 1th Cluster 10X 3 X+L 8 LR 40 M 18-24 H AVERAGE 2,51 – 4 No one LC is in this cluster for the Q4 WHO WANT TO COVER THIS POSITION ???
  29. 29. 2th Cluster 6 X 2 X+L 6 LR 30 M 12-17 H AVERAGE 1,51 – 2,50 <ul><li>LC: </li></ul><ul><li>Ancona </li></ul><ul><li>Bari </li></ul><ul><li>Napoli Parthenope </li></ul><ul><li>Palermo </li></ul><ul><li>Roma Tre </li></ul><ul><li>Torino </li></ul>
  30. 30. 3th Cluster 3 X 1 X+L 2 LR 10 M 6-11 H AVERAGE 0 – 1,50 LCs Bolzano Catania Genova Milano Cattolica Napoli Federico II Pavia Pisa Roma Sapienza Trento Trieste Venezia
  31. 31. CONGRATULATION TO: <ul><li>Napoli Parthenope </li></ul><ul><li>Ancona </li></ul><ul><li>Bari </li></ul><ul><li>Roma Tre </li></ul><ul><li>Palermo </li></ul><ul><li>For their new position in Cluster 2 </li></ul>
  32. 32. Italian Do it Better… <ul><li>For each question you can contact Silvia, MCVP LCD & Project </li></ul><ul><li>s [email_address] </li></ul><ul><li>Good Work… </li></ul>

×