Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Hyperlocal e-participation: Scottish community councils on the internet, for CeDEM 2014

92

Published on

A brief presentation that talks a little about the implications of our 2012 survey of internet use by Community Councils in Scotland - and exploring options for further research approaches

A brief presentation that talks a little about the implications of our 2012 survey of internet use by Community Councils in Scotland - and exploring options for further research approaches

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
92
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Peter Cruickshank Bruce Ryan Colin F Smith ‘Hyperlocal e-participation’? Evaluating online activity by Scottish Community Councils
  • 2. What are community councils • Their purpose is to represent small areas within Local Authorities • Powers are limited – Mostly, the right to be consulted – Some more direct input into planning processes • Community Council members are unpaid volunteers • Small to non-existent budgets – Average annual income is around £400 – enough to hire a monthly meeting room, pay for some stationery (Arrangements of hyperlocal government vary across the United Kingdom between England, Wales and Scotland and Northern Ireland but share a common model) CEDEM14
  • 3. Three similar countries Austria Norway Scotland* Pop. (m) 8.3 5.0 5.3 Federal 9 Bundesländer - (Part of UK) County 84 Bezirke 15 Statutarstädte 19 fylker 32 Local Authorities Community 2346 Gemeinden 434 kommuner 1369 Community Councils ‘000 people per community 3.5 11.5 3.9 CEDEM14 *Depending who you ask Three smallish countries with a mix of urban and remote rural populations
  • 4. Community Council locations CEDEM14
  • 5. Three similar countries Austria Norway Scotland Websites 98% (2008) 90% (2003) Hosting .gv.at Social media 58% (2011) CEDEM14 Community councils online
  • 6. Three similar countries Austria Norway Scotland Websites 98% (2008) 90% (2003) ? Hosting .gv.at ? Social media 58% (2011) ? CEDEM14 Community councils online
  • 7. What does the literature say • E-participation – Can hold government to account – Helps communication (Grosse 2013) – But isn’t everything: Reinforces power relations – Seen in context of channel choice (Saglie & Vabo, 2009) – Don’t expect 100% (active) participation • Delivery of information: perhaps models of media would be where to look? – Recognises role of passive participation (‘lurking’) • Voluntary organisation? – Should we look to charities? (Goatman & Lewis 2007) – And how they target interest groups (Winterich et al 2012) • Impact of smallscale Geography – Cities are different from countryside – Part of identification with small towns (Bruns 2010) – Community groups as a way to get to now your neighbours (Nyseth & Ringholm, 2008) CEDEM14
  • 8. How are CCs (visibly) acting? Represent- ative body Com- munity group Campaign- ing group Local media CEDEM14
  • 9. Gathering the data Limitations Offline only Closed groups Social media not the web CEDEM14 Activity levels Level of e- participation Content types • Contacts • News • Planning • Local info Hosting arrangements • Where are the servers • What platform is used
  • 10. Results Inactive CCs Active with online presences… Total CCs…missing …out-of- date …up- to-date Total 213 498 351 307 1,369 % of all 16% 36% 26% 22% 100% %of active NA 43% 30% 27% 100% CEDEM14
  • 11. Results What does seem to work? CEDEM14 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Active and…
  • 12. Results • This level of use of websites compares adversely with the 98% of Austrian Gemeinden and 90% of Norwegian kommuner. • Only 38 CCs (12% of active online sites) had information to support engagement with the planning process • despite this being core to their mission. • Low level of use of Facebook • LA-hosted presences tended to have only minutes and CC contact details • What are the drivers for use if internet? – Data seem to imply support from LA was most significant – No simple relationship between urban/rural characteristic of LAs and CCs’ online effectiveness – Probably need to drill down into more detailed social statistics – Profile of the community councillors (eg age) is probably also significant CEDEM14
  • 13. Put simply: Community Councils aren’t flying CEDEM14 • Essentially, Looking at a failed part of the political system …an edge case » Technology will not solve this problem • BUT: It is interesting to look for cases where technology does make a difference • Can models of practice be shared? www.identitybydesign.co.nz
  • 14. What next Data gathering… • Resurvey • Twitter analysis • Ethnography Interventions • KM • ? CEDEM14
  • 15. THANK YOU Peter Cruickshank p.cruickshank@napier.ac.uk @spartakan CEDEM14

×