Wikipedia: Order without orders

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Wikipedia: Order without orders - Presentation Transcript

    1. Wikipedia: Order without orders Promovendidag 2006
        • Sander Spek Universiteit Maastricht
        • [email_address]
        • Supervisors:
        • Jaap van den Herik
        • Eric Postma
        • Antal van den Bosch
      Picture by Brion Vibber (CC-BY-SA)
    2. Agenda
      • Wikipedia
      • Organised content
      • Organised work division
      • Conclusions and questions
      photo by Michael Dietsch (CC-BY-SA-NC)
    3. What is Wikipedia? Juggling? Self- managing team? Democracy? Anarchy?
    4. My Wikipedia research
      • Organisation despite the 'chaotic' fundament.
      • Content: articles and their relations.
      • Work division: author expertise and roles.
    5. photo by Marie Richie (CC-BY-SA)
      • The Dutch Wikipedia article network is
      • clustered scale-free a small-world?
    6. Organised content
      • Article types:
      • All-round authorities;
      • guru authorities;
      • referring authorities;
      • regular nodes.
      photo by Jonathan Ragan-Kelley (CC-BY-SA)
    7. All-round authorities
      • General time units
      • Recent years
      • Countries and other relevant geographical entities
      • Template items
      photo by Jonathan Ragan-Kelley (CC-BY-SA)
    8. Guru authorities
      • Known concepts
      • Template legends
      photo by Jonathan Ragan-Kelley (CC-BY-SA)
    9. Referring authorities
      • General lists
      • A to Z lists
      • Portals
      photo by Jonathan Ragan-Kelley (CC-BY-SA)
    10. photo by Jonathan Ragan-Kelley (CC-BY-SA) Regular nodes
      • The big majority of
      • Wikipedia articles.
      • Expertises in categories: almost a Pareto-effect (20-80 rule)
      Organised work division
        • specialistic topics
        • high average number of edits per editor
        • e.g., chess player , Russian political party
        • topics we can all talk about
        • (party topics, lunch topics)
        • low average number of edits per editor
        • e.g., philosophy , investing
      photo by Piero Sierra (CC-BY-NC)
    11. User types (Sorry, no free license information. I actually stole this image from the web. But if one of you gets interested and goes out to buy the book, I'm sure the authors don't mind.) 0% contribution of largest category 100% 0% number of active categories 100%
    12. Introducing entropy
      • Expertise of users:
      • calculated using author's entropy over categories
      photo by Kai Schreiber (CC-BY-NC)
    13. To wrap it up...
      • Despite its 'chaotic', 'anarchistic', 'self-managing' fundament...
      • ... Wikipedia articles are well-structured and form a coherent network;
      • ... Wikipedia authors can organise themselves and take upon expertises themselves, without dirty jobs being left.
      photo by Aine D. (CC-BY-SA)
      • Any questions?
      Any questions? Photo by Haley (CC-BY-NC)
    14. Disclaimer:
      • The contents of this presentation is available under a CC-BY-license.
      • The images used in this presentation are available under the license mentioned at the slides.
      • The juggling image on slide three is made by me, and is also CC-BY.
      • The crowd image on slide four and the Russian puppets on slide eleven are public domain.

    + sndrspksndrspk, 3 years ago

    custom

    1536 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More Info

    CC Attribution License

    Go to text version
    • Total Views 1536
      • 1536 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as innappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel

    Categories