ECG: Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

ECG: Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia

on

  • 4,398 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
4,398
Views on SlideShare
4,011
Embed Views
387

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
39
Comments
0

6 Embeds 387

http://www.cardiologylinks.org 309
http://cardiologylinks.webs.com 46
http://www.slideshare.net 17
http://smcphysiciansmeet.blogspot.com 10
http://smcphysiciansmeet.blogspot.in 4
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

ECG: Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia ECG: Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia Presentation Transcript

  • Physician’s Meet M3 unit Dr. S Sundar’s Unit ECG of the week Dr. Deepu Sebin
  •  
    • 12 lead ECG
    • Sinus Rhythm
    • Rate = 62/m
    • Axis = +30
    • Pace maker spikes +
    • PR Interval = 0.12
    • QRS duration = 0.16sec
    • LBBB pattern
    • Concordent ST evelevation in V4,V5,V6,1,aVL
    • ST segment depression in 111,aVF
      • AnteroLateral MI with LBBB
  • LBBB and MI
    • Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is present in approximately 7 percent of acute infarctions
    • Patients with LBBB have more comorbid conditions, are less likely to receive therapy, and have an increased risk for in-hospital death compared with patients with no BBB.
    TI - Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. AU - Go AS; Barron HV; Rundle AC; Ornato JP; Avins AL SO - Ann Intern Med 1998 Nov 1;129(9):690-7.
    • The sequence of repolarization is altered in LBBB, with the ST segment and T wave vectors being directed opposite to the QRS complex. These changes may mask the ST segment depression and T wave inversion induced by ischemia.
    • The diagnosis of an acute MI or ischemia can occasionally be made in a patient with underlying LBBB if certain ST-T changes are seen, particularly if the ST-T vectors are in the same direction as the QRS complex.
  • Concordant v/s Discordant changes
  • Sgarbossa Criteria
    • The three ECG criteria with an independent value in the diagnosis of acute infarction and the score for each were:
      • ST segment elevation of 1 mm or more that was in the same direction (concordant) as the QRS complex in any lead — score 5.
      • ST segment depression of 1 mm or more in any lead from V1 to V3 — score 3.
      • ST segment elevation of 5 mm or more that was discordant with the QRS complex (ie, associated with a QS or rS complex) — score 2
    Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. AU - Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Barbagelata A; Underwood DA; Gates KB; Topol EJ; Califf RM; Wagner GS SO - N Engl J Med 1996 Feb 22;334(8):481-7
    • At a score-sum of 3, these criteria have a specificity of 90% for detecting a myocardial infarction.
    • A Sgarbossa score of ≥ 3 was highly specific (ie, few false positives) but much less sensitive (36 percent) in the validation sample in the original report. Similar findings were noted in a subsequent meta-analysis of 10 studies of 1614 patients in which a Sgarbossa score of ≥ 3.
  • Additional Findings
    • The presence of deep T wave inversions in leads with a predominantly negative QRS complex (eg, V1-V3) is highly suggestive of evolving ischemia or MI.
    • The presence of QR complexes in leads I, V5, or V6, or in II, III, and aVF with LBBB strongly suggests underlying infarction.
    • Pseudonormalization of previously inverted T waves is suggestive but not diagnostic of ischemia.
  • Additional Findings
    • An anterolateral MI should be suspected if new S waves appear in leftward leads (I, aVL, and V6) in a patient with preexisting common LBBB.
    • Underlying MI is also suggested by notching of the ascending part of a wide S waves in the mid-precordial leads ( Cabrera's sign ) is present.
  • Additional Findings
    • Cabrera's sign
      • refers to prominent (0.05 sec) notching in the ascending limb of the S wave in leads V3 and V4 .
    • Chapman's sign :
      • a similar finding is prominent notching (>/= 0.05 sec ) of the ascending limb of the R wave in lead V5 or V6 .
    • These signs have a specificity that approaches 90 percent. However, there may be a high degree of interobserver variability in accurate identification and their sensitivity is quite low.
    • Serial ECG changes — 67 percent sensitivity
    • ST segment elevation — 54 percent sensitivity
    • Abnormal Q waves — 31 percent sensitivity
    • Initial positivity in V1 with a Q wave in V6 — 20 percent sensitivity but 100 percent specificity for anteroseptal MI.
    • Cabrera's sign — 27 percent sensitivity overall, 47 percent for anteroseptal MI
    • In addition to difficulties in ECG interpretation, approximately one-half of patients with LBBB and an acute MI do not have chest pain. These patients are much less likely to receive appropriate medical therapy (eg, aspirin, beta blockers) or reperfusion therapy than LBBB patients with chest pain.
    • Serial ECGs, Enzymes help in diagnosis
    • American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend reperfusion therapy for all patients with LBBB whose history suggests acute myocardial infarction.
    • Thank you