Environmental Issues Affecting Real Estate   Smu Cox Real Estate Law Class
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Environmental Issues Affecting Real Estate Smu Cox Real Estate Law Class

on

  • 450 views

Environmental issues affecting transactions involving real estate

Environmental issues affecting transactions involving real estate

Statistics

Views

Total Views
450
Views on SlideShare
442
Embed Views
8

Actions

Likes
4
Downloads
8
Comments
0

2 Embeds 8

http://realestate.whichboxdemo.com 4
http://chbutts5.wordpress.com 4

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Environmental Issues Affecting Real Estate   Smu Cox Real Estate Law Class Environmental Issues Affecting Real Estate Smu Cox Real Estate Law Class Presentation Transcript

  • Environmental IssuesAffecting Real Estate SMU Cox School of Business Real Estate Law March 8, 2012 by: Sally A. Longroy y g y
  • Overview RCRA / Texas SWDA CERCLA / Texas SWDA Brownfield Redevelopment St Storm Water Management W t M t Floodplains and Wetlands Asbestos & Lead Endangered Species Trends – Sustainable Development
  • RCRA / Texas SWDA Waste management - “Cradle-to-grave” Allows EPA to address releases from underground storage tanks Injunctive relief available if “imminent and substantial endangerment”
  • Trinity River Audubon Center
  • Trinity River Audubon CenterEFFORT TO HAUL IT OUT?City sCity’s Expert Report Estimated:  12 year excavation process  146,000 truckloads of materials  Semi trucks must enter/exit every 3 minutes with 15 pieces of h i t ith i f heavy construction equipment operating 8 hours per day $107,000,000.00
  • Trinity River Audubon CenterThe $77 Million Order
  • Trinity River Audubon Center Over 100 soil borings/landfill gas monitoringpoints Over 90 test pits 22 Groundwatermonitor wells 9 Surface water/sediment samples Bi-weekly/quarterlymethane monitoring
  • Trinity River Audubon Center 130,000 cywaste relocatedon-site 1,400,000 cyimported fill
  • Trinity River Audubon Center
  • Trinity River Audubon Center
  • CERCLA / Texas SWDA Goal - Clean up of hazardous substances Liability –  Status liability - PRPs  Joint and several  Strict  Retroactive  Perpetual
  • CERCLA / Texas SWDA Liability  Lender protections  Petroleum exclusion
  • CERCLA / Texas SWDA CERCLA Defenses  Innocent Landowner  Contiguous Property Owner  Bona fide Prospective Purchaser p Requires “All Appropriate Inquiry”  ASTM E1527-05 – consistent with final rule on AAI  Codified at 40 CFR Part 312
  • CERCLA / Texas SWDA Why Perform Assessment?  Set transaction condition √ Liability allocation √ Remediation conditions  Who pays?  Who runs the show?  Permitted uses?  How clean?  Who’s the long-term caretaker? √ Construction-related issues  Lender requirements  Asset valuation
  • CERCLA / Texas SWDA Recognized Environmental Conditions AIA Components Co po e s  Records review  Site reconnaissance  Interviews with owners, occupants, operators and state and local regulatory agencies  Report  Qualified environmental professional
  • CERCLA / Texas SWDA AAI Does Not  Radon Cover:  Mold  Petroleum  Municipal solid waste  Asbestos in buildings b ildi  Wetlands  Lead-based paint  Threatened and endangered  Lead in drinkingg species water  Archeological and  Indoor air cultural pollution/vapor intrusion  Regulatory compliance
  • CERCLA / Texas SWDA If REC → Phase II Invasive sampling of  Soil  Ground water  Surface water  Sediment
  • Brownfield RedevelopmentTexas Risk Reduction Program Remedy Standard A  Self Implemented  Meets critical PCLs  No physical or institutional controls
  • Brownfield RedevelopmentTexas Risk Reduction Program Remedy Standard B  Prior TCEQ approval required  Meets critical PCLs  Physical and institutional controls may be used
  • Brownfield Redevelopment Goal – get environmentally impaired p p properties back on the market Manage CERCLA and other environmental risks
  • Brownfield RedevelopmentTexas Voluntary Cleanup Program Remediate to meet Texas standards Certificate of Completion – releases future owners and lenders from liability to Texas Must apply before taking title Must apply before performing remediation
  • Brownfield RedevelopmentTexas Innocent Owner/OperatorProgram Immune from liability if  Property contaminated by release or migration from off-site source or sources, and  Did not cause or contribute to the source or sources of the contamination
  • Brownfield RedevelopmentTexas Innocent Owner/OperatorProgram IOP Certificate of Completion confirms eligibility IOP Certificates are not transferable
  • Brownfield RedevelopmentTexas Municipal Setting Designation City ordinance restricts potable use of groundwater Eliminates exposure pathway so may  Lower cleanup standards  Reduce investigation/remediation requirements  Reduce costs TCEQ certifies the ordinance
  • Lake Highlands Town Center
  • Release Reporting Storage tank systems Non-tank releases  “Whenever an accidental discharge or spill occurs from an activity or at a facility which causes or may cause pollution . . . “
  • Storm Water ManagementTypical Problems – Construction Extensive siltation and sediment deposits p Excessive storm water discharges Storm water relocates hazardous substances from industrial run-off
  • Storm Water ManagementClean Water Act NPDES Program g  Regulates discharge of any pollutant from any point source to navigable waters TPDES Program
  • Storm Water ManagementConstruction General Permit What’s regulated What s  Large construction activities  Disturbs > 5 acres  Small construction activities  Disturbs > 1 acre  Part of larger “common plan of development” p
  • Storm Water ManagementConstruction General Permit Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan File Notice of Intent (NOI) Pay Fee Post Construction Site Notice with NOI Construction File Notice of Termination
  • Storm Water ManagementEnforcement Government enforcement – EPA priority CWA citizen suits  Failure to obtain permit  Ongoing violation of a permit Trespass nuisance negligence claims Trespass, nuisance,
  • Floodplains Land subject to inundation by the 100-year flood Designated by FEMA maps Regulated at local level
  • Wetlands Areas inundated or saturated by surface or g ground water at a frequency and duration q y sufficient to support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions d il di i
  • WetlandsRapanos v. United States (2006) Scalia, Renquist, Thomas, and Alito Opinion:  J i di ti only over relatively Jurisdiction l l ti l permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water forming streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes, AND  Wetlands with a continuous surface connection thereto
  • WetlandsRapanos v United States (2006) v. Kennedy Opinion:  Jurisdiction over water or wetland if it possesses a “significant nexus” to waters that are navigable i f t or th t t th t i bl in fact that could reasonably be so made  Significant nexus - wetlands alone or wetlands, in combination with similarly situated lands in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical and biological integrity of traditionally navigable water
  • WetlandsRapanos v United States (2006) v. Stevens Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer Stevens, Souter Ginsburg Dissent:  Jurisdiction extends to the outer limits of the commerce power
  • WetlandsEPA and USACE Memorandum Follow Kennedy Opinion Jurisdiction:  T diti Traditional navigable waters l i bl t  Relatively permanent, non-navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters  Wetlands d ec y adjace to bo , e a ds directly adjacent o both, even if no continuous surface connection
  • WetlandsEPA and USACE Memorandum Case-by-Case Significant Nexus Evaluation  Non-navigable tributaries - NOT relatively permanent l i l  Wetlands adjacent to non-navigable tributaries - NOT relatively permanent  Wetlands adjacent to, but not directly abutting, abutting relatively permanent tributary
  • WetlandsTexas § 401 Certification TCEQ certifies § 404 permit complies with Texas water quality standards Tier I  Small project  Checklist - incorporates all applicable BMPs Tier II – Individual certification Imposes regional conditions on NWPs
  • Asbestos TSCA  Production, use, disposal Clean Air Act  Air emissions (NESHAP) Concern - friable asbestos and some non- friable
  • AsbestosDemolition and Renovation Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules  Asbestos survey  Remove all ACM before demolition or renovation, with certain exceptions Municipal ordinances
  • AsbestosConstruction Industry OSHA – worker health and safety  No exposure in excess of PELs  Work practices  Training  Medical surveillance
  • Lead-Based Paint 1977 - CPSC ban 1996 - Lead Paint Disclosure Regulations 2010 - Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule
  • Endangered Species Act Prohibits any action that results in a "taking" of a listed species, or adversely g p , y affects habitat Plants and animals US Fish & Wildlife  1500 endangered species  300 threatened species
  • Trends Greenhouse Gas Regulation  Massachusettes v. EPA (2007)  GHG Reporting Required (9/09)  Endangerment finding ( g g (12/09) )  Regulation of GHGs under CAA (3/10)  Tailoring Rule (5/10)
  • Trends Sustainable Development  Green Buildings  LEED  Energy Star gy  Municipal requirements  Land planning
  • Trends Trends Thank You! Th k Y !Questions & AnswersQ Presented by: Sally A. Longroy