The Impending Failure of Western Diplomacy in the Middle East
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

The Impending Failure of Western Diplomacy in the Middle East

  • 1,026 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: News & Politics
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,026
On Slideshare
1,026
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. The Impending Failure of Western Diplomacy in the Middle EastIn a previous monograph, I discussed the fallacy of US Diplomacy in Libya.Now I would like to expand the subject matter to include Western Nations andThe Middle East.Memo to Western World LeadersRe: Middle East TurmoilSubject: Don’t get happy.There are, no doubt, many who are secretively happy to see the turmoil in theMiddle East. Diplomatically, they may express their concerns, regrets, desire tohelp, compassion, support, and so on. Still, inside, they are embracing thewrong impressions. They secretively believe that this turmoil will bring about notmerely change in the Middle East, not merely a positive change in the MiddleEast, but a change that will result in truly favourable diplomatic and economicrelations.The problem arises from the fact that the Diplomacy of late falls into the followingcategories:1. Diplomatic relations with those with similar, agendas and common goals. Pro-forma Diplomatic Relations.2. Diplomatic relations with those with dissimilar agendas and common goals. Goal Oriented Diplomatic Relations.3. Diplomatic relations with those with dissimilar agendas and common goals. Expedient Diplomatic Relations.4. Diplomatic relations with those with dissimilar agendas and dissimilar goals. Tenuous Diplomatic Relations5. Anticipated diplomatic relations with those with dissimilar agendas and withdivergent goals. Now we have the need to find and engage in a mutually beneficialDiplomatic Agenda to accommodate those divergent goals.
  • 2. Why will we have problems?We have been dealing with government leaders who operate within a system ofunilateral decision-making. (Disagreements, if any, are not expressed publiclyand often times are not expressed privately, either.) The old canard, “It takes tenpeople to say yes but only one person to say no.” does not apply. The oldsystem was simple. It takes one person to say yes. Full Stop.Soon, if the revolutions result in regime change, the changes may or may notchange the above system of decision-making. If the system stays the same, theWest will have to contend with the divergent goals. If there is a new system,refer to the old canard.A second reason we will have problems establishing Diplomatic Relations is thatwe are not equipped to accept the types of government that may arise from thechanges in the different regimes.Within new regimes, we will be contending with the following:1. Pro-Western Regimes.2. Anti-Western Regimes.3. Regimes where most are Pro-Western and a few are Anti-Western.4. Regimes where most are Anti-Western and a few are Pro-Western.Our Diplomatic Relations will be different with different countries out of necessity.The differences in these relationships will give rise to contention both at homeand abroad. The differences will be bargaining chips in Diplomatic Relationsabroad and at home, they will become justifications for political rhetoric.“Everybody knows what everybody knows. The rest is rhetoric.” – Slim Fairviewfrom the Quotations of Slim Fairview ©We are no longer engaged in relationships based on demonstrating sensitivity toa diversity of cultures. We are now about to approach people with divergentagendas, methods, and goals. Their interests may not be our interests. Theremay be little common ground with some and much common ground with others.
  • 3. We were told:The friend of my enemy is my enemy. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.We were also told:It’s me and my cousin against my neighbor; but, it’s me and my brother againstmy cousin.These we were told. Now it is up to us to establish Diplomatic Relations with adiversity of cultures where we’ve defined diversity as different from us. Now wewill have to redefine diversity as those who are different from one another.It will be interesting to watch Western Nations establish Diplomatic Relations inthe Middle East with any new regimes that may arise.Regards,Slim FairviewCopyright © 2011 Slim Fairviewslimfairview@yahoo.com