Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Skip Allums: Usability Analysis of Insurance Brands
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Skip Allums: Usability Analysis of Insurance Brands


Published on

High level analysis of insurance brands. …

High level analysis of insurance brands.

Published in: Technology, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Skip Allums Usability Consulting @skippr
  • 2. (Competitive Analysis of insurance brands) Skip Allums Usability Consulting
  • 3. • Accessibility & Interactivity • Criteria • The Playing Field • What can you learn from this? Overview Skip Allums Usability Consulting
  • 4. Accessibility & Interactivity Skip Allums Usability Consulting • “Seniors fear technology” is a stereotype. • “The fastest growing group of new U.S. users on Facebook are 55-to-65 years old. Up 175% from Sept 30 2008 to Feb 1, 2009 – Fortune” • Similar growth can be found in recent years for Skype, Flickr, Twitter, etc. • Even has zooming, mouse-guided carousel interactions. • There is a happy medium between the utilitarian and the abstract.
  • 5. Criteria • Placement of insurance products • “Products” vs. “Solutions” • Functionality • Language • User segmentation • Branding • Calls to Action • Visual Design Skip Allums Usability Consulting
  • 6. Overall Findings Skip Allums Usability Consulting • Trends toward image heavy designs as opposed to text-based. • The best sites funnel the user by offering clear self identification opportunities e.g. “I own a small business, I’m looking for commercial grade insurance” • The worst sites offer no direction or user path. Users aren’t sure where to start the process, or how to contact the company.
  • 7. Allstate Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • Quote process is given the most real estate • Accordion interaction allows users to quickly find an agent or access account • Carousel of solutions callouts, based on life stages The Bad • Copy is somewhat wordy. Gray text on white is hard to read.
  • 8. Esurance Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • Get A Quote is given highest priority, offering quotes for multiple products in one interaction The Bad • Tab labels are crowded. • Tabs aren’t actually “tabs” – each landing page has a different visual treatment & layout. • Dry. Very little brand voice, when compared to media campaigns
  • 9. Geico Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • Users can quickly get quotes for 13 different insurance products from the upper banner • Rotating lower banner tells brand story, calls out Geico solutions • Multiple account login options The Bad • Rollover menu is unwieldy • Visual treatment is busy – there’s a lot going on here
  • 10. MetLife Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • Offers two product recommender applications based on two ways that users look for insurance. Fits users’ mental model. • Highly functional accordion module, walks user through detailed tasks • Visual treatments for product offerings and audience groupings is consistent. The Bad • Products and Service module could be more interactive. Current treatment is bland.
  • 11. Nationwide Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • User conversion applications are given high priority • Modular. Callouts below the fold are interchangeable, to push timely initiatives • Offers a module of most frequent user tasks The Bad • Visual treatment makes tabs look like utilities, rather than site navigation • Business landing page does not reflect the same mood or tone.
  • 12. Progressive Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • Banner is simple, but multifunctional: get a quote, real-time customer quotes, find an agent. • Navigation labeled well, and is broken down by product type • Site branding is quirky & friendly -- copacetic with media campaigns • Social media efforts are highlighted The Bad • Text size is generally too small
  • 13. State Farm Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • Banner makes the homepage feel inviting and fun, but could be more functional. Auto quote is defaulted in the Quote module • Users are channeled quickly with enticing callouts to get quotes, find an agent, and contact the claim center The Bad • Business and banking offerings have completely unrelated treatments
  • 14. Virgin Money Skip Allums Usability Consulting The Good • Copy is straightforward, assuring, despite Virgin's “rock n roll” image • Callout trays slide up to reveal more content about each product offering • Translates well to Internet Explorer 6 The Bad • Landing pages for Insurance, Mortgages, etc is much less dynamic • Login/Register module is almost hidden
  • 15. • Global navs that employ pulldown interactions give users a preview of what lies under each category. • Quote modules can be maximized for different insurance products. • “Achievement” life goal metaphor can help the user self-identify and find appropriate solutions. • Opportunity for personalization, and guided processes. • Presence of brand voice. What can you offer, and what is your brand’s story? 15 What can you learn from this? Skip Allums Usability Consulting