Communicative competence revisited round table

1,192 views
1,116 views

Published on

In Japanese

0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,192
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • Communicative competence revisited round table

    1. 1. 1
    2. 2. Wong, Jean & Hansun Zhang Waring, Conversation Analysis and Second LanguagePedagogy: A Guide for ESL/EFL Teachers. (Routledge, 2010)
    3. 3. Garfinkel, “Central Claims of Ethnomethodology: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism”in Ethnomethodology’s Program Chapter 1, 91-120. (2002)
    4. 4. thingsGarfinkel, “Central Claims of Ethnomethodology: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism”in Ethnomethodology’s Program Chapter 1, 91-120. (2002)
    5. 5. M. Moerman & H. Sacks, On “Understanding” in the Analysis of NaturalConversation.” (1971)
    6. 6. Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Paul Drew (1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interactionin Judicial Settings.: 136-187Firth, Alan & Johannes Wagner (2007) “Second/ForeignLanguage Learning as a SocialAccomplishment: Elaborations on a Re-conceptualized SLA“ The Modern Language Journal,Vol. 91, Focus Issue: Second Language Acquisition Reconceptualized? The Impact of Firth andWagner (1997) , pp. 800-819Garfinkel, Harold (1967)  “Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities” in his Studies inEthnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.Garfinkel, Harold (2002) "The Central Claims of Ethnomethodology: Working Out Durkheim’sAphorism" in his Ethnomethodologys Program. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: 91-120.Garfinkel, Harold & Egon Bittner 1967 "Methodological Adequacy in the Quantitative Studyof Selection Criteria and Selection Activities in Psychiatric Outpatient Clinics" in GarfinkelStudies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.Heritage, John (2005) "Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk" in Kristine L. Fitch &Robert E. Sanders, eds. Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, Psychology Press andRoutledge: 103-147.
    7. 7. Komter, Martha (1997) "Remorse, Redress, and Reform: Blame-Taking in the Courtroom"inMax Travers & John F. Manzo, eds. Law in Action: Ethnomethodological and ConversationAnalytic Approaches to Law: 239-97Lynch & Bogen (1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-ContraHearings.Duke University Press.Livingston, Eric (2008) Ethnography of Reason. Ashgate.Moerman, Michael (1973/2003) "The Use of Precedent in Natural Conversation: A Study inPractical Legal Reasoning" in Michael Lynch & Wes Sharrock, eds. Harold Garfinkel 4 Vols. Vol.3: 371-393.Moerman, Michael & Harvey Sacks, (1971/2003 ) “On Understanding in the Analysis of NaturalConversation. in Michael Lynch & Wes Sharrock, eds. Harold Garfinkel 4 VolsPomerantz, Anita (1987) "Descriptions in Legal Setting” in Graham Button & John R. E. Lee,eds. Talk and Social Organisation 226-243
    8. 8. Pomerantz, Anita & Jenny Mandelbaum (2005) "Conversation Analytic Approaches tothe Relevance and Uses of Relationship Categories in Interaction" in Kristine L. Fitch &Robert E. Sanders, eds.  Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, Psychology Pressand Routledge: 149-171Sacks, Harvey (1972) "Notes on Police Assessment of Moral Character"in DavidSudnow, ed. Studies in Social Interaction : 280-29Sacks, Harvey (1978) "Some Technical Considerations of a Dirty Joke" in JimSchenkein, ed. Studies in the Organizatoin of Conversational Interaction. : 249-269.Sacks, Harvey (1997) The Lawyers Work, in M. Travers and J. Manzo (eds) Law inAction: Ethnomethodological and Conversation Analytic Approaches to Law : 43-9.Ashgate.Sharrock, Wes & Roy Turner (1978) "On a Conversational Environment ofEquivocality" in Jim Schenkein, ed. Studies in the Organizatoin of ConversationalInteraction. : 173-197.
    9. 9. Schenkein, Jim (1978) "Identity Negotiations in Conversation" in Jim Schenkein, ed. Studiesin the Organization of Conversational Interaction : 57-78.Sudnow, David (1965) "Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a PublicDefender Office" in Social Problems, Vol. 12, No. 3 : 255-276Watson, D. R. (1990) "Some Features of the Elicitation of Confessions in MurderInterrogations" in George Psathas, ed. Interaction Competence: 263-295Wieder, D.L. (1974) Language and Social Reality: The Case of Telling Convict Code. Mouton,The Hague. Zimmerman, Don H. (1971) “The Practicalities of Rule Use” in J. Douglas (ed.)Understanding Everyday Life. Chicago: Aldine: 285-95. (2001) (2002) < > 17(1), 122-125,

    ×