SHOW M E THE M ONEY:
BRI NGI NG REALI TY TO REDEVELOP M EN T




                         APA Florida Conference
         ...
Stephen A. David, Director
                                               James G. LaRue, AICP




                       ...
South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency
• City of South Miami & CRA Location
• Existing Land Uses
•Area Amenities
• Are...
City of South Miami & CRA Location
City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities




      South Miami Location Map
      (Miami Beach, South Miami, Coral ...
City of South Miami Land Uses
City of South Miami Future Land-Use Map (Prior to 1997)



                            Land-Use Categories
               ...
City of South Miami 1997 Future Land-Use Map
                             (Citizen Participation and
                     ...
CRA Area Land Uses
South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Map
City/CRA Area Demographics
City / Community Redevelopment Area Profile
               South Miami   SMCRA       % of City
Total Acres      1,552     ...
City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities


                                       Transit-Oriented District




Mia...
City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities
    Shops of Sunset Mixed-Use Redevelopment   (Old Bakery Center)
City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities
     Completed Infrastructure & Streetscape Improvements




Sunset Drive ...
City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities




     Red Road Commons             Shops of Sunset



Mixed-Use
Redevel...
City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities




                        State of the Art Community Center


Park Impro...
South Miami CRA Redevelopment Plan




Madison Square      SMCRA                              Madison Square
(Dover, Kohl ...
Madison Square Project - Historical Significance
              Marshall Williamson
              • City of South Miami Pio...
Local Area Politics



  Constituent Concerns & Electoral Platforms

   Maintain “Small Town” Atmosphere

   Regulate an...
Need for Re-Evaluation of Current Market

Constituent Concerns & Subsequent Electoral Platforms


 Will Electoral Platfor...
Development of Consultant Scope of Services

  1. Formulate Most Appropriate Project Densities and Future Building Heights...
Reality         Ideal

          Gap
                Becomes Target
• Diagnostic Concept
• Best Practices
• Regulations
•   Madison Square Needs Viable Development
•   Realistic for Developer
•   Neighborhood Compatibility
•   Acceptance by G...
•   Planning vs Reality
•   Visual – Design
•   Alternate Scenarios
•   Specific Planning Recommendations
Team
• SMCRA
• SMCRA Community
• LaRue Team
•   Different Skill Requirements for Project Analysis
•   Public Planning and Government Skills
•   Architect / Builder Ex...
•   Changing Market Conditions
•   Highest and Best Use
•   Compatible
•   Feasible
•   Marketable
• Existing Land Use
• Surrounding Neighborhood Character:
     Height, Size, Scale, Land Use Mix, Features
• Infrastructur...
• Planning Research Skills
• Design Concepts
• Planning Solutions
GOALS

• SUSTAINABLE
• VIABLE
• LIVEABLE
• Conditions
• Land Uses (Housing mix)
• Infrastructure
• Drainage
• Densities
• Distance to Schools, Commercial & Civic
•...
• Coastal
• Wetlands
• Protected Species
• Wildlife Corridors / Crossings
• Historic Flow-ways
• Canals
• Brownfields
• Gr...
• Economic Attractors
• Community Themes
• Ports
• Neighborhood
• Existing Land Uses / Mixture of Uses
• Size, Mass, Height, FAR, Design Features
• Connecting People & Pla...
•   Comprehensive Plan / EAR
•   Land Development Code
•   Plat, Ordinances, Resolutions
•   Restrictions
•   Property App...
• Abandoned
• Foreclosures
• Reuse Opportunities
• Forgotten Easements
• Platted R-O-W Improvements
• Madison Square EAR Based Amendments
• Mixed Use Commercial / Residential 4 Story
• Single-family Residential
• Proposed ...
• Neighborhood Retail NR
• Small Lot Single-family Residential RS-4
• Planned Unit Development
• Community Service Overlay...
• “Tight-knit” African American Community
• 66% African American; 19% Hispanic
• Low Incomes
• High Poverty
• Young (56% o...
• Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Housing
• Affordability
• Income Limits
                Housing sales between January ...
• Subject Property
• Platted-Undeveloped
• Mixed Use Commercial /Residential 4 story FLUM
• Zoned NR, Neighborhood Retail
...
• Combined 1.92 Acres
• Frontage
  350 ft: SW 60th Avenue
  200 ft: SW 59th Place
  360 ft: SW 64th Street
• Current Comprehensive Plan FLUM
   Mix Residential, Retail, Office Land Uses
   24 du/ac Maximum
   1.6 FAR Intensity
  ...
• Parcel Does Not Meet PUD-R / PUD-M Size Standard
• If PUD Zoning:
   Amend Current PUD-R Zoning District Regulations
• C...
Non-Conforming Lots
• A Lot of Record = 1 SF Unit/Lot (Conditions)
• SMCRA Ownership = Less Than 1 Unit / Lot Allowed if
 ...
Surrounding Neighborhood
• Single-family 1 Story
• Multi-family 2 Story
• Scattered Nonresidential
• Small Platted Lots
• ...
• Basic Go, No-Go Analysis for Developers
• Does Development Work in Dollars and Cents?
Proformas for Planners
          •   Educate Us
          •   Keep Us Realistic
          •   Point to Logical Decision Ma...
Proforma Summary




                   Proforma 101
 Getting Familiar with a Basic Tool of Real Estate Analysis
         ...
Proforma - Architects
Project “Program”

 • Balances Density, Intensity
 • Measures Height with Feasibility
 • Allows Ince...
Madison Square Proforma

Preliminary Scenario I
     High Density
Land Cost Incentive



Preliminary Scenario I
     High Density
Land Cost Incentive


Secondary Scenario 1
    High Density
Land Cost Incentive


Secondary Scenario 2
  Medium Density
Report Exhibit 1
Recapping Purpose of Study
 •   Analyze 19 lots of Madison Square
 •   As Assembled Project
 •   Highest Best Use Accepted...
Current Market Climate
 • Condos “not in”
 • Neighborhood Commercial Desired
 • Low Income Housing / Rentals
Three Scenario Approach

To Gauge:
• Desired Density / Intensity
• Compatibility
• Feasibility
Subject Area
Building Inventory
Residential   Count      Sq. Ft./Unit     Total             Cost/Sq. Ft.   Building Cost
Walk-up       ...
Building Inventory
Residential   Count      Sq. Ft./Unit     Total             Cost/Sq. Ft. Building Cost

Walk-up       3...
Building Inventory

Residential   Count      Sq. Ft./Unit     Total             Cost/Sq. Ft. Building Cost

Walk-up       ...
Building Inventory

 Residential   Count       Sq. Ft./Unit        Total         Cost/Sq. Ft.   Building Cost

1 BR
      ...
Building Inventory
 Residential   Count       Sq. Ft./Unit        Total         Cost/Sq. Ft.   Building Cost
1 BR
        ...
Building Inventory
                                                                             Building
 Residential   Co...
•   Neighborhood Compatibility
•   Services demand – FAR, Intensity
•   Housing Types – Multi-family, Affordable
•   Seeki...
• High Density
• 32 du/ac
• $7,981,735
• Medium Density
• 26.5 du/ac
• $6,653,415
• Low Density
• 22 du/ac
• $5,874,490
• Neighborhood Center/Mixed Use 4-Story
• Mixed Use/Commercial Residential/PUD-R
• Mixed Use/Commercial Residential/New PD...
Maximum
           Maximum Units   Commercial                               Pros                           Cons
          ...
Maximum
           Maximum Units   Commercial                               Pros                        Cons
             ...
Maximum
           Maximum Units   Commercial                                 Pros                         Cons
          ...
•   Employment and Apprenticeship Job Training Programs
•   Business Start-up Assistance Program
•   Commercial Rehabilita...
• Provide Land To Developer At No Cost
• Provide Infrastructure Contributions, Including
  Sidewalks/Bikeways, Landscaping...
• Increasing Density / Intensity



          NOT A GOOD OPTION
• Create new Land Development Regulations
 expediting the permitting process to encourage
 affordable housing projects.
• The SMCRA could assist the Developer with
 finding and qualifying renters.
• The City could offer a property tax discount similar
 to the State’s “Homestead Exemption” Program.
• The SMCRA could offer assistance with locating
 and completing grant applications that would help
 finance the developme...
STEPHEN DAVID, DIRECTOR
   sdavid@cityofsouthmiami.net
          305-668-7230




   JAMES G. LARUE, AICP
       jim@larue...
Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10
Show me the money   apa presentation 9-17-10
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Show me the money apa presentation 9-17-10

508 views
437 views

Published on

2010 APA Florida Presentation

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
508
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
8
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Show me the money apa presentation 9-17-10

  1. 1. SHOW M E THE M ONEY: BRI NGI NG REALI TY TO REDEVELOP M EN T APA Florida Conference September 17, 2010
  2. 2. Stephen A. David, Director James G. LaRue, AICP Sharon Jenkins-Owen, AICP
  3. 3. South Miami Community Redevelopment Agency • City of South Miami & CRA Location • Existing Land Uses •Area Amenities • Area Demographics • Past, Present Conditions • Agency Establishment (Madison Square Project) • Madison Square – Historical Significance • Local Political Concerns • Need for Re-Evaluation of Current Market • Preparation and Approval of Scope of Services
  4. 4. City of South Miami & CRA Location
  5. 5. City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities South Miami Location Map (Miami Beach, South Miami, Coral Gables, Coconut Grove, Pinecrest )
  6. 6. City of South Miami Land Uses
  7. 7. City of South Miami Future Land-Use Map (Prior to 1997) Land-Use Categories (Prior to 1997) 1. General Retail 2. Neighborhood Retail 3. Auto Service 4. Public & Semi Public 5. Special Retail Residential
  8. 8. City of South Miami 1997 Future Land-Use Map (Citizen Participation and Dover, Kohl Influence)
  9. 9. CRA Area Land Uses
  10. 10. South Miami Community Redevelopment Area Map
  11. 11. City/CRA Area Demographics
  12. 12. City / Community Redevelopment Area Profile South Miami SMCRA % of City Total Acres 1,552 185 12% Population 10,741 1,951 18.6% Black 26% 66% White 74% 34% Hispanic 34% 19% Income $42,488 $22,296 52.5% Housing $170,000 $98,000 58%
  13. 13. City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities Transit-Oriented District Miami-Dade County Metro-Rail Station (Sunset Drive)
  14. 14. City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities Shops of Sunset Mixed-Use Redevelopment (Old Bakery Center)
  15. 15. City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities Completed Infrastructure & Streetscape Improvements Sunset Drive Improvements Church Street Improvements SW 66th Street Improvements Sunset Drive Improvements
  16. 16. City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities Red Road Commons Shops of Sunset Mixed-Use Redevelopment Projects The Valencia
  17. 17. City and Community Redevelopment Area Amenities State of the Art Community Center Park Improvements
  18. 18. South Miami CRA Redevelopment Plan Madison Square SMCRA Madison Square (Dover, Kohl ) (2005 Redevelopment Plan Update) (2003 Corradino Study)
  19. 19. Madison Square Project - Historical Significance Marshall Williamson • City of South Miami Pioneer • Born in Madison Florida (1890) • African American • Large Landowner • Donated Large Tracts of Land for Community Development Purposes (St. John’s AME Church, JRE Lee Elementary School, South Miami Senior Center)
  20. 20. Local Area Politics Constituent Concerns & Electoral Platforms  Maintain “Small Town” Atmosphere  Regulate and Encourage Sustainable Development  Minimize Project Densities and Building Heights
  21. 21. Need for Re-Evaluation of Current Market Constituent Concerns & Subsequent Electoral Platforms  Will Electoral Platforms = Financially Feasible Redevelopment ?  Will Reduced Project Heights & Densities = Affordable Housing ?  Will Developers Bid on Proposed Redevelopment Project ?  $SHOW ME THE MONEY$
  22. 22. Development of Consultant Scope of Services 1. Formulate Most Appropriate Project Densities and Future Building Heights Based on Compatibility with Surrounding Area; 2. Will the Above Referenced Density & Height Determinations Result in an Economically Viable Redevelopment Project? 3. What would be the Minimum Project Height & Density Threshold Which Will Allow for and Economically Viable Project? 4. Given the Current Economic Conditions, What Would Be the Most Appropriate Commercial Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) for the Proposed Project? 5. Develop a Framework for a Regulatory Approach which will facilitate development of the project as a unique situation not generally transferable to other properties or situations in the community.
  23. 23. Reality Ideal Gap Becomes Target
  24. 24. • Diagnostic Concept • Best Practices • Regulations
  25. 25. • Madison Square Needs Viable Development • Realistic for Developer • Neighborhood Compatibility • Acceptance by Government Entities • Housing Must Be Affordable
  26. 26. • Planning vs Reality • Visual – Design • Alternate Scenarios • Specific Planning Recommendations
  27. 27. Team • SMCRA • SMCRA Community • LaRue Team
  28. 28. • Different Skill Requirements for Project Analysis • Public Planning and Government Skills • Architect / Builder Expertise • Affordable Housing Knowledge • Zoning / Regulatory Expertise • Urban Design Skills
  29. 29. • Changing Market Conditions • Highest and Best Use • Compatible • Feasible • Marketable
  30. 30. • Existing Land Use • Surrounding Neighborhood Character: Height, Size, Scale, Land Use Mix, Features • Infrastructure • Distance to Services & Transit • Existing Entitlements • Regulatory Constraints • Proforma: Current Market, Sales & Rentals
  31. 31. • Planning Research Skills • Design Concepts • Planning Solutions
  32. 32. GOALS • SUSTAINABLE • VIABLE • LIVEABLE
  33. 33. • Conditions • Land Uses (Housing mix) • Infrastructure • Drainage • Densities • Distance to Schools, Commercial & Civic • Transit Access • Entitlements • Regulatory Constraints • R-O-W Widths -Easements
  34. 34. • Coastal • Wetlands • Protected Species • Wildlife Corridors / Crossings • Historic Flow-ways • Canals • Brownfields • Greyfields
  35. 35. • Economic Attractors • Community Themes • Ports
  36. 36. • Neighborhood • Existing Land Uses / Mixture of Uses • Size, Mass, Height, FAR, Design Features • Connecting People & Places • Multi-Modal Transportation • Access, Footpaths • Interconnecting Uses
  37. 37. • Comprehensive Plan / EAR • Land Development Code • Plat, Ordinances, Resolutions • Restrictions • Property Appraiser • GIS • Meeting Minutes • 2010 Census • Florida Statistical Abstract
  38. 38. • Abandoned • Foreclosures • Reuse Opportunities • Forgotten Easements • Platted R-O-W Improvements
  39. 39. • Madison Square EAR Based Amendments • Mixed Use Commercial / Residential 4 Story • Single-family Residential • Proposed Neighborhood Center / Mixed Use 4 Story • Existing Non-Conforming Lots
  40. 40. • Neighborhood Retail NR • Small Lot Single-family Residential RS-4 • Planned Unit Development • Community Service Overlay • Historic Preservation Overlay • Transit-Oriented Development District
  41. 41. • “Tight-knit” African American Community • 66% African American; 19% Hispanic • Low Incomes • High Poverty • Young (56% of the population under age 35) • 1,951 Population (± 365 residents since 1990) • 1999 Incomes under $25,000 Annually • Renter • 2000: 754 Units / 40 Vacant
  42. 42. • Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Housing • Affordability • Income Limits Housing sales between January 2009 and November 2009 indicate very little availability for Very Low Income families. Most of the sales would accommodate Low Income families. There are very few rentals available in the subject area.
  43. 43. • Subject Property • Platted-Undeveloped • Mixed Use Commercial /Residential 4 story FLUM • Zoned NR, Neighborhood Retail • 5 Lots: Single-family Residential 2 story FLUM • 4 Lots: Single-family RS-4
  44. 44. • Combined 1.92 Acres • Frontage 350 ft: SW 60th Avenue 200 ft: SW 59th Place 360 ft: SW 64th Street
  45. 45. • Current Comprehensive Plan FLUM Mix Residential, Retail, Office Land Uses 24 du/ac Maximum 1.6 FAR Intensity 4 Story Maximum • Proposed Amendment to Neighborhood Center / Mixed Use 4 Story Density Increase to 60 du/ac 2.0 FAR Intensity
  46. 46. • Parcel Does Not Meet PUD-R / PUD-M Size Standard • If PUD Zoning: Amend Current PUD-R Zoning District Regulations • Create New PUD District
  47. 47. Non-Conforming Lots • A Lot of Record = 1 SF Unit/Lot (Conditions) • SMCRA Ownership = Less Than 1 Unit / Lot Allowed if Redeveloped • NR Zoning District Does Not Permit Single-family Uses • Limited to Commercial (Unless Rezoned)
  48. 48. Surrounding Neighborhood • Single-family 1 Story • Multi-family 2 Story • Scattered Nonresidential • Small Platted Lots • Paved, 2-Lane Undivided Local Roadways • 1 Mile Proximity to Metro Rail Station
  49. 49. • Basic Go, No-Go Analysis for Developers • Does Development Work in Dollars and Cents?
  50. 50. Proformas for Planners • Educate Us • Keep Us Realistic • Point to Logical Decision Making • Prevent Unrealistic Alternatives
  51. 51. Proforma Summary Proforma 101 Getting Familiar with a Basic Tool of Real Estate Analysis by Wayne A Lemmon
  52. 52. Proforma - Architects Project “Program” • Balances Density, Intensity • Measures Height with Feasibility • Allows Incentives as “Sweetener”
  53. 53. Madison Square Proforma Preliminary Scenario I High Density
  54. 54. Land Cost Incentive Preliminary Scenario I High Density
  55. 55. Land Cost Incentive Secondary Scenario 1 High Density
  56. 56. Land Cost Incentive Secondary Scenario 2 Medium Density
  57. 57. Report Exhibit 1
  58. 58. Recapping Purpose of Study • Analyze 19 lots of Madison Square • As Assembled Project • Highest Best Use Accepted • Compatible with Neighborhood • Best Regulatory Approach • Marketability
  59. 59. Current Market Climate • Condos “not in” • Neighborhood Commercial Desired • Low Income Housing / Rentals
  60. 60. Three Scenario Approach To Gauge: • Desired Density / Intensity • Compatibility • Feasibility
  61. 61. Subject Area
  62. 62. Building Inventory Residential Count Sq. Ft./Unit Total Cost/Sq. Ft. Building Cost Walk-up 35 units 500 sq. ft. 17,500 sq. ft. $175.00 $3,062,500.00 Apartments Garden 39 units 600 sq. ft. 23,400 sq. ft. $160.00 $3,744,000.00 Apartments Townhouses 4 units 1,200 sq. ft. 4,800 sq. ft. $120.00 $576,000.00 Commercial 7,000 sq. ft. $100.00 $700,000.00 Totals 78 52,700 sq. ft. $8,082,500.00
  63. 63. Building Inventory Residential Count Sq. Ft./Unit Total Cost/Sq. Ft. Building Cost Walk-up 35 units 500 sq. ft. 17,500 sq. ft. $175.00 $3,062,500.00 Apartments Garden 26 units 600 sq. ft. 15,600 sq. ft. $160.00 $2,496,000.00 Apartments Townhouses 4 units 1,200 sq. ft. 4,800 sq. ft. $120.00 $576,000.00 Commercial 7,000 sq. ft. $100.00 $700,000.00 Totals 65 44,900 sq. ft. $6,834,500.00
  64. 64. Building Inventory Residential Count Sq. Ft./Unit Total Cost/Sq. Ft. Building Cost Walk-up 18 units 500 sq. ft. 9,000 sq. ft. $175.00 $1,575,000.00 Apartments Garden 24 units 600 sq. ft. 14,400 sq. ft. $160.00 $2,304,000.00 Apartments Townhouses 4 units 1,200 sq. ft. 4,800 sq. ft. $120.00 $576,000.00 Commercial 7,000 sq. ft. $100.00 $700,000.00 Totals 46 35,200 sq. ft. $5,155,000.00
  65. 65. Building Inventory Residential Count Sq. Ft./Unit Total Cost/Sq. Ft. Building Cost 1 BR 21 units 453 sq.ft. 9,513 sq.ft. $175.00 $1,664,775.00 Units 2 BR 18 units 700 sq.ft. 12,600 sq.ft. $160.00 $2,016,000.00 Units 3 BR 18 units 917 sq.ft. 16,506 sq.ft. $160.00 $2,640,960.00 Units Townhouse 4 units 1,600 sq.ft. 6,400 sq.ft. $150.00 $960,000.00 Units Total 61 units 45,019 sq.ft. Residential Commercial 7,000 sq. ft. $100.00 $700,000.00 Totals 52,019 sq. ft. $7,981,735.00
  66. 66. Building Inventory Residential Count Sq. Ft./Unit Total Cost/Sq. Ft. Building Cost 1 BR 21 units 453 sq.ft. 9,513 sq.ft. $175.00 $1,664,775.00 Units 2 BR 18 units 700 sq.ft. 12,600 sq.ft. $160.00 $2,016,000.00 Units 3 BR 18 units 917 sq.ft. 16,506 sq.ft. $160.00 $2,640,960.00 Units Townhouse 4 units 1,600 sq.ft. 6,400 sq.ft. $150.00 $960,000.00 Units Total 61 units 45,019 sq.ft. Residential Commercial 7,000 sq. ft. $100.00 $700,000.00 Totals 52,019 sq. ft. $7,981,735.00
  67. 67. Building Inventory Building Residential Count Sq. Ft./Unit Total Cost/Sq. Ft. Cost 1 BR 21 units 453 sq.ft. 9,513 sq.ft. $175.00 $1,664,775.00 Units 2 BR 18 units 700 sq.ft. 12,600 sq.ft. $160.00 $2,016,000.00 Units 3 BR 18 units 917 sq.ft. 16,506 sq.ft. $160.00 $2,640,960.00 Units Townhouse 4 units 1,600 sq.ft. 6,400 sq.ft. $150.00 $960,000.00 Units Total 61 units 45,019 sq.ft. Residential Commercial 7,000 sq. ft. $100.00 $700,000.00 Totals 52,019 sq. ft. $7,981,735.00
  68. 68. • Neighborhood Compatibility • Services demand – FAR, Intensity • Housing Types – Multi-family, Affordable • Seeking Balance Between Community, Government & Developer
  69. 69. • High Density • 32 du/ac • $7,981,735
  70. 70. • Medium Density • 26.5 du/ac • $6,653,415
  71. 71. • Low Density • 22 du/ac • $5,874,490
  72. 72. • Neighborhood Center/Mixed Use 4-Story • Mixed Use/Commercial Residential/PUD-R • Mixed Use/Commercial Residential/New PD or Zoning Category
  73. 73. Maximum Maximum Units Commercial Pros Cons Floors Option 1 115 dwelling 2.0 FAR 4 Allows more units and Commercial; PUD Units would be units as allows site specific conditions to small to currently address constraints and compatibility; accommodate proposed reducing allowable density to 41 du/ac 115 units; would be somewhat compatible with the Preliminary neighborhood; Providing 78 units on the Scenario 1 subject parcels allow for more economic diversity within the development; The Secondary revised high density scenario becomes Scenario 1 61 total units; Projects with more units have a competitive advantage in Preliminary obtaining and leveraging funds. Scenario 1 The proposed NC/MU density would be further reduced to 34 dwelling units per Secondary acre for a total of 65 units. The revised Scenario 2 medium density scenario becomes 51 total units or 26.5 du/ac.
  74. 74. Maximum Maximum Units Commercial Pros Cons Floors Option 2 46 1.6 FAR 4 Only 5 lots need to undergo the Limited to Comprehensive Plan amendment 46 units Preliminary process and would qualify as a small Scenario 3 scale amendment; PUD allows site specific conditions to address Preliminary constraints and compatibility; Scenario 3 Modifying existing PUD-R category is typically easier than devising a new Secondary category; Scenario 3 46 maximum number of units more compatible with surrounding neighborhood; The revised low density scenario becomes 42 total units; Smaller number of units would attract larger pool of developers specializing in affordable housing.
  75. 75. Maximum Maximum Units Commercial Pros Cons Floors Option 3 46 1.6 FAR 4 Only 5 lots need to undergo the Limited Comprehensive Plan amendment process to 46 Preliminary and would qualify as a small scale units Scenario 3 amendment; PUD regulation can be created specifically tailored to the project; New PUD Secondary could be used to encourage additional Scenario 3 affordable housing on redevelopment sites; 46 and revised as 42 maximum number of units more compatible with surrounding neighborhood; Smaller number of units would attract larger pool of developers specializing in affordable housing.
  76. 76. • Employment and Apprenticeship Job Training Programs • Business Start-up Assistance Program • Commercial Rehabilitation Program • Consumer Credit Counseling • Multi-family Rehabilitation Program for Developments • Multi-family Rehabilitation Program for Individual Property Owners • Single-family Home Rehabilitation Program • Home Ownership Program • Bowman Scholarship Program • Specific Financial and Regulatory Incentives
  77. 77. • Provide Land To Developer At No Cost • Provide Infrastructure Contributions, Including Sidewalks/Bikeways, Landscaping, Drainage Improvements • Allow Joint Use And Street Parking
  78. 78. • Increasing Density / Intensity NOT A GOOD OPTION
  79. 79. • Create new Land Development Regulations expediting the permitting process to encourage affordable housing projects.
  80. 80. • The SMCRA could assist the Developer with finding and qualifying renters.
  81. 81. • The City could offer a property tax discount similar to the State’s “Homestead Exemption” Program.
  82. 82. • The SMCRA could offer assistance with locating and completing grant applications that would help finance the development of affordable housing on the property.
  83. 83. STEPHEN DAVID, DIRECTOR sdavid@cityofsouthmiami.net 305-668-7230 JAMES G. LARUE, AICP jim@larueplanning.com 239-334-3366 SHARON JENKINS-OWEN, AICP sharon@sjolandconsultants.com 239-849-0656

×