Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Example Solutions for Scheduling and Work Planning

1,495

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,495
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Comment for Problem#4: Even if each database access would only 1ms (normally it’s greater then 5ms) and there is approximately 4 database accesses per calculation. 4800*4 = 19200ms – it is not acceptable for online scheduling
  • Time Cell Preference Index defines desirability of Task Assignment for this Cell and Service Team
  • Selected calculations order : 1. Area Assignment Coefficient 2. Travel Time Coefficient 3. Work Load Coefficient 4. Skills Coefficient
  • Example for trick “Rarely changed coefficients”. Coefficient that’s has been changed 2 times during planning period will be calculated only twice even if planning period consists of 50 time-cells
  • Example for Apartments allocation rule: Building to be scheduled – Somestreet str. 18. This building has 100 apartments. Task for Sales Agent for one date can be 1-10 but can not be 1-5 and 15-20
  • Generic and probational approaches: new variants are being generated based on previous ones, by applying random combinations of generation strategies. Area of changes - a set of tasks which have a non-zero penalty value Etalon optimum test depends on the address count to be scheduled
  • Generic and probational approaches: new variants are being generated based on previous ones, by applying random combinations of generation strategies. Area of changes - a set of tasks which have a non-zero penalty value Etalon optimum test depends on the address count to be scheduled
  • Transcript

    • 1. Example Solutions for scheduling and work planning
    • 2. Online Field Service Task Planning
    • 3. Task Description
      • Service Desk accepts call and enters request
      • The Task Planning Module proposes possible variants in form of Time Cell Preference Map
      • Dispatcher confirms visit with customer for certain time cell
      • New task order for team issued, with task list, address and customer details
    • 4. Requirements
      • Online task scheduling requires real-time algorithms.
      • Batch task scheduling is not applicable.
      • Assignment of service teams by
        • Skills and competence
        • Service Zones
        • Shortest travel time from previous / to next task location
        • Leveling of work load
      • Assignment factors change with time
      • Each assignment requires several accesses to DB.
    • 5. Index-based Solution
      • Skills Index : calculated, depends on service team members skills and requirements for planned task
      • Area Assignment Index : persistent, stored at data base
      • Travel Time Index: calculated, depends on previously scheduled tasks and current / next planned location
      • Work Load Index: calculated, depending on already scheduled tasks
      • Preference Index for Service Team calculated from all indexes
      • Time Cell Preference Index calculated as maximum of Preference Indexes of all potential Service Teams for this time cell
    • 6. Algorithm Workflow
    • 7. Algorithm Optimization
      • Cutting of useless calculations . Exclusion of Service Teams with zero Indexes minimizes calculations
      • Calculations order defined by rules:
        • Indexes with higher probability to take zero value are to be calculated first
        • Indexes with higher computing efforts are to be calculated at the end
      Calculation of Indexes according to the combination of these two factors minimizes calculation times.
    • 8. Performance Optimization
      • All calculations are performed on the server , with higher database performance and faster hardware
      • In-memory Caching of frequently used values avoids repeated calculations and minimizes database accesses
      • Rarely changed indexes are calculated only when being changed at the planning period, instead of calculations for every Time Cell.
    • 9. Sales Rep Visit Scheduling
    • 10. Task Description
      • Sales Manager selects addresses and enters Planning Period Begin Date
      • Scheduling module generates Sales Rep visits schedule: Tasks Lists assigned to Sales Reps
      • Sales Manager edits schedule if necessary
    • 11. Requirements
      • Leveling of Work Load . Work items amount should be about equal for every Sales Rep, close to an optimal value, should not be less/greater then min/max value.
      • Work Items Grouping . Task should contain only contiguous addresses.
      • Visits Period Reduction. Schedules should be generated in a way which minimizes time to visit one building. The date range of a Task List should not contain weekends.
      • Customer Relation Consideration . If a Sale Rep is somehow connected with an address, he should be assigned as a preference.
      • Schedule Generation Time . A Schedule generation for 10 , 000 addresses for 40 Sales Reps shouldn’t take more then 10 minutes.
    • 12. Solution. Algorithm model
      • Several sets ( generations ) of schedule variants are generated.
      • The best variant is selected. The best variant is one that corresponds the requirements better than others.
      • A schedule variant optimality is defined based on the sum of all penalties for every requirement factor deviation.
      • Penalty for each factor is a numerical measure of this factor deviation from etalon.
    • 13. Generation of new schedule variants 2 nd generation
    • 14. Generation of new schedule variants
      • The schedule variants generation combines genetic and probabilistic approaches .
      • New variants are being generated based on previous ones, by applying random combinations of generation strategies from pool of about 10 strategies.
        • The generation strategy defines rules of tasks readjustment for work item area of change .
      • Generation of schedule variants continues, until :
        • a schedule variant penalty becomes equal to or less than some Etalon penalty;
        • a parent-child variant chain length reaches the maximum allowed value.
    • 15. New variant generation approach Variant 1 Variant 2 Selected strategies Pool of strategies Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 Strategy 4 Strategy 5 Strategy 1 Strategy 5 Strategy 2 Random selection
    • 16. Regrouping of work items between tasks
    • 17. Algorithm Optimization
      • The Genetic approach avoids exhaustive searches for optimal Schedule Variants, and provides an acceptable Schedule Variant within required time.
      • The list of possible generation strategies for areas of changes depends on factor types, which are sources of penalty for this area. This increases the algorithm intelligence and minimizes the final Schedule Variant total penalty.
      • A set of parameters allows to manage the algorithm effectiveness and performance. Main parameters are an etalon penalty value, a max parent-child variant chain length, and a count of generation strategies combinations.
    • 18. Contact us! Elena Popretinskaya CTO Gersis Software LLC Phone: +375 (17) 259 19 16 www.gersis-software.com [email_address] SIS Group International is a system integrator in telecommunications, IT, automation and safety We would be pleased to develop a custom scheduling algorithm for you.

    ×