IPAn ^ A Picture is Worth a 1,000 Words Image courtesy of Arecont Vision Surround View
Shareability• Deliver informa8on to ﬁrst responders, and decision makers promptly • Remotely access the required feeds for distributed monitoring. • Collaborate with internal and external inves8gators by viewing the same footage at the same 8me
Scalability• Growth = Change • Businesses are networked. • Adding cameras to exis8ng networked sites does not require addi8onal infrastructure work. • Changing camera loca8ons does not require addi8onal infrastructure work.
Integarateability• A surveillance system is the Access Intrusion POS sum of its components Control – Video Surveillance, Access Control, Intrusion, etc. • Each sub system shows a part of the picture Fire & Safety Video Surveillance EBR • Integra8on allows for a fuller picture • Advanced integra8on brings in other business, Business Dispatch Etc... and excep8on repor8ng TXN Systems systems
Video Analytics• If integra8on completes the picture, analy8cs narrate the story – Enhance response 8me – Create event based alerts – Direct aRen8on of operators to high interest events – Introduce automa8on, and workﬂows into surveillance – Mine the video surveillance data
Operator Efficiency• Reduce number of situa8onal awareness displays, by u8lizing higher resolu8on cameras. • Less displays + larger, clearer view = – BeRer monitoring ability – Increased monitored footprint • Along with integra8on, and analy8cs, operators are directed to events proac8vely
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)Labor Cabling Recording Cameras • Installa8on Infrastructure Equipment • Including camera • Conﬁgura8on • Cables • Servers power • Training • Switches • Storage • Panels • SoZware Total Cost of Ownership
It is interesting to note the flexibility of the IP-based system, represented by the wide spread in quotes. The reason is the wide flexibility using IP technology represented by using PoE, different cab IP & Analog A verage System types, network and server platforms. In an analog system, there is very little flexibility; hence m quotes came in close to the same cost. That is quite typical for a mature market. Costs The split of the cost in the IP-based system showed to be quite different from the analog/DVR system outlined in the graph below: • On average IP systems $70,000 Figure 5. The split up of the costs 3.4% cost 3.4% less than looked very different in the $60,000 analog system Analog compared to the IP-based $50,000 $21,932 34% system. $33, 209 54% • Variance within IP $40,000 16% systems is greater with $10,123 $30,000 the most expensive $3,841 6% $16,066 25% priced at USD $72K for $20,000 $13,437 21% the same project $10,000 $15,360 25% $10,895 19% $0 IP System Analog Cameras & DVR Labor (installation, configuration, training) Recording & Playback (servers, storage, software)Source: “Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): Comparison of IP and analog-‐based Cable infrastructure (cable, switches, panels) Cameras (including camera power)surveillance systems” White Paper, Axis Communica8ons, and Lund University (Sweden)
7. Cost as a function of the number of channels A general consensus around IP-based system is that the larger the system, the more favorable the cost of the IP system will be compared to the analog. So what would be the breakpoint, i.e. for what system TCO & Scalability size is IP lower cost than analog, and does the difference increase as the size of the system increases? Based on the research data, and additional information, the cost as a function of the number was cal- culated, as shown in the graph below.Figure 6.The cost differenceof analog versus BLUE: IP System has lower costIP-based system as 15%a function of thenumber of cameras 32 shows a 10% lower Cameras cost for analogsystems between1 and 16 cameras, Analog 10% IP 10% lower cost TCO: Price advantage of IP systemclose to the same lower cost Same costcost between 17-32 5%cameras, and a10% lower cost ofIP-based system be-yond 33 cameras. 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 1 3 5 7 9 Number of cameras -5% RED: IP System has higher cost -15% Source: “Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): Comparison of IP and analog-‐based surveillance The result shows that beyond 32 cameras the IP-based system is lowerhite Paper, Axis Communica8ons, and Lund University (Sweden) systems” W cost, and between 16 and 32 the cost is quite similar. In the case above, the assumption was that no infrastructure was in place. In many
Future Orientation• A new solu8ons must address today’s needs, and tomorrow’s an8cipated needs. – More integra8on. – More on demand processing. – More proac8ve analy8cs. • More networked!
Where is the future? Rogers’ Innova8on Adop8on Curve IMS Research Tipping Point PerdiNons: • Global 2015 • Americas 2013 • EMEA 2012 2011 IP Video Surveillance market share of total installa8ons* Consumers’ Adop8on * IMS Research Market Share 30%
Image Quality Sharing Ability Scalability Because You AreWhy IP ? Integrate-‐ability Building for toda & y Video Analy8cs Tomorrow Operator Eﬃciency Total Cost of Ownership
Khaldiya Business Center, Oﬃce 306 Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz Street Jeddah, Saudi Arabia T. +966 (2) 690-‐1503 F. +966 (2) 690-‐1502 www.sintsys.com High Tech, High Impact, High Value Security Solutions