Critiquing Participatory Video
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Critiquing Participatory Video

on

  • 579 views

This presentation critiques Participatory Video and questions some underlying assumptions about the emancipatory nature of the video-making process. Do ask for the full paper if you are interested

This presentation critiques Participatory Video and questions some underlying assumptions about the emancipatory nature of the video-making process. Do ask for the full paper if you are interested

Statistics

Views

Total Views
579
Views on SlideShare
555
Embed Views
24

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

1 Embed 24

http://voicingover.wordpress.com 24

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Critiquing Participatory Video Presentation Transcript

  • 1. QuickTime™ decompresso are needed to seeUnderstandings from the Process:How does PV affect the agency ofwomen? - Namita Singh
  • 2. How and Where: The lens and its focus• PV - my Practice and Research• Ground Zero - Akshara in Mumbai and Mahita in Hyderabad, India• The PV Projects - For local social change• The freedom and critical perspective equation - through young women participants• Factors I explore - Viability and sustainability
  • 3. Methodology: How I did, what I did (last summer!)• Participatory Observation• Interviews• Focus Groups• Participatory Video
  • 4. Agency in Context: It all makes Sen’s…!• Citizen’s participation and agency• Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach• The ability ‘To do’ and ‘To be’
  • 5. The Video-Making: Shoot to skill…• Representation• Raising Issues• Engagement with Communities
  • 6. Representation: Mirror, mirror on the wall …• Is Representation essentially empowering?• What about Reality and Aspirations?• Resisting and Accepting Gender Norms• Multiple performative identities
  • 7. Raising Issues: What say you…?• How to balance support and domination?• Need to choose between product quality and participants’ agency?• The freedom and critical perspective equation
  • 8. Being with Communities : The Engagement Ring• From harassment to respect• From hostility to trust• Community engagement as a source of agency• The focus - wide angle or community oriented?
  • 9. PV in Research: Shooting from my lip …• Representation: Balancing reality and aspirations, resistance and acceptance of gender norms• Raising Issues: Treading between research agendas and participants’ objectives• Being with communities: ‘My’ audience; ‘Their’ audience
  • 10. The Understanding : To be or not to be…• Agency as the focus - understanding the contribution of participatory processes in development• Video or participants - choosing between the product and the process• PV as Technique or PV for Sustaining Agency - focusing on furthering change