China VS India

  • 8,449 views
Uploaded on

 

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
8,449
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
482
Comments
0
Likes
3

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. TIGER V/S DRAGON
  • 2. INTRODUCTION:
    • China opened up in 1978, India did so in 1991 i.e. 14 yrs. after.
    • India and China rank among the
    • front runners of global economy.
    • Both the countries were among the most ancient civilizations.
  • 3. CHINA AND INDIA
    • INDIA AND CHINA EMERGING GLOBAL PLAYERS:
    • High Economic Growth Rate.
    • Rapid Share In The World.
    • Large Inflow Of Funds.
  • 4. Development Strategies: China (1949 –1978) -India (1947 –mid 1980’s)
    • Communist take-over in China in 1949 and at India’s Independence from Great Britain in 1947.
    • Both adopted a Soviet Style Centrally Planned Development Strategies.
    • Both insulated their economies from the world economy.
  • 5. Development Strategies: Contd.
    • China's economy was almost entirely state-owned and state-controlled whereas India’s economy was state-controlled and directed but mostly privately owned except in industry, finance, transport and communication
    • China was a single-party controlled state whereas India is formally a federal state with a constitutionally set assignment of powers and responsibilities between the Central and state governments.
  • 6. Sector-Wise Comparison
  • 7. Liberalization Of The Market
    • While India's liberalization policies started in the 1990s, China welcomed foreign direct investment and private investment in the mid 1980s.
    • This made a significant change in its economy and the GDP increased considerably.
  • 8. Difference In Infrastructure
    • Compared to India, China has a much well developed infrastructure
    • Aspects like manpower and labor development, water management, health care facilities and services, communication, civic amenities are well developed in China which has put a positive impact in its economy to make it one of the best in the world.
    • India is still plagued by problems such as poverty, unemployment, lack of civic amenities and so on. In fact unlike India, China is still investing in huge amounts towards manpower development and strengthening of infrastructure.
  • 9. IT/BPO
    • India's earnings from the BPO sector alone in 2010 is $49.7 billion while China earned $35.76 billion.
    • Process and Quality : India would soon have the highest number of ISO-9000 software companies in the world.
    • Government Support : The Indian Government has formulated policies and laws to ensure growth of the ITES-BPO sector in India.
    • Skilled and Talented Resource : India has highly talented and qualified resource in IT.
    • Education System : The education standard is at par with global standards.
  • 10. Communication
    • Native language: English
    • Number who has Internet access: 287.5 million
    • Percentage of World’s online population:  35.2%
    • Native language:  Other European 
    • Number who has Internet access:  276 million
    • Percentage of World’s online population:  37.9%
    • Native language:  All Asian languages (including Mandarin)
    • Number of world online population 240 million
    • Percentage of World online population:  33%
  • 11.
    • Over 80% of scientific articles are published in English, up from only 60% fifty years ago. 
    • Indian managers’ ability to communicate easily in English gives them a tremendous advantage and India is making skilled use of that advantage.
  • 12. Company Development
    • Chinese capital market lags behind the Indian capital market in terms of predictability and transparency.
    • Shanghai Stock Exchange is larger than the BSE
    • SSE has US$1.7 trillion with 849 listed companies and the BSE has US$1 trillion with 4,833 listed companies.
    • But BSE is run on the principles of international guidelines and is more stable due to the quality of the listed companies.
    • Chinese government is the major stake holder of most of its State-owned organizations hence the listed firms have to run according to the rules and regulations laid down by the government. Hence India is ahead of China in matters of financial transparency.
  • 13. Company Management Capabilities
    • management reform training in China began 30 years ago and sadly the subject has still not picked up as a matter of interest by the citizens of the country.
    • most of the countries came to China and manufactured their goods. It was not Chinas exports that drove the economy instead it was the export products of outsiders.
    • Indian companies are rapidly expanding mergers and acquisitions. Some of the recent examples include; Tata Steel's $13.6 Billion Acquisition of Corus, Tata Tea's purchase of a controlling stake in Britain's Tetley for US$407 million, Indian Pharmaceutical giant Ranbaxy's acquisition of Romania's Terapiaetc.
  • 14. “ GDP Growth 2000 to 2050” Source: Goldmann Sachs: The Path to 2050 -8- 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 [2003 bn US Dollars] Germany Brazil Japan Russia
  • 15. Structural Change
    • China: “classic” pattern, moving from primary to manufacturing sector, which has doubled its share of workforce and tripled its share of output.
    • India: Move has been mainly from agriculture to services in share of output, with no substantial increase in manufacturing, and the structure of employment has not changed much.
  • 16. China – Economic Fact Sheet GDP – Real Growth Rate:   9.8% (2008) 13% (2007) Gdp-per Capita (PPP): $6,000 (2008) $5,500 (2007) GDP – Composition By Sector: Agriculture: 10.6% Industry: 49.2% Services: 40.2% (2008)
  • 17. GDP- Real Growth Rate: 6.6% (2008) 9% (2007) Gdp – Per Capita (Ppp) $2,800 (2008) $2,700 (2007) Gdp – Composition By Sector: Agriculture: 17.2% Industry: 29.1% Services: 53.7% (2008) India – Economic Fact Sheet
  • 18. “ SECTOR-WISE BREAK-UP” -12-
  • 19. Comparing India and China’s Growth Stories Indicators India China Political System Multi-party Democracy One-party authoritarian rule Speed of Growth Economic reforms started in 1991. Average 6% growth rate in past two decades. Economic reforms started in 1978. Average 9.5% growth rate in past two decades. Areas of Specialization Rising power in software, design, services, and precision industry. Dominant in mass manufacturing, electronics and heavy industrial plants
  • 20. Indicators India China Gini index (standard measure of inequality) 36.8 47.0 (up 10 points from 15 yrs ago) Foreign Direct Investment 6.8% (up from 0.3% in 2004) 17.8% Future Areas of growth R&D, bio-technology, high-value IT enabled services (legal, medical, engineering architecture), manufacturing, agro-based industry IT business, services and continued manufacturing
  • 21.  
  • 22. Impact of Global Economic Crisis and Response:
    • In China also GDP growth declined -from 13% in 2007, to 9 percent in 2008 and even further to a projected 7.2% in 2009.
    • Real export growth declined from 23.3% in 2006, to 8.8% in 2008. In 2009, the growth projected at a negative 10.1%.
    • Fiscal balance worsened from 0.7$ of GDP in 2007 to a projected -4.9% in 2009
    • With domestic demand at 68% of gross domestic expenditure, much lower than India’s 83%, the scope for domestic demand expansion through stimulus packages is much greater in China. China’s stimulus packages have in fact been far larger in magnitude (second only to the U.S) as a proportion of GDP than India’s (a total of 4.4% for three years 2008-10 versus 0.5%).
  • 23.
    • However, with Chinese investment being comparatively inefficient, it would be better to focus on expanding household’s consumption demand, which is only 25% as compared to India’s 44% of domestic expenditure.
    • China runs a substantial current account surplus-11.3% of GDP in 2007, 9.8% in 2008 and a projected 8.0% in 2009 and its foreign currency reserves of $1.95 trillion in 2008 is projected at $2.17 trillion in 2009, already reached at the end of June. With most of reserves invested in U.S. Treasury bills and securities and doubts being raised about the credit rating of U.S. government debt, China is understandably concerned about the security and value of the reserves.
    • The governor of the Peoples’ Bank of China has defended China’s high domestic savings rates and expressed his support for a move away from the U.S. dollar as the major international reserve currency
  • 24.
    • On balance, given China’s extremely modest fiscal deficit, large scope for expanding domestic consumption and the availability of sizeable resources, China can comfortably adjust to the crisis and resume growth in the near future.
    • China has liberalized trade far more than India
    • India –still one of the most protected countries in the developing world by some measures
    • China’s embrace of openness and its purposive use in accelerating domestic reform process have been important as compared to continuing skepticism about the benefits of openness in India.
  • 25.
    • Future Prospects
    • India’s potential future prospects once the global crisis ends and growth resumes are bright. Realizing the potential requires that the following reform tasks are completed.
    • A credible commitment to complete the reform agenda is needed urgently. For example, India could announce its willingness to consider much more liberal commitment to reduce barriers to agricultural and nonagricultural trade in the Doha negotiations; the budget presented on July 6 unfortunately did not announce reductions in non-merit subsidies and handouts, revive and go further on labor law reform.
    • Constraints of infrastructure –physical and human to be addressed.
    • Reform of labor laws –their dysfunctionality and growth and equity costs has been known for a long time
    • Reform of bankruptcy laws –took a decade on average to close a business in June 2008
    • Rethinking SEZs along the lines of Chinese SEZs