2008 01 30 ELNs and Compliance

421 views

Published on

Looking at the different legal and regulatory requirements that surround ELN projects

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
421
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

2008 01 30 ELNs and Compliance

  1. 1. ELNs and Compliance Simon Coles
  2. 2. Copies of these slides http://www.amphora-research.com 2
  3. 3. ELNs and Compliance • Compliant with what? • Typical approaches • Common problems http://www.amphora-research.com 3
  4. 4. About Amphora • Started in ELNs in 1996 • Globally deployed, fully electronic ELN for Kodak • Grew from there... • Now work with large & small companies • Biotechs, Pharma, Chemicals http://www.amphora-research.com 4
  5. 5. Who we work with 5
  6. 6. Industry http://www.amphora-research.com 6
  7. 7. What we do • Patent Evidence Creation & Preservation • Make lawyers happy • Which means you can make scientists happy http://www.amphora-research.com 7
  8. 8. What we do • Sometimes our stuff is used... • Standalone (e.g. CRT presentation) • In conjunction with other “ELN” products (e.g. Solvay, Array etc.) • With in house systems (e.g. J&J) http://www.amphora-research.com 8
  9. 9. “ELNs and Compliance” http://www.amphora-research.com 9
  10. 10. Compliant with what? • The world cares about what your company does and how you do it (Regulation) • You want to be able to prove what you did so you can get the credit for it (Patents) • You have some internal requirements for retention & use of scientific data http://www.amphora-research.com 10
  11. 11. What is an ELN? • Helpful to distinguish • The different functionality that is provided by ELN systems • The different data which is created in the Research Lab http://www.amphora-research.com 11
  12. 12. What’s in an ELN? “Broad” aspects Security, Collaboration, Patent Protection etc. Chemistry Biology etc. etc. http://www.amphora-research.com 12
  13. 13. What’s sloshing around? • Not all the “Stuff” on our hard disks is the same • Various levels of abstraction • Need to keep it for different periods • Different levels of importance http://www.amphora-research.com 13
  14. 14. Different types of stuff Programmes Projects Experiments Interpreted Data/Reports Analysed/Processed Data Raw Data http://www.amphora-research.com 14
  15. 15. Records Requirements Quality Material to be Scrutiny Timescale Format criteria preserved XML Internal Scientific data Internal use Little, if any Company defined De Facto standards requirements Experiment write up ad hoc Published Primarily Scientific Regulatory XML Regulatory regulations, with data Defined by regulations inspection De Facto standards comment Some write up ~ 10 years before first Case law Primarily Experiment PDF come under scrutiny Patents Federal Rules of write up Adversarial Paper Retain for 50 -100 evidence etc. Some data Microfilm years http://www.amphora-research.com 15
  16. 16. Regulatory Compliance • Regulatory authorities want you to work in a certain way and require proof that you did • They also want to be assured you’re creating the records that are needed to diagnose/trace/fix issues http://www.amphora-research.com 16
  17. 17. Regulators • Medical, e.g. FDA and other national counterparts • Environmental, e.g. EPA • Employment, Health, etc. http://www.amphora-research.com 17
  18. 18. Regulators • Generally the people who are performing a regulated activity are intimately away of their regulatory responsibilities • There will often be an individual or group within the organisation who are responsible for your relationship with the regulator http://www.amphora-research.com 18
  19. 19. ELNs in a Regulated area • The regulator is generally interested in what you did and how • It is impossible to split the record keeping layer and the activity http://www.amphora-research.com 19
  20. 20. Regulated areas “Broad” aspects o ut te into ra g Security, Collaboration, Patent Protection etc. pa pin er Se ee ay ’t K an rd L C o ra te ec Sepa etc. Chemistry R Biology etc. a http://www.amphora-research.com 20
  21. 21. Have to do this is ng p”, pi e ee De ity k “ rd he onal Chemistry eco Biologyt ti etc. etc. R t of unc ar ific f p c s pe http://www.amphora-research.com 21
  22. 22. Different types of stuff Care an awful lot about the lower Programmes levels Projects Experiments Interpreted Data/Reports Analysed/Processed Data Raw Data http://www.amphora-research.com 22
  23. 23. ELNs in a Regulated Area • “Generic” ELNs are rare in a regulated area • Often, the thing that replaces your Paper Notebook may not even be called an “ELN” http://www.amphora-research.com 23
  24. 24. Paper Notebook Replacements • SDMS • Compliance Management Systems • LIMS http://www.amphora-research.com 24
  25. 25. Keeping Lawyers Happy • In Discovery, at some point you’re going to have a clever idea • Your lawyers will want to patent it http://www.amphora-research.com 25
  26. 26. Patents and Records • You get a patent primarily for what happened in someone’s brain • Hopefully you have some record of that • Which you then take into court http://www.amphora-research.com 26
  27. 27. Patents and Records • Unfortunately a patent case is conducted in a court of law • This makes it somewhat of a blood sport • Your records have to survive adversarial scrutiny • Ideally you haven’t got anything hanging around which causes you a problem http://www.amphora-research.com 27
  28. 28. Keeping Lawyers Happy • Some kind of Patent Evidence Creation & Preservation Process/System • Will take records from all systems • Author Signed, and Witnessed • Long retention periods for the experiment writeups • Get rid of everything else http://www.amphora-research.com 28
  29. 29. Surviving Court • Designing Patent Evidence Systems is an interesting game • Lots little interdependencies • Technology is only a small part of it • In fact, the less technology the better! • All about simplicity and reliability http://www.amphora-research.com 29
  30. 30. Keeping Lawyers Happy “Broad” aspects st u n m io Security, Collaboration, Patent Protection etc. ly at te ar lu ep so s b is A th d o Chemistry Biology etc. etc. http://www.amphora-research.com 30
  31. 31. Different types of stuff Keep Experiment Get rid of this stuff as Writeups for a long soon as prudent Programmes time (assuming you don’t Projects need it for any other Experiments reason) Interpreted Data/Reports Analysed/Processed Data Raw Data http://www.amphora-research.com 31
  32. 32. Interesting Thoughts • A lot of people in Discovery aren’t keeping the right stuff in their notebooks • Sometimes too detailed, sometimes not enough • Sometimes the people keeping the best notebooks don’t need to keep them • Sometimes the people who should aren’t! http://www.amphora-research.com 32
  33. 33. Interesting Thoughts • The lawyers don’t want to torture you • Really, honestly • You can create good patent evidence reasonably painlessly • Decent front-end system • Good backend http://www.amphora-research.com 33
  34. 34. Interesting Thoughts • Scientists are happy and productive • You don’t spend all that much money (good ROI!) • Lawyers get a reliable process and good evidence http://www.amphora-research.com 34
  35. 35. Questions? http://www.amphora-research.com 35
  36. 36. Copies of these slides http://www.amphora-research.com 36

×