Quality Management Chapter 15 “ Operations Management: Goods, Services, and Value Chains”, by D. A. Collier and J. R. Evans
Although Hyundai Motor Co. dominated the Korean car market, it had a poor reputation for quality overseas, with doors that didn’t fit properly, frames that rattled, and engines that delivered poor acceleration. In addition, the company was losing money.
When Chung Mong Koo became CEO in 1999, he visited Hyundai’s plant at Ulsan. To the shock of his employees, who hardly ever see a CEO, Chung walked onto the factory floor and looked under the hood of a Sonata sedan.
He didn’t like what he saw: loose wires, tangled hoses, bolts painted four different colors—the kind of sloppiness that would never be seen in a Japanese car.
On the spot, he instructed the plant chief to paint all bolts and screws black and ordered workers not to release a car unless all was orderly under the hood. “You’ve got to get back to basics. The only way we can survive is to raise our quality to Toyota’s level” he fumed.
The next year, U.S. sales rose by 42 percent, and in 2004, Hyundai tied with Honda as the second-best carmaker on the J.D. Powers Initial Quality ranking.
Definitions
Quality Management : systematic policies, methods, and procedures used to ensure that goods and services are produced with appropriate levels of quality meeting customer needs
Quality : Fitness for use - the ability of a good or service to meet customer needs
History of Quality Management
Surely quality was always a priority in production and trade
1450 B.C. Egyptians used measuring devices to ensure high quality during pyramid construction
Early 20th Century
Mass Production creates the need for quality inspection of batches
Interchangeable parts
Specialization in Production
Problem : Organization of production required that workers deal with quality and managers with supervision
History of Quality Management
1940-50
During World War II the need for production efficiency required the dissemination of statistical quality control techniques
Gradually quality control migrated to manufacturing industries
Two US consultants, J. Juran and W. Edwards Deming, introduce statistical quality control to Japanese (importantly their target audience was executives)
1970-90
Japanese electronics and automobiles have world class quality and make fast inroads to US market.
Total Quality Management (TQM)
History of Quality Management
1990-2000
Quality Costing
Market-Driven Strategy
2000-present
Quality an important priority among US car manufacturers and in US Health Care Industry
Six-sigma
Understanding Quality
Multiple Definitions for Quality
perfection
consistency
eliminating waste
speed of delivery
compliance with policies and procedures
providing a good, usable product
doing it right the first time
delighting or pleasing customers
total customer service and satisfaction
GAP Model
Quality in Operations
Conformance Quality
Meet specifications
Quality Control
Service Quality
External Focus: Customer Expectations
Internal Focus: Delivery Process Criteria
TQM Principles
Focus on customers / stakeholders
Process focus: continuous improvement / learning
Teamwork: Quality is everyone’s business
Continuous Improvement Process
Quality & Business Results
Improved employee skills
Improved productivity
Improved customer satisfaction
(Hendricks & Singhal, 1997) study
Growth in operating income
8% improvement in return to sales
9% improvement in return to assets
Quality Performers beat SP500 by 34% in 5 years
Quality Guru: W. Edwards Deming
Prof. of Quality Control
Taught QC in effort to revive world economy after WWII in many countries including Japan
Quality cannot be the responsibility of specialists only
Executives should understand quality
Quality defects can be our friends if used to spot and fix root causes of bad quality
Drive out fear: facilitate problem finding
Quality Guru: Joseph Juran
Not an academic, many years of experience with Western Electric
Also taught QC after WWII in Japan
Quality is “fitness for use”
Like Deming advocated Continuous Improvement
Cost of Poor Quality
Quality Management Programs
ISO 9000
Standardizes Quality Management Practices
Self assessment based
Six Sigma
Requires all critical processes to conform to 6-sigma standard (3.4 defects / million)
Pioneered by Motorola in 1980s
Results Oriented
Six Sigma (Not Exactly)
6 Defect Level : 3.4 / million
Probability Theory : 2 / billion
Six Sigma DMAIC approach
Define (D)
Identify customers and their priorities.
Identify a project suitable for Six Sigma efforts.
Identify CTQs (critical to quality characteristics).
Measure (M)
Determine how to measure the process and how is it performing.
Identify the key internal processes that influence CTQs.
Analyze (A)
Determine the most likely causes of defects.
Understand why defects are generated
Improve (I)
Remove causes of the defects.
Confirm the key variables and quantify CTQ effects.
Identify maximum acceptable ranges.
Modify the process to stay within the acceptable range.
Control (C)
Maintain the improvements.
Ensure key variables remain within ranges
Six Sigma Education
Champions
Senior Level Managers - Rainmakers
Master Black Belts
Major Initiatives - Strategy - Mentoring
Black Belts
Lead Major Projects - Mentoring
Green Belts
Lead Small Projects - Support Black Belts
Team Members
Quality Cost Classification
Prevention Costs
Appraisal Costs
Internal-Failure costs
External-Failure
Example
The “Seven QC Tools”
Flowcharts
Control charts
Checksheets
Histograms
Pareto analysis
Cause-and-effect (fishbone) diagrams
Scatter diagrams
Check Sheet
Control Chart
Pareto Diagrams
Cause-and-effect Diagram
The Deming Cycle
Six Sigma Applications in Services
Reducing the average and variation of days outstanding of accounts receivable
Closing the books faster
Improving the accuracy and speed of the audit process
Reducing variation in cash flow
Improving the accuracy of journal entry (most businesses have a 3–4 percent error rate)
Improving the accuracy and cycle time of standard financial reports
Quality Guru: Philip B. Crosby
Learned quality at International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT)
0 comments
Post a comment