Member Recruiting A Focus On Marketing - Presentation Transcript
Member Recruiting: A Focus on Marketing
Purpose
Help improve IUCRC member recruitment by highlighting marketing “best practices”
Summary of a recent survey of center marketing practices
Highlight some specific best practices
Stimulate discussion about what works and what doesn’t work when trying to recruit member companies
Who will join and who will decline? An analysis of factors predicting a firm’s decision to join a university-based industrial consortia Denis O.Gray, Ph.D & Drew Rivers, M.S. Psychology in the Public Interest Program NC State University
Motivation
Why Important
Recruitment of new members is one of the most, if not the most, important challenges a center directors confronts
Affects technology transfer
Joiners :
Sustain these centers
Get to influence the research agenda
Get technology transfer and other benefits (e.g. recruitment)
Decliners
Do not …
Factors affecting participation/non-participation in CRCs is an important scholarly issue
Very small literature
Study Plan
Center marketing practices
Web-based survey of IUCRC Directors
Complete
Factors within the firm affect decision to join/not join
Qualitative interviews
Underway
Quantify the importance of various factors to membership decision
Questionnaire
Next Year
Center Marketing Study- Overview
Motivation
It is the part of the membership process that Center Directors have the most control over
No literature!
Purposes
Identify which advertising, marketing and recruiting strategies directors use
Perceived effectiveness (best practices)
Explore empirical relationship of practices to “success”: leads; new members
Perceived facilitators and barriers to membership
Web-based survey of IUCRC directors & site directors
Use of marketing plans and recruitment goals correlates negatively with membership counts
Multi-site center recruiting
[If your site is part of a multi-site center, please answer item 9]
9) Which of the following best describes how your multi-site center handles recruiting? (n=32)
50%: Each site handles recruiting independently of other sites
25%: Each site establishes their own leads, but other sites help 'sell' the center
25%: Sites work closely together throughout the recruitment process
Recruiting Success Rates
Lead generation
On average, centers generate about 11 new leads over a 12 month period
New member commitments
On average, for every 10 firms actively pursued by centers for membership:
3 will join
2 will decline
5 will be undecided
Descriptive Findings: Marketing Activities and Perceived Effectiveness
From leads to prospect
1) Consider how your center/site identifies potential industry members. How effective have you found the following activities in generating leads for new members?
Effectiveness Percent reporting use Many methods used to identify prospects Relationship networking viewed as most effective
Recruiting responsibilities
7) To what degree are the following individuals or groups actively involved in the recruitment of industry members?
Degree of involvement Percent reporting involvement Directors bear most of the recruitment burden Consultants also contribute
Recruiting responsibilities
6) For those organizations interested in learning more about your center/site, how effective have you found the following approaches at securing new members?
Level of effectiveness Percent reporting use Dedicated marketing visits appear to be superior
Predictive Findings: What Factors Correlate with Memberships
Predictive Findings
Leads
Total center funding
Larger recruiting budget
Director administration time & past industry experience
Memberships
Presenting at trade shows and scientific meetings
Networking through other stakeholders (IAB, faculty PIs)
Director with industry experience
Industry experience director relationships
More leads
Higher percentage of rejections
Higher networking for leads through other center staff
Get other stakeholders involved in recruiting (IAB)
What else works? Director comments on effective practices
To generate leads…
Organizing workshops and conferences
Respond to industry need for consulting
Marketing materials…
Website
Re-prints of publications
PowerPoint presentations, videos
Changes to membership structure…
Tiered structure, associate membership
Guaranteed research project to new sponsor
Perceived Acceptance and Rejection
Acceptance and Rejection Factors
Factors that directors believe account for joining :
Factors that directors believe account for NOT joining
Selected as a Top 3 reason Relevance of research to organization needs 78.7% High probability of future knowledge and technology transfer benefits 61.7% Success of past Center/PI research accomplishments 40.4% Quantity and/or quality of graduate students to recruit 21.3% High financial leveraging provided by your center/site 21.3% Selected as a Top 3 reason Cost of membership fee 51.1% Lack of relevance of research to organization needs 38.3% Concerns about IP and licensing rights 38.3% Organization had short-term research priorities 34.0% Organization rep did not have access to real decision makers 29.8%
Marketing Model
Relationship development model
Rao, S. & Perry, C. (2002). Thinking about relationship marketing: Where are we now? The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing , 17 (7), pp 598 –614. Initiation Establishment Development Maintenance Dormant Termination
Summary
General marketing model application
Initiate & establish relationships Develop relationships Secure new members Key Factors
Relationship networking
Conference & tradeshow presentations
Involving other site stakeholders
Recruitment strategy
Involving other site stakeholders (consultant)
Face time
Visiting the organization
Hosting visits to the center
Demonstrating technical relevance
Future technology transfer
Justifying benefits relative to costs
Neutralizing IP concerns
Facilitating within firm decision making
TT
Director Ind. experience
Recruiting budget
Conclusions
A modified “relationship development marketing model” appears to do a good job of representing how directors market memberships
Technical issues dominate when membership is really decided
Understand “consultative sales”
Our early peek into how decisions are made within a firm is very intriguing
Need to move focus from doing the right thing to doing things right
Acknowledgements
Support for this project provided by the NSF IUCRC and the NSF STC programs
0 comments
Post a comment