Better Project Management Performance With Six Sigma
Every organization faces the daunting task of executing projects that meet or exceed the expectations
of its customers. That makes project management a key component of most enterprises, regardless of
the business sector. Yet project management is not always met with organization-wide satisfaction. One
major reason is that many project management offices (PMOs) are replicated and not designed.
Inevitably many PMO processes are little more than copies of what other companies have
implemented. They lack a root-level connection to the company they support.
PMO Designed to Meet Customer Needs
When a project is not properly planned, the PMO may be forced to improve systems never designed to
meet the customer's needs, and subsequently appear to fail to meet those needs. The root cause of
this failure arises from the disconnection between process performance metrics and customer needs.
When this is the case, the PMO is forced to find ways to repair a problem that never had to exist.
The key to consistently maximizing project performance metrics is rooted in the proper development of
the PMO metrics. To maximize a project's performance, management needs to build a better project
management process dedicated to meeting the customer's most important needs.
By applying Lean Six Sigma in a multi-generational model, a strong project management process can
be developed. A successful metrics model can be developed using the Design for Six Sigma's DMEDI
(Define, Measure, Explore, Develop, Implement) roadmap. The application of successive quality
function deployment (QFD) iterations will be a core step in this process. Subsequent generations of
PMO improvements should utilize the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) roadmap.
DMEDI Step 0: PMO Charter
No project should ever be launched without a well-defined charter. Regardless of the project leader's
skills, if the expectations of the PMO are not well-conceived, the cycle time, goal attainment and
acceptance will be limited.
The PMO charter should answer all of the following key questions:
• Sponsor/Champion
o Who will be where the buck stops? The project Sponsor/Champion must hold a
position high enough in the organization to enforce the plans defined for the PMO.
• Business impact
o What are the quantifiable desired gains from the PMO?
o What stands to be gained when from a successful PMO?
• Opportunity or problem
o What is the current quantifiable deficiency that has caused the need for a PMO?
o What is the greatest pain the PMO is targeted to heal?
• Goal statement
o What should the PMO look like and produce?
o What will the data say to provide a picture of success?
• PMO scope
o What should the PMO be doing and not be doing?
o Where should and should not the PMO operate?
• Project plan
o How long and when will the PMO operate?

o What are the key milestones in its development and measurement?
• PMO team
o Who are the players on this project?
o Who will manage the daily activities?
o Who will participate in establishing the PMO?
DMEDI Step 1: Define
In order to maximize individual project performance, the company's senior leadership must first
establish and agree upon what the overall objective is for the PMO. This objective must fall in line with
the overall company's and customer's objectives. Without a corporate standard and objective for the
PMO that is globally accepted, individual projects have little chance of being viewed in their proper light.
This task is significant and many organizations still struggle with it. Operational definitions must be
clearly defined and reinforced by C-level management. Without their support, the implementation and
adherence to these operational definitions will cause project performance to be seen as lacking.
Operational definitions which need clear definition include:
• Project must be defined and scoped:
o Who is authorized to initiate a project?
o What is required to initiate a project?
o What is the breadth and scope of the project?
o What is the project engagement process?
• Customer must be defined and stratified into clear categories:
o Internal (finance, sales, service, delivery, etc.)
o External (new customers, existing customers, vendors)
• Financial benefit must be clearly defined, according to the following elements:
o Direct external (i.e., new business, new customers, etc.)
o Direct internal (i.e., reduction in production costs)
o Indirect (i.e., losses or costs avoided)
o Benefit recognition period (i.e., time period benefits are realized for accounting
purposes)
o Currency (gross or net profit to the organization)
Finally, the chief financial officer (CFO) or chief operating officer (COO) must regularly assess PMO
performance. This timetable and scope must be defined early on. The CFO/COO should monitor how
the quality of execution has met the strategic vision and overall business needs. Without this high-level
oversight, the PMO may come to serve an internal department as opposed to the overall business.
DMEDI Step 2: Measure
This step focuses on capturing and understanding the voice of the customer (VOC). The VOC must be
used to appropriately design a PMO to deliver maximum project performance. Capturing the VOC is no
small task. To accomplish this effectively, the appropriate customer segment must be identified. In
theory, any internal department, external customer, potential customer or vendor may benefit from the
services from the PMO. But specific organizations will receive greater benefit of the PMO based on the
definitions established in the previous phase. To truly maximize project performance, the needs
expressed by organizations with the greatest overall benefit must weigh more heavily.
The secret in the definition of metrics is that customers value services differently. This is where the QFD
tool pays off. This tool quantifiably identifies the priorities of the customer's needs. The QFD tool helps
develop the services a PMO will need to satisfy the customer's needs. Once the services are identified,
metrics can be developed to measure them. Properly developed metrics will be closely tied to PMO
services that are:

• Essential to the customer's core needs: Services and metrics must address needs important
to the customer and not the company.
• Quantifiable: A company cannot show excellence if it cannot measure what it has done.
• Comprehendible: The PMO services will not be utilized if customers do not understand them.
Figure 1: House of Quality Template
Here is a high-level overview of the QFD house of quality process.
1. Customer needs (VOC)
- For each critical customer segment, capture customer feedback and VOC input consisting of customer
\"needs.\"
- Prioritize each need on a scale from 1 to 9.
2. Critical customer requirements (CCRs)
- The top row of the house contains the CCRs.
- How will meeting customer requirements be measured?
- Translate customer's terms into process or feature terms.
- Identify ways to deliver on customer needs.

3. Interrelationship matrix
- Evaluate relationships between customer needs (whats) and critical customer requirements (hows).
- Determine relative importance of each critical customer requirement.
4. Customer rating of competitors
- Who is the competition?
- How do customers perceive the competition's ability to meet the requirements?
- What do competitors do that the company's customers value?
5. Correlation matrix
- Compare CCRs (hows) to identify conflict, influence or no effect on each other.
6. Process targets
- Determine minimum and desired performance specifications for each CCR.
7. Analyze and diagnose
- Evaluate the house of quality process.
The output of the QFD should provide a ranked set of mission critical deliverables that need to be both
implemented into the company PMO and measured on a continual basis. These key deliverables
should become the company's your key performance metrics.
DMEDI Step 3: Explore
The Explore phase seeks to discover the most efficient and best way for the PMO to meet or exceed
the customer's needs. While still at a high level, the company can recognize the opportunity for great
innovation. The objective is to identify innovative ways to provide what the customer's need.
Here again, the QFD is used, but in this iteration the tool is used to conduct a functional analysis. The
functional analysis dissects each service into specific features or tasks that must be accomplished to
provide the service. Once these have been identified, the company has the ground work to begin
developing the model for its PMO.
Remember to ensure that all of the functions in the PMO model are measurable. Therefore this is the
perfect time to build a system to measure the PMO's services. This system must measure each project
key metrics and aggregate their sums.
DMEDI Step 4: Develop
This step is where the detailed PMO structure is developed. Keep the core PMO deliverables in focus
and make sure the team does not omit any of the following:
• Human resources and staffing plan
o Who will work the PMO?
o How many will work in each role?
o What will they be paid?
• Facilities plan
o Where will the PMO be located?
o What physical resources will be needed?
• Supplies and materials plan
o What will the PMO need to operate?
o What will it cost to set the office up?
o What will it cost for the PMO to operate?
• Technology plan

What hardware and software will be needed for the PMO?
o
What IT services will be needed?
o
How will the PMO fit into the company's business continuity/disaster recovery plans?
o
One key component that should not be overlooked in the technology plan is the implementation of an
automated monitoring/tracking tool. This tool should provide the PMO with a single-pane-of-glass view
of key metrics for the entire project portfolio.
DMEDI Step 5: Implement or Re-launch
When the PMO model has been developed or improved, it is time to implement a pilot of the new
process. Select a reasonably achievable, moderate-risk project and process it through the new
model. The measurement tools should evaluate how the pilot project met or missed the service
objectives established in the Measure step. Any necessary changes should be made to ensure future
projects will meet the defined customer requirements. Once any necessary changes are completed, the
company should be ready to formally launch the PMO organization-wide.
Conclusion: DMEDI Is a Logical Course
The Lean Six Sigma methodology will benefit efforts with its implementation and process control
discipline. Without this initial investment in the quality of design for the PMO, the company may see the
initiative fall apart after its initial launch.
Ultimately a Design for Lean Six Sigma deployment is the most logical course for any organization
seeking to develop a strong PMO or resurrect an ailing one. The DMEDI roadmap can guide any
company through the development process and help reduce or eliminate unwanted complexity. Proper
use will infuse the PMO with customer-oriented services that satisfy the customer's most important
needs.
About the Author: Steven H. Jones is a process engineer who earned his certification as a Lean Six
Sigma Black Belt while employed at Xerox Global Services. His career began with the 3M Corporation,
an early adopter of the Lean Six Sigma methodology, and he has worked in quality improvement of
telecommunications and IT arenas since 1993. Since then, he has provided quality improvement and
process engineering services to customers in North America and Europe, including Baxter Healthcare,
BP Canada, Convergys and Microsoft. He is currently a senior process engineer with Siemens
Business Services. Mr. Jones can be reached at steven.jones@sbs.siemens.com.
http://www.isixsigma.com/library/content/c060102a.asp